|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
bda3dd0d |
| 27-Mar-2020 |
Kirstóf Umann <[email protected]> |
[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions
Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options. To make this possible this patc
[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions
Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options. To make this possible this patch changes the parameter of the shouldRegister* function to CheckerManager to be able to query the analyzer options when deciding whether the checker should be registered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4 |
|
| #
2f169e7c |
| 09-Sep-2019 |
Artem Dergachev <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] NFC: Introduce sub-classes for path-sensitive and basic reports.
Checkers are now required to specify whether they're creating a path-sensitive report or a path-insensitive report by cons
[analyzer] NFC: Introduce sub-classes for path-sensitive and basic reports.
Checkers are now required to specify whether they're creating a path-sensitive report or a path-insensitive report by constructing an object of the respective type.
This makes BugReporter more independent from the rest of the Static Analyzer because all Analyzer-specific code is now in sub-classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66572
llvm-svn: 371450
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
2b3d49b6 |
| 14-Aug-2019 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
[Clang] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement o
[Clang] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
058a7a45 |
| 26-Jan-2019 |
Kristof Umann <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function
Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO) function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. T
[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function
Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO) function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways.
A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker, once it is called, registration is guaranteed.
This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more info here: D54438#1315953
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424
llvm-svn: 352277
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
2946cd70 |
| 19-Jan-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> |
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the ne
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
show more ...
|
| #
76a21502 |
| 15-Dec-2018 |
Kristof Umann <[email protected]> |
[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend
ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept. It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed
[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend
ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept. It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend, whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend depends on both of those libraries.
One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core, it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which is where it ultimately belongs.
This move implies that since include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:
class CheckerRegistry;
void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry ®istry);
it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h, which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436
llvm-svn: 349275
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
b2cf0063 |
| 23-Oct-2018 |
George Karpenkov <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Rename trackNullOrUndefValue to trackExpressionValue
trackNullOrUndefValue is a long and confusing name, and it does not actually reflect what the function is doing. Give a function a new
[analyzer] Rename trackNullOrUndefValue to trackExpressionValue
trackNullOrUndefValue is a long and confusing name, and it does not actually reflect what the function is doing. Give a function a new name, with a relatively clear semantics.
Also remove some dead code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52758
llvm-svn: 345064
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.1, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.0, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.1, llvmorg-3.8.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.0, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.7.1, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc1 |
|
| #
e39bd407 |
| 16-Sep-2015 |
Devin Coughlin <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Add generateErrorNode() APIs to CheckerContext.
The analyzer trims unnecessary nodes from the exploded graph before reporting path diagnostics. However, in some cases it can trim all node
[analyzer] Add generateErrorNode() APIs to CheckerContext.
The analyzer trims unnecessary nodes from the exploded graph before reporting path diagnostics. However, in some cases it can trim all nodes (including the error node), leading to an assertion failure (see https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24184).
This commit addresses the issue by adding two new APIs to CheckerContext to explicitly create error nodes. Unless the client provides a custom tag, these APIs tag the node with the checker's tag -- preventing it from being trimmed. The generateErrorNode() method creates a sink error node, while generateNonFatalErrorNode() creates an error node for a path that should continue being explored.
The intent is that one of these two methods should be used whenever a checker creates an error node.
This commit updates the checkers to use these APIs. These APIs (unlike addTransition() and generateSink()) do not take an explicit Pred node. This is because there are not any error nodes in the checkers that were created with an explicit different than the default (the CheckerContext's Pred node).
It also changes generateSink() to require state and pred nodes (previously these were optional) to reduce confusion.
Additionally, there were several cases where checkers did check whether a generated node could be null; we now explicitly check for null in these places.
