[OpaquePtrs][Clang] Add -no-opaque-pointers to tests (NFC)

This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be p

[OpaquePtrs][Clang] Add -no-opaque-pointers to tests (NFC)

This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.

The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115

show more ...

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default

Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default

Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.

Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453

Reviewed By: eugenis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169

show more ...

Revert "[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default"

This reverts commit aacfbb953eb705af2ecfeb95a6262818fa85dd92.

Revert "Fix lit test failu

Revert "[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default"

This reverts commit aacfbb953eb705af2ecfeb95a6262818fa85dd92.

Revert "Fix lit test failures in CodeGenCoroutines"

This reverts commit 63fff0f5bffe20fa2c84a45a41161afa0043cb34.

show more ...

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default

Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default

Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.

Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453

Reviewed By: eugenis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default (2)

This patch updates test files after D105169.
Autogenerated test codes are changed by `utils/update_cc_test_checks.py,` and non-autogenerated test codes are changed as follows:

(1) I wrote a python script that (partially) updates the tests using regex: {F18594904} The script is not perfect, but I believe it gives hints about which patterns are updated to have `noundef` attached.

(2) The remaining tests are updated manually.

Reviewed By: eugenis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108453

Resolve lit failures in clang after 8ca4b3e's land

Fix lit test failures in clang-ppc* and clang-x64-windows-msvc

Fix missing failures in clang-ppc64be* and retry fixing clang-x64-windows-msvc

Fix internal_clone(aarch64) inline assembly

show more ...

Revert "[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default"

This reverts commit 7584ef766a7219b6ee5a400637206d26e0fa98ac.

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default

Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default

Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.

Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453

Reviewed By: eugenis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169

show more ...

Revert D105169 due to the two-stage failure in ASAN

This reverts the following commits:
37ca7a795b277c20c02a218bf44052278c03344b
9aa6c72b92b6c89cc6d23b693257df9af7de2d15
705387c5074bcca36d626882462e

Revert D105169 due to the two-stage failure in ASAN

This reverts the following commits:
37ca7a795b277c20c02a218bf44052278c03344b
9aa6c72b92b6c89cc6d23b693257df9af7de2d15
705387c5074bcca36d626882462ebbc2bcc3bed4
8ca4b3ef19fe82d7ad6a6e1515317dcc01b41515
80dba72a669b5416e97a42fd2c2a7bc5a6d3f44a

show more ...

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default (2)

This patch updates test files after D105169.
Autogenerated test codes are changed by `utils/up

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default (2)

This patch updates test files after D105169.
Autogenerated test codes are changed by `utils/update_cc_test_checks.py,` and non-autogenerated test codes are changed as follows:

(1) I wrote a python script that (partially) updates the tests using regex: {F18594904} The script is not perfect, but I believe it gives hints about which patterns are updated to have `noundef` attached.

(2) The remaining tests are updated manually.

Reviewed By: eugenis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108453

show more ...

Reland [AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions

NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

Compl

Reland [AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions

NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch
shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt
assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it
easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use".

As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this
scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the
assumption outlining.

show more ...

Temporarily Revert "[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions"
due to the performance bugs filed in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46753.

An SROA change soon may obv

Temporarily Revert "[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions"
due to the performance bugs filed in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46753.

An SROA change soon may obviate some of these problems.

This reverts commit 8d09f20798ac180b1749276bff364682ce0196ab.

show more ...

[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions

Summary:
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

Com

[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions

Summary:
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch
shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt
assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it
easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use".

As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this
scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the
assumption outlining.

Reviewers: hfinkel, xbolva00, lebedev.ri, nikic, rjmccall, spatel, jdoerfert, sstefan1

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: thopre, yamauchi, kuter, fhahn, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, bollu, rkruppe, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71739

show more ...

Revert "[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions"

Assume bundle can have more than one entry with the same name,
but at least AlignmentFromAssumptionsPass::extractAlignmen

Revert "[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions"

Assume bundle can have more than one entry with the same name,
but at least AlignmentFromAssumptionsPass::extractAlignmentInfo() uses
getOperandBundle("align"), which internally assumes that it isn't the
case, and happily crashes otherwise.

Minimal reduced reproducer: run `opt -alignment-from-assumptions` on

target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"

%0 = type { i64, %1*, i8*, i64, %2, i32, %3*, i8* }
%1 = type opaque
%2 = type { i8, i8, i16 }
%3 = type { i32, i32, i32, i32 }

; Function Attrs: nounwind
define i32 @f(%0* noalias nocapture readonly %arg, %0* noalias %arg1) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
bb:
call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "align"(%0* %arg, i64 8), "align"(%0* %arg1, i64 8) ]
ret i32 0
}

; Function Attrs: nounwind willreturn
declare void @llvm.assume(i1) #1

attributes #0 = { nounwind "reciprocal-estimates"="none" }
attributes #1 = { nounwind willreturn }


This is what we'd have with -mllvm -enable-knowledge-retention

This reverts commit c95ffadb2474a4d8c4f598d94d35a9f31d9606cb.

show more ...

