[libc++][format] Improve pointer formatters.

This changes the implementation of the formatter. Instead of inheriting
from a specialized parser all formatters will use the same generic
parser. This r

[libc++][format] Improve pointer formatters.

This changes the implementation of the formatter. Instead of inheriting
from a specialized parser all formatters will use the same generic
parser. This reduces the binary size.

The new parser contains some additional fields only used in the chrono
formatting. Since this doesn't change the size of the parser the fields
are in the generic parser. The parser is designed to fit in 128-bit,
making it cheap to pass by value.

The new format function is a const member function. This isn't required
by the Standard yet, but it will be after LWG-3636 is accepted.
Additionally P2286 adds a formattable concept which requires the member
function to be const qualified in C++23. This paper is likely to be
accepted in the 2022 July plenary.

This is based on D125606. That commit did the groundwork and did similar
changes for the string formatters.

Depends on D128139.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128671

show more ...

[libc++][format] Improve integral formatters.

This changes the implementation of the formatter. Instead of inheriting
from a specialized parser all formatters will use the same generic
parser. This

[libc++][format] Improve integral formatters.

This changes the implementation of the formatter. Instead of inheriting
from a specialized parser all formatters will use the same generic
parser. This reduces the binary size.

The new parser contains some additional fields only used in the chrono
formatting. Since this doesn't change the size of the parser the fields
are in the generic parser. The parser is designed to fit in 128-bit,
making it cheap to pass by value.

The new format function is a const member function. This isn't required
by the Standard yet, but it will be after LWG-3636 is accepted.
Additionally P2286 adds a formattable concept which requires the member
function to be const qualified in C++23. This paper is likely to be
accepted in the 2022 July plenary.

This is based on D125606. That commit did the groundwork and did similar
changes for the string formatters.

Depends on D125606

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128139

show more ...

Revert "[libc++][format] Use a helper constant."

This reverts commit 82427685ea3732665286d5b1c8a1424b1f96164e.

This seems to break the AIX-32 bit build.

[libc++][format] Use a helper constant.

The code accidentally uses a hard-coded value. Use a constant to make
sure the same value is used at both places.

[libc++] Add missing <cstddef> include

[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.

All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBC

[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.

All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528

show more ...

[libc++] Revert "Protect users from relying on detail headers" & related changes

This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit).

[libc++] Revert "Protect users from relying on detail headers" & related changes

This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683

show more ...

[libcxx][modules] protects users from relying on detail headers

libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that ou

[libcxx][modules] protects users from relying on detail headers

libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124

show more ...

[libc++] Move everything related solely to _LIBCPP_ASSERT to its own file

This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional

[libc++] Move everything related solely to _LIBCPP_ASSERT to its own file

This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional change: it simply moves
_LIBCPP_ASSERT-related stuff to its own file so as to make it clear that
libc++ assertions and the debug mode are different things. Future patches
will make it possible to enable assertions without enabling the debug
mode.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119769

show more ...

[libc++] Remove the ability to use the std::nullptr_t emulation in C++03 mode

Back in https://reviews.llvm.org/D109459, we stopped using the C++03
emulation for std::nullptr_t by default, which was

[libc++] Remove the ability to use the std::nullptr_t emulation in C++03 mode

Back in https://reviews.llvm.org/D109459, we stopped using the C++03
emulation for std::nullptr_t by default, which was an ABI break. We
still left a knob for users to turn it back on if they were broken by
the change, with a note that we would remove that knob after one release.

The time has now come to remove the knob and clean up the std::nullptr_t
emulation.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114786

show more ...

[libc++][format] Adds formatter pointer.

This implements the last required formatter specialization.

Completes:
- LWG 3251 Are std::format alignment specifiers applied to string arguments?
- LWG 33

[libc++][format] Adds formatter pointer.

This implements the last required formatter specialization.

Completes:
- LWG 3251 Are std::format alignment specifiers applied to string arguments?
- LWG 3340 Formatting functions should throw on argument/format string mismatch in §[format.functions]
- LWG 3540 §[format.arg] There should be no const in basic_format_arg(const T* p)

Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting

Depends on D114001

Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115988

show more ...