History log of /llvm-project-15.0.7/lldb/source/API/SBAddress.cpp (Results 1 – 25 of 63)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3
# 1755f5b1 19-Jan-2022 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[lldb] Decouple instrumentation from the reproducers

Remove the last remaining references to the reproducers from the
instrumentation. This patch renames the relevant files and macros.

Differential

[lldb] Decouple instrumentation from the reproducers

Remove the last remaining references to the reproducers from the
instrumentation. This patch renames the relevant files and macros.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117712

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2
# d232abc3 10-Jan-2022 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[lldb] Remove LLDB_RECORD_RESULT macro


# d51402ac 08-Jan-2022 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[lldb] Remove reproducer instrumentation

This patch removes most of the reproducer instrumentation. It keeps
around the LLDB_RECORD_* macros for logging. See [1] for more details.

[1] https://lists

[lldb] Remove reproducer instrumentation

This patch removes most of the reproducer instrumentation. It keeps
around the LLDB_RECORD_* macros for logging. See [1] for more details.

[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2021-September/017045.html

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116847

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4
# 6cd4a4cd 25-Sep-2020 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[lldb] Pass reference instead of pointer in protected SBAddress methods.

Every call to the protected SBAddress constructor and the SetAddress
method takes the address of a valid object which means w

[lldb] Pass reference instead of pointer in protected SBAddress methods.

Every call to the protected SBAddress constructor and the SetAddress
method takes the address of a valid object which means we might as well
pass it as a const reference instead of a pointer and drop the null
check.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88249

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2
# 1c0bbe43 24-Jun-2020 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[lldb/API] Use std::make_unique<> (NFC)

I was holding off on this change until we moved to C++14 as to not have
to convert llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique. That happened a while
ago so here's

[lldb/API] Use std::make_unique<> (NFC)

I was holding off on this change until we moved to C++14 as to not have
to convert llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique. That happened a while
ago so here's the first patch for the API which had a bunch of raw
`new`s.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3
# 866b7a65 18-Feb-2020 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[lldb] Replace empty ctor en dtor bodies with =default (NFC)

Use = default instead of empty constructor and destructor bodies in the
API layer.


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1
# 80814287 24-Jan-2020 Raphael Isemann <[email protected]>

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5
# 1761f6fc 11-Sep-2019 Raphael Isemann <[email protected]>

[lldb][NFC] Remove dead code in SBAddress::GetDescription

llvm-svn: 371618


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3
# a8f3ae7c 14-Aug-2019 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[LLDB] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique

Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of

[LLDB] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique

Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259

llvm-svn: 368933

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2
# 248a1305 23-May-2019 Konrad Kleine <[email protected]>

[lldb] NFC modernize codebase with modernize-use-nullptr

Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]

This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codeba

[lldb] NFC modernize codebase with modernize-use-nullptr

Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]

This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.

