[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.

All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBC

[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.

All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528

show more ...

[libc++] Removes base member from tests.

Change the tests to use the base friend function instead of members.
Also changed some types to have a base friends instead of members.

Reviewed By: #libc,

[libc++] Removes base member from tests.

Change the tests to use the base friend function instead of members.
Also changed some types to have a base friends instead of members.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120742

show more ...

[libc++] Remove conditional noexcepts from view_interface.

As suggested in D117966.
These conditional noexcepts are *permitted* by the Standard (as long
as there were no mistakes in them, I guess);

[libc++] Remove conditional noexcepts from view_interface.

As suggested in D117966.
These conditional noexcepts are *permitted* by the Standard (as long
as there were no mistakes in them, I guess); but not *mandated*.
The Standard doesn't put any noexcept-specifications on these member functions.
The same logic would apply to `transform_view::iterator::operator*`
and `transform_view::iterator::operator[]`, but the Standard mandates
conditional noexcept on `iter_move(transform_view::iterator)`, and
I think it doesn't make much sense to say "moving from this iterator
is conditionally noexcept but not-moving from it is noexcept(false),"
so I'm leaving transform_view alone for now.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119374

show more ...

[libcxx][test] tests for strengthened `noexcept` are non-portable

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117966

[libc++] Implement LWG3549: view_interface need not inherit from view_base

Implement LWG3549 by making `view_interface` not inherit from `view_base`. Types
are still views if they have a public and

[libc++] Implement LWG3549: view_interface need not inherit from view_base

Implement LWG3549 by making `view_interface` not inherit from `view_base`. Types
are still views if they have a public and unambiguous derivation from
`view_interface`, so adjust the `enable_view` machinery as such to account for
that.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117714

show more ...

[libcxx][test] view_interface need not derive from view_base

... after LWG-3549.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117608

[libc++][test] Fix invalid test for views::view_interface

The type `MoveOnlyForwardRange` violates the precondition stated in
`view.interface.general`. Specifically, the type passed to
`view_interfa

[libc++][test] Fix invalid test for views::view_interface

The type `MoveOnlyForwardRange` violates the precondition stated in
`view.interface.general`. Specifically, the type passed to
`view_interface` shall model the `view` concept. In turn, this requires the
type to satisfy `movable` concept (and others), but this type
`MoveOnlyForwardRange` does not satisfy the `movable` concept.

Add a move assignment operator so that `MoveOnlyForwardRange` satisfies the
`movable` concept. While we're here, ensure the neighboring types that inherit
from `view_interface` also satisfy the `view` concept to avoid similar issues.

Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50720

Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112631

show more ...

[libc++] Remove Lit annotations for unsupported GCC versions from the test suite

Since we officially don't support several older compilers now, we can
drop a lot of the markup in the test suite. Thi

[libc++] Remove Lit annotations for unsupported GCC versions from the test suite

Since we officially don't support several older compilers now, we can
drop a lot of the markup in the test suite. This helps keep the test
suite simple and makes sure that UNSUPPORTED annotations don't rot.

This is the first patch of a series that will remove annotations for
compilers that are now unsupported.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107787

show more ...

[libc++] Disable incomplete library features.

Adds a new CMake option to disable the usage of incomplete headers.
These incomplete headers are not guaranteed to be ABI stable. This
option is intende

[libc++] Disable incomplete library features.

Adds a new CMake option to disable the usage of incomplete headers.
These incomplete headers are not guaranteed to be ABI stable. This
option is intended to be used by vendors so they can avoid their users
from code that's not ready for production usage.

The option is enabled by default.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106763

show more ...

[libc++] [test] Fix some GCC 11 errors/warnings in these tests. NFCI.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104228

[libcxx] Implement view.interface.

This will unblock work on ranges::view. Based on D101396.

Refs http://eel.is/c++draft/view.interface.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101737