This commit also includes a test case written by Ying Yi as part of http://reviews.llvm.org/D12163 (that patch originally addressed this issue but was reverted because it introduced false positive regressions).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12780
llvm-svn: 247859
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.7.0, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.6.2, llvmorg-3.6.2-rc1 |
|
| #
8d3a7a56 |
| 23-Jun-2015 |
Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> |
Clarify pointer ownership semantics by hoisting the std::unique_ptr creation to the caller instead of hiding it in emitReport. NFC.
llvm-svn: 240400
|
| #
ab9db510 |
| 22-Jun-2015 |
Alexander Kornienko <[email protected]> |
Revert r240270 ("Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy").
llvm-svn: 240353
|
| #
3d9d929e |
| 22-Jun-2015 |
Alexander Kornienko <[email protected]> |
Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \ -checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comme
Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \ -checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \ work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.1, llvmorg-3.6.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.5.2, llvmorg-3.5.2-rc1, llvmorg-3.6.0, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.5.1, llvmorg-3.5.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.5.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.5.0, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc1 |
|
| #
0dbb783c |
| 27-May-2014 |
Craig Topper <[email protected]> |
[C++11] Use 'nullptr'. StaticAnalyzer edition.
llvm-svn: 209642
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.4.2, llvmorg-3.4.2-rc1, llvmorg-3.4.1, llvmorg-3.4.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.4.1-rc1 |
|
| #
b8984329 |
| 07-Mar-2014 |
Ahmed Charles <[email protected]> |
Replace OwningPtr with std::unique_ptr.
This compiles cleanly with lldb/lld/clang-tools-extra/llvm.
llvm-svn: 203279
|
| #
867ea1d4 |
| 02-Mar-2014 |
Benjamin Kramer <[email protected]> |
[C++11] Replace llvm::tie with std::tie.
llvm-svn: 202639
|
| #
4aca9b1c |
| 11-Feb-2014 |
Alexander Kornienko <[email protected]> |
Expose the name of the checker producing each diagnostic message.
Summary: In clang-tidy we'd like to know the name of the checker producing each diagnostic message. PathDiagnostic has BugType and C
Expose the name of the checker producing each diagnostic message.
Summary: In clang-tidy we'd like to know the name of the checker producing each diagnostic message. PathDiagnostic has BugType and Category fields, which are both arbitrary human-readable strings, but we need to know the exact name of the checker in the form that can be used in the CheckersControlList option to enable/disable the specific checker.
This patch adds the CheckName field to the CheckerBase class, and sets it in the CheckerManager::registerChecker() method, which gets them from the CheckerRegistry.
Checkers that implement multiple checks have to store the names of each check in the respective registerXXXChecker method.
Reviewers: jordan_rose, krememek
Reviewed By: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2557
llvm-svn: 201186
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.4.0, llvmorg-3.4.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.4.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.4.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.3.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.3.0, llvmorg-3.3.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.3.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.3.0-rc1 |
|
| #
add14263 |
| 17-Apr-2013 |
Jordan Rose <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Don't warn for returning void expressions in void blocks.
This was slightly tricky because BlockDecls don't currently store an inferred return type. However, we can rely on the fact that
[analyzer] Don't warn for returning void expressions in void blocks.
This was slightly tricky because BlockDecls don't currently store an inferred return type. However, we can rely on the fact that blocks with inferred return types will have return statements that match the inferred type.
<rdar://problem/13665798>
llvm-svn: 179699
show more ...
|
| #
b41977f8 |
| 07-Mar-2013 |
Jordan Rose <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Check for returning null references in ReturnUndefChecker.
Officially in the C++ standard, a null reference cannot exist. However, it's still very easy to create one:
int &getNullRef() {
[analyzer] Check for returning null references in ReturnUndefChecker.
Officially in the C++ standard, a null reference cannot exist. However, it's still very easy to create one:
int &getNullRef() { int *p = 0; return *p; }
We already check that binds to reference regions don't create null references. This patch checks that we don't create null references by returning, either.
