add option to instantiate templates already in the PCH

Add -fpch-instantiate-templates which makes template instantiations be
performed already in the PCH instead of it being done in every single
fi

add option to instantiate templates already in the PCH

Add -fpch-instantiate-templates which makes template instantiations be
performed already in the PCH instead of it being done in every single
file that uses the PCH (but every single file will still do it as well
in order to handle its own instantiations). I can see 20-30% build
time saved with the few tests I've tried.

The change may reorder compiler output and also generated code, but
should be generally safe and produce functionally identical code.
There are some rare cases that do not compile with it,
such as test/PCH/pch-instantiate-templates-forward-decl.cpp. If
template instantiation bailed out instead of reporting the error,
these instantiations could even be postponed, which would make them
work.

Enable this by default for clang-cl. MSVC creates PCHs by compiling
them using an empty .cpp file, which means templates are instantiated
while building the PCH and so the .h needs to be self-contained,
making test/PCH/pch-instantiate-templates-forward-decl.cpp to fail
with MSVC anyway. So the option being enabled for clang-cl matches this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69585

show more ...

[c++20] Implement semantic restrictions for C++20 designated
initializers.

This has some interesting interactions with our existing extensions to
support C99 designated initializers as an extension

[c++20] Implement semantic restrictions for C++20 designated
initializers.

This has some interesting interactions with our existing extensions to
support C99 designated initializers as an extension in C++. Those are
resolved as follows:

* We continue to permit the full breadth of C99 designated initializers
in C++, with the exception that we disallow a partial overwrite of an
initializer with a non-trivially-destructible type. (Full overwrite
is OK, because we won't run the first initializer at all.)

* The C99 extensions are disallowed in SFINAE contexts and during
overload resolution, where they could change the meaning of valid
programs.

* C++20 disallows reordering of initializers. We only check for that for
the simple cases that the C++20 rules permit (designators of the form
'.field_name =' and continue to allow reordering in other cases).
It would be nice to improve this behavior in future.

* All C99 designated initializer extensions produce a warning by
default in C++20 mode. People are going to learn the C++ rules based
on what Clang diagnoses, so it's important we diagnose these properly
by default.

* In C++ <= 17, we apply the C++20 rules rather than the C99 rules, and
so still diagnose C99 extensions as described above. We continue to
accept designated C++20-compatible initializers in C++ <= 17 silently
by default (but naturally still reject under -pedantic-errors).

This is not a complete implementation of P0329R4. In particular, that
paper introduces new non-C99-compatible syntax { .field { init } }, and
we do not support that yet.

This is based on a previous patch by Don Hinton, though I've made
substantial changes when addressing the above interactions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59754

llvm-svn: 370544

show more ...

PR29097: add an update record when we instantiate the default member
initializer of an imported field.

llvm-svn: 279667

PR24597: Fix in-place evaluation of call expressions to provide a proper "this"
pointer to an RVO construction of a returned object.

llvm-svn: 246263

Add another test I forgot to svn add.

llvm-svn: 179959