History log of /llvm-project-15.0.7/flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-labels.cpp (Results 1 – 14 of 14)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5
# ee9c9170 07-Jun-2022 Peter Klausler <[email protected]>

[flang] Fix bogus branch target error on END SELECT

The scope model used for branch target checking treats a label
on an END SELECT statement as if it were in the previous CASE block.
This makes it

[flang] Fix bogus branch target error on END SELECT

The scope model used for branch target checking treats a label
on an END SELECT statement as if it were in the previous CASE block.
This makes it illegal to GO TO that label from within any earlier
CASE block in that statement. Fix by treating the CASE blocks as
nested scopes within the scope of the SELECT construct.

Also, add a "warning:" tag to related warning messages.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127425

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1
# eb4d5b85 08-Apr-2022 PeixinQiao <[email protected]>

[flang] Fix semantic analysis for "forall" targeted by "label"

As Fortran 2018 3.18 states, the branch target statement can be
`forall-construct-stmt`, but cannot be `forall-stmt`. `forall-stmt` is

[flang] Fix semantic analysis for "forall" targeted by "label"

As Fortran 2018 3.18 states, the branch target statement can be
`forall-construct-stmt`, but cannot be `forall-stmt`. `forall-stmt` is
wrapped by `Statement` in `action-stmt` and `action-stmt` can be one
branch target statement. Fix the semantic analysis and add two
regression test cases in lowering.

Reviewed By: Jean Perier

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123373

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3
# a53967cd 07-Mar-2022 Peter Klausler <[email protected]>

[flang] Distinguish usage and portability warning messages

Using recently established message severity codes, upgrade
non-fatal messages to usage and portability warnings as
appropriate.

Differenti

[flang] Distinguish usage and portability warning messages

Using recently established message severity codes, upgrade
non-fatal messages to usage and portability warnings as
appropriate.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121246

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# c3dddeea 10-Nov-2021 Peter Klausler <[email protected]>

[flang] Allow exterior branch to outermost WHERE construct statement

The labels of WHERE constructs were being created within the scope of
the construct, not the scope of its parent, leading to inco

[flang] Allow exterior branch to outermost WHERE construct statement

The labels of WHERE constructs were being created within the scope of
the construct, not the scope of its parent, leading to incorrect error
messages for branches to that label.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113696

show more ...


# 80f0bb59 29-Oct-2021 Peter Klausler <[email protected]>

[flang] Distinguish error/warning cases for bad jumps into constructs

Previously, jumps to labels in constructs from exterior statements
would elicit only a warning. Upgrade these to errors unless

[flang] Distinguish error/warning cases for bad jumps into constructs

Previously, jumps to labels in constructs from exterior statements
would elicit only a warning. Upgrade these to errors unless the
branch into the construct would enter into only DO, IF, and SELECT CASE
constructs, whose interiors don't scope variables or have other
set-up/tear-down semantics. Branches into these "safe" constructs
are still errors if they're nested in an unsafe construct that doesn't
also enclose the exterior branch statement.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113310

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4
# 9eab0da1 16-Sep-2021 peter klausler <[email protected]>

[flang] Catch branching into FORALL/WHERE constructs

Enforce constraints C1034 & C1038, which disallow the use
of otherwise valid statements as branch targets when they
appear in FORALL &/or WHERE c

[flang] Catch branching into FORALL/WHERE constructs

Enforce constraints C1034 & C1038, which disallow the use
of otherwise valid statements as branch targets when they
appear in FORALL &/or WHERE constructs. (And make the
diagnostic message somewhat more user-friendly.)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109936

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3
# 18942502 09-Sep-2021 peter klausler <[email protected]>

[flang] Revamp C1502 checking of END INTERFACE [generic-spec]

Validation of the optional generic-spec on an END INTERFACE statement
was missing many possible error cases; reimplement it.

Differenti

[flang] Revamp C1502 checking of END INTERFACE [generic-spec]

Validation of the optional generic-spec on an END INTERFACE statement
was missing many possible error cases; reimplement it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109910

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1
# b781a04f 10-Nov-2020 peter klausler <[email protected]>

[flang] Allow labels on END statements.

