|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init |
|
| #
888673b6 |
| 15-Jul-2022 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was re-landed wi
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was re-landed without addressing the issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
7c51f02e |
| 11-Oct-2021 |
Matheus Izvekov <[email protected]> |
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which go
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer handling.
---
Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:
1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default, print types as written. There are customization options there, but not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a problem where we failed to distinguish between a type that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers, such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::', and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such, the so called canonical types. Example: ``` namespace foo { struct A {}; A a; }; ``` If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have, by default, printed the canonical type of A as well. As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch will make it print it accurately even when written without qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.
2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example, if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A, then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if you want to match against the name of a type, and you want the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on the name of the canonical type is the better choice.
3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(), which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new, and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself. This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are dealing with will always include some source location.
4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match. Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar, be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType. The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs. For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.
5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.
Let me know if you need any help!
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <[email protected]>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
show more ...
|
| #
3968936b |
| 13-Jul-2022 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.
import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py
https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/
show more ...
|
| #
bdc6974f |
| 11-Oct-2021 |
Matheus Izvekov <[email protected]> |
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which go
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer handling.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <[email protected]>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
show more ...
|
| #
aee49255 |
| 14-Oct-2021 |
David Blaikie <[email protected]> |
Recommit: Compress formatting of array type names (int [4] -> int[4])
Based on post-commit review discussion on 2bd84938470bf2e337801faafb8a67710f46429d with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing Ha
Recommit: Compress formatting of array type names (int [4] -> int[4])
Based on post-commit review discussion on 2bd84938470bf2e337801faafb8a67710f46429d with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me - they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5a672d707390e2c3eaf30a9eb4b075c
Reverted in f9ad1d1c775a8e264bebc15d75e0c6e5c20eefc7 due to breakages outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on "char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
show more ...
|
| #
f9ad1d1c |
| 14-Oct-2021 |
David Blaikie <[email protected]> |
Revert "Compress formatting of array type names (int [4] -> int[4])"
Looks like lldb has some issues with this - somehow it causes lldb to treat a "char[N]" type as an array of chars (prints them ou
Revert "Compress formatting of array type names (int [4] -> int[4])"
Looks like lldb has some issues with this - somehow it causes lldb to treat a "char[N]" type as an array of chars (prints them out individually) but a "char [N]" is printed as a string. (even though the DWARF doesn't have this string in it - it's something to do with the string lldb generates for itself using clang)
This reverts commit 277623f4d5a672d707390e2c3eaf30a9eb4b075c.
show more ...
|
| #
277623f4 |
| 14-Oct-2021 |
David Blaikie <[email protected]> |
Compress formatting of array type names (int [4] -> int[4])
Based on post-commit review discussion on 2bd84938470bf2e337801faafb8a67710f46429d with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlac
Compress formatting of array type names (int [4] -> int[4])
Based on post-commit review discussion on 2bd84938470bf2e337801faafb8a67710f46429d with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me - they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
7e5cea5b |
| 19-Feb-2021 |
Tomas Matheson <[email protected]> |
[Clang][Sema] Warn when function argument is less aligned than parameter
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42154.
GCC's __attribute__((align)) can reduce the alignment of a type when applie
[Clang][Sema] Warn when function argument is less aligned than parameter
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42154.
GCC's __attribute__((align)) can reduce the alignment of a type when applied to a typedef. However, functions which take a pointer or reference to the original type are compiled assuming the original alignment. Therefore when any such function is passed an object of the new, less-aligned type, an alignment fault can occur. In particular, this applies to the constructor, which is defined for the original type and called for the less-aligned object.
This change adds a warning whenever an pointer or reference to an object is passed to a function that was defined for a more-aligned type.
The calls to ASTContext::getTypeAlignInChars seem change the order in which record layouts are evaluated, which caused changes to the output of -fdump-record-layouts. As such some tests needed to be updated:
* Use CHECK-LABEL rather than counting the number of "Dumping AST Record Layout" headers.
* Check for end of line in labels, so that struct B1 doesn't match struct B etc.
* Add --strict-whitespace, since the whitespace shows meaningful structure.
* The order in which record layouts are printed has changed in some cases.
* clang-format for regions changed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97187
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
76377dcf |
| 10-Mar-2017 |
Alex Lorenz <[email protected]> |
Print nested name specifiers for typedefs and type aliases
Printing typedefs or type aliases using clang_getTypeSpelling() is missing the namespace they are defined in. This is in contrast to other
Print nested name specifiers for typedefs and type aliases
Printing typedefs or type aliases using clang_getTypeSpelling() is missing the namespace they are defined in. This is in contrast to other types that always yield the full typename including namespaces.
