[analyzer] Clean checker options from bool to DefaultBool (NFC)

A recent review emphasized the preference to use DefaultBool instead of
bool for checker options. This change is a NFC and cleans up s

[analyzer] Clean checker options from bool to DefaultBool (NFC)

A recent review emphasized the preference to use DefaultBool instead of
bool for checker options. This change is a NFC and cleans up some of the
instances where bool was used, and could be changed to DefaultBool.

Reviewed By: steakhal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123464

show more ...

[clang] Add a raw_ostream operator<< overload for QualType

Under the hood this prints the same as `QualType::getAsString()` but cuts out the middle-man when that string is sent to another raw_ostrea

[clang] Add a raw_ostream operator<< overload for QualType

Under the hood this prints the same as `QualType::getAsString()` but cuts out the middle-man when that string is sent to another raw_ostream.

Also cleaned up all the call sites where this occurs.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123926

show more ...

[Sema, StaticAnalyzer] Use StringRef::contains (NFC)

[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patc

[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patch changes the parameter of the shouldRegister*
function to CheckerManager to be able to query the analyzer options when
deciding whether the checker should be registered.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271

show more ...

[analyzer] Add a syntactic security check for ObjC NSCoder API.

Method '-[NSCoder decodeValueOfObjCType:at:]' is not only deprecated
but also a security hazard, hence a loud check.

Differential Rev

[analyzer] Add a syntactic security check for ObjC NSCoder API.

Method '-[NSCoder decodeValueOfObjCType:at:]' is not only deprecated
but also a security hazard, hence a loud check.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71728

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Fix inconsistent references to checkers as "checks"

Traditionally, clang-tidy uses the term check, and the analyzer uses checker,
but in the very early years, this wasn't the case, a

[analyzer][NFC] Fix inconsistent references to checkers as "checks"

Traditionally, clang-tidy uses the term check, and the analyzer uses checker,
but in the very early years, this wasn't the case, and code originating from the
early 2010's still incorrectly refer to checkers as checks.

This patch attempts to hunt down most of these, aiming to refer to checkers as
checkers, but preserve references to callback functions (like checkPreCall) as
checks.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140

llvm-svn: 371760

show more ...

[analyzer] Fix analyzer warnings on analyzer.

Write tests for the actual crash that was found. Write comments and refactor
code around 17 style bugs and suppress 3 false positives.

Differential Rev

[analyzer] Fix analyzer warnings on analyzer.

Write tests for the actual crash that was found. Write comments and refactor
code around 17 style bugs and suppress 3 false positives.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66847

llvm-svn: 370246

show more ...

[analyzer] PR41185: Fix regression where __builtin_* functions weren't recognized

For the following code snippet:

void builtin_function_call_crash_fixes(char *c) {
__builtin_strncpy(c, "", 6);

[analyzer] PR41185: Fix regression where __builtin_* functions weren't recognized

For the following code snippet:

void builtin_function_call_crash_fixes(char *c) {
__builtin_strncpy(c, "", 6);
__builtin_memset(c, '\0', (0));
__builtin_memcpy(c, c, 0);
}
security.insecureAPI.DeprecatedOrUnsafeBufferHandling caused a regression, as it
didn't recognize functions starting with __builtin_. Fixed exactly that.

I wanted to modify an existing test file, but the two I found didn't seem like
perfect candidates. While I was there, I prettified their RUN: lines.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59812

llvm-svn: 358609

show more ...

[analyzer] New checker for detecting usages of unsafe I/O functions

There are certain unsafe or deprecated (since C11) buffer handling
functions which should be avoided in safety critical code. They

[analyzer] New checker for detecting usages of unsafe I/O functions

There are certain unsafe or deprecated (since C11) buffer handling
functions which should be avoided in safety critical code. They
could cause buffer overflows. A new checker,
'security.insecureAPI.DeprecatedOrUnsafeBufferHandling' warns for
every occurrence of such functions (unsafe or deprecated printf,
scanf family, and other buffer handling functions, which now have
a secure variant).

Patch by Dániel Kolozsvári!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35068

llvm-svn: 353698

show more ...

[analyzer] Add CheckerManager::getChecker, make sure that a registry function registers no more than 1 checker

This patch effectively fixes the almost decade old checker naming issue.
The solution i

[analyzer] Add CheckerManager::getChecker, make sure that a registry function registers no more than 1 checker

This patch effectively fixes the almost decade old checker naming issue.
The solution is to assert when CheckerManager::getChecker is called on an
unregistered checker, and assert when CheckerManager::registerChecker is called
on a checker that is already registered.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55429

llvm-svn: 352292

show more ...

[analyzer] Reimplement dependencies between checkers

Unfortunately, up until now, the fact that certain checkers depended on one
another was known, but how these actually unfolded was hidden deep wi

[analyzer] Reimplement dependencies between checkers

Unfortunately, up until now, the fact that certain checkers depended on one
another was known, but how these actually unfolded was hidden deep within the
implementation. For example, many checkers (like RetainCount, Malloc or CString)
modelled a certain functionality, and exposed certain reportable bug types to
the user. For example, while MallocChecker models many many different types of
memory handling, the actual "unix.MallocChecker" checker the user was exposed to
was merely and option to this modeling part.

