[OpenMP] Change OpenMP code generation for target region entries

This patch changes the code we generate to enter a target region on the
device. This is in-line with the new definition in the runtim

[OpenMP] Change OpenMP code generation for target region entries

This patch changes the code we generate to enter a target region on the
device. This is in-line with the new definition in the runtime that was
added previously. Additionally we implement this in the OpenMPIRBuilder
so that this code can be shared with Flang in the future.

Reviewed By: ABataev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128550

show more ...

[OpaquePtrs][Clang] Add -no-opaque-pointers to tests (NFC)

This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be p

[OpaquePtrs][Clang] Add -no-opaque-pointers to tests (NFC)

This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.

The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115

show more ...

[OpenMP, test] Fix use of undef DECL FileCheck var

OpenMP test target_data_use_device_ptr_if_codegen contains a CHECK-NOT
directive using an undefined DECL FileCheck variable. It seems copied
from t

[OpenMP, test] Fix use of undef DECL FileCheck var

OpenMP test target_data_use_device_ptr_if_codegen contains a CHECK-NOT
directive using an undefined DECL FileCheck variable. It seems copied
from target_data_use_device_ptr_codegen where there's a CHECK for a load
that defined the variable. Since there is no corresponding load in this
testcase, the simplest is to simply forbid any store and get rid of the
variable altogether.

Reviewed By: ABataev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99771

show more ...

[OPENMP]Do not use OMP_MAP_TARGET_PARAM for data movement directives.

OMP_MAP_TARGET_PARAM flag is used to mark the data that shoud be passed
as arguments to the target kernels, nothing else. But th

[OPENMP]Do not use OMP_MAP_TARGET_PARAM for data movement directives.

OMP_MAP_TARGET_PARAM flag is used to mark the data that shoud be passed
as arguments to the target kernels, nothing else. But the compiler still
marks the data with OMP_MAP_TARGET_PARAM flags even if the data is
passed to the data movement directives, like target data, target update
etc. This flag is just ignored for this directives and the compiler does
not need to emit it.

Reviewed By: cchen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91261

show more ...

[OpenMP] target nested `use_device_ptr() if()` and is_device_ptr trigger asserts

Clang now asserts for the below case:
```
void clang::CodeGen::CGOpenMPRuntime::createOffloadEntriesAndInfoMetadata()

[OpenMP] target nested `use_device_ptr() if()` and is_device_ptr trigger asserts

Clang now asserts for the below case:
```
void clang::CodeGen::CGOpenMPRuntime::createOffloadEntriesAndInfoMetadata(): Assertion `std::get<0>(E) && "All ordered entries must exist!"' failed.
```

The reason why Clang hit the assert is because in
`emitTargetDataCalls`, both `BeginThenGen` and `BeginElseGen` call
`registerTargetRegionEntryInfo` and try to register the Entry in
OffloadEntriesTargetRegion with same key. If changing the expression in
if clause to any constant expression, then the assert disappear. (https://godbolt.org/z/TW7haj)

The assert itself is to avoid
user from accessing elements out of bound inside `OrderedEntries` in
`createOffloadEntriesAndInfoMetadata`.

In this patch, I add a check in `registerTargetRegionEntryInfo` to avoid
register the target region more than once.

A test case that triggers assert: https://godbolt.org/z/4cnGW8

Reviewed By: ABataev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90704

show more ...