<rdar://problem/13364378>
llvm-svn: 176601
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.2.0, llvmorg-3.2.0-rc3 |
|
| #
3a02247d |
| 04-Dec-2012 |
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> |
Sort all of Clang's files under 'lib', and fix up the broken headers uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module headers I could find, and running the new llvm/util
Sort all of Clang's files under 'lib', and fix up the broken headers uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.2.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.2.0-rc1 |
|
| #
e10d5a76 |
| 02-Nov-2012 |
Jordan Rose <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Rename 'EmitReport' to 'emitReport'.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 167275
|
| #
5d2964e7 |
| 12-Sep-2012 |
Anna Zaks <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Do not report use of undef on "return foo();" when the return type is void.
Fixes a false positive found by analyzing LLVM code base.
llvm-svn: 163750
|
| #
5d4ec363 |
| 29-Aug-2012 |
Anna Zaks <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Improved diagnostic pruning for calls initializing values.
This heuristic addresses the case when a pointer (or ref) is passed to a function, which initializes the variable (or sets it to
[analyzer] Improved diagnostic pruning for calls initializing values.
This heuristic addresses the case when a pointer (or ref) is passed to a function, which initializes the variable (or sets it to something other than '0'). On the branch where the inlined function does not set the value, we report use of undefined value (or NULL pointer dereference). The access happens in the caller and the path through the callee would get pruned away with regular path pruning. To solve this issue, we previously disabled diagnostic pruning completely on undefined and null pointer dereference checks, which entailed very verbose diagnostics in most cases. Furthermore, not all of the undef value checks had the diagnostic pruning disabled.
This patch implements the following heuristic: if we pass a pointer (or ref) to the region (on which the error is reported) into a function and it's value is either undef or 'NULL' (and is a pointer), do not prune the function.
llvm-svn: 162863
show more ...
|
| #
a0f7d35a |
| 28-Aug-2012 |
Jordan Rose <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Rename addTrackNullOrUndefValueVisitor to trackNullOrUndefValue.
This helper function (in the clang::ento::bugreporter namespace) may add more than one visitor, but conceptually it's trac
[analyzer] Rename addTrackNullOrUndefValueVisitor to trackNullOrUndefValue.
This helper function (in the clang::ento::bugreporter namespace) may add more than one visitor, but conceptually it's tracking a single use of a null or undefined value and should do so as best it can.
Also, the BugReport parameter has been made a reference to underscore that it is non-optional.
llvm-svn: 162720
show more ...
|
| #
cfb4eb29 |
| 03-Aug-2012 |
Jordan Rose <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] When a symbol is null, we should track its constraints.
Because of this, we would previously emit NO path notes when a parameter is constrained to null (because there are no stores). Now
[analyzer] When a symbol is null, we should track its constraints.
Because of this, we would previously emit NO path notes when a parameter is constrained to null (because there are no stores). Now we show where we made the assumption, which is much more useful.
llvm-svn: 161280
show more ...
|
| #
5d6e7c33 |
| 01-Jun-2012 |
Ted Kremenek <[email protected]> |
Disable diagnosic path pruning for ReturnUndefChecker.
llvm-svn: 157851
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.1.0, llvmorg-3.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.1.0-rc1 |
|
| #
1e809b4c |
| 09-Mar-2012 |
Ted Kremenek <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Implement basic path diagnostic pruning based on "interesting" symbols and regions. Essentially, a bug centers around a story for various symbols and regions. We should only include the p
[analyzer] Implement basic path diagnostic pruning based on "interesting" symbols and regions. Essentially, a bug centers around a story for various symbols and regions. We should only include the path diagnostic events that relate to those symbols and regions.
The pruning is done by associating a set of interesting symbols and regions with a BugReporter, which can be modified at BugReport creation or by BugReporterVisitors.
This patch reduces the diagnostics emitted in several of our test cases. I've vetted these as having desired behavior. The only regression is a missing null check diagnostic for the return value of realloc() in test/Analysis/malloc-plist.c. This will require some investigation to fix, and I have added a FIXME to the test case.
llvm-svn: 152361
show more ...
|