|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6 |
|
| #
ee78181f |
| 13-Jun-2022 |
Louis Dionne <[email protected]> |
[libc++] Remove macros for IBM compiler
It's not tested or used anymore -- instead a Clang-based compiler is used on IBM nowadays.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127650
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0 |
|
| #
d2baefae |
| 12-Mar-2022 |
Joe Loser <[email protected]> |
[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove `_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBC
[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove `_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
9027887e |
| 02-Feb-2022 |
Mark de Wever <[email protected]> |
[libc++][nfc] Add TEST_HAS_NO_CHAR8_T.
This avoids using an libc++ internal macro in our tests. This version doesn't depend on the internal macro but redefines it.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Diff
[libc++][nfc] Add TEST_HAS_NO_CHAR8_T.
This avoids using an libc++ internal macro in our tests. This version doesn't depend on the internal macro but redefines it.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119460
show more ...
|
| #
95967842 |
| 02-Feb-2022 |
Mark de Wever <[email protected]> |
[libc++][nfc] Add TEST_HAS_NO_UNICODE_CHARS.
This avoids using an libc++ internal macro in our tests.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118832
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
048688fd |
| 20-Oct-2021 |
Louis Dionne <[email protected]> |
[libc++] Fix incorrect main() signatures in the tests
Those creep up from time to time. We need to use `int main(int, char**)` because in freestanding mode, `main` doesn't get special treatment and
[libc++] Fix incorrect main() signatures in the tests
Those creep up from time to time. We need to use `int main(int, char**)` because in freestanding mode, `main` doesn't get special treatment and special mangling, so we setup a symbol alias from the mangled version of `main(int, char**)` to `extern "C" main`. That only works if all the tests are consistent about how they define their main function.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
f4c1258d |
| 23-Aug-2021 |
Louis Dionne <[email protected]> |
[libc++] Add an option to disable wide character support in libc++
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It
[libc++] Add an option to disable wide character support in libc++
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out of functionality for wchar_t.
Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some embedded platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265
show more ...
|
| #
c0824a70 |
| 04-Oct-2021 |
Louis Dionne <[email protected]> |
[libc++][NFC] Qualify nullptr_t in test
|
| #
71752e00 |
| 09-Sep-2021 |
Louis Dionne <[email protected]> |
[libc++][NFC] Remove #endif comments for really small conditionals on _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_UNICODE_CHARS
We generally don't put a comment on the #endif when the #if block is so small that it's unambiguous
[libc++][NFC] Remove #endif comments for really small conditionals on _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_UNICODE_CHARS
We generally don't put a comment on the #endif when the #if block is so small that it's unambiguous what the #endif refers to.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
5c40c994 |
| 19-Apr-2021 |
Arthur O'Dwyer <[email protected]> |
[libc++] s/_LIBCPP_NO_HAS_CHAR8_T/_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CHAR8_T/g
This was raised in D94511.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100736
|
| #
36c3918e |
| 19-Apr-2021 |
Kamlesh Kumar <[email protected]> |
[libc++] [C++20] [P0586] Implement safe integral comparisons
* https://wg21.link/P0586
Reviewed By: #libc, curdeius, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94511
|