[analyzer][NFC] Introduce CXXDeallocatorCall, deploy it in MallocChecker

One of the pain points in simplifying MallocCheckers interface by gradually
changing to CallEvent is that a variety of C++ al

[analyzer][NFC] Introduce CXXDeallocatorCall, deploy it in MallocChecker

One of the pain points in simplifying MallocCheckers interface by gradually
changing to CallEvent is that a variety of C++ allocation and deallocation
functionalities are modeled through preStmt<...> where CallEvent is unavailable,
and a single one of these callbacks can prevent a mass parameter change.

This patch introduces a new CallEvent, CXXDeallocatorCall, which happens after
preStmt<CXXDeleteExpr>, and can completely replace that callback as
demonstrated.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75430

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patc

[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patch changes the parameter of the shouldRegister*
function to CheckerManager to be able to query the analyzer options when
deciding whether the checker should be registered.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Fix inconsistent references to checkers as "checks"

Traditionally, clang-tidy uses the term check, and the analyzer uses checker,
but in the very early years, this wasn't the case, a

[analyzer][NFC] Fix inconsistent references to checkers as "checks"

Traditionally, clang-tidy uses the term check, and the analyzer uses checker,
but in the very early years, this wasn't the case, and code originating from the
early 2010's still incorrectly refer to checkers as checks.

This patch attempts to hunt down most of these, aiming to refer to checkers as
checkers, but preserve references to callback functions (like checkPreCall) as
checks.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140

llvm-svn: 371760

show more ...

[analyzer] NFC: Move getStmt() and createEndOfPath() out of PathDiagnostic.

These static functions deal with ExplodedNodes which is something we don't want
the PathDiagnostic interface to know anyth

[analyzer] NFC: Move getStmt() and createEndOfPath() out of PathDiagnostic.

These static functions deal with ExplodedNodes which is something we don't want
the PathDiagnostic interface to know anything about, as it's planned to be
moved out of libStaticAnalyzerCore.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67382

llvm-svn: 371659

show more ...

[analyzer] NFC: Re-implement stack hints as a side map in BugReport.

That's one of the few random entities in the PathDiagnostic interface that
are specific to the Static Analyzer. By moving them ou

[analyzer] NFC: Re-implement stack hints as a side map in BugReport.

That's one of the few random entities in the PathDiagnostic interface that
are specific to the Static Analyzer. By moving them out we could let
everybody use path diagnostics without linking against Static Analyzer.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67381

llvm-svn: 371658

show more ...

[analyzer] NFC: Introduce sub-classes for path-sensitive and basic reports.

Checkers are now required to specify whether they're creating a
path-sensitive report or a path-insensitive report by cons

[analyzer] NFC: Introduce sub-classes for path-sensitive and basic reports.

Checkers are now required to specify whether they're creating a
path-sensitive report or a path-insensitive report by constructing an
object of the respective type.

This makes BugReporter more independent from the rest of the Static Analyzer
because all Analyzer-specific code is now in sub-classes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66572

llvm-svn: 371450

show more ...

[analyzer] CastValueChecker: Rewrite dead header hotfix

llvm-svn: 369607

[Clang] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique

Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
o

[Clang] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique

Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259

llvm-svn: 368942

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Refactoring BugReporter.cpp P3.: std::shared_pointer<PathDiagnosticPiece> -> PathDiagnosticPieceRef

find clang/ -type f -exec sed -i 's/std::shared_ptr<PathDiagnosticPiece>/PathDiagn

[analyzer][NFC] Refactoring BugReporter.cpp P3.: std::shared_pointer<PathDiagnosticPiece> -> PathDiagnosticPieceRef

find clang/ -type f -exec sed -i 's/std::shared_ptr<PathDiagnosticPiece>/PathDiagnosticPieceRef/g' {} \;
git diff -U3 --no-color HEAD^ | clang-format-diff-6.0 -p1 -i

Just as C++ is meant to be refactored, right?

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65381

llvm-svn: 368717

show more ...

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. T

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every
checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of
ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based
on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways.

A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker,
once it is called, registration is guaranteed.

This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more
info here: D54438#1315953

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424

llvm-svn: 352277

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend

ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed

[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend

ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend,
whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can
imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the
checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that
library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend
depends on both of those libraries.

One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core,
it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which
is where it ultimately belongs.

This move implies that since
include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:

class CheckerRegistry;

void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry &registry);

it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to
clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h,
which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration
functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436

llvm-svn: 349275

show more ...

[analyzer] [NFC] Remove unused parameters, as found by -Wunused-parameter

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52640

llvm-svn: 343353

[analyzer] Do not run visitors until the fixpoint, run only once.

In the current implementation, we run visitors until the fixed point is
reached.
That is, if a visitor adds another visitor, the cur

[analyzer] Do not run visitors until the fixpoint, run only once.

In the current implementation, we run visitors until the fixed point is
reached.
That is, if a visitor adds another visitor, the currently processed path
is destroyed, all diagnostics is discarded, and it is regenerated again,
until it's no longer modified.
This pattern has a few negative implications:

- This loop does not even guarantee to terminate.
E.g. just imagine two visitors bouncing a diagnostics around.
- Performance-wise, e.g. for sqlite3 all visitors are being re-run at
least 10 times for some bugs.
We have already seen a few reports where it leads to timeouts.
- If we want to add more computationally intense visitors, this will
become worse.
- From architectural standpoint, the current layout requires copying
visitors, which is conceptually wrong, and can be annoying (e.g. no
unique_ptr on visitors allowed).

The proposed change is a much simpler architecture: the outer loop
processes nodes upwards, and whenever the visitor is added it only
processes current nodes and above, thus guaranteeing termination.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47856

llvm-svn: 335666

show more ...

[analyzer] introduce getSVal(Stmt *) helper on ExplodedNode, make sure the helper is used consistently

In most cases using
`N->getState()->getSVal(E, N->getLocationContext())`
is ugly, verbose, and

[analyzer] introduce getSVal(Stmt *) helper on ExplodedNode, make sure the helper is used consistently

In most cases using
`N->getState()->getSVal(E, N->getLocationContext())`
is ugly, verbose, and also opens up more surface area for bugs if an
inconsistent location context is used.

This patch introduces a helper on an exploded node, and ensures
consistent usage of either `ExplodedNode::getSVal` or
`CheckContext::getSVal` across the codebase.
As a result, a large number of redundant lines is removed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42155

llvm-svn: 322753

show more ...

[analyzer] Add new delete with non-virtual destructor check

Patch by: Reka Nikolett Kovacs

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35796

llvm-svn: 313973