|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init |
|
| #
5061eb6b |
| 21-Jan-2022 |
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> |
[Sparc] Don't define __sparcv9 and __sparcv9__ when targeting V8+
Currently, clang defines the three macros __sparcv9, __sparcv9__
and __sparc_v9__ when targeting the V8+ baseline, i.e. using the
V9
[Sparc] Don't define __sparcv9 and __sparcv9__ when targeting V8+
Currently, clang defines the three macros __sparcv9, __sparcv9__
and __sparc_v9__ when targeting the V8+ baseline, i.e. using the
V9 instruction set on a 32-bit target.
Since neither gcc nor SolarisStudio define __sparcv9 and __sparcv9__
when targeting V8+, some existing code such as the glibc breaks when
defining either of these two macros on a 32-bit target as they are
used to detect a 64-bit target. Update the tests accordingly.
Fixes PR49562.
Reviewed By: jrtc27, MaskRay, hvdijk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98574
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
76e85ae2 |
| 11-Sep-2020 |
Rainer Orth <[email protected]> |
[clang][Sparc] Default to -mcpu=v9 for Sparc V8 on Solaris
As reported in Bug 42535, `clang` doesn't inline atomic ops on 32-bit
Sparc, unlike `gcc` on Solaris. In a 1-stage build with `gcc`, only
[clang][Sparc] Default to -mcpu=v9 for Sparc V8 on Solaris
As reported in Bug 42535, `clang` doesn't inline atomic ops on 32-bit
Sparc, unlike `gcc` on Solaris. In a 1-stage build with `gcc`, only two
testcases are affected (currently `XFAIL`ed), while in a 2-stage build more
than 100 tests `FAIL` due to this issue.
The reason for this `gcc`/`clang` difference is that `gcc` on 32-bit
Solaris/SPARC defaults to `-mpcu=v9` where atomic ops are supported, unlike
with `clang`'s default of `-mcpu=v8`. This patch changes `clang` to use
`-mcpu=v9` on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC, too.
Doing so uncovered two bugs:
`clang -m32 -mcpu=v9` chokes with any Solaris system headers included:
/usr/include/sys/isa_defs.h:461:2: error: "Both _ILP32 and _LP64 are defined"
#error "Both _ILP32 and _LP64 are defined"
While `clang` currently defines `__sparcv9` in a 32-bit `-mcpu=v9`
compilation, neither `gcc` nor Studio `cc` do. In fact, the Studio 12.6
`cc(1)` man page clearly states:
These predefinitions are valid in all modes:
[...]
__sparcv8 (SPARC)
__sparcv9 (SPARC -m64)
At the same time, the patch defines `__GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_[1248]`
for a 32-bit Sparc compilation with any V9 cpu. I've also changed
`MaxAtomicInlineWidth` for V9, matching what `gcc` does and the Oracle
Developer Studio 12.6: C User's Guide documents (Ch. 3, Support for Atomic
Types, 3.1 Size and Alignment of Atomic C Types).
The two testcases that had been `XFAIL`ed for Bug 42535 are un-`XFAIL`ed
again.
Tested on `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11` and `amd64-pc-solaris2.11`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86621
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
5fe17132 |
| 11-Aug-2020 |
Brad Smith <[email protected]> |
[Sparc] Define __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP macros on SPARCv9
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
2946cd70 |
| 19-Jan-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> |
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
8cc53aec |
| 30-May-2018 |
Daniel Cederman <[email protected]> |
[Sparc] Add floating-point register names
Reviewers: jyknight
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: eraman, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47137
[Sparc] Add floating-point register names
Reviewers: jyknight
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: eraman, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47137
llvm-svn: 333510
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
e44bdb3f |
| 08-Feb-2018 |
Erich Keane <[email protected]> |
Add Rest of Targets Support to ValidCPUList (enabling march notes)
A followup to: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42978
Most of the rest of the Targets were pretty rote, so this
patch knocks them all out
Add Rest of Targets Support to ValidCPUList (enabling march notes)
A followup to: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42978
Most of the rest of the Targets were pretty rote, so this
patch knocks them all out at once.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43057
llvm-svn: 324676
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
637aafc4 |
| 06-Feb-2018 |
Walter Lee <[email protected]> |
[Myriad] Define __ma2x5x and __ma2x8x
Summary: Add architecture defines for ma2x5x and ma2x8x.
Reviewers: jyknight
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, MartinO
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.
[Myriad] Define __ma2x5x and __ma2x8x
Summary: Add architecture defines for ma2x5x and ma2x8x.
Reviewers: jyknight
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, MartinO
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42882
llvm-svn: 324420
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
fc7f8f25 |
| 02-Oct-2017 |
Walter Lee <[email protected]> |
Add support for Myriad ma2x8x series of CPUs
Summary:
Also:
- Add support for some older Myriad CPUs that were missing.
- Fix some incorrect compiler defines for exisitng CPUs.
Reviewers: jyknight
Add support for Myriad ma2x8x series of CPUs
Summary:
Also:
- Add support for some older Myriad CPUs that were missing.
- Fix some incorrect compiler defines for exisitng CPUs.
Reviewers: jyknight
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37551
llvm-svn: 314706
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
ebba5926 |
| 21-Jul-2017 |
Erich Keane <[email protected]> |
Break up Targets.cpp into a header/impl pair per target type[NFCI]
Targets.cpp is getting unwieldy, and even minor changes cause the entire thing
to cause recompilation for everyone. This patch bit
Break up Targets.cpp into a header/impl pair per target type[NFCI]
Targets.cpp is getting unwieldy, and even minor changes cause the entire thing
to cause recompilation for everyone. This patch bites the bullet and breaks
it up into a number of files.
I tended to keep function definitions in the class declaration unless it
caused additional includes to be necessary. In those cases, I pulled it
over into the .cpp file. Content is copy/paste for the most part,
besides includes/format/etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35701
llvm-svn: 308791
show more ...
|