Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6
# ee78181f 13-Jun-2022 Louis Dionne <[email protected]>

[libc++] Remove macros for IBM compiler

It's not tested or used anymore -- instead a Clang-based compiler is
used on IBM nowadays.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127650


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0
# d2baefae 12-Mar-2022 Joe Loser <[email protected]>

[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.

All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBC

[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.

All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1
# 9027887e 02-Feb-2022 Mark de Wever <[email protected]>

[libc++][nfc] Add TEST_HAS_NO_CHAR8_T.

This avoids using an libc++ internal macro in our tests. This version
doesn't depend on the internal macro but redefines it.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Diff

[libc++][nfc] Add TEST_HAS_NO_CHAR8_T.

This avoids using an libc++ internal macro in our tests. This version
doesn't depend on the internal macro but redefines it.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119460

show more ...


# 95967842 02-Feb-2022 Mark de Wever <[email protected]>

[libc++][nfc] Add TEST_HAS_NO_UNICODE_CHARS.

This avoids using an libc++ internal macro in our tests.

Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118832


Revision tags: llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# 048688fd 20-Oct-2021 Louis Dionne <[email protected]>

[libc++] Fix incorrect main() signatures in the tests

Those creep up from time to time. We need to use `int main(int, char**)`
because in freestanding mode, `main` doesn't get special treatment and

[libc++] Fix incorrect main() signatures in the tests

Those creep up from time to time. We need to use `int main(int, char**)`
because in freestanding mode, `main` doesn't get special treatment and
special mangling, so we setup a symbol alias from the mangled version of
`main(int, char**)` to `extern "C" main`. That only works if all the tests
are consistent about how they define their main function.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2
# f4c1258d 23-Aug-2021 Louis Dionne <[email protected]>

[libc++] Add an option to disable wide character support in libc++

Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It

[libc++] Add an option to disable wide character support in libc++

Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for
libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out
of functionality for wchar_t.

Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this
patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide
impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this
configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some
embedded platforms.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265

show more ...


# c0824a70 04-Oct-2021 Louis Dionne <[email protected]>

[libc++][NFC] Qualify nullptr_t in test


# 71752e00 09-Sep-2021 Louis Dionne <[email protected]>

[libc++][NFC] Remove #endif comments for really small conditionals on _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_UNICODE_CHARS

We generally don't put a comment on the #endif when the #if block is so small
that it's unambiguous

[libc++][NFC] Remove #endif comments for really small conditionals on _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_UNICODE_CHARS

We generally don't put a comment on the #endif when the #if block is so small
that it's unambiguous what the #endif refers to.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1
# 5c40c994 19-Apr-2021 Arthur O'Dwyer <[email protected]>

[libc++] s/_LIBCPP_NO_HAS_CHAR8_T/_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CHAR8_T/g

This was raised in D94511.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100736


# 36c3918e 19-Apr-2021 Kamlesh Kumar <[email protected]>

[libc++] [C++20] [P0586] Implement safe integral comparisons

* https://wg21.link/P0586

Reviewed By: #libc, curdeius, Quuxplusone

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94511