This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:

```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```

NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.

NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.

Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #lldb, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847

llvm-svn: 361484

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1
# 306809f2 03-Apr-2019 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[Reproducers] Capture return values of functions returning by ptr/ref

For some reason I had convinced myself that functions returning by
pointer or reference do not require recording their result. H

[Reproducers] Capture return values of functions returning by ptr/ref

For some reason I had convinced myself that functions returning by
pointer or reference do not require recording their result. However,
after further considering I don't see how that could work, at least not
with the current implementation. Interestingly enough, the reproducer
instrumentation already (mostly) accounts for this, though the
lldb-instr tool did not.

This patch adds the missing macros and updates the lldb-instr tool.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60178

llvm-svn: 357639

show more ...


# 4bc05006 02-Apr-2019 Pavel Labath <[email protected]>

Make operator==s consistent between c++ and python APIs

Summary:
modify-python-lldb.py had code to insert python equality operators to
some classes. Some of those classes already had c++ equality op

Make operator==s consistent between c++ and python APIs

Summary:
modify-python-lldb.py had code to insert python equality operators to
some classes. Some of those classes already had c++ equality operators,
and some didn't.

This makes the situation more consistent, by removing all equality
handilng from modify-python-lldb. Instead, I add c++ operators to
classes where they were missing, and expose them in the swig interface
files so that they are available to python too.

The only tricky case was the SBAddress class, which had an operator==
defined as a free function, which is not handled by swig. This function
cannot be removed without breaking ABI, and we cannot add an extra
operator== member, as that would make equality comparisons ambiguous.
For this class, I define a python __eq__ function by hand and have it
delegate to the operator!=, which I have defined as a member function.

This isn't fully NFC, as the semantics of some equality functions in
python changes slightly, but I believe it changes for the better (e.g.,
previously SBBreakpoint.__eq__ would consider two breakpoints with the
same ID as equal, even if they belonged to different targets; now they
are only equal if they belong to the same target).

Reviewers: jingham, clayborg, zturner

Subscribers: jdoerfert, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59819

llvm-svn: 357463

show more ...


# ae211ece 19-Mar-2019 Michal Gorny <[email protected]>

[lldb] [Reproducer] Move SBRegistry registration into declaring files

Move SBRegistry method registrations from SBReproducer.cpp into files
declaring the individual APIs, in order to reduce the memo

[lldb] [Reproducer] Move SBRegistry registration into declaring files

Move SBRegistry method registrations from SBReproducer.cpp into files
declaring the individual APIs, in order to reduce the memory consumption
during build and improve maintainability. The current humongous
SBRegistry constructor exhausts all memory on a NetBSD system with 4G
RAM + 4G swap, therefore making it impossible to build LLDB.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59427

llvm-svn: 356481

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5
# 7f5237bc 11-Mar-2019 Pavel Labath <[email protected]>

Add "operator bool" to SB APIs

Summary:
Our python version of the SB API has (the python equivalent of)
operator bool, but the C++ version doesn't.

This is because our python operators are added by

Add "operator bool" to SB APIs

Summary:
Our python version of the SB API has (the python equivalent of)
operator bool, but the C++ version doesn't.

This is because our python operators are added by modify-python-lldb.py,
which performs postprocessing on the swig-generated interface files.

In this patch, I add the "operator bool" to all SB classes which have an
IsValid method (which is the same logic used by modify-python-lldb.py).
This way, we make the two interfaces more constent, and it allows us to
rely on swig's automatic syntesis of python __nonzero__ methods instead
of doing manual fixups.

Reviewers: zturner, jingham, clayborg, jfb, serge-sans-paille

Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58792

llvm-svn: 355824

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4
# 581af8b0 07-Mar-2019 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[SBAPI] Log from record macro

The current record macros already log the function being called. This
patch extends the macros to also log their input arguments and removes
explicit logging from the S

[SBAPI] Log from record macro

The current record macros already log the function being called. This
patch extends the macros to also log their input arguments and removes
explicit logging from the SB API.

This might degrade the amount of information in some cases (because of
smarter casts or efforts to log return values). However I think this is
outweighed by the increased coverage and consistency. Furthermore, using
the reproducer infrastructure, diagnosing bugs in the API layer should
become much easier compared to relying on log messages.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59101

llvm-svn: 355649

show more ...


# baf5664f 06-Mar-2019 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[Reproducers] Add SBReproducer macros

This patch adds the SBReproducer macros needed to capture and reply the
corresponding calls. This patch was generated by running the lldb-instr
tool on the API

[Reproducers] Add SBReproducer macros

This patch adds the SBReproducer macros needed to capture and reply the
corresponding calls. This patch was generated by running the lldb-instr
tool on the API source files.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57475

