|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init |
|
| #
1795f8cd |
| 29-Jun-2022 |
Peixin-Qiao <[email protected]> |
[NFC][OpenMP] Fix worksharing-loop
1. Remove the redundant collapse clause in MLIR OpenMP worksharing-loop
operation.
2. Fix several typos.
3. Refactor the chunk size type conversion since Create
[NFC][OpenMP] Fix worksharing-loop
1. Remove the redundant collapse clause in MLIR OpenMP worksharing-loop
operation.
2. Fix several typos.
3. Refactor the chunk size type conversion since CreateSExtOrTrunc has
both type check and type conversion.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128338
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3 |
|
| #
dc4bf2c3 |
| 17-Jan-2022 |
Mats Petersson <[email protected]> |
[flang][OpenMP]Make omp.wsloop arguments appear in memory (#1277)
As per issue #1196, the loop induction variable, which is an argument
in the omp.wsloop operation, does not have a memory location,
[flang][OpenMP]Make omp.wsloop arguments appear in memory (#1277)
As per issue #1196, the loop induction variable, which is an argument
in the omp.wsloop operation, does not have a memory location, so when
passed to a function or subroutine, the reference to the value is not
a memory location, but the value of the induction variable. The callee
function/subroutine is then trying to dereference memory at address 1
or some other "not a good memory location".
This is fixed by creating a temporary memory location and storing the
value of the induction variable in that.
Test fixes as a consequence of the changed code generated.
Add checking for some of the omp-unstructured.f90 to check for alloca,
store and load operations, to ensure the correct flow. Add a test
for CYCLE inside a omp-do loop.
Also convert to use -emit-fir in the omp-unstructrued, and make
the symbol matching consistent in the omp-wsloop-variable test.
Reviewed By: peixin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126711
show more ...
|
| #
870f4421 |
| 20-May-2022 |
Peixin-Qiao <[email protected]> |
[flang][OpenMP] Fix the types of worksharing-loop variables
The types of lower bound, upper bound, and step are converted into the
type of the loop variable if necessary. OpenMP runtime requires 32-
[flang][OpenMP] Fix the types of worksharing-loop variables
The types of lower bound, upper bound, and step are converted into the
type of the loop variable if necessary. OpenMP runtime requires 32-bit
or 64-bit loop variables. OpenMP loop iteration variable cannot have
more than 64 bits size and will be narrowed.
This patch is part of upstreaming code from the fir-dev branch of
https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18-llvm-project. (#1256)
Co-authored-by: kiranchandramohan <[email protected]>
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, shraiysh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125740
show more ...
|