|
Revision tags: v6.15, v6.15-rc7, v6.15-rc6, v6.15-rc5, v6.15-rc4, v6.15-rc3, v6.15-rc2, v6.15-rc1, v6.14, v6.14-rc7, v6.14-rc6, v6.14-rc5, v6.14-rc4, v6.14-rc3, v6.14-rc2, v6.14-rc1, v6.13, v6.13-rc7, v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4, v6.13-rc3, v6.13-rc2, v6.13-rc1, v6.12, v6.12-rc7, v6.12-rc6, v6.12-rc5, v6.12-rc4, v6.12-rc3, v6.12-rc2, v6.12-rc1, v6.11, v6.11-rc7, v6.11-rc6, v6.11-rc5, v6.11-rc4, v6.11-rc3, v6.11-rc2, v6.11-rc1, v6.10, v6.10-rc7, v6.10-rc6, v6.10-rc5, v6.10-rc4, v6.10-rc3, v6.10-rc2, v6.10-rc1, v6.9, v6.9-rc7, v6.9-rc6, v6.9-rc5, v6.9-rc4, v6.9-rc3, v6.9-rc2, v6.9-rc1, v6.8, v6.8-rc7, v6.8-rc6, v6.8-rc5, v6.8-rc4, v6.8-rc3, v6.8-rc2, v6.8-rc1, v6.7, v6.7-rc8, v6.7-rc7, v6.7-rc6, v6.7-rc5, v6.7-rc4, v6.7-rc3, v6.7-rc2, v6.7-rc1, v6.6, v6.6-rc7, v6.6-rc6, v6.6-rc5, v6.6-rc4, v6.6-rc3, v6.6-rc2, v6.6-rc1, v6.5 |
| #
d837813f |
| 20-Aug-2023 |
Osama Muhammad <[email protected]> |
selftests: prctl: Add prctl test for PR_GET_NAME
This patch covers the testing of PR_GET_NAME by
reading it's value from proc/self/task/pid/comm
and matching it with the value returned by PR_GET_NAM
selftests: prctl: Add prctl test for PR_GET_NAME
This patch covers the testing of PR_GET_NAME by
reading it's value from proc/self/task/pid/comm
and matching it with the value returned by PR_GET_NAME.
If the values are matched then it's successful, otherwise
it fails.
changes since v1:
- Handled fscanf,fopen error checking.
- Defined MAX_PATH_LEN.
Signed-off-by: Osama Muhammad <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
e0606dae |
| 07-Jun-2023 |
Osama Muhammad <[email protected]> |
selftests: prctl: Add new prctl test for PR_SET_NAME
This patch will add the new test, which covers the prctl call
PR_SET_NAME command. The test tries to give a name using the PR_SET_NAME
call and t
selftests: prctl: Add new prctl test for PR_SET_NAME
This patch will add the new test, which covers the prctl call
PR_SET_NAME command. The test tries to give a name using the PR_SET_NAME
call and then confirm it that it changed correctly by using PR_GET_NAME.
It also tries to rename it with empty name.In the test PR_GET_NAME is
tested by passing null pointer to it and check its behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Osama Muhammad <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
show more ...
|