Other than this being an ugly mess, this issue made resolving the checker naming
issue almost impossible. (The checker naming issue being that if a checker
registered more than one checker within its registry function, both checker
object recieved the same name) Also, if the user explicitly disabled a checker
that was a dependency of another that _was_ explicitly enabled, it implicitly,
without "telling" the user, reenabled it.

Clearly, changing this to a well structured, declarative form, where the
handling of dependencies are done on a higher level is very much preferred.

This patch, among the detailed things later, makes checkers declare their
dependencies within the TableGen file Checkers.td, and exposes the same
functionality to plugins and statically linked non-generated checkers through
CheckerRegistry::addDependency. CheckerRegistry now resolves these dependencies,
makes sure that checkers are added to CheckerManager in the correct order,
and makes sure that if a dependency is disabled, so will be every checker that
depends on it.

In detail:

* Add a new field to the Checker class in CheckerBase.td called Dependencies,
which is a list of Checkers.
* Move unix checkers before cplusplus, as there is no forward declaration in
tblgen :/
* Add the following new checkers:
- StackAddrEscapeBase
- StackAddrEscapeBase
- CStringModeling
- DynamicMemoryModeling (base of the MallocChecker family)
- IteratorModeling (base of the IteratorChecker family)
- ValistBase
- SecuritySyntaxChecker (base of bcmp, bcopy, etc...)
- NSOrCFErrorDerefChecker (base of NSErrorChecker and CFErrorChecker)
- IvarInvalidationModeling (base of IvarInvalidation checker family)
- RetainCountBase (base of RetainCount and OSObjectRetainCount)
* Clear up and registry functions in MallocChecker, happily remove old FIXMEs.
* Add a new addDependency function to CheckerRegistry.
* Neatly format RUN lines in files I looked at while debugging.

Big thanks to Artem Degrachev for all the guidance through this project!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54438

llvm-svn: 352287

show more ...

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. T

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every
checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of
ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based
on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways.

A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker,
once it is called, registration is guaranteed.

This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more
info here: D54438#1315953

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424

llvm-svn: 352277

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

[analyzer] [PR39792] false positive on strcpy targeting struct members

Patch by Pierre van Houtryve.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55226

llvm-svn: 351097

Replace getOS() == llvm::Triple::*BSD with isOS*BSD() [NFCI]

Replace multiple comparisons of getOS() value with FreeBSD, NetBSD,
OpenBSD and DragonFly with matching isOS*BSD() methods. This should

Replace getOS() == llvm::Triple::*BSD with isOS*BSD() [NFCI]

Replace multiple comparisons of getOS() value with FreeBSD, NetBSD,
OpenBSD and DragonFly with matching isOS*BSD() methods. This should
improve the consistency of coding style without changing the behavior.
Direct getOS() comparisons were left whenever used in switch or switch-
like context.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55916

llvm-svn: 349752

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend

ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed

[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend

ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend,
whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can
imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the
checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that
library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend
depends on both of those libraries.

One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core,
it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which
is where it ultimately belongs.

This move implies that since
include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:

class CheckerRegistry;

void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry &registry);

it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to
clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h,
which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration
functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436

llvm-svn: 349275

show more ...

Misc typos fixes in ./lib folder

Summary: Found via `codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt -L uint,importd,crasher,gonna,cant,ue,ons,orign,ned`

Reviewers: teemperor

Reviewed By: teemperor

Subs

Misc typos fixes in ./lib folder

Summary: Found via `codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt -L uint,importd,crasher,gonna,cant,ue,ons,orign,ned`

Reviewers: teemperor

Reviewed By: teemperor

Subscribers: teemperor, jholewinski, jvesely, nhaehnle, whisperity, jfb, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55475

llvm-svn: 348755

show more ...

Revert "Revert r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.""

It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037

Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the

Revert "Revert r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.""

It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037

Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the bad CodeGen/builtin-constant-p.c for now

llvm-svn: 348053

show more ...

Revert r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures."

Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the fo

Revert r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures."

Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the following snippet fails:

extern char extern_var;
struct { int a; } a = {__builtin_constant_p(extern_var)};

llvm-svn: 348039

show more ...

Re-commit r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures."

This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was b

Re-commit r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures."

This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was broken.

llvm-svn: 347756

show more ...

Revert r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures."

This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:

static bool f(int *a, int *

Revert r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures."

This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:

static bool f(int *a, int *b) {
return !__builtin_constant_p(b - a) || (!(b - a));
}

int arr[] = {1,2,3};

bool g() {
return f(arr, arr + 3);
}

$ clang -O2 -S -emit-llvm a.cc -o -

g() should return true, but after r347417 it became false for some reason.

This also reverts the follow-up commits.

r347417:
> Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
>
> Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
> __builtin_constant_p().
>
> Third time's a charm!

r347446:
> The result of is.constant() is unsigned.

r347480:
> A __builtin_constant_p() returns 0 with a function type.

r347512:
> isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
>
> Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
> be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
> __builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
> constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
> constant.

r347531:
> A "constexpr" is evaluated in a constant context. Make sure this is reflected
> if a __builtin_constant_p() is a part of a constexpr.

llvm-svn: 347656

show more ...

Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.

Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
__builtin_constant_p().

Third time's a charm!

llvm-svn: 347417

Revert r347364 again, the fix was incomplete.

llvm-svn: 347389

Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.

EvaluateAsInt() is sometimes called in a constant context. When that's the
case, we need to specify it as so.

llvm-svn: 347364

Change \t to spaces

llvm-svn: 337530