History log of /linux-6.15/mm/usercopy.c (Results 1 – 25 of 38)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.15, v6.15-rc7, v6.15-rc6, v6.15-rc5, v6.15-rc4, v6.15-rc3, v6.15-rc2, v6.15-rc1, v6.14, v6.14-rc7, v6.14-rc6, v6.14-rc5, v6.14-rc4, v6.14-rc3, v6.14-rc2, v6.14-rc1
# 496d2d23 23-Jan-2025 Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

mm: security: Check early if HARDENED_USERCOPY is enabled

HARDENED_USERCOPY is checked within a function so even if disabled, the
function overhead still exists. Move the static check inline.

This

mm: security: Check early if HARDENED_USERCOPY is enabled

HARDENED_USERCOPY is checked within a function so even if disabled, the
function overhead still exists. Move the static check inline.

This is at best a micro-optimisation and any difference in performance
was within noise but it is relatively consistent with the init_on_*
implementations.

Suggested-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>

show more ...


# d2132f45 23-Jan-2025 Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

mm: security: Allow default HARDENED_USERCOPY to be set at compile time

HARDENED_USERCOPY defaults to on if enabled at compile time. Allow
hardened_usercopy= default to be set at compile time simila

mm: security: Allow default HARDENED_USERCOPY to be set at compile time

HARDENED_USERCOPY defaults to on if enabled at compile time. Allow
hardened_usercopy= default to be set at compile time similar to
init_on_alloc= and init_on_free=. The intent is that hardening
options that can be disabled at runtime can set their default at
build time.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 808aac63 28-Feb-2025 Kees Cook <[email protected]>

uaccess: Introduce ucopysize.h

The object size sanity checking macros that uaccess.h and uio.h use
have been living in thread_info.h for historical reasons. Needing to
use jump labels for these chec

uaccess: Introduce ucopysize.h

The object size sanity checking macros that uaccess.h and uio.h use
have been living in thread_info.h for historical reasons. Needing to
use jump labels for these checks, however, introduces a header include
loop under certain conditions. The dependencies for the object checking
macros are very limited, but they are used by separate header files,
so introduce a new header that can be used directly by uaccess.h and
uio.h. As a result, this also means thread_info.h (which is rather large)
and be removed from those headers.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.13, v6.13-rc7, v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4, v6.13-rc3, v6.13-rc2, v6.13-rc1, v6.12, v6.12-rc7, v6.12-rc6, v6.12-rc5, v6.12-rc4, v6.12-rc3, v6.12-rc2, v6.12-rc1, v6.11, v6.11-rc7, v6.11-rc6, v6.11-rc5, v6.11-rc4, v6.11-rc3, v6.11-rc2, v6.11-rc1, v6.10, v6.10-rc7, v6.10-rc6, v6.10-rc5, v6.10-rc4, v6.10-rc3, v6.10-rc2, v6.10-rc1, v6.9, v6.9-rc7, v6.9-rc6, v6.9-rc5, v6.9-rc4, v6.9-rc3, v6.9-rc2, v6.9-rc1, v6.8, v6.8-rc7, v6.8-rc6, v6.8-rc5, v6.8-rc4, v6.8-rc3, v6.8-rc2, v6.8-rc1, v6.7, v6.7-rc8, v6.7-rc7, v6.7-rc6, v6.7-rc5, v6.7-rc4, v6.7-rc3, v6.7-rc2, v6.7-rc1, v6.6, v6.6-rc7, v6.6-rc6, v6.6-rc5, v6.6-rc4, v6.6-rc3, v6.6-rc2, v6.6-rc1, v6.5, v6.5-rc7, v6.5-rc6, v6.5-rc5, v6.5-rc4, v6.5-rc3, v6.5-rc2, v6.5-rc1, v6.4, v6.4-rc7, v6.4-rc6, v6.4-rc5, v6.4-rc4, v6.4-rc3, v6.4-rc2, v6.4-rc1, v6.3, v6.3-rc7
# d319f344 10-Apr-2023 Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>

mm: Fix copy_from_user_nofault().

There are several issues with copy_from_user_nofault():

- access_ok() is designed for user context only and for that reason
it has WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() which triggers

mm: Fix copy_from_user_nofault().

There are several issues with copy_from_user_nofault():

- access_ok() is designed for user context only and for that reason
it has WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() which triggers when bpf, kprobe, eprobe
and perf on ppc are calling it from irq.

