|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4 |
|
| #
80bebbc7 |
| 13-May-2022 |
Nathan Sidwell <[email protected]> |
[clang][NFC] Cleanup some coroutine tests
I noticed these two tests emit a warning about a missing
unhandled_exception. That's irrelevant to what is being tested, but
is unnecessary noise.
Reviewe
[clang][NFC] Cleanup some coroutine tests
I noticed these two tests emit a warning about a missing
unhandled_exception. That's irrelevant to what is being tested, but
is unnecessary noise.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125535
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
ec117158 |
| 04-Nov-2021 |
Chuanqi Xu <[email protected]> |
[Coroutines] [Frontend] Lookup in std namespace first
Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are defined in
std::experimental namespace.
And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20.
[Coroutines] [Frontend] Lookup in std namespace first
Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are defined in
std::experimental namespace.
And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20. So in the working draft
like N4892, we could find the coroutine components is defined in std
namespace instead of std::experimental namespace.
And the coroutine support in clang seems to be relatively stable. So I
think it may be suitable to move the coroutine component into the
experiment namespace now.
This patch would make clang lookup coroutine_traits in std namespace
first. For the compatibility consideration, clang would lookup in
std::experimental namespace if it can't find definitions in std
namespace. So the existing codes wouldn't be break after update
compiler.
And in case the compiler found std::coroutine_traits and
std::experimental::coroutine_traits at the same time, it would emit an
error for it.
The support for looking up std::experimental::coroutine_traits would be
removed in Clang16.
Reviewed By: lxfind, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
79f8b5f0 |
| 03-Sep-2021 |
Louis Dionne <[email protected]> |
Revert "[Coroutines] [Clang] Look up coroutine component in std namespace first"
This reverts commit 2fbd254aa46b, which broke the libc++ CI. I'm reverting
to get things stable again until we've fig
Revert "[Coroutines] [Clang] Look up coroutine component in std namespace first"
This reverts commit 2fbd254aa46b, which broke the libc++ CI. I'm reverting
to get things stable again until we've figured out a way forward.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
show more ...
|
| #
2fbd254a |
| 03-Sep-2021 |
Chuanqi Xu <[email protected]> |
[Coroutines] [Clang] Look up coroutine component in std namespace first
Summary: Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are
defined in std::experimental namespace.
And now the corouti
[Coroutines] [Clang] Look up coroutine component in std namespace first
Summary: Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are
defined in std::experimental namespace.
And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20. So in the working draft
like N4892, we could find the coroutine components is defined in std
namespace instead of std::experimental namespace.
And the coroutine support in clang seems to be relatively stable. So I
think it may be suitable to move the coroutine component into the
experiment namespace now.
But move the coroutine component into the std namespace may be an break
change. So I planned to split this change into two patch. One in clang
and other in libcxx.
This patch would make clang lookup coroutine_traits in std namespace
first. For the compatibility consideration, clang would lookup in
std::experimental namespace if it can't find definitions in std
namespace and emit a warning in this case. So the existing codes
wouldn't be break after update compiler.
Test Plan: check-clang, check-libcxx
Reviewed By: lxfind
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
f16afcd9 |
| 05-May-2021 |
Nico Weber <[email protected]> |
[clang] remove an incremental build workaround
This cleaned up an oversight over a year ago. Should no longer be needed.
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
9783e209 |
| 04-Mar-2021 |
Zequan Wu <[email protected]> |
Revert "Revert "[Coverage] Emit gap region between statements if first statements contains terminate statements.""
Reland with update on test case ContinuousSyncmode/basic.c.
This reverts commit fe
Revert "Revert "[Coverage] Emit gap region between statements if first statements contains terminate statements.""
Reland with update on test case ContinuousSyncmode/basic.c.
This reverts commit fe5c2c3ca682b140dd5e640e75948363b6b25ef9.
show more ...
|
| #
fe5c2c3c |
| 04-Mar-2021 |
Nico Weber <[email protected]> |
Revert "[Coverage] Emit gap region between statements if first statements contains terminate statements."
This reverts commit 2d7374a0c680f96bdcdb3d05034a93bf145d140f.
Breaks ContinuousSyncMode/basi
Revert "[Coverage] Emit gap region between statements if first statements contains terminate statements."
This reverts commit 2d7374a0c680f96bdcdb3d05034a93bf145d140f.
