[lldb] Decouple instrumentation from the reproducers

Remove the last remaining references to the reproducers from the
instrumentation. This patch renames the relevant files and macros.

Differential

[lldb] Decouple instrumentation from the reproducers

Remove the last remaining references to the reproducers from the
instrumentation. This patch renames the relevant files and macros.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117712

show more ...

[lldb] Remove LLDB_RECORD_DUMMY_* macros

[lldb] Remove LLDB_RECORD_RESULT macro

[lldb] Remove reproducer instrumentation

This patch removes most of the reproducer instrumentation. It keeps
around the LLDB_RECORD_* macros for logging. See [1] for more details.

[1] https://lists

[lldb] Remove reproducer instrumentation

This patch removes most of the reproducer instrumentation. It keeps
around the LLDB_RECORD_* macros for logging. See [1] for more details.

[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2021-September/017045.html

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116847

show more ...

[API] Remove redundant member initialization (NFC)

Identified with readability-redundant-member-init.

[lldb/API] Add missing LLDB_REGISTER_METHOD macros

Add LLDB_REGISTER_METHOD macros for GetRetriesWithFixIts and
SetRetriesWithFixIts.

[lldb] Add option to retry Fix-Its multiple times to failed expressions

Summary:
Usually when Clang emits an error Fix-It it does two things. It emits the diagnostic and then it fixes the
currently

[lldb] Add option to retry Fix-Its multiple times to failed expressions

Summary:
Usually when Clang emits an error Fix-It it does two things. It emits the diagnostic and then it fixes the
currently generated AST to reflect the applied Fix-It. While emitting the diagnostic is easy to implement,
fixing the currently generated AST is often tricky. That causes that some Fix-Its just keep the AST as-is or
abort the parsing process entirely. Once the parser stopped, any Fix-Its for the rest of the expression are
not detected and when the user manually applies the Fix-It, the next expression will just produce a new
Fix-It.

This is often occurring with quickly made Fix-Its that are just used to bridge temporary API changes
and that often are not worth implementing a proper API fixup in addition to the diagnostic. To still
give some kind of reasonable user-experience for users that have these Fix-Its and rely on them to
fix their expressions, this patch adds the ability to retry parsing with applied Fix-Its multiple time to
give the normal Fix-It experience where things Clang knows how to fix are not causing actual expression
error (at least when automatically applying Fix-Its is activated).

The way this is implemented is just by having another setting in the expression options that specify how
often we should try applying Fix-Its and then reparse the expression. The default setting is still 1 for everyone
so this should not affect the speed in which we fail to parse expressions.

Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere, friss, shafik

Reviewed By: shafik

Subscribers: shafik, abidh

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77214

show more ...

[lldb] Replace empty ctor en dtor bodies with =default (NFC)

Use = default instead of empty constructor and destructor bodies in the
API layer.

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...

[Reproducers] Capture return values of functions returning by ptr/ref

For some reason I had convinced myself that functions returning by
pointer or reference do not require recording their result. H

[Reproducers] Capture return values of functions returning by ptr/ref

For some reason I had convinced myself that functions returning by
pointer or reference do not require recording their result. However,
after further considering I don't see how that could work, at least not
with the current implementation. Interestingly enough, the reproducer
instrumentation already (mostly) accounts for this, though the
lldb-instr tool did not.

This patch adds the missing macros and updates the lldb-instr tool.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60178

llvm-svn: 357639

show more ...

[lldb] [Reproducer] Move SBRegistry registration into declaring files

Move SBRegistry method registrations from SBReproducer.cpp into files
declaring the individual APIs, in order to reduce the memo

[lldb] [Reproducer] Move SBRegistry registration into declaring files

Move SBRegistry method registrations from SBReproducer.cpp into files
declaring the individual APIs, in order to reduce the memory consumption
during build and improve maintainability. The current humongous
SBRegistry constructor exhausts all memory on a NetBSD system with 4G
RAM + 4G swap, therefore making it impossible to build LLDB.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59427

llvm-svn: 356481

show more ...

[Reproducers] Implement log_append for function pointers.

Changing the type in the DUMMY macro to void* doesn't actually fix the
build error, because the argument type is deducted from the template

[Reproducers] Implement log_append for function pointers.

Changing the type in the DUMMY macro to void* doesn't actually fix the
build error, because the argument type is deducted from the template (as
opposed to when serializing through the instrumentation framework, where
this would matter). Instead I've added a proper instance of log_append
that takes function pointers and logs their address.

llvm-svn: 355863

show more ...

[Reproducers] Replace callbacks with void*

Callbacks in the LLDB_RECORD_DUMMY macros were causing build failures
with the Xcode project. This patch replaces the function pointers with
void pointers

[Reproducers] Replace callbacks with void*

Callbacks in the LLDB_RECORD_DUMMY macros were causing build failures
with the Xcode project. This patch replaces the function pointers with
void pointers so they can be logged.

llvm-svn: 355842

show more ...