- it's missing nmi_uaccess_okay() which is a nop on all architectures
except x86 where it's required.
The comment in arch/x86/mm/tlb.c explains the details why it's necessary.
Calling copy_from_user_nofault() from bpf, [ke]probe without this check is not safe.

- __copy_from_user_inatomic() under CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is calling
check_object_size()->__check_object_size()->check_heap_object()->find_vmap_area()->spin_lock()
which is not safe to do from bpf, [ke]probe and perf due to potential deadlock.

Fix all three issues. At the end the copy_from_user_nofault() becomes
equivalent to copy_from_user_nmi() from safety point of view with
a difference in the return value.

Reported-by: Hsin-Wei Hung <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Florian Lehner <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Hsin-Wei Hung <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Florian Lehner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.3-rc6, v6.3-rc5, v6.3-rc4, v6.3-rc3, v6.3-rc2, v6.3-rc1, v6.2, v6.2-rc8, v6.2-rc7, v6.2-rc6, v6.2-rc5, v6.2-rc4, v6.2-rc3, v6.2-rc2, v6.2-rc1, v6.1, v6.1-rc8, v6.1-rc7, v6.1-rc6, v6.1-rc5, v6.1-rc4
# f15be1b8 01-Nov-2022 Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>

mm: use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()

strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool(). However, the latter is more used
within the kernel.

In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrto

mm: use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()

strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool(). However, the latter is more used
within the kernel.

In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to
the other function name.

While at it, include the corresponding header file (<linux/kstrtox.h>)

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/03f9401a6c8b87a1c786a2138d16b048f8d0eb53.1667336095.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Pasha Tatashin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1-rc3, v6.1-rc2, v6.1-rc1, v6.0, v6.0-rc7, v6.0-rc6, v6.0-rc5, v6.0-rc4, v6.0-rc3, v6.0-rc2, v6.0-rc1, v5.19, v5.19-rc8, v5.19-rc7, v5.19-rc6, v5.19-rc5, v5.19-rc4, v5.19-rc3
# 170b2c35 16-Jun-2022 Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]>

usercopy: use unsigned long instead of uintptr_t

A recent commit factored out a series of annoying (unsigned long) casts
into a single variable declaration, but made the pointer type a
`uintptr_t` r

usercopy: use unsigned long instead of uintptr_t

A recent commit factored out a series of annoying (unsigned long) casts
into a single variable declaration, but made the pointer type a
`uintptr_t` rather than the usual `unsigned long`. This patch changes it
to be the integer type more typically used by the kernel to represent
addresses.

Fixes: 35fb9ae4aa2e ("usercopy: Cast pointer to an integer once")
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.19-rc2
# 1dfbe9fc 12-Jun-2022 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>

usercopy: Make usercopy resilient against ridiculously large copies

If 'n' is so large that it's negative, we might wrap around and mistakenly
think that the copy is OK when it's not. Such a copy w

usercopy: Make usercopy resilient against ridiculously large copies

If 'n' is so large that it's negative, we might wrap around and mistakenly
think that the copy is OK when it's not. Such a copy would probably
crash, but just doing the arithmetic in a more simple way lets us detect
and refuse this case.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Zorro Lang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


# 35fb9ae4 12-Jun-2022 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>

usercopy: Cast pointer to an integer once

Get rid of a lot of annoying casts by setting 'addr' once at the top
of the function.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Reviewed

usercopy: Cast pointer to an integer once

Get rid of a lot of annoying casts by setting 'addr' once at the top
of the function.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Zorro Lang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


# 993d0b28 12-Jun-2022 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>

usercopy: Handle vm_map_ram() areas

vmalloc does not allocate a vm_struct for vm_map_ram() areas. That causes
us to deny usercopies from those areas. This affects XFS which uses
vm_map_ram() for i

usercopy: Handle vm_map_ram() areas

vmalloc does not allocate a vm_struct for vm_map_ram() areas. That causes
us to deny usercopies from those areas. This affects XFS which uses
vm_map_ram() for its directories.

Fix this by calling find_vmap_area() instead of find_vm_area().

Fixes: 0aef499f3172 ("mm/usercopy: Detect vmalloc overruns")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Zorro Lang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.19-rc1, v5.18, v5.18-rc7, v5.18-rc6
# a5f4d9df 05-May-2022 Yuanzheng Song <[email protected]>

mm: usercopy: move the virt_addr_valid() below the is_vmalloc_addr()

The is_kmap_addr() and the is_vmalloc_addr() in the check_heap_object()
will not work, because the virt_addr_valid() will exclude

mm: usercopy: move the virt_addr_valid() below the is_vmalloc_addr()

The is_kmap_addr() and the is_vmalloc_addr() in the check_heap_object()
will not work, because the virt_addr_valid() will exclude the kmap and
vmalloc regions. So let's move the virt_addr_valid() below
the is_vmalloc_addr().

Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song <[email protected]>
Fixes: 4e140f59d285 ("mm/usercopy: Check kmap addresses properly")
Fixes: 0aef499f3172 ("mm/usercopy: Detect vmalloc overruns")
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.18-rc5, v5.18-rc4, v5.18-rc3, v5.18-rc2, v5.18-rc1, v5.17, v5.17-rc8, v5.17-rc7, v5.17-rc6, v5.17-rc5, v5.17-rc4, v5.17-rc3, v5.17-rc2, v5.17-rc1
# 1109a5d9 10-Jan-2022 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>

usercopy: Remove HARDENED_USERCOPY_PAGESPAN

There isn't enough information to make this a useful check any more;
the useful parts of it were moved in earlier patches, so remove this
set of checks no

usercopy: Remove HARDENED_USERCOPY_PAGESPAN

There isn't enough information to make this a useful check any more;
the useful parts of it were moved in earlier patches, so remove this
set of checks now.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


# ab502103 10-Jan-2022 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>

mm/usercopy: Detect large folio overruns

Move the compound page overrun detection out of
CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY_PAGESPAN and convert it to use folios so it's
enabled for more people.

Signed-off-b

mm/usercopy: Detect large folio overruns

Move the compound page overrun detection out of
CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY_PAGESPAN and convert it to use folios so it's
enabled for more people.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


# 0aef499f 10-Jan-2022 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>

mm/usercopy: Detect vmalloc overruns

If you have a vmalloc() allocation, or an address from calling vmap(),
you cannot overrun the vm_area which describes it, regardless of the
size of the underlyin

mm/usercopy: Detect vmalloc overruns

If you have a vmalloc() allocation, or an address from calling vmap(),
you cannot overrun the vm_area which describes it, regardless of the
size of the underlying allocation. This probably doesn't do much for
security because vmalloc comes with guard pages these days, but it
prevents usercopy aborts when copying to a vmap() of smaller pages.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


# 4e140f59 10-Jan-2022 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>

mm/usercopy: Check kmap addresses properly

If you are copying to an address in the kmap region, you may not copy
across a page boundary, no matter what the size of the underlying
allocation. You ca

mm/usercopy: Check kmap addresses properly

If you are copying to an address in the kmap region, you may not copy
across a page boundary, no matter what the size of the underlying
allocation. You can't kmap() a slab page because slab pages always
come from low memory.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


# 05fe3c10 22-Mar-2022 Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

mm/usercopy: return 1 from hardened_usercopy __setup() handler

__setup() handlers should return 1 if the command line option is handled
and 0 if not (or maybe never return 0; it just pollutes init's

mm/usercopy: return 1 from hardened_usercopy __setup() handler

__setup() handlers should return 1 if the command line option is handled
and 0 if not (or maybe never return 0; it just pollutes init's
environment). This prevents:

Unknown kernel command line parameters \
"BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/bzImage-517rc5 hardened_usercopy=off", will be \
passed to user space.

Run /sbin/init as init process
with arguments:
/sbin/init
with environment:
HOME=/
TERM=linux
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/bzImage-517rc5
hardened_usercopy=off
or
hardened_usercopy=on
but when "hardened_usercopy=foo" is used, there is no Unknown kernel
command line parameter.

Return 1 to indicate that the boot option has been handled.
Print a warning if strtobool() returns an error on the option string,
but do not mark this as in unknown command line option and do not cause
init's environment to be polluted with this string.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: b5cb15d9372ab ("usercopy: Allow boot cmdline disabling of hardening")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Igor Zhbanov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Chris von Recklinghausen <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 6eada26f 22-Mar-2022 Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>

mm: remove usercopy_warn()

Users of usercopy_warn() were removed by commit 53944f171a89 ("mm:
remove HARDENED_USERCOPY_FALLBACK")

Remove it.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5f26643fc70b05f8455b60b

mm: remove usercopy_warn()

Users of usercopy_warn() were removed by commit 53944f171a89 ("mm:
remove HARDENED_USERCOPY_FALLBACK")