llvm-svn: 355459

show more ...


# bd4bf82a 06-Mar-2019 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[SBAPI] Don't check IsValid in constructor

When running the test suite with the instrumentation macros, I noticed
two lldb-mi tests regressed. The issue was the copy constructor of
SBLineEntry. With

[SBAPI] Don't check IsValid in constructor

When running the test suite with the instrumentation macros, I noticed
two lldb-mi tests regressed. The issue was the copy constructor of
SBLineEntry. Without the macros the returned value would be elided, but
with the macros the copy constructor was called. The latter using ::IsValid
to determine whether the underlying opaque pointer should be set. This
is likely a remnant of when ::IsValid would only check the validity of the
smart pointer. In SBLineEntry however, it actually forwards to
LineEntry::IsValid().

So what happened here was that because of the macros the copy
constructor was called. The opaque pointer was valid but the LineEntry
didn't consider itself valid. So the copied-to object ended up default
initialized.

This patch replaces all checks for IsValid in copy (assignment)
constructors with checks for the opaque pointer itself.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58946

llvm-svn: 355458

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3
# d5b44036 13-Feb-2019 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

Replace 'ap' with 'up' suffix in variable names. (NFC)

The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique

Replace 'ap' with 'up' suffix in variable names. (NFC)

The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.

In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.

I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.

llvm-svn: 353912

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1
# 2946cd70 19-Jan-2019 Chandler Carruth <[email protected]>

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...


# 3447077a 20-Dec-2018 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[API] Remove redundants get() from smart pointers. NFC

Removes redundant calls to ::get() from smart pointers in the source/API
directory..

llvm-svn: 349821


Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1
# 991e4453 25-Oct-2018 Zachary Turner <[email protected]>

Don't type-erase the SymbolContextItem enumeration.

When we get the `resolve_scope` parameter from the SB API, it's a
`uint32_t`. We then pass it through all of LLDB this way, as a uint32.
This is

Don't type-erase the SymbolContextItem enumeration.

When we get the `resolve_scope` parameter from the SB API, it's a
`uint32_t`. We then pass it through all of LLDB this way, as a uint32.
This is unfortunate, because it means the user of an API never actually
knows what they're dealing with. We can call it something like
`resolve_scope` and have comments saying "this is a value from the
`SymbolContextItem` enumeration, but it makes more sense to just have it
actually *be* the correct type in the actual C++ type system to begin
with. This way the person reading the code just knows what it is.

The reason to use integers instead of enumerations for flags is because
when you do bitwise operations on enumerations they get promoted to
integers, so it makes it tedious to constantly be casting them back
to the enumeration types, so I've introduced a macro to make this
happen magically. By writing LLDB_MARK_AS_BITMASK_ENUM after defining
an enumeration, it will define overloaded operators so that the
returned type will be the original enum. This should address all
the mechanical issues surrounding using rich enum types directly.

This way, we get a better debugger experience, and new users to
the codebase can get more easily acquainted with the codebase because
their IDE features can help them understand what the types mean.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53597

llvm-svn: 345313

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1
# 9e1a117d 27-Jun-2018 Tatyana Krasnukha <[email protected]>

Move AddressClass to private enums since API doesn't provide any functions to manage it.

This change allows to make AddressClass strongly typed enum and not to have issues with old versions of SWIG

Move AddressClass to private enums since API doesn't provide any functions to manage it.

This change allows to make AddressClass strongly typed enum and not to have issues with old versions of SWIG that don't support enum classes.

llvm-svn: 335710

show more ...


# 04803b3e 26-Jun-2018 Tatyana Krasnukha <[email protected]>

Change AddressClass type from 'enum' to 'enum class'.

If we have a function with signature f(addr_t, AddressClass), it is easy to muddle up the order of arguments without any warnings from compiler.

Change AddressClass type from 'enum' to 'enum class'.

If we have a function with signature f(addr_t, AddressClass), it is easy to muddle up the order of arguments without any warnings from compiler. 'enum class' prevents passing integer in place of AddressClass and vice versa.

llvm-svn: 335599

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2
# 05097246 30-Apr-2018 Adrian Prantl <[email protected]>

Reflow paragraphs in comments.

This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to r

Reflow paragraphs in comments.

This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.

FYI, the script I used was:

import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue

if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)

continue

if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""

out.write(line)

os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144

llvm-svn: 331197

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2
# dd125943 04-May-2017 Nitesh Jain <[email protected]>

[LLDB][MIPS] Fix TestStepOverBreakpoint.py failure.

Reviewers: jingham, labath

Subscribers: jaydeep, bhushan, lldb-commits, slthakur

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32168

llvm-sv

[LLDB][MIPS] Fix TestStepOverBreakpoint.py failure.

Reviewers: jingham, labath

Subscribers: jaydeep, bhushan, lldb-commits, slthakur

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32168

llvm-svn: 302139

show more ...


123