|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4 |
|
| #
57c55165 |
| 29-Apr-2022 |
Andrew Ng <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Fix return of llvm::StringRef to destroyed std::string
This issue was discovered whilst testing with ASAN.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124683
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4 |
|
| #
1cb15b10 |
| 16-Mar-2021 |
Aaron Puchert <[email protected]> |
Correct Doxygen syntax for inline code
There is no syntax like {@code ...} in Doxygen, @code is a block command that ends with @endcode, and generally these are not enclosed in braces. The correct s
Correct Doxygen syntax for inline code
There is no syntax like {@code ...} in Doxygen, @code is a block command that ends with @endcode, and generally these are not enclosed in braces. The correct syntax for inline code snippets is @c <code>.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98665
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
71132715 |
| 03-Jun-2020 |
Paul Pelzl <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] ObjCAutoreleaseWriteChecker: Support explicit autoreleasepools.
The checker currently supports only a whitelist of block-enumeration methods which are known to internally clear an autorel
[analyzer] ObjCAutoreleaseWriteChecker: Support explicit autoreleasepools.
The checker currently supports only a whitelist of block-enumeration methods which are known to internally clear an autorelease pool. Extend this checker to detect writes within the scope of explicit @autoreleasepool statements.
rdar://25301111
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81072
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
bda3dd0d |
| 27-Mar-2020 |
Kirstóf Umann <[email protected]> |
[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions
Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options. To make this possible this patc
[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions
Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options. To make this possible this patch changes the parameter of the shouldRegister* function to CheckerManager to be able to query the analyzer options when deciding whether the checker should be registered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
ac66c61b |
| 11-Feb-2020 |
Justin Lebar <[email protected]> |
Use C++14-style return type deduction in clang.
Summary: Simplifies the C++11-style "-> decltype(...)" return-type deduction.
Note that you have to be careful about whether the function return type
Use C++14-style return type deduction in clang.
Summary: Simplifies the C++11-style "-> decltype(...)" return-type deduction.
Note that you have to be careful about whether the function return type is `auto` or `decltype(auto)`. The difference is that bare `auto` strips const and reference, just like lambda return type deduction. In some cases that's what we want (or more likely, we know that the return type is a value type), but whenever we're wrapping a templated function which might return a reference, we need to be sure that the return type is decltype(auto).
No functional change.
Reviewers: bkramer, MaskRay, martong, shafik
Subscribers: martong, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74423
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init |
|
| #
49a3ad21 |
| 16-Jul-2019 |
Rui Ueyama <[email protected]> |
Fix parameter name comments using clang-tidy. NFC.
This patch applies clang-tidy's bugprone-argument-comment tool to LLVM, clang and lld source trees. Here is how I created this patch:
$ git clone
Fix parameter name comments using clang-tidy. NFC.
This patch applies clang-tidy's bugprone-argument-comment tool to LLVM, clang and lld source trees. Here is how I created this patch:
$ git clone https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git $ cd llvm-project $ mkdir build $ cd build $ cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS='clang;lld;clang-tools-extra' \ -DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=On -DLLVM_ENABLE_LLD=On \ -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ ../llvm $ ninja $ parallel clang-tidy -checks='-*,bugprone-argument-comment' \ -config='{CheckOptions: [{key: StrictMode, value: 1}]}' -fix \ ::: ../llvm/lib/**/*.{cpp,h} ../clang/lib/**/*.{cpp,h} ../lld/**/*.{cpp,h}
llvm-svn: 366177
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
058a7a45 |
| 26-Jan-2019 |
Kristof Umann <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function
Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO) function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. T
[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function
Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO) function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways.
A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker, once it is called, registration is guaranteed.
This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more info here: D54438#1315953
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424
llvm-svn: 352277
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
2946cd70 |
| 19-Jan-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> |
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the ne
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
show more ...
|
| #
76a21502 |
| 15-Dec-2018 |
Kristof Umann <[email protected]> |
[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend
ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept. It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed
[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend
ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept. It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend, whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend depends on both of those libraries.
One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core, it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which is where it ultimately belongs.
This move implies that since include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:
class CheckerRegistry;
void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry ®istry);
it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h, which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436
llvm-svn: 349275
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
04951d4f |
| 16-May-2018 |
George Karpenkov <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Extend ObjCAutoreleaseWriteChecker to catch block declarations with autoreleasing variables
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46984
llvm-svn: 332546
|
| #
434019a6 |
| 14-May-2018 |
George Karpenkov <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Extend the ObjCAutoreleaseWriteChecker to warn on captures as well
A common pattern is that the code in the block does not write into the variable explicitly, but instead passes it to a h
[analyzer] Extend the ObjCAutoreleaseWriteChecker to warn on captures as well
A common pattern is that the code in the block does not write into the variable explicitly, but instead passes it to a helper function which performs the write.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46772
llvm-svn: 332300
show more ...
|
| #
3ee2a6bd |
| 11-May-2018 |
George Karpenkov <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Ignore the nullability quantifiers for autoreleasewritechecker
llvm-svn: 332136
|
| #
befce133 |
| 27-Apr-2018 |
Artem Dergachev <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] ObjCAutoreleaseWrite: Support a few more APIs and fix warning text.
API list and improved warning text composed by Devin Coughlin.
llvm-svn: 331089
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
d676ba0f |
| 29-Mar-2018 |
George Karpenkov <[email protected]> |
[analyzer] Path-insensitive checker for writes into an auto-releasing pointer
from the wrong auto-releasing pool, as such writes may crash.
rdar://25301111
Differential Revision: https://reviews.l
[analyzer] Path-insensitive checker for writes into an auto-releasing pointer
from the wrong auto-releasing pool, as such writes may crash.
rdar://25301111
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44722
llvm-svn: 328827
show more ...
|