Remove it.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5f26643fc70b05f8455b60b99c30c17d635fa640.1644231910.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Kitt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 2792d84e 16-Feb-2022 Kees Cook <[email protected]>

usercopy: Check valid lifetime via stack depth

One of the things that CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY sanity-checks is whether
an object that is about to be copied to/from userspace is overlapping
the stac

usercopy: Check valid lifetime via stack depth

One of the things that CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY sanity-checks is whether
an object that is about to be copied to/from userspace is overlapping
the stack at all. If it is, it performs a number of inexpensive
bounds checks. One of the finer-grained checks is whether an object
crosses stack frames within the stack region. Doing this on x86 with
CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER was cheap/easy. Doing it with ORC was deemed too
heavy, and was left out (a while ago), leaving the courser whole-stack
check.

The LKDTM tests USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_TO and USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM
try to exercise these cross-frame cases to validate the defense is
working. They have been failing ever since ORC was added (which was
expected). While Muhammad was investigating various LKDTM failures[1],
he asked me for additional details on them, and I realized that when
exact stack frame boundary checking is not available (i.e. everything
except x86 with FRAME_POINTER), it could check if a stack object is at
least "current depth valid", in the sense that any object within the
stack region but not between start-of-stack and current_stack_pointer
should be considered unavailable (i.e. its lifetime is from a call no
longer present on the stack).

Introduce ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER to track which architectures
have actually implemented the common global register alias.

Additionally report usercopy bounds checking failures with an offset
from current_stack_pointer, which may assist with diagnosing failures.

The LKDTM USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_TO and USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM tests
(once slightly adjusted in a separate patch) pass again with this fixed.

[1] https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-project/issues/84

Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
---
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
v4: - improve commit log (akpm)

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.16, v5.16-rc8, v5.16-rc7, v5.16-rc6, v5.16-rc5, v5.16-rc4, v5.16-rc3, v5.16-rc2, v5.16-rc1, v5.15, v5.15-rc7, v5.15-rc6, v5.15-rc5
# 0b3eb091 04-Oct-2021 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>

mm: Convert check_heap_object() to use struct slab

Ensure that we're not seeing a tail page inside __check_heap_object() by
converting to a slab instead of a page. Take the opportunity to mark
the

mm: Convert check_heap_object() to use struct slab

Ensure that we're not seeing a tail page inside __check_heap_object() by
converting to a slab instead of a page. Take the opportunity to mark
the slab as const since we're not modifying it. Also move the
declaration of __check_heap_object() to mm/slab.h so it's not available
to the wider kernel.

[ [email protected]: in check_heap_object() only convert to struct slab for
actual PageSlab pages; use folio as intermediate step instead of page ]

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15-rc4, v5.15-rc3, v5.15-rc2, v5.15-rc1, v5.14, v5.14-rc7, v5.14-rc6, v5.14-rc5, v5.14-rc4, v5.14-rc3, v5.14-rc2, v5.14-rc1, v5.13, v5.13-rc7, v5.13-rc6, v5.13-rc5, v5.13-rc4, v5.13-rc3, v5.13-rc2, v5.13-rc1, v5.12, v5.12-rc8, v5.12-rc7, v5.12-rc6, v5.12-rc5, v5.12-rc4, v5.12-rc3, v5.12-rc2, v5.12-rc1, v5.12-rc1-dontuse, v5.11, v5.11-rc7, v5.11-rc6, v5.11-rc5, v5.11-rc4, v5.11-rc3, v5.11-rc2, v5.11-rc1, v5.10, v5.10-rc7, v5.10-rc6, v5.10-rc5, v5.10-rc4, v5.10-rc3, v5.10-rc2, v5.10-rc1, v5.9, v5.9-rc8, v5.9-rc7, v5.9-rc6, v5.9-rc5, v5.9-rc4, v5.9-rc3, v5.9-rc2, v5.9-rc1
# 5ce1be0e 12-Aug-2020 Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

mm/usercopy.c: delete duplicated word

Drop the repeated word "the".

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrew

mm/usercopy.c: delete duplicated word

Drop the repeated word "the".

