Rewording "static_assert" diagnostics

This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to b

Rewording "static_assert" diagnostics

This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048

show more ...

Revert "Rewording the "static_assert" to static assertion"

Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.

This

Revert "Rewording the "static_assert" to static assertion"

Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.

This reverts commit 6542cb55a3eb115b1c3592514590a19987ffc498.

show more ...

Rewording the "static_assert" to static assertion

This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should n

Rewording the "static_assert" to static assertion

This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.

consider a c file having code

_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");

In clang the output is like:

<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1

Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:

<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1

The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048

show more ...

Improve the formatting of static_assert messages

Display 'static_assert failed: message' instead of
'static_assert failed "message"' to be consistent
with other implementations and be slightly more

Improve the formatting of static_assert messages

Display 'static_assert failed: message' instead of
'static_assert failed "message"' to be consistent
with other implementations and be slightly more
readable.

Reviewed By: #libc, aaron.ballman, philnik, Mordante

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128844

show more ...

Treat `std::move`, `forward`, etc. as builtins.

This is extended to all `std::` functions that take a reference to a
value and return a reference (or pointer) to that same value: `move`,
`forward`,

Treat `std::move`, `forward`, etc. as builtins.

This is extended to all `std::` functions that take a reference to a
value and return a reference (or pointer) to that same value: `move`,
`forward`, `move_if_noexcept`, `as_const`, `addressof`, and the
libstdc++-specific function `__addressof`.

We still require these functions to be declared before they can be used,
but don't instantiate their definitions unless their addresses are
taken. Instead, code generation, constant evaluation, and static
analysis are given direct knowledge of their effect.

This change aims to reduce various costs associated with these functions
-- per-instantiation memory costs, compile time and memory costs due to
creating out-of-line copies and inlining them, code size at -O0, and so
on -- so that they are not substantially more expensive than a cast.
Most of these improvements are very small, but I measured a 3% decrease
in -O0 object file size for a simple C++ source file using the standard
library after this change.

We now automatically infer the `const` and `nothrow` attributes on these
now-builtin functions, in particular meaning that we get a warning for
an unused call to one of these functions.

In C++20 onwards, we disallow taking the addresses of these functions,
per the C++20 "addressable function" rule. In earlier language modes, a
compatibility warning is produced but the address can still be taken.

The same infrastructure is extended to the existing MSVC builtin
`__GetExceptionInfo`, which is now only recognized in namespace `std`
like it always should have been.

This is a re-commit of
fc3090109643af8d2da9822d0f99c84742b9c877,
a571f82a50416b767fd3cce0fb5027bb5dfec58c,
64c045e25b8471bbb572bd29159c294a82a86a2, and
de6ddaeef3aaa8a9ae3663c12cdb57d9afc0f906,
and reverts aa643f455a5362de7189eac630050d2c8aefe8f2.
This change also includes a workaround for users using libc++ 3.1 and
earlier (!!), as apparently happens on AIX, where std::move sometimes
returns by value.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345

Revert "Fixup D123950 to address revert of D123345"

This reverts commit aa643f455a5362de7189eac630050d2c8aefe8f2.

show more ...

Revert "Don't treat 'T &forward(T&&)' as builtin."

This reverts commit e43c93dd63cca295ef26ab69cd305816a71d45fd as the
parent https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345 breaks the AIX CI.

Don't treat 'T &forward(T&&)' as builtin.

This allows the standard library to diagnose it properly. Suppress
warning in libc++ testsuite for unused result of call to std::forward.

[libcxx][modularisation] moves <utility> content out of <type_traits>

Moves:

* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges`

[libcxx][modularisation] moves <utility> content out of <type_traits>

Moves:

* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734

show more ...

[libc++] Implement D2351R0 "Mark all library static cast wrappers as [[nodiscard]]"

These [[nodiscard]] annotations are added as a conforming extension;
it's unclear whether the paper will actually

[libc++] Implement D2351R0 "Mark all library static cast wrappers as [[nodiscard]]"

These [[nodiscard]] annotations are added as a conforming extension;
it's unclear whether the paper will actually be adopted and make them
mandatory, but they do seem like good ideas regardless.

https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2351R0.pdf

This patch implements the paper's effect on:
- std::to_integer, std::to_underlying
- std::forward, std::move, std::move_if_noexcept
- std::as_const
- std::identity

The paper also affects (but libc++ does not yet have an implementation of):
- std::bit_cast

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99895

show more ...

Make move and forward work in C++03.

These functions are key to allowing the use of rvalues and variadics
in C++03 mode. Everything works the same as in C++11, except for one
tangentially related ca

Make move and forward work in C++03.

These functions are key to allowing the use of rvalues and variadics
in C++03 mode. Everything works the same as in C++11, except for one
tangentially related case:

struct T {
T(T &&) = default;
};

In C++11, T has a deleted copy constructor. But in C++03 Clang gives
it both a move and a copy constructor. This seems reasonable enough
given the extensions it's using.

The other changes in this patch were the minimal set required
to keep the tests passing after the move/forward change. Most notably
the removal of the `__rv<unique_ptr>` hack that was present
in an attempt to make unique_ptr move only without language support.

llvm-svn: 364063

show more ...

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".

Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:

In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:

self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']

Run the tests and they all fail.

Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).

Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.

The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.

The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:

https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed

This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.

Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.

<rdar://problem/47754795>

Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF

Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624

llvm-svn: 353086

show more ...

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351648

show more ...

Fix two failing -verify tests to tolerate old and new clang versions

llvm-svn: 313502

Fix failing -verify tests due to change in Clangs static_assert message.

Clang recently changed the way it outputs static assert diagnostics.
This patch fixes libc++'s -verify tests so they tolerate

Fix failing -verify tests due to change in Clangs static_assert message.

Clang recently changed the way it outputs static assert diagnostics.
This patch fixes libc++'s -verify tests so they tolerate both the old
and new message format.

llvm-svn: 313499

show more ...

[libc++] Extension: Make `move` and `forward` constexpr in C++11.

Summary:
`std::move` and `std::forward` were not marked constexpr in C++11. This can be very damaging because it makes otherwise co

[libc++] Extension: Make `move` and `forward` constexpr in C++11.

Summary:
`std::move` and `std::forward` were not marked constexpr in C++11. This can be very damaging because it makes otherwise constant expressions non-constant. For example:

```
#include <utility>
template <class T>
struct Foo {
constexpr Foo(T&& tx) : t(std::move(tx)) {}
T t;
};
[[clang::require_constant_initialization]] Foo<int> f(42); // Foo should be constant initialized but C++11 move is not constexpr. As a result `f` is an unsafe global.
```

This patch applies `constexpr` to `move` and `forward` as an extension in C++11. Normally the library is not allowed to add `constexpr` because it may be observable to the user. In particular adding constexpr may cause valid code to stop compiling. However these problems only happen in more complex situations, like making `__invoke(...)` constexpr. `forward` and `move` are simply enough that applying `constexpr` is safe.

Note that libstdc++ has offered this extension since at least 4.8.1.

Most of the changes in this patch are simply test cleanups or additions. The main changes in the tests are:

* Fold all `forward_N.fail.cpp` tests into a single `forward.fail.cpp` test using -verify.
* Delete most `move_only_N.fail.cpp` tests because they weren't actually testing anything.
* Fold `move_copy.pass.cpp` and `move_only.pass.cpp` into a single `move.pass.cpp` test.
* Add return type and noexcept tests for `forward` and `move`.




Reviewers: rsmith, mclow.lists, EricWF

Subscribers: K-ballo, loladiro

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24637

llvm-svn: 282439

show more ...