[analyzer][NFC] Switch to using CallDescription::matches() instead of isCalled()

This patch replaces each use of the previous API with the new one.
In variadic cases, it will use the ADL `matchesAny

[analyzer][NFC] Switch to using CallDescription::matches() instead of isCalled()

This patch replaces each use of the previous API with the new one.
In variadic cases, it will use the ADL `matchesAny(Call, CDs...)`
variadic function.
Also simplifies some code involving such operations.

Reviewed By: martong, xazax.hun

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113591

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Separate CallDescription from CallEvent

`CallDescriptions` deserve its own translation unit.
This patch simply moves the corresponding parts.
Also includes the `CallDescription.h` wh

[analyzer][NFC] Separate CallDescription from CallEvent

`CallDescriptions` deserve its own translation unit.
This patch simply moves the corresponding parts.
Also includes the `CallDescription.h` where it's necessary.

Reviewed By: martong, xazax.hun, Szelethus

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113587

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patc

[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patch changes the parameter of the shouldRegister*
function to CheckerManager to be able to query the analyzer options when
deciding whether the checker should be registered.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271

show more ...

BlockInCriticalSectionChecker - silence static analyzer dyn_cast null dereference warning. NFCI.

The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<

BlockInCriticalSectionChecker - silence static analyzer dyn_cast null dereference warning. NFCI.

The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.

llvm-svn: 374717

show more ...

[analyzer] NFC: Introduce sub-classes for path-sensitive and basic reports.

Checkers are now required to specify whether they're creating a
path-sensitive report or a path-insensitive report by cons

[analyzer] NFC: Introduce sub-classes for path-sensitive and basic reports.

Checkers are now required to specify whether they're creating a
path-sensitive report or a path-insensitive report by constructing an
object of the respective type.

This makes BugReporter more independent from the rest of the Static Analyzer
because all Analyzer-specific code is now in sub-classes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66572

llvm-svn: 371450

show more ...

[Clang] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique

Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
o

[Clang] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique

Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259

llvm-svn: 368942

show more ...

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. T

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every
checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of
ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based
on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways.

A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker,
once it is called, registration is guaranteed.

This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more
info here: D54438#1315953

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424

llvm-svn: 352277

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend

ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed

[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend

ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend,
whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can
imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the
checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that
library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend
depends on both of those libraries.

One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core,
it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which
is where it ultimately belongs.

This move implies that since
include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:

class CheckerRegistry;

void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry &registry);

it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to
clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h,
which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration
functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436

llvm-svn: 349275

show more ...

[analyzer] lock_guard and unique_lock extension for BlockInCriticalSection checker

A patch by zdtorok (Zoltán Dániel Török)!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33729

llvm-svn: 316892

[analyzer] Extend block in critical section check with C11 and Pthread APIs.

Patch by Zoltan Daniel Torok!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29567

llvm-svn: 297461

[analyzer] Add a checker that detects blocks in critical sections

This checker should find the calls to blocking functions (for example: sleep, getc, fgets,read,recv etc.) inside a critical section.

[analyzer] Add a checker that detects blocks in critical sections

This checker should find the calls to blocking functions (for example: sleep, getc, fgets,read,recv etc.) inside a critical section. When sleep(x) is called while a mutex is held, other threads cannot lock the same mutex. This might take some time, leading to bad performance or even deadlock.

Example:

mutex_t m;

void f() {
sleep(1000); // Error: sleep() while m is locked! [f() is called from foobar() while m is locked]
// do some work
}

void foobar() {
lock(m);
f();
unlock(m);
}

A patch by zdtorok (Zoltán Dániel Török)!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21506

llvm-svn: 282011

show more ...