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.8, v5.8-rc7, v5.8-rc6, v5.8-rc5, v5.8-rc4, v5.8-rc3, v5.8-rc2, v5.8-rc1, v5.7, v5.7-rc7, v5.7-rc6, v5.7-rc5, v5.7-rc4, v5.7-rc3, v5.7-rc2, v5.7-rc1, v5.6, v5.6-rc7, v5.6-rc6, v5.6-rc5, v5.6-rc4, v5.6-rc3, v5.6-rc2, v5.6-rc1, v5.5, v5.5-rc7, v5.5-rc6, v5.5-rc5, v5.5-rc4, v5.5-rc3, v5.5-rc2, v5.5-rc1, v5.4, v5.4-rc8, v5.4-rc7, v5.4-rc6, v5.4-rc5, v5.4-rc4, v5.4-rc3, v5.4-rc2, v5.4-rc1
# 314eed30 17-Sep-2019 Kees Cook <[email protected]>

usercopy: Avoid HIGHMEM pfn warning

When running on a system with >512MB RAM with a 32-bit kernel built with:

CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL=y
CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y

all execve()s wi

usercopy: Avoid HIGHMEM pfn warning

When running on a system with >512MB RAM with a 32-bit kernel built with:

CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL=y
CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y

all execve()s will fail due to argv copying into kmap()ed pages, and on
usercopy checking the calls ultimately of virt_to_page() will be looking
for "bad" kmap (highmem) pointers due to CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL=y:

------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at ../arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:83!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc8 #6
Hardware name: Dell Inc. Inspiron 1318/0C236D, BIOS A04 01/15/2009
EIP: __phys_addr+0xaf/0x100
...
Call Trace:
__check_object_size+0xaf/0x3c0
? __might_sleep+0x80/0xa0
copy_strings+0x1c2/0x370
copy_strings_kernel+0x2b/0x40
__do_execve_file+0x4ca/0x810
? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1c7/0x370
do_execve+0x1b/0x20
...

The check is from arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:

VIRTUAL_BUG_ON((phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) > max_low_pfn);

Due to the kmap() in fs/exec.c:

kaddr = kmap(kmapped_page);
...
if (copy_from_user(kaddr+offset, str, bytes_to_copy)) ...

Now we can fetch the correct page to avoid the pfn check. In both cases,
hardened usercopy will need to walk the page-span checker (if enabled)
to do sanity checking.

Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Fixes: f5509cc18daa ("mm: Hardened usercopy")
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/201909171056.7F2FFD17@keescook

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.3, v5.3-rc8, v5.3-rc7, v5.3-rc6, v5.3-rc5
# 95153169 13-Aug-2019 Isaac J. Manjarres <[email protected]>

mm/usercopy: use memory range to be accessed for wraparound check

Currently, when checking to see if accessing n bytes starting at address
"ptr" will cause a wraparound in the memory addresses, the

mm/usercopy: use memory range to be accessed for wraparound check

Currently, when checking to see if accessing n bytes starting at address
"ptr" will cause a wraparound in the memory addresses, the check in
check_bogus_address() adds an extra byte, which is incorrect, as the
range of addresses that will be accessed is [ptr, ptr + (n - 1)].

This can lead to incorrectly detecting a wraparound in the memory
address, when trying to read 4 KB from memory that is mapped to the the
last possible page in the virtual address space, when in fact, accessing
that range of memory would not cause a wraparound to occur.

Use the memory range that will actually be accessed when considering if
accessing a certain amount of bytes will cause the memory address to
wrap around.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: f5509cc18daa ("mm: Hardened usercopy")
Signed-off-by: Prasad Sodagudi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Prasad Sodagudi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Trilok Soni <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.3-rc4, v5.3-rc3, v5.3-rc2, v5.3-rc1, v5.2, v5.2-rc7, v5.2-rc6, v5.2-rc5, v5.2-rc4
# d2912cb1 04-Jun-2019 Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 500

Based on 2 normalized pattern(s):

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of th

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 500

Based on 2 normalized pattern(s):

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation #

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.2-rc3, v5.2-rc2, v5.2-rc1, v5.1, v5.1-rc7, v5.1-rc6, v5.1-rc5, v5.1-rc4, v5.1-rc3, v5.1-rc2, v5.1-rc1, v5.0, v5.0-rc8, v5.0-rc7, v5.0-rc6, v5.0-rc5, v5.0-rc4, v5.0-rc3, v5.0-rc2
# 7bff3c06 08-Jan-2019 Qian Cai <[email protected]>

mm/usercopy.c: no check page span for stack objects

It is easy to trigger this with CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY_PAGESPAN=y,

usercopy: Kernel memory overwrite attempt detected to spans multiple pages

mm/usercopy.c: no check page span for stack objects

It is easy to trigger this with CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY_PAGESPAN=y,

usercopy: Kernel memory overwrite attempt detected to spans multiple pages (offset 0, size 23)!
kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:102!

