History log of /linux-6.15/tools/perf/tests/event_groups.c (Results 1 – 5 of 5)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.15, v6.15-rc7, v6.15-rc6, v6.15-rc5, v6.15-rc4, v6.15-rc3, v6.15-rc2, v6.15-rc1, v6.14, v6.14-rc7, v6.14-rc6, v6.14-rc5, v6.14-rc4, v6.14-rc3, v6.14-rc2, v6.14-rc1, v6.13, v6.13-rc7
# 91b7747d 10-Jan-2025 Athira Rajeev <[email protected]>

perf test: Update event_groups test to use instructions

In some of the powerpc platforms, event group testcase fails as below:

# perf test -v 'Event groups'
69: Event groups

perf test: Update event_groups test to use instructions

In some of the powerpc platforms, event group testcase fails as below:

# perf test -v 'Event groups'
69: Event groups :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 9765
Using CPUID 0x00820200
Using hv_24x7 for uncore pmu event
0x0 0x0, 0x0 0x0, 0x0 0x0: Fail
0x0 0x0, 0x0 0x0, 0x1 0x3: Pass

The testcase creates various combinations of hw, sw and uncore
PMU events and verify group creation succeeds or fails as expected.
This tests one of the limitation in perf where it doesn't allow
creating a group of events from different hw PMUs.

The testcase starts a leader event and opens two sibling events.
The combination the fails is three hardware events in a group.
"0x0 0x0, 0x0 0x0, 0x0 0x0: Fail"

Type zero and config zero which translates to PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE
and PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLE. There is event constraint in powerpc
that events using same counter cannot be programmed in a group.
Here there is one alternative event for cycles, hence one leader
and only one sibling event can go in as a group.

if all three events (leader and two sibling events), are hardware
events, use instructions as one of the sibling event. Since
PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS is a generic hardware event and present
in all architectures, use this as third event.

Reported-by: Tejas Manhas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4, v6.13-rc3, v6.13-rc2, v6.13-rc1, v6.12, v6.12-rc7, v6.12-rc6, v6.12-rc5, v6.12-rc4, v6.12-rc3, v6.12-rc2, v6.12-rc1, v6.11, v6.11-rc7, v6.11-rc6, v6.11-rc5, v6.11-rc4, v6.11-rc3, v6.11-rc2, v6.11-rc1, v6.10, v6.10-rc7, v6.10-rc6, v6.10-rc5, v6.10-rc4, v6.10-rc3, v6.10-rc2, v6.10-rc1, v6.9, v6.9-rc7, v6.9-rc6, v6.9-rc5, v6.9-rc4, v6.9-rc3, v6.9-rc2, v6.9-rc1, v6.8, v6.8-rc7, v6.8-rc6, v6.8-rc5, v6.8-rc4, v6.8-rc3, v6.8-rc2, v6.8-rc1, v6.7, v6.7-rc8, v6.7-rc7, v6.7-rc6, v6.7-rc5, v6.7-rc4, v6.7-rc3, v6.7-rc2, v6.7-rc1, v6.6, v6.6-rc7, v6.6-rc6, v6.6-rc5, v6.6-rc4, v6.6-rc3, v6.6-rc2, v6.6-rc1, v6.5, v6.5-rc7, v6.5-rc6, v6.5-rc5, v6.5-rc4, v6.5-rc3, v6.5-rc2, v6.5-rc1, v6.4, v6.4-rc7, v6.4-rc6, v6.4-rc5, v6.4-rc4
# 1eaf496e 27-May-2023 Ian Rogers <[email protected]>

perf pmu: Separate pmu and pmus

Separate and hide the pmus list in pmus.[ch]. Move pmus functionality
out of pmu.[ch] into pmus.[ch] renaming pmus functions which were
prefixed perf_pmu__ to perf_pm

perf pmu: Separate pmu and pmus

Separate and hide the pmus list in pmus.[ch]. Move pmus functionality
out of pmu.[ch] into pmus.[ch] renaming pmus functions which were
prefixed perf_pmu__ to perf_pmus__.

Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Ali Saidi <[email protected]>
Cc: Athira Rajeev <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
Cc: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: James Clark <[email protected]>
Cc: Jing Zhang <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: John Garry <[email protected]>
Cc: Kajol Jain <[email protected]>
Cc: Kang Minchul <[email protected]>
Cc: Leo Yan <[email protected]>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Leach <[email protected]>
Cc: Ming Wang <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <[email protected]>
Cc: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Cc: Sandipan Das <[email protected]>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Cc: Suzuki Poulouse <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Richter <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Xing Zhengjun <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>

show more ...


# f24ebe80 27-May-2023 Ian Rogers <[email protected]>

perf pmus: Prefer perf_pmu__scan over perf_pmus__for_each_pmu

perf_pmus__for_each_pmu doesn't lazily initialize pmus making its use
error prone. Just use perf_pmu__scan as this only impacts
non-perf

perf pmus: Prefer perf_pmu__scan over perf_pmus__for_each_pmu

perf_pmus__for_each_pmu doesn't lazily initialize pmus making its use
error prone. Just use perf_pmu__scan as this only impacts
non-performance critical tests.

Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Ali Saidi <[email protected]>
Cc: Athira Rajeev <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitrii Dolgov <[email protected]>
Cc: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: James Clark <[email protected]>
Cc: Jing Zhang <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: John Garry <[email protected]>
Cc: Kajol Jain <[email protected]>
Cc: Kang Minchul <[email protected]>
Cc: Leo Yan <[email protected]>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Leach <[email protected]>
Cc: Ming Wang <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <[email protected]>
Cc: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Cc: Sandipan Das <[email protected]>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Cc: Suzuki Poulouse <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Richter <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Xing Zhengjun <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.4-rc3, v6.4-rc2, v6.4-rc1, v6.3, v6.3-rc7, v6.3-rc6, v6.3-rc5, v6.3-rc4, v6.3-rc3, v6.3-rc2, v6.3-rc1, v6.2, v6.2-rc8, v6.2-rc7, v6.2-rc6, v6.2-rc5, v6.2-rc4, v6.2-rc3, v6.2-rc2, v6.2-rc1, v6.1
# 232b82d2 07-Dec-2022 Athira Rajeev <[email protected]>

perf test: Update event group check for support of uncore event

The event group test checks group creation for combinations of hw, sw
and uncore PMU events. Some of the uncore pmus may require addit

perf test: Update event group check for support of uncore event

The event group test checks group creation for combinations of hw, sw
and uncore PMU events. Some of the uncore pmus may require additional
permission to access the counters.

For example, in case of hv_24x7, partition need to have permissions to
access hv_24x7 pmu counters. If not, event_open will fail. Hence add a
sanity check to see if event_open succeeds before proceeding with the
test.

Fixes: 9d9b22bedad13d96 ("perf test: Add event group test for events in multiple PMUs")
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ravi Bangoria <[email protected]>
Cc: Disha Goel <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: James Clark <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Kajol Jain <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 9d9b22be 06-Dec-2022 Ravi Bangoria <[email protected]>

perf test: Add event group test for events in multiple PMUs

Multiple events in a group can belong to one or more PMUs, however
there are some limitations.

One of the limitations is that perf doesn'

perf test: Add event group test for events in multiple PMUs

Multiple events in a group can belong to one or more PMUs, however
there are some limitations.

One of the limitations is that perf doesn't allow creating a group of
events from different hw PMUs.

Write a simple test to create various combinations of hw, sw and uncore
PMU events and verify group creation succeeds or fails as expected.

Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kan Liang <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <[email protected]>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Ananth Narayan <[email protected]>
Cc: Athira Jajeev <[email protected]>
Cc: Carsten Haitzler <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Kajol Jain <[email protected]>
Cc: Leo Yan <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Sandipan Das <[email protected]>
Cc: Santosh Shukla <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Richter <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>

show more ...