[lldb] Decouple instrumentation from the reproducers

Remove the last remaining references to the reproducers from the
instrumentation. This patch renames the relevant files and macros.

Differential

[lldb] Decouple instrumentation from the reproducers

Remove the last remaining references to the reproducers from the
instrumentation. This patch renames the relevant files and macros.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117712

show more ...

[lldb] Remove LLDB_RECORD_RESULT macro

[lldb] Remove reproducer instrumentation

This patch removes most of the reproducer instrumentation. It keeps
around the LLDB_RECORD_* macros for logging. See [1] for more details.

[1] https://lists

[lldb] Remove reproducer instrumentation

This patch removes most of the reproducer instrumentation. It keeps
around the LLDB_RECORD_* macros for logging. See [1] for more details.

[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2021-September/017045.html

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116847

show more ...

[API] Remove redundant member initialization (NFC)

Identified with readability-redundant-member-init.

Revert "[LLDB/API] Expose args and env from SBProcessInfo."

This reverts commit 8d33437d030af27fff21dd3fd0e66893b0148217.

This broke one of the buildbots.

[LLDB/API] Expose args and env from SBProcessInfo.

This is another step towards implementing the equivalent of
`platform process list` and related functionality.

`uint32_t` is used for the argument

[LLDB/API] Expose args and env from SBProcessInfo.

This is another step towards implementing the equivalent of
`platform process list` and related functionality.

`uint32_t` is used for the argument count and index despite the
underlying value being `size_t` to be consistent with other
index-based access to arguments.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103675

show more ...

[lldb/API] Expose triple for SBProcessInfo.

This is present when doing a `platform process list` and is
tracked by the underlying code. To do something like the
process list via the SB API in the fu

[lldb/API] Expose triple for SBProcessInfo.

This is present when doing a `platform process list` and is
tracked by the underlying code. To do something like the
process list via the SB API in the future, this must be
exposed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103375

show more ...

[lldb/API] Use std::make_unique<> (NFC)

I was holding off on this change until we moved to C++14 as to not have
to convert llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique. That happened a while
ago so here's

[lldb/API] Use std::make_unique<> (NFC)

I was holding off on this change until we moved to C++14 as to not have
to convert llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique. That happened a while
ago so here's the first patch for the API which had a bunch of raw
`new`s.

show more ...

[lldb] Replace empty ctor en dtor bodies with =default (NFC)

Use = default instead of empty constructor and destructor bodies in the
API layer.

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...

[Reproducers] Capture return values of functions returning by ptr/ref

For some reason I had convinced myself that functions returning by
pointer or reference do not require recording their result. H

[Reproducers] Capture return values of functions returning by ptr/ref

For some reason I had convinced myself that functions returning by
pointer or reference do not require recording their result. However,
after further considering I don't see how that could work, at least not
with the current implementation. Interestingly enough, the reproducer
instrumentation already (mostly) accounts for this, though the
lldb-instr tool did not.

This patch adds the missing macros and updates the lldb-instr tool.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60178

llvm-svn: 357639

show more ...

[lldb] [Reproducer] Move SBRegistry registration into declaring files

Move SBRegistry method registrations from SBReproducer.cpp into files
declaring the individual APIs, in order to reduce the memo

[lldb] [Reproducer] Move SBRegistry registration into declaring files

Move SBRegistry method registrations from SBReproducer.cpp into files
declaring the individual APIs, in order to reduce the memory consumption
during build and improve maintainability. The current humongous
SBRegistry constructor exhausts all memory on a NetBSD system with 4G
RAM + 4G swap, therefore making it impossible to build LLDB.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59427

llvm-svn: 356481

show more ...

Add "operator bool" to SB APIs

Summary:
Our python version of the SB API has (the python equivalent of)
operator bool, but the C++ version doesn't.

This is because our python operators are added by

Add "operator bool" to SB APIs

Summary:
Our python version of the SB API has (the python equivalent of)
operator bool, but the C++ version doesn't.

This is because our python operators are added by modify-python-lldb.py,
which performs postprocessing on the swig-generated interface files.

In this patch, I add the "operator bool" to all SB classes which have an
IsValid method (which is the same logic used by modify-python-lldb.py).
This way, we make the two interfaces more constent, and it allows us to
rely on swig's automatic syntesis of python __nonzero__ methods instead
of doing manual fixups.

Reviewers: zturner, jingham, clayborg, jfb, serge-sans-paille

Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58792

llvm-svn: 355824

show more ...

[Reproducers] Add SBReproducer macros

This patch adds the SBReproducer macros needed to capture and reply the
corresponding calls. This patch was generated by running the lldb-instr
tool on the API

[Reproducers] Add SBReproducer macros

This patch adds the SBReproducer macros needed to capture and reply the
corresponding calls. This patch was generated by running the lldb-instr
tool on the API source files.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57475

llvm-svn: 355459

show more ...

[SBAPI] Don't check IsValid in constructor

When running the test suite with the instrumentation macros, I noticed
two lldb-mi tests regressed. The issue was the copy constructor of
SBLineEntry. With

[SBAPI] Don't check IsValid in constructor

When running the test suite with the instrumentation macros, I noticed
two lldb-mi tests regressed. The issue was the copy constructor of
SBLineEntry. Without the macros the returned value would be elided, but
with the macros the copy constructor was called. The latter using ::IsValid
to determine whether the underlying opaque pointer should be set. This
is likely a remnant of when ::IsValid would only check the validity of the
smart pointer. In SBLineEntry however, it actually forwards to
LineEntry::IsValid().

So what happened here was that because of the macros the copy
constructor was called. The opaque pointer was valid but the LineEntry
didn't consider itself valid. So the copied-to object ended up default
initialized.

This patch replaces all checks for IsValid in copy (assignment)
constructors with checks for the opaque pointer itself.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58946

llvm-svn: 355458

show more ...

Move ProcessInfo from Host to Utility.

There are set of classes in Target that describe the parameters of a
process - e.g. it's PID, name, user id, and similar. However, since it
is a bare descripti

Move ProcessInfo from Host to Utility.

There are set of classes in Target that describe the parameters of a
process - e.g. it's PID, name, user id, and similar. However, since it
is a bare description of a process and contains no actual functionality,
there's nothing specifically that makes this appropriate for being in
Target -- it could just as well be describing a process on the host, or
some hypothetical virtual process that doesn't even exist.

To cement this, I'm moving these classes to Utility. It's possible that
we can find a better place for it in the future, but as it is neither
Host specific nor Target specific, Utility seems like the most appropriate
place for the time being.

After this there is only 2 remaining references to Target from Host,
which I'll address in a followup.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58842

llvm-svn: 355342

show more ...

Replace 'ap' with 'up' suffix in variable names. (NFC)

The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique

Replace 'ap' with 'up' suffix in variable names. (NFC)

The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.

In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.

I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.

llvm-svn: 353912

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

[API] Remove redundants get() from smart pointers. NFC

Removes redundant calls to ::get() from smart pointers in the source/API
directory..

llvm-svn: 349821

Expose process instance info via SB API

Summary:
Implement SBProcessInfo to wrap lldb_private::ProcessInstanceInfo,
and add SBProcess::GetProcessInfo() to retrieve info like parent ID,
group ID, use

Expose process instance info via SB API

Summary:
Implement SBProcessInfo to wrap lldb_private::ProcessInstanceInfo,
and add SBProcess::GetProcessInfo() to retrieve info like parent ID,
group ID, user ID etc. from a live process.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35881

llvm-svn: 309664

show more ...