F18 clause 5.3.3 explicitly allows labels on program unit END statements.
Label resolution code accounts for this for singleton program units,
but incorrectly

[flang] Allow labels on END statements.

F18 clause 5.3.3 explicitly allows labels on program unit END statements.
Label resolution code accounts for this for singleton program units,
but incorrectly generates an error for host subprograms with internal
subprograms.

subroutine s(n)
call s1(n)
if (n == 0) goto 88 ! incorrect error
print*, 's'
contains
subroutine s1(n)
if (n == 0) goto 77 ! ok
print*, 's1'
77 end subroutine s1
88 end

Label resolution code makes a sequential pass over an entire file to
collect label information for all subprograms, followed by a pass through
that information for semantics checks. The problem is that END statements
may be separated from prior subprogram code by internal subprogram
definitions, so an END label can be associated with the wrong subprogram.

There are several ways to fix this. Labels are always local to a
subprogram. So the two separate passes over the entire file could probably
instead be interleaved to perform analysis on a subprogram as soon as the
end of the subprogram is reached, using a small stack. The stack structure
would account for the "split" code case. This might work.

It is possible that there is some not otherwise apparent advantage to
the current full-file pass design. The parse tree has productions that
provide access to a subprogram END statement "in advance". An alternative
is to access this information to solve the problem. This PR implements
this latter option.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91217

show more ...


# 0047f6ae 17-Oct-2020 Peter Steinfeld <[email protected]>

[flang] Add name match checks for interface procedures

We had neglected to check for name mismatches for procedure definitions that
appear in interfaces.

I also changed label11.f90 to an error test

[flang] Add name match checks for interface procedures

We had neglected to check for name mismatches for procedure definitions that
appear in interfaces.

I also changed label11.f90 to an error test since I think they're better than
"FileCheck" tests.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89611

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3
# 646f19bb 31-Aug-2020 peter klausler <[email protected]>

[flang] Format label scope is independent of block scope

Compilation of the following program currently generates a warning message:

i = 1
if (i .eq. 0) then
write(6, 200)

[flang] Format label scope is independent of block scope

Compilation of the following program currently generates a warning message:

i = 1
if (i .eq. 0) then
write(6, 200) i
200 format (I8)
end if
write(6, 200) i
end

x.f90:6:9: Label '200' is not in scope
write(6, 200) i
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Whereas branch targets must conform to the Clause 11.1.2.1 program
requirement "Transfer of control to the interior of a block from
outside the block is prohibited, ...", this doesn't apply to format
statement references.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1
# 455ed8de 03-Apr-2020 peter klausler <[email protected]>

[flang] Process names in ASSIGN and assigned GOTO

Allow ASSIGNed integer variables as formats

Address review comment

Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@361a151508b4a1940fc0669dead180be67964d8d
Re

[flang] Process names in ASSIGN and assigned GOTO

Allow ASSIGNed integer variables as formats

Address review comment

Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@361a151508b4a1940fc0669dead180be67964d8d
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1099

show more ...


# 1f879005 29-Mar-2020 Tim Keith <[email protected]>

[flang] Reformat with latest clang-format and .clang-format

Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@9fe84f45d7fd685051004678d6b5775dcc4c6f8f
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1094


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4
# e03b20e6 10-Mar-2020 peter klausler <[email protected]>

[flang] Changes to get a clean build of f18 with latest clang

Prep for review

Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@111f49061e07604670614250197a1064959fd981
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-comp

[flang] Changes to get a clean build of f18 with latest clang

Prep for review

Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@111f49061e07604670614250197a1064959fd981
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1059

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3
# 64ab3302 25-Feb-2020 CarolineConcatto <[email protected]>

[flang] [LLVMify F18] Compiler module folders should have capitalised names (flang-compiler/f18#980)

This patch renames the modules in f18 to use a capital letter in the
module name

Signed-off-b

[flang] [LLVMify F18] Compiler module folders should have capitalised names (flang-compiler/f18#980)

This patch renames the modules in f18 to use a capital letter in the
module name

Signed-off-by: Caroline Concatto <[email protected]>

Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@d2eb7a1c443d1539ef12b6f027074a0eb15b1ea0
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/980

show more ...