[clang] Rename StringRef _lower() method calls to _insensitive()

This is mostly a mechanical change, but a testcase that contains
parts of the StringRef class (clang/test/Analysis/llvm-conventions.c

[clang] Rename StringRef _lower() method calls to _insensitive()

This is mostly a mechanical change, but a testcase that contains
parts of the StringRef class (clang/test/Analysis/llvm-conventions.cpp)
isn't touched.

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patc

[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patch changes the parameter of the shouldRegister*
function to CheckerManager to be able to query the analyzer options when
deciding whether the checker should be registered.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271

show more ...

Use C++14-style return type deduction in clang.

Summary:
Simplifies the C++11-style "-> decltype(...)" return-type deduction.

Note that you have to be careful about whether the function return type

Use C++14-style return type deduction in clang.

Summary:
Simplifies the C++11-style "-> decltype(...)" return-type deduction.

Note that you have to be careful about whether the function return type
is `auto` or `decltype(auto)`. The difference is that bare `auto`
strips const and reference, just like lambda return type deduction. In
some cases that's what we want (or more likely, we know that the return
type is a value type), but whenever we're wrapping a templated function
which might return a reference, we need to be sure that the return type
is decltype(auto).

No functional change.

Reviewers: bkramer, MaskRay, martong, shafik

Subscribers: martong, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74423

show more ...

Fix parameter name comments using clang-tidy. NFC.

This patch applies clang-tidy's bugprone-argument-comment tool
to LLVM, clang and lld source trees. Here is how I created this
patch:

$ git clone

Fix parameter name comments using clang-tidy. NFC.

This patch applies clang-tidy's bugprone-argument-comment tool
to LLVM, clang and lld source trees. Here is how I created this
patch:

$ git clone https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
$ cd llvm-project
$ mkdir build
$ cd build
$ cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS='clang;lld;clang-tools-extra' \
-DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=On -DLLVM_ENABLE_LLD=On \
-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ ../llvm
$ ninja
$ parallel clang-tidy -checks='-*,bugprone-argument-comment' \
-config='{CheckOptions: [{key: StrictMode, value: 1}]}' -fix \
::: ../llvm/lib/**/*.{cpp,h} ../clang/lib/**/*.{cpp,h} ../lld/**/*.{cpp,h}

llvm-svn: 366177

show more ...

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. T

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every
checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of
ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based
on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways.

A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker,
once it is called, registration is guaranteed.

This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more
info here: D54438#1315953

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424

llvm-svn: 352277

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend

ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed

[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend

ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend,
whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can
imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the
checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that
library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend
depends on both of those libraries.

One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core,
it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which
is where it ultimately belongs.

This move implies that since
include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:

class CheckerRegistry;

void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry &registry);

it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to
clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h,
which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration
functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436

llvm-svn: 349275

show more ...

[analyzer] Fix GCDAntipatternChecker to only fire when the semaphore is initialized to zero

Initializing a semaphore with a different constant most likely signals a different intent

rdar://41802552

[analyzer] Fix GCDAntipatternChecker to only fire when the semaphore is initialized to zero

Initializing a semaphore with a different constant most likely signals a different intent

rdar://41802552

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48911

llvm-svn: 337212

show more ...

[analyzer] Change the warning message for GCD antipattern checker

llvm-svn: 332544

[analyzer] Extend GCDAntipatternChecker to match group_enter/group_leave pattern

rdar://38480416

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44653

llvm-svn: 328281

[analyzer] Fix the matcher for GCDAntipattern to look for "signal" call in all parameters

rdar://38405904

llvm-svn: 327426

[analyzer] Move the GCDAsyncSemaphoreChecker to optin.performance

rdar://38383753

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44228

llvm-svn: 327309