|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
bbb0f2c7 |
| 11-Feb-2022 |
Arthur O'Dwyer <[email protected]> |
[libc++] Replace `#include ""` with `<>` in libcxx/src/. NFCI.
Our best guess is that the two syntaxes should have exactly equivalent
effects, so, let's be consistent with what we do in libcxx/inclu
[libc++] Replace `#include ""` with `<>` in libcxx/src/. NFCI.
Our best guess is that the two syntaxes should have exactly equivalent
effects, so, let's be consistent with what we do in libcxx/include/.
I've left `#include "include/x.h"` and `#include "../y.h"` alone
because I'm less sure that they're interchangeable, and they aren't
inconsistent with libcxx/include/ because libcxx/include/ never
does that kind of thing.
Also, use the `_LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS/POP_MACROS` dance for `<__undef_macros>`,
even though it's technically unnecessary in a standalone .cpp file,
just so we have consistently one way to do it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119561
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
eb8650a7 |
| 17-Nov-2021 |
Louis Dionne <[email protected]> |
[runtimes][NFC] Remove filenames at the top of the license notice
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste st
[runtimes][NFC] Remove filenames at the top of the license notice
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
5601305f |
| 01-Mar-2021 |
Louis Dionne <[email protected]> |
[libc++/abi] Replace uses of _NOEXCEPT in src/ by noexcept
We always build the libraries in a Standard mode that supports noexcept,
so there's no need to use the _NOEXCEPT macro.
Differential Revis
[libc++/abi] Replace uses of _NOEXCEPT in src/ by noexcept
We always build the libraries in a Standard mode that supports noexcept,
so there's no need to use the _NOEXCEPT macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97700
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
689ce810 |
| 23-Oct-2019 |
Casey Carter <[email protected]> |
[libc++][NFC] Remove excess trailing newlines from most files
Testing git commit access.
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4 |
|
| #
8baf8383 |
| 07-Jul-2019 |
Eric Fiselier <[email protected]> |
Fix PR27658 - Make ~mutex trivial when possible.
Currently std::mutex has a constexpr constructor, but a non-trivial
destruction.
The constexpr constructor is required to ensure the construction of
Fix PR27658 - Make ~mutex trivial when possible.
Currently std::mutex has a constexpr constructor, but a non-trivial
destruction.
The constexpr constructor is required to ensure the construction of a
mutex with static storage duration happens at compile time, during
constant initialization, and not during dynamic initialization.
This means that static mutex's are always initialized and can be used
safely during dynamic initialization without the "static initialization
order fiasco".
A trivial destructor is important for similar reasons. If a mutex is
used during dynamic initialization it might also be used during program
termination. If a static mutex has a non-trivial destructor it will be
invoked during termination. This can introduce the "static
deinitialization order fiasco".
Additionally, function-local statics emit a guard variable around
non-trivially destructible types. This results in horrible codegen and
adds a runtime cost to every call to that function. non-local static's
also result in slightly worse codegen but it's not as big of a problem.
Example codegen can be found here: https://goo.gl/3CSzbM
Note: This optimization is not safe with every pthread implementation.
Some implementations allocate on the first call to pthread_mutex_lock
and free the allocation in pthread_mutex_destroy.
Also, changing the triviality of the destructor is not an ABI break.
At least to the best of my knowledge :-)
llvm-svn: 365273
show more ...
|