|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init |
|
| #
1ddc51d8 |
| 15-Jul-2022 |
Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]> |
Inliner: don't mark call sites as 'nounwind' if that would be redundant
When F calls G calls H, G is nounwind, and G is inlined into F, then the
inlined call-site to H should be effectively nounwind
Inliner: don't mark call sites as 'nounwind' if that would be redundant
When F calls G calls H, G is nounwind, and G is inlined into F, then the
inlined call-site to H should be effectively nounwind so as not to lose
information during inlining.
If H itself is nounwind (which often happens when H is an intrinsic), we
no longer mark the callsite explicitly as nounwind. Previously, there
were cases where the inlined call-site of H differs from a pre-existing
call-site of H in F *only* in the explicitly added nounwind attribute,
thus preventing common subexpression elimination.
v2:
- just check CI->doesNotThrow
v3 (resubmit after revert at 344378808778c61d5599f4e0ac783ef7e6f8ed05):
- update Clang tests
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129860
show more ...
|
| #
3d2256cc |
| 19-Jul-2022 |
Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]> |
Revert "Update some more tests with update_cc_test_checks.py"
This reverts commit 9fb33d52b045b6cc97f2f56fe5cd23b41de86ffe.
Buildbots are showing a number of regressions that don't reproduce
locall
Revert "Update some more tests with update_cc_test_checks.py"
This reverts commit 9fb33d52b045b6cc97f2f56fe5cd23b41de86ffe.
Buildbots are showing a number of regressions that don't reproduce
locally. Needs more investigating.
show more ...
|
| #
9fb33d52 |
| 19-Jul-2022 |
Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]> |
Update some more tests with update_cc_test_checks.py
|
| #
8322fe20 |
| 27-Jun-2022 |
Ritanya B Bharadwaj <[email protected]> |
Adding support for target in_reduction
Implementing target in_reduction by wrapping target task with host task with in_reduction and if clause. This is in compliance with OpenMP 5.0 section: 2.19.5.
Adding support for target in_reduction
Implementing target in_reduction by wrapping target task with host task with in_reduction and if clause. This is in compliance with OpenMP 5.0 section: 2.19.5.6.
So, this
```
for (int i=0; i<N; i++) {
res = res+i
}
```
will become
```
#pragma omp task in_reduction(+:res) if(0)
#pragma omp target map(res)
for (int i=0; i<N; i++) {
res = res+i
}
```
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125669
show more ...
|