Breaks ContinuousSyncMode/basic.c in check-profile on macOS.
show more ...
|
| #
2d7374a0 |
| 03-Mar-2021 |
Zequan Wu <[email protected]> |
[Coverage] Emit gap region between statements if first statements contains terminate statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97101
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1 |
|
| #
9f2967bc |
| 28-Dec-2020 |
Alan Phipps <[email protected]> |
[Coverage] Add support for Branch Coverage in LLVM Source-Based Code Coverage
This is an enhancement to LLVM Source-Based Code Coverage in clang to track how
many times individual branch-generating
[Coverage] Add support for Branch Coverage in LLVM Source-Based Code Coverage
This is an enhancement to LLVM Source-Based Code Coverage in clang to track how
many times individual branch-generating conditions are taken (evaluate to TRUE)
and not taken (evaluate to FALSE). Individual conditions may comprise larger
boolean expressions using boolean logical operators. This functionality is
very similar to what is supported by GCOV except that it is very closely
anchored to the ASTs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84467
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
9caa3fbe |
| 02-Sep-2020 |
Zequan Wu <[email protected]> |
[Coverage] Add empty line regions to SkippedRegions
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84988
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
b46176bb |
| 23-Jul-2020 |
Zequan Wu <[email protected]> |
Reland [Coverage] Add comment to skipped regions
Bug filled here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45757.
Add comment to skipped regions so we don't track execution count for lines containing o
Reland [Coverage] Add comment to skipped regions
Bug filled here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45757.
Add comment to skipped regions so we don't track execution count for lines containing only comments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83592
show more ...
|
| #
238bbd48 |
| 22-Jul-2020 |
Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> |
Revert abd45154b "[Coverage] Add comment to skipped regions"
This casued assertions during Chromium builds. See comment on the code review
> Bug filled here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Revert abd45154b "[Coverage] Add comment to skipped regions"
This casued assertions during Chromium builds. See comment on the code review
> Bug filled here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45757.
> Add comment to skipped regions so we don't track execution count for lines containing only comments.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84208
This reverts commit abd45154bdb6b76c5b480455eacc8c75b08242aa and the
follow-up 87d725473380652bbe845fd2fbd9c0507a55172f.
show more ...
|
| #
abd45154 |
| 20-Jul-2020 |
Zequan Wu <[email protected]> |
[Coverage] Add comment to skipped regions
Bug filled here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45757.
Add comment to skipped regions so we don't track execution count for lines containing only com
[Coverage] Add comment to skipped regions
Bug filled here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45757.
Add comment to skipped regions so we don't track execution count for lines containing only comments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84208
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3 |
|
| #
9fc87721 |
| 01-Jul-2020 |
Xun Li <[email protected]> |
clang CoverageMapping tests bot cleanup
Summary:
D82928 generated unexpected tmp files in the CoverageMapping test directory. This patch cleans it up and remove the file in the test bots.
It will be
clang CoverageMapping tests bot cleanup
Summary:
D82928 generated unexpected tmp files in the CoverageMapping test directory. This patch cleans it up and remove the file in the test bots.
It will be revered after a week.
Reviewers: thakis
Reviewed By: thakis
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82992
show more ...
|
| #
ddcf063d |
| 01-Jul-2020 |
Xun Li <[email protected]> |
[Coroutines] Fix test breakage in D82928
Summary: The test file in D82928 generated temp files within the test directory, causing test failures. Fix it.
Reviewers: modocache, fhahn
Reviewed By: mo
[Coroutines] Fix test breakage in D82928
Summary: The test file in D82928 generated temp files within the test directory, causing test failures. Fix it.
Reviewers: modocache, fhahn
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82986
show more ...
|
| #
565e37c7 |
| 01-Jul-2020 |
Xun Li <[email protected]> |
[Coroutines] Fix code coverage for coroutine
Summary:
Previously, source-based coverage analysis does not work properly for coroutine.
This patch adds processing of coroutine body and co_return in t
[Coroutines] Fix code coverage for coroutine
Summary:
Previously, source-based coverage analysis does not work properly for coroutine.
This patch adds processing of coroutine body and co_return in the coverage analysis, so that we can handle them properly.
For coroutine body, we should only look at the actual function body and ignore the compiler-generated things; for co_return, we need to terminate the region similar to return statement.
Added a test, and confirms that it now works properly. (without this patch, the statement after the if statement will be treated wrongly)
Reviewers: lewissbaker, modocache, junparser
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82928
show more ...
|