[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patc

[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patch changes the parameter of the shouldRegister*
function to CheckerManager to be able to query the analyzer options when
deciding whether the checker should be registered.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271

show more ...

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. T

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every
checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of
ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based
on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways.

A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker,
once it is called, registration is guaranteed.

This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more
info here: D54438#1315953

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424

llvm-svn: 352277

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend

ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed

[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend

ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend,
whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can
imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the
checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that
library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend
depends on both of those libraries.

One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core,
it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which
is where it ultimately belongs.

This move implies that since
include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:

class CheckerRegistry;

void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry &registry);

it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to
clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h,
which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration
functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436

llvm-svn: 349275

show more ...

Port getLocStart -> getBeginLoc

Reviewers: teemperor!

Subscribers: jholewinski, whisperity, jfb, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50350

llvm-svn: 339385

[analyzer] Make checkEndFunction() give access to the return statement.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49387

llvm-svn: 337215

[analyzer] Add checker callback for beginning of function.

Add a checker callback that is called when the analyzer starts analyzing a
function either at the top level or when inlined. This will be u

[analyzer] Add checker callback for beginning of function.

Add a checker callback that is called when the analyzer starts analyzing a
function either at the top level or when inlined. This will be used by a
follow-on patch making the DeallocChecker path sensitive.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17418

llvm-svn: 261293

show more ...

[C++11] Use 'nullptr'. StaticAnalyzer edition.

llvm-svn: 209642

[analyzer] Print return values from debug.DumpCalls checker.

Debug utility only, no functionality change.

llvm-svn: 177649

[analyzer] Rename callback EndPath -> EndFunction

This better reflects when callback is called and what the checkers
are relying on. (Both names meant the same pre-IPA.)

llvm-svn: 171432

Include pruning and general cleanup.

llvm-svn: 169095

[analyzer] Rename Calls.{h,cpp} to CallEvent.{h,cpp}. No functionality change.

llvm-svn: 160815

[analyzer] Add debug.DumpCalls, which prints out any CallEvents it sees.

This is probably not so useful yet because it is not path-sensitive, though
it does try to show inlining with indentation.

T

[analyzer] Add debug.DumpCalls, which prints out any CallEvents it sees.

This is probably not so useful yet because it is not path-sensitive, though
it does try to show inlining with indentation.

This also adds a dump() method to CallEvent, which should be useful for
debugging.

llvm-svn: 160030

show more ...

[analyzer] Add a test that we are, in fact, doing a DFS on the ExplodedGraph.

Previously:
...the comment said DFS...
...the WorkList being instantiated said BFS...
...and the implementation was actu

[analyzer] Add a test that we are, in fact, doing a DFS on the ExplodedGraph.

Previously:
...the comment said DFS...
...the WorkList being instantiated said BFS...
...and the implementation was actually DFS...
...due to an unintentional change in 2010...
...and everything kept working anyway.

This fixes our std::deque implementation of BFS, but switches back to a
SmallVector-based implementation of DFS.

We should probably still investigate the ramifications of DFS vs. BFS,
especially for large functions (and especially when we hit our block path
limit), since this might completely change our memory use. It can also mask
some bugs and reveal others depending on when we halt analysis. But at least
we will not have this kind of little mistake creep in again.

llvm-svn: 159397

show more ...