[Reproducers] Add missing LLDB_RECORD_DUMMY macros

Re-ran lldb-inst on the API folder to insert missing LLDB_RECORD_DUMMY
macros.

llvm-svn: 355711

[Reproducers] Add SBReproducer macros

This patch adds the SBReproducer macros needed to capture and reply the
corresponding calls. This patch was generated by running the lldb-instr
tool on the API

[Reproducers] Add SBReproducer macros

This patch adds the SBReproducer macros needed to capture and reply the
corresponding calls. This patch was generated by running the lldb-instr
tool on the API source files.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57475

llvm-svn: 355459

show more ...

[SBAPI] Don't check IsValid in constructor

When running the test suite with the instrumentation macros, I noticed
two lldb-mi tests regressed. The issue was the copy constructor of
SBLineEntry. With

[SBAPI] Don't check IsValid in constructor

When running the test suite with the instrumentation macros, I noticed
two lldb-mi tests regressed. The issue was the copy constructor of
SBLineEntry. Without the macros the returned value would be elided, but
with the macros the copy constructor was called. The latter using ::IsValid
to determine whether the underlying opaque pointer should be set. This
is likely a remnant of when ::IsValid would only check the validity of the
smart pointer. In SBLineEntry however, it actually forwards to
LineEntry::IsValid().

So what happened here was that because of the macros the copy
constructor was called. The opaque pointer was valid but the LineEntry
didn't consider itself valid. So the copied-to object ended up default
initialized.

This patch replaces all checks for IsValid in copy (assignment)
constructors with checks for the opaque pointer itself.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58946

llvm-svn: 355458

show more ...

Replace 'ap' with 'up' suffix in variable names. (NFC)

The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique

Replace 'ap' with 'up' suffix in variable names. (NFC)

The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.

In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.

I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.

llvm-svn: 353912

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Add an SBExpressionOptions setting mirroring the "exec" command's --allow-jit.

<rdar://problem/44809176>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54056

llvm-svn: 346053

Use Timeout<> in EvaluateExpressionOptions class

llvm-svn: 288797

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging t

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751

show more ...

Expose top-level Clang expressions via the command line and the API.

Top-level Clang expressions are expressions that act as new translation units,
and define their own symbols. They do not have fu

Expose top-level Clang expressions via the command line and the API.

Top-level Clang expressions are expressions that act as new translation units,
and define their own symbols. They do not have function wrappers like regular
expressions do, and declarations are persistent regardless of use of the dollar
sign in identifiers. Names defined by these are given priority over all other
symbol lookups.

This patch adds a new expression option, '-p' or '--top-level,' which controls
whether the expression is treated this way. It also adds a flag controlling
this to SBExpressionOptions so that this API is usable externally. It also adds
a test that validates that this works. (The test requires a fix to the Clang
AST importer which I will be committing shortly.)

<rdar://problem/22864976>

llvm-svn: 264662

show more ...

Use Clang's FixItHints to correct expressions with "trivial" mistakes (e.g. "." for "->".)
This feature is controlled by an expression command option, a target property and the
SBExpressionOptions se

Use Clang's FixItHints to correct expressions with "trivial" mistakes (e.g. "." for "->".)
This feature is controlled by an expression command option, a target property and the
SBExpressionOptions setting. FixIt's are only applied to UserExpressions, not UtilityFunctions,
those you have to get right when you make them.

This is just a first stage. At present the fixits are applied silently. The next step
is to tell the user about the applied fixit.

<rdar://problem/25351938>

llvm-svn: 264379

show more ...

Allow expresions to have unique expression prefixes:

expr_options = lldb.SBExpressionOptions()
expr_options.SetPrefix('''
struct Foo {
int a;
int b;
int c;
}
'''
expr_result = frame.Evaluat

Allow expresions to have unique expression prefixes:

expr_options = lldb.SBExpressionOptions()
expr_options.SetPrefix('''
struct Foo {
int a;
int b;
int c;
}
'''
expr_result = frame.EvaluateExpression ("Foo foo = { 1, 2, 3}; foo", expr_options)

This fixed a current issue with ptr_refs, cstr_refs and malloc_info so that they can work. If expressions define their own types and then return expression results that use those types, those types get copied into the target's AST context so they persist and the expression results can be still printed and used in future expressions. Code was added to the expression parser to copy the context in which types are defined if they are used as the expression results. So in the case of types defined by expressions, they get defined in a lldb_expr function and that function and _all_ of its statements get copied. Many types of statements are not supported in this copy (array subscript, lambdas, etc) so this causes expressions to fail as they can't copy the result types. To work around this issue I have added code that allows expressions to specify an expression specific prefix. Then when you evaluate the expression you can pass the "expr_options" and have types that can be correctly copied out into the target. I added this as a way to work around an issue, but I also think it is nice to be allowed to specify an expression prefix that can be reused by many expressions, so this feature is very useful.

<rdar://problem/21130675>

llvm-svn: 238365

show more ...

Add an option to suppress the persistent result variable when running EvaluateExpression
from Python. If you don't need to refer to the result in another expression, there's no
need to bloat the per

Add an option to suppress the persistent result variable when running EvaluateExpression
from Python. If you don't need to refer to the result in another expression, there's no
need to bloat the persistent variable table with them since you already have the result
SBValue to work with.

<rdar://problem/17963645>

llvm-svn: 215244

show more ...