For example,

print_worker_info
char name[WQ_NAME_LEN] = { };
char desc[WORKER_DESC_LEN] = { };
probe_kernel_read(name, wq->name, sizeof(name) - 1);
probe_kernel_read(desc, worker->desc, sizeof(desc) - 1);
__copy_from_user_inatomic
check_object_size
check_heap_object
check_page_span

This is because on-stack variables could cross PAGE_SIZE boundary, and
failed this check,

if (likely(((unsigned long)ptr & (unsigned long)PAGE_MASK) ==
((unsigned long)end & (unsigned long)PAGE_MASK)))

ptr = FFFF889007D7EFF8
end = FFFF889007D7F00E

Hence, fix it by checking if it is a stack object first.

[[email protected]: improve comments after reorder]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103165151.GA32845@beast
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.0-rc1, v4.20, v4.20-rc7, v4.20-rc6, v4.20-rc5, v4.20-rc4, v4.20-rc3, v4.20-rc2, v4.20-rc1, v4.19, v4.19-rc8, v4.19-rc7, v4.19-rc6, v4.19-rc5, v4.19-rc4, v4.19-rc3, v4.19-rc2, v4.19-rc1, v4.18, v4.18-rc8, v4.18-rc7, v4.18-rc6, v4.18-rc5, v4.18-rc4
# b5cb15d9 03-Jul-2018 Chris von Recklinghausen <[email protected]>

usercopy: Allow boot cmdline disabling of hardening

Enabling HARDENED_USERCOPY may cause measurable regressions in networking
performance: up to 8% under UDP flood.

I ran a small packet UDP flood u

usercopy: Allow boot cmdline disabling of hardening

Enabling HARDENED_USERCOPY may cause measurable regressions in networking
performance: up to 8% under UDP flood.

I ran a small packet UDP flood using pktgen vs. a host b2b connected. On
the receiver side the UDP packets are processed by a simple user space
process that just reads and drops them:

https://github.com/netoptimizer/network-testing/blob/master/src/udp_sink.c

Not very useful from a functional PoV, but it helps to pin-point
bottlenecks in the networking stack.

When running a kernel with CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y, I see a 5-8%
regression in the receive tput, compared to the same kernel without this
option enabled.

With CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y, perf shows ~6% of CPU time spent
cumulatively in __check_object_size (~4%) and __virt_addr_valid (~2%).

The call-chain is:

__GI___libc_recvfrom
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
do_syscall_64
__x64_sys_recvfrom
__sys_recvfrom
inet_recvmsg
udp_recvmsg
__check_object_size

udp_recvmsg() actually calls copy_to_iter() (inlined) and the latters
calls check_copy_size() (again, inlined).

A generic distro may want to enable HARDENED_USERCOPY in their default
kernel config, but at the same time, such distro may want to be able to
avoid the performance penalties in with the default configuration and
disable the stricter check on a per-boot basis.

This change adds a boot parameter that conditionally disables
HARDENED_USERCOPY via "hardened_usercopy=off".

Signed-off-by: Chris von Recklinghausen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v4.18-rc3, v4.18-rc2, v4.18-rc1, v4.17, v4.17-rc7, v4.17-rc6, v4.17-rc5, v4.17-rc4, v4.17-rc3, v4.17-rc2, v4.17-rc1, v4.16, v4.16-rc7, v4.16-rc6, v4.16-rc5, v4.16-rc4, v4.16-rc3, v4.16-rc2, v4.16-rc1, v4.15, v4.15-rc9, v4.15-rc8
# afcc90f8 10-Jan-2018 Kees Cook <[email protected]>

usercopy: WARN() on slab cache usercopy region violations

This patch adds checking of usercopy cache whitelisting, and is modified
from Brad Spengler/PaX Team's PAX_USERCOPY whitelisting code in the

usercopy: WARN() on slab cache usercopy region violations

This patch adds checking of usercopy cache whitelisting, and is modified
from Brad Spengler/PaX Team's PAX_USERCOPY whitelisting code in the
last public patch of grsecurity/PaX based on my understanding of the
code. Changes or omissions from the original code are mine and don't
reflect the original grsecurity/PaX code.

The SLAB and SLUB allocators are modified to WARN() on all copy operations
in which the kernel heap memory being modified falls outside of the cache's
defined usercopy region.

Based on an earlier patch from David Windsor.

Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>

show more ...


12