Patch by Michael Reiher!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29944
llvm-svn: 297465
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.1, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.0, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.1, llvmorg-3.8.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.0, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.7.1, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.7.0, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.6.2, llvmorg-3.6.2-rc1 |
|
| #
674cf268 |
| 26-May-2015 |
Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> |
__declspec is not a core Clang language extension. Instead, require -fms-extensions or -fborland to enable the language extension.
Note: __declspec is also temporarily enabled when compiling for a C
__declspec is not a core Clang language extension. Instead, require -fms-extensions or -fborland to enable the language extension.
Note: __declspec is also temporarily enabled when compiling for a CUDA target because there are implementation details relying on __declspec(property) support currently. When those details change, __declspec should be disabled for CUDA targets. llvm-svn: 238238
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.1, llvmorg-3.6.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.5.2, llvmorg-3.5.2-rc1, llvmorg-3.6.0, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.5.1, llvmorg-3.5.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.5.1-rc1 |
|
| #
00a061dc |
| 30-Sep-2014 |
David Majnemer <[email protected]> |
MS ABI: Correct layout for empty records
Empty records do not always have size equivalent to their alignment. They only do so when their alignment is at least as large as the minimum empty struct si
MS ABI: Correct layout for empty records
Empty records do not always have size equivalent to their alignment. They only do so when their alignment is at least as large as the minimum empty struct size: 1 byte in C++ and 4 bytes in C.
llvm-svn: 218661
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.5.0, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.4.2, llvmorg-3.4.2-rc1, llvmorg-3.4.1, llvmorg-3.4.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.4.1-rc1 |
|
| #
c89450e0 |
| 24-Mar-2014 |
Warren Hunt <[email protected]> |
[MS-ABI] Drop Special Layout in 64-bit mode.
As of cl.exe version 18, the special layout rules for structs with alignment 16 or greater has been dropped. This patch drops the behavior from clang.
[MS-ABI] Drop Special Layout in 64-bit mode.
As of cl.exe version 18, the special layout rules for structs with alignment 16 or greater has been dropped. This patch drops the behavior from clang. This patch also updates the lit tests to reflect the change.
llvm-svn: 204674
show more ...
|
| #
db673ca2 |
| 25-Feb-2014 |
Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> |
MS ABI: Just use getTypeInfoInChars to get the field size
This was changed to use manual desugaring and multiplication in r201832 and fixed for multi-dimensional arrays in r201917. However, it brea
MS ABI: Just use getTypeInfoInChars to get the field size
This was changed to use manual desugaring and multiplication in r201832 and fixed for multi-dimensional arrays in r201917. However, it breaks down in the presence of typedefs. Rather than attempting to handle all the desugaring, just go back to calling the generic type info code.
This was discovered while compiling SIInstrWaits.cpp in the R600 backend.
llvm-svn: 202175
show more ...
|
| #
c8594203 |
| 22-Feb-2014 |
Warren Hunt <[email protected]> |
[MS-ABI] Fix MSRecordLayout to handel MultiDimensionalArrays A recent change caused multi-dimensional arrays not to be handled correctly, this patch fixes that. Also, it adds a lit test for multi-
[MS-ABI] Fix MSRecordLayout to handel MultiDimensionalArrays A recent change caused multi-dimensional arrays not to be handled correctly, this patch fixes that. Also, it adds a lit test for multi-dimensional arrays.
llvm-svn: 201917
show more ...
|
| #
c9bd88e6 |
| 14-Jan-2014 |
Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> |
Remove the -cxx-abi command-line flag.
This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples, Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.
To be ab
Remove the -cxx-abi command-line flag.
This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples, Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.
To be able to run a test with a specific ABI without constraining it to a specific triple, new substitutions are added to lit: %itanium_abi_triple and %ms_abi_triple can be used to get the current target triple adjusted to the desired ABI. For example, if the test suite is running with the i686-pc-win32 target, %itanium_abi_triple will expand to i686-pc-mingw32.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2545
llvm-svn: 199250
show more ...
|
| #
4f017cee |
| 13-Jan-2014 |
Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> |
[ms-abi] Quick fix layout of an array of records
This fixes llvm::SmallVector, which fixes lots of TUs in the MS ABI self host.
llvm-svn: 199129
|
| #
d640d7d9 |
| 09-Jan-2014 |
Warren Hunt <[email protected]> |
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout
This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout
This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest for the first base/field after the vbptr.
llvm-svn: 198818
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.4.0, llvmorg-3.4.0-rc3 |
|
| #
4431fe6b |
| 12-Dec-2013 |
Warren Hunt <[email protected]> |
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout
This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout
This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK).
llvm-svn: 197183
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.4.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.4.0-rc1 |
|
| #
55d8e82f |
| 23-Oct-2013 |
Warren Hunt <[email protected]> |
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder.
Differential Revision: http://llv
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003
llvm-svn: 193290
show more ...
|
| #
bd1b0c69 |
| 14-Oct-2013 |
Warren Hunt <[email protected]> |
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add.
llvm-svn: 192612
|