[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions

Summary:
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

Com

[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions

Summary:
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch
shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt
assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it
easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use".

As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this
scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the
assumption outlining.

Reviewers: hfinkel, xbolva00, lebedev.ri, nikic, rjmccall, spatel, jdoerfert, sstefan1

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: yamauchi, kuter, fhahn, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, bollu, rkruppe, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71739

show more ...

[NFC] update test to make diff of the following commit clear

[CGCall] Annotate references with "align" attribute.

If we're going to assume references are dereferenceable, we should also
assume they're aligned: otherwise, we can't actually dereference them.

S

[CGCall] Annotate references with "align" attribute.

If we're going to assume references are dereferenceable, we should also
assume they're aligned: otherwise, we can't actually dereference them.

See also D80072.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80166

show more ...

Revert "[CodeGenModule] Assume dso_local for -fpic -fno-semantic-interposition"

This reverts commit 789a46f2d742e11edaade28cb59a0f4d2a1d770e.

Accidentally committed.

[CodeGenModule] Assume dso_local for -fpic -fno-semantic-interposition

Summary:
Clang -fpic defaults to -fno-semantic-interposition (GCC -fpic defaults
to -fsemantic-interposition).
Users need to sp

[CodeGenModule] Assume dso_local for -fpic -fno-semantic-interposition

Summary:
Clang -fpic defaults to -fno-semantic-interposition (GCC -fpic defaults
to -fsemantic-interposition).
Users need to specify -fsemantic-interposition to get semantic
interposition behavior.

Semantic interposition is currently a best-effort feature. There may
still be some cases where it is not handled well.

Reviewers: peter.smith, rnk, serge-sans-paille, sfertile, jfb, jdoerfert

Subscribers: dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, nemanjai, jvesely, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, arphaman, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73865

show more ...

Fix test failure from r265361

llvm-svn: 265362

Emit @llvm.assume for non-parameter lvalue align_value-attribute loads

We already add the align parameter attribute for function parameters that have
the align_value attribute (or those with a typed

Emit @llvm.assume for non-parameter lvalue align_value-attribute loads

We already add the align parameter attribute for function parameters that have
the align_value attribute (or those with a typedef type having that attribute),
which is an important special case, but does not handle pointers with value
alignment assumptions that come into scope in any other way. To handle the
general case, emit an @llvm.assume-based alignment assumption whenever we load
the pointer-typed lvalue of an align_value-attributed variable (except for
function parameters, which we already deal with at entry).

I'll also note that this is more general than Intel's described support in:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-alignment-to-assist-vectorization
which states that the compiler inserts __assume_aligned directives in response
to align_value-attributed variables only for function parameters and for the
initializers of local variables. I think that we can make the optimizer deal
with this more-general scheme (which could lead to a lot of calls to
@llvm.assume inside of loop bodies, for example), but if not, I'll rework this
to be less aggressive.

llvm-svn: 219052

show more ...

Initial support for the align_value attribute

This adds support for the align_value attribute. This attribute is supported by
Intel's compiler (versions 14.0+), and several of my HPC users have requ

Initial support for the align_value attribute

This adds support for the align_value attribute. This attribute is supported by
Intel's compiler (versions 14.0+), and several of my HPC users have requested
support in Clang. It specifies an alignment assumption on the values to which a
pointer points, and is used by numerical libraries to encourage efficient
generation of vector code.

Of course, we already have an aligned attribute that can specify enhanced
alignment for a type, so why is this additional attribute important? The
problem is that if you want to specify that an input array of T is, say,
64-byte aligned, you could try this:

typedef double aligned_double attribute((aligned(64)));
void foo(aligned_double *P) {
double x = P[0]; // This is fine.
double y = P[1]; // What alignment did those doubles have again?
}

the access here to P[1] causes problems. P was specified as a pointer to type
aligned_double, and any object of type aligned_double must be 64-byte aligned.
But if P[0] is 64-byte aligned, then P[1] cannot be, and this access causes
undefined behavior. Getting round this problem requires a lot of awkward
casting and hand-unrolling of loops, all of which is bad.

With the align_value attribute, we can accomplish what we'd like in a well
defined way:

typedef double *aligned_double_ptr attribute((align_value(64)));
void foo(aligned_double_ptr P) {
double x = P[0]; // This is fine.
double y = P[1]; // This is fine too.
}

This attribute does not create a new type (and so it not part of the type
system), and so will only "propagate" through templates, auto, etc. by
optimizer deduction after inlining. This seems consistent with Intel's
implementation (thanks to Alexey for confirming the various Intel-compiler
behaviors).

As a final note, I would have chosen to call this aligned_value, not
align_value, for better naming consistency with the aligned attribute, but I
think it would be more useful to users to adopt Intel's name.

llvm-svn: 218910

show more ...