[libc++] [test] Qualify `distance` as `std::distance` in a lot of tests. NFCI.

We shouldn't be calling `distance` via ADL -- and neither should anybody
in the wild be calling it via ADL, so it's not

[libc++] [test] Qualify `distance` as `std::distance` in a lot of tests. NFCI.

We shouldn't be calling `distance` via ADL -- and neither should anybody
in the wild be calling it via ADL, so it's not like we need to test
this ADL ability of `distance` in particular.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119685

show more ...

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".

Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:

In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:

self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']

Run the tests and they all fail.

Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).

Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.

The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.

The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:

https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed

This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.

Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.

<rdar://problem/47754795>

Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF

Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624

llvm-svn: 353086

show more ...

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351648

show more ...

[libcxx] [test] Fix Clang -Wunused-local-typedef, part 2/3.

These typedefs were completely unused.

Fixes D29136.

llvm-svn: 294155

fix warnings only produced by apple-clang

llvm-svn: 290474

[libcxx] [test] D27025: Fix MSVC warning C4389 "signed/unsigned mismatch", part 12/12.

Various changes:

test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.merge/inplace_merge.pass.cpp
This is comparing value_type

[libcxx] [test] D27025: Fix MSVC warning C4389 "signed/unsigned mismatch", part 12/12.

Various changes:

test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.merge/inplace_merge.pass.cpp
This is comparing value_type to unsigned. value_type is sometimes int and sometimes struct S (implicitly constructible from int).
static_cast<value_type>(unsigned) silences the warning and doesn't do anything bad (as the values in question are small).

test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.nth.element/nth_element_comp.pass.cpp
This is comparing an int remote-element to size_t. The values in question are small and non-negative,
so either type is fine. I think that converting int to size_t is marginally better here than the reverse.

test/std/containers/sequences/deque/deque.cons/size.pass.cpp
DefaultOnly::count is int (and non-negative). When comparing to unsigned, use static_cast<unsigned>.

test/std/strings/basic.string/string.access/index.pass.cpp
We're comparing char to '0' through '9', but formed with the type size_t. Add static_cast<char>.

test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.cons/ull_ctor.pass.cpp
Include <cstddef> for pedantic correctness (this test was already mentioning std::size_t).

"v[i] == (i & 1)" was comparing bool to size_t. Saying "v[i] == ((i & 1) != 0)" smashes the RHS to bool.

llvm-svn: 288749

show more ...

[libcxx] [test] D27021: Fix MSVC warning C4389 "signed/unsigned mismatch", part 8/12.

Add static_cast<std::size_t> when comparing distance() to size().

These replacements were performed programmati

[libcxx] [test] D27021: Fix MSVC warning C4389 "signed/unsigned mismatch", part 8/12.

Add static_cast<std::size_t> when comparing distance() to size().

These replacements were performed programmatically with regex_replace():

const vector<pair<regex, string>> reg_fmt = {
{ regex(R"(assert\((\w+)\.size\(\) == std::distance\((\w+, \w+)\)\))"),
"assert($1.size() == static_cast<std::size_t>(std::distance($2)))" },
{ regex(R"(assert\(distance\((\w+\.begin\(\), \w+\.end\(\))\) == (\w+)\.size\(\)\))"),
"assert(static_cast<std::size_t>(distance($1)) == $2.size())" },
{ regex(R"(assert\(std::distance\((\w+\.\w*begin\(\), \w+\.\w*end\(\))\) == (\w+)\.size\(\)\))"),
"assert(static_cast<std::size_t>(std::distance($1)) == $2.size())" },
};

Also, include <cstddef> when it wasn't already being included.

llvm-svn: 288745

show more ...

[libcxx] [test] Replace _LIBCPP_STD_VER with TEST_STD_VER.

This replaces every occurrence of _LIBCPP_STD_VER in the tests with
TEST_STD_VER. Additionally, for every affected
file, #include "test_mac

[libcxx] [test] Replace _LIBCPP_STD_VER with TEST_STD_VER.

This replaces every occurrence of _LIBCPP_STD_VER in the tests with
TEST_STD_VER. Additionally, for every affected
file, #include "test_macros.h" is being added explicitly if it wasn't
already there.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D26294

llvm-svn: 286007

show more ...

[PATCH] D25483: [libcxx] [test] Fix non-Standard assumptions about how many elements are allocated

llvm-svn: 285346

[libc++] Fix stack_allocator

Summary:
To quote STL the problems with stack allocator are"

>"stack_allocator<T, N> is seriously nonconformant to N4582 17.6.3.5 [allocator.requirements].
> First, it

[libc++] Fix stack_allocator

Summary:
To quote STL the problems with stack allocator are"

>"stack_allocator<T, N> is seriously nonconformant to N4582 17.6.3.5 [allocator.requirements].
> First, it lacks a rebinding constructor. (The nested "struct rebind" isn't sufficient.)
> Second, it lacks templated equality/inequality.
> Third, it completely ignores alignment.
> Finally, and most severely, the Standard forbids its existence. Allocators are forbidden from returning memory "inside themselves". This requirement is implied by the Standard's requirements for rebinding and equality. It's permitted to return memory from a separate buffer object on the stack, though."

This patch attempts to address all of those issues.

First, instead of storing the buffer inside the allocator I've change `stack_allocator` to accept the buffer as an argument.

Second, in order to fix rebinding I changed the parameter list from `<class T, size_t NumElements>` to `<class T, size_t NumBytes>`. This allows allocator rebinding
between types that have different sizes.

Third, I added copy and rebinding constructors and assignment operators.

And finally I fixed the allocation logic to always return properly aligned storage.



Reviewers: mclow.lists, howard.hinnant, STL_MSFT

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25154

llvm-svn: 283631

show more ...

Replace __cplusplus comparisons and dialect __has_feature checks with TEST_STD_VER.

This is a huge cleanup that helps make the libc++ test suite more portable.
Patch from [email protected]. Thanks S

Replace __cplusplus comparisons and dialect __has_feature checks with TEST_STD_VER.

This is a huge cleanup that helps make the libc++ test suite more portable.
Patch from [email protected]. Thanks STL!

llvm-svn: 272716

show more ...

Move test into test/std subdirectory.

llvm-svn: 224658