[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.

All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBC

[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.

All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528

show more ...

[libc++] Make common_iterator's proxy types into aggregates.

Saves one move in each case, which is basically nothing perf-wise;
this is more about simplifying the code.

Differential Revision: https

[libc++] Make common_iterator's proxy types into aggregates.

Saves one move in each case, which is basically nothing perf-wise;
this is more about simplifying the code.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121130

show more ...

[libc++] Add `explicit` to a bunch of internal detail ctors.

Notably the following ctors remain non-explicit because they
are used as implicit conversions in too many places:
* __debug_less(_Compare

[libc++] Add `explicit` to a bunch of internal detail ctors.

Notably the following ctors remain non-explicit because they
are used as implicit conversions in too many places:
* __debug_less(_Compare&)
* __map_iterator(_TreeIterator)
* __map_const_iterator(_TreeIterator)
* __hash_map_iterator(_HashIterator)
* __hash_map_const_iterator(_HashIterator)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119894

show more ...

[libc++] Revert "Protect users from relying on detail headers" & related changes

This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit).

[libc++] Revert "Protect users from relying on detail headers" & related changes

This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683

show more ...

[libcxx][modules] protects users from relying on detail headers

libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that ou

[libcxx][modules] protects users from relying on detail headers

libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124

show more ...

[libc++] Move everything related solely to _LIBCPP_ASSERT to its own file

This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional

[libc++] Move everything related solely to _LIBCPP_ASSERT to its own file

This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional change: it simply moves
_LIBCPP_ASSERT-related stuff to its own file so as to make it clear that
libc++ assertions and the debug mode are different things. Future patches
will make it possible to enable assertions without enabling the debug
mode.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119769

show more ...

[libc++] Normalize all our '#pragma GCC system_header', and regression-test.

Now we'll notice if a header forgets to include this magic phrase.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D1188

[libc++] Normalize all our '#pragma GCC system_header', and regression-test.

Now we'll notice if a header forgets to include this magic phrase.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118800

show more ...

[libc++] [NFC] s/__referenceable/__can_reference/

The Standard name for this exposition-only concept is _can-reference_.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118726

[libc++] Merge _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_RANGES into _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS. NFC.

The macro that opts out of `std::ranges::` functionality is called
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`, and is unrelated to thi

[libc++] Merge _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_RANGES into _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS. NFC.

The macro that opts out of `std::ranges::` functionality is called
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`, and is unrelated to this macro
which is specifically about _compiler_ support for the _syntax_.

The only non-mechanical diff here is in `<__config>`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118507

show more ...

[libc++] Fix common_iterator for output_iterators

We were missing a constraint in common_iterator's iterator_traits and
we were eagerly instantiating iter_value_t even when invalid.

Thanks to Casey

[libc++] Fix common_iterator for output_iterators

We were missing a constraint in common_iterator's iterator_traits and
we were eagerly instantiating iter_value_t even when invalid.

Thanks to Casey Carter for finding this bug.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117449

show more ...

[libc++] Fix bugs in common_iterator; add test coverage.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117400

[libc++][NFC] Remove useless _LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS

Only files that actually use min/max are required to do this dance.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108778

[libcxx][ranges] Add common_iterator.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103335