|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init |
|
| #
6c641d0d |
| 11-Jul-2022 |
Kaining Zhong <[email protected]> |
[lld-macho] Handle user-provided dtrace symbols to avoid linking failure
This fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56238. ld64.lld currently does not generate __dof section in Mach-O, a
[lld-macho] Handle user-provided dtrace symbols to avoid linking failure
This fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56238. ld64.lld currently does not generate __dof section in Mach-O, and -no_dtrace_dof option is on by default. However when there are user-defined dtrace symbols, ld64.lld will treat them as undefined symbols, which causes the linking to fail because lld cannot find their definitions. This patch allows ld64.lld to rewrite the instructions calling dtrace symbols to instructions like nop as what ld64 does; therefore, when encountered with user-provided dtrace probes, the linking can still succeed.
I'm not sure whether support for dtrace is expected in lld, so for now I didn't add codes to make lld emit __dof section like ld64, and only made it possible to link with dtrace symbols provided. If this feature is needed, I can add that part in Dtrace.cpp & Dtrace.h.
Reviewed By: int3, #lld-macho
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129062
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
a552fb2a |
| 01-Mar-2022 |
Jez Ng <[email protected]> |
[lld-macho] Have relocation address included in range-check error message
This makes it easier to debug those errors. See e.g. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52767#issuecomment-10287139
[lld-macho] Have relocation address included in range-check error message
This makes it easier to debug those errors. See e.g. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52767#issuecomment-1028713943
We take the approach of 'reverse-engineering' the InputSection from the
output buffer offset. This provides for a cleaner Target API, and is
similar to LLD-ELF's implementation of getErrorPlace().
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, Roger
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118903
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
1aa29dff |
| 20-Apr-2021 |
Jez Ng <[email protected]> |
[lld-macho] Support subtractor relocations that reference sections
The minuend (but not the subtrahend) can reference a section.
Note that we do not yet properly validate that the subtrahend isn't
[lld-macho] Support subtractor relocations that reference sections
The minuend (but not the subtrahend) can reference a section.
Note that we do not yet properly validate that the subtrahend isn't
referencing a section; I've filed PR50034 to track that.
I've also extended the reloc-subtractor.s test to reorder symbols, to
make sure that the addends are being associated with the minuend (and not
the subtrahend) relocation.
Fixes PR49999.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100804
show more ...
|
| #
1acda12d |
| 16-Apr-2021 |
Jez Ng <[email protected]> |
[lld-macho] Make load relaxation work for arm64_32
arm64_32 uses 32-bit GOT loads, so we should accept those
instructions in `ARM64Common::relaxGotLoad()` too.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differe
[lld-macho] Make load relaxation work for arm64_32
arm64_32 uses 32-bit GOT loads, so we should accept those
instructions in `ARM64Common::relaxGotLoad()` too.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100229
show more ...
|
| #
3bc88eb3 |
| 16-Apr-2021 |
Jez Ng <[email protected]> |
[lld-macho] Add support for arm64_32
From what I can tell, it's pretty similar to arm64. The two main differences
are:
1. No 64-bit relocations
2. Stub code writes to 32-bit registers instead of 64
[lld-macho] Add support for arm64_32
From what I can tell, it's pretty similar to arm64. The two main differences
are:
1. No 64-bit relocations
2. Stub code writes to 32-bit registers instead of 64-bit
Plus of course the various on-disk structures like `segment_command` are using
the 32-bit instead of the 64-bit variants.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99822
show more ...
|
| #
682d1dfe |
| 13-Apr-2021 |
Jez Ng <[email protected]> |
[lld-macho] Make load relaxation work for arm64_32
arm64_32 uses 32-bit GOT loads, so we should accept those
instructions in `ARM64Common::relaxGotLoad()` too.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differe
[lld-macho] Make load relaxation work for arm64_32
arm64_32 uses 32-bit GOT loads, so we should accept those
instructions in `ARM64Common::relaxGotLoad()` too.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100229
show more ...
|
| #
8914902b |
| 13-Apr-2021 |
Jez Ng <[email protected]> |
[lld-macho] Add support for arm64_32
From what I can tell, it's pretty similar to arm64. The two main differences
are:
1. No 64-bit relocations
2. Stub code writes to 32-bit registers instead of 64
[lld-macho] Add support for arm64_32
From what I can tell, it's pretty similar to arm64. The two main differences
are:
1. No 64-bit relocations
2. Stub code writes to 32-bit registers instead of 64-bit
Plus of course the various on-disk structures like `segment_command` are using
the 32-bit instead of the 64-bit variants.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99822
show more ...
|