|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
cb055e51 |
| 02-Mar-2022 |
Louis Dionne <[email protected]> |
[libc++] Add a CI job running MSAN
For some reason, we've been going without a MSAN CI job, even though
even run-buildbot defined a generic-msan job. This must have been an
oversight that went unnot
[libc++] Add a CI job running MSAN
For some reason, we've been going without a MSAN CI job, even though
even run-buildbot defined a generic-msan job. This must have been an
oversight that went unnoticed. Thanks to @EricWF for the catch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120851
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
ebfeeec4 |
| 22-Nov-2021 |
Louis Dionne <[email protected]> |
[libunwind] Fix testing with sanitizers enabled
When testing with sanitizers enabled, we need to link against a plethora
of system libraries. Using `-nodefaultlibs` like we used to breaks this,
and
[libunwind] Fix testing with sanitizers enabled
When testing with sanitizers enabled, we need to link against a plethora
of system libraries. Using `-nodefaultlibs` like we used to breaks this,
and we would have to add all these system libraries manually, which is
not portable and error prone. Instead, stop using `-nodefaultlibs` so
that we get the libraries added by default by the compiler.
The only caveat with this approach is that we are now relying on the
fact that `-L <path-to-local-libunwind>` will cause the just built
libunwind to be selected before the system implementation (either of
libunwind or libgcc_s.so), which is somewhat fragile.
This patch also turns the 32 bit multilib build into a soft failure
since we are in the process of removing it anyway, see D114473 for
details. This patch is incompatible with the 32 bit multilib build
because Ubuntu does not provide a proper libstdc++ for 32 bits, and
that is required when running with sanitizers enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114385
show more ...
|
| #
6fd55bba |
| 12-Oct-2021 |
Louis Dionne <[email protected]> |
[libunwind] Add a from-scratch config for running libunwind tests
Running tests for libunwind is a lot simpler than running tests for
libc++, so a simple Lit config file is sufficient. The benefit i
[libunwind] Add a from-scratch config for running libunwind tests
Running tests for libunwind is a lot simpler than running tests for
libc++, so a simple Lit config file is sufficient. The benefit is that
we disentangle the libunwind test configuration from the libc++ and
libc++abi test configuration. The setup was too complicated, which led
to some bugs (notably we were running against the system libunwind on
Apple platforms).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111664
show more ...
|
| #
60fe1f59 |
| 30-Sep-2021 |
Louis Dionne <[email protected]> |
[runtimes][ci] Run the tests for libunwind in the CI
We should arguably have always been doing that. The state of libunwind
is quite sad, so this commit adds several XFAILs to make the CI pass.
We n
[runtimes][ci] Run the tests for libunwind in the CI
We should arguably have always been doing that. The state of libunwind
is quite sad, so this commit adds several XFAILs to make the CI pass.
We need to investigate why so many tests are not passing in some
configurations, but I'll defer that to folks who actually work on
libunwind for lack of bandwidth.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110872
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
f5b997e6 |
| 02-Sep-2021 |
Daniel Kiss <[email protected]> |
[Unwind] Harmonise exception class for EHABI spec.
EHABI defines the exception class as char[8] instead of uint64_t [1].
For ABI compatibility the ABI the definition needs to be updated.
[1] https:
[Unwind] Harmonise exception class for EHABI spec.
EHABI defines the exception class as char[8] instead of uint64_t [1].
For ABI compatibility the ABI the definition needs to be updated.
[1] https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/ehabi32/ehabi32.rst#82language-independent-unwinding-types-and-functions
Reviewed By: manojgupta, MaskRay, #libunwind
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109047
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
db126ae2 |
| 11-Aug-2021 |
Daniel Kiss <[email protected]> |
[Arm][Unwind][libc++abi] Add _Unwind_ForcedUnwind to EHABI.
_Unwind_ForcedUnwind is not mandated by the EHABI but for compatibilty
reasons adding so the interface to higher layers would be the same.
[Arm][Unwind][libc++abi] Add _Unwind_ForcedUnwind to EHABI.
_Unwind_ForcedUnwind is not mandated by the EHABI but for compatibilty
reasons adding so the interface to higher layers would be the same.
Dropping EHABI specific _Unwind_Stop_Fn definition since it is not defined by EHABI.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89570
show more ...
|