History log of /linux-6.15/kernel/power/suspend.c (Results 1 – 25 of 125)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.15, v6.15-rc7, v6.15-rc6, v6.15-rc5, v6.15-rc4, v6.15-rc3, v6.15-rc2, v6.15-rc1, v6.14, v6.14-rc7
# 4b7d6542 11-Mar-2025 Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>

PM: s2idle: Extend comment in s2idle_enter()

The s2idle_lock must be held while checking for a pending wakeup and while
moving into S2IDLE_STATE_ENTER, to make sure a wakeup doesn't get lost.
Let's

PM: s2idle: Extend comment in s2idle_enter()

The s2idle_lock must be held while checking for a pending wakeup and while
moving into S2IDLE_STATE_ENTER, to make sure a wakeup doesn't get lost.
Let's extend the comment in the code to make this clear.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
[ rjw: Rewrote the new comment ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 0f42194c 11-Mar-2025 Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>

PM: s2idle: Drop redundant locks when entering s2idle

The calls to cpus_read_lock|unlock() protects us from getting CPUS
hotplugged, while entering suspend-to-idle. However, when s2idle_enter() is
c

PM: s2idle: Drop redundant locks when entering s2idle

The calls to cpus_read_lock|unlock() protects us from getting CPUS
hotplugged, while entering suspend-to-idle. However, when s2idle_enter() is
called we should be far beyond the point when CPUs may be hotplugged.
Let's therefore simplify the code and drop the use of the lock.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
[ rjw: Rewrote the new comment ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.14-rc6, v6.14-rc5
# 63830aef 26-Feb-2025 Marcos Paulo de Souza <[email protected]>

printk: Rename resume_console to console_resume_all

The function resume_console has a misleading name, since it resumes all
consoles, so rename it accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza

printk: Rename resume_console to console_resume_all

The function resume_console has a misleading name, since it resumes all
consoles, so rename it accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: John Ogness <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[[email protected]: Fixed typo in the commit message.]
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>

show more ...


# e9cec448 26-Feb-2025 Marcos Paulo de Souza <[email protected]>

printk: Rename suspend_console to console_suspend_all

The function suspend_console has a misleading name, since it suspends all
consoles, so rename it accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de So

printk: Rename suspend_console to console_suspend_all

The function suspend_console has a misleading name, since it suspends all
consoles, so rename it accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: John Ogness <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[[email protected]: Fixed typo in the commit message.]
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.14-rc4, v6.14-rc3, v6.14-rc2, v6.14-rc1, v6.13, v6.13-rc7, v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4, v6.13-rc3, v6.13-rc2, v6.13-rc1, v6.12, v6.12-rc7, v6.12-rc6, v6.12-rc5, v6.12-rc4, v6.12-rc3, v6.12-rc2, v6.12-rc1, v6.11, v6.11-rc7, v6.11-rc6, v6.11-rc5, v6.11-rc4, v6.11-rc3, v6.11-rc2, v6.11-rc1, v6.10, v6.10-rc7, v6.10-rc6, v6.10-rc5, v6.10-rc4, v6.10-rc3, v6.10-rc2, v6.10-rc1, v6.9, v6.9-rc7, v6.9-rc6, v6.9-rc5, v6.9-rc4
# 3c89a068 08-Apr-2024 Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>

PM: s2idle: Make sure CPUs will wakeup directly on resume

s2idle works like a regular suspend with freezing processes and freezing
devices. All CPUs except the control CPU go into idle. Once this is

PM: s2idle: Make sure CPUs will wakeup directly on resume

s2idle works like a regular suspend with freezing processes and freezing
devices. All CPUs except the control CPU go into idle. Once this is
completed the control CPU kicks all other CPUs out of idle, so that they
reenter the idle loop and then enter s2idle state. The control CPU then
issues an swait() on the suspend state and therefore enters the idle loop
as well.

Due to being kicked out of idle, the other CPUs leave their NOHZ states,
which means the tick is active and the corresponding hrtimer is programmed
to the next jiffie.

On entering s2idle the CPUs shut down their local clockevent device to
prevent wakeups. The last CPU which enters s2idle shuts down its local
clockevent and freezes timekeeping.

On resume, one of the CPUs receives the wakeup interrupt, unfreezes
timekeeping and its local clockevent and starts the resume process. At that
point all other CPUs are still in s2idle with their clockevents switched
off. They only resume when they are kicked by another CPU or after resuming
devices and then receiving a device interrupt.

That means there is no guarantee that all CPUs will wakeup directly on
resume. As a consequence there is no guarantee that timers which are queued
on those CPUs and should expire directly after resume, are handled. Also
timer list timers which are remotely queued to one of those CPUs after
resume will not result in a reprogramming IPI as the tick is
active. Queueing a hrtimer will also not result in a reprogramming IPI
because the first hrtimer event is already in the past.

The recent introduction of the timer pull model (7ee988770326 ("timers:
Implement the hierarchical pull model")) amplifies this problem, if the
current migrator is one of the non woken up CPUs. When a non pinned timer
list timer is queued and the queuing CPU goes idle, it relies on the still
suspended migrator CPU to expire the timer which will happen by chance.

The problem exists since commit 8d89835b0467 ("PM: suspend: Do not pause
cpuidle in the suspend-to-idle path"). There the cpuidle_pause() call which
in turn invoked a wakeup for all idle CPUs was moved to a later point in
the resume process. This might not be reached or reached very late because
it waits on a timer of a still suspended CPU.

Address this by kicking all CPUs out of idle after the control CPU returns
from swait() so that they resume their timers and restore consistent system
state.

Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218641
Fixes: 8d89835b0467 ("PM: suspend: Do not pause cpuidle in the suspend-to-idle path")
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Cc: 5.16+ <[email protected]> # 5.16+
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.9-rc3, v6.9-rc2, v6.9-rc1, v6.8, v6.8-rc7
# 9bc4ffd3 29-Feb-2024 Maulik Shah <[email protected]>

PM: suspend: Set mem_sleep_current during kernel command line setup

psci_init_system_suspend() invokes suspend_set_ops() very early during
bootup even before kernel command line for mem_sleep_defaul

PM: suspend: Set mem_sleep_current during kernel command line setup

psci_init_system_suspend() invokes suspend_set_ops() very early during
bootup even before kernel command line for mem_sleep_default is setup.
This leads to kernel command line mem_sleep_default=s2idle not working
as mem_sleep_current gets changed to deep via suspend_set_ops() and never
changes back to s2idle.

Set mem_sleep_current along with mem_sleep_default during kernel command
line setup as default suspend mode.

Fixes: faf7ec4a92c0 ("drivers: firmware: psci: add system suspend support")
CC: [email protected] # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.8-rc6, v6.8-rc5, v6.8-rc4, v6.8-rc3
# 9ff544fa 29-Jan-2024 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

PM: sleep: stats: Define suspend_stats next to the code using it

It is not necessary to define struct suspend_stats in a header file and the
suspend_stats variable in the core device system-wide PM

PM: sleep: stats: Define suspend_stats next to the code using it

It is not necessary to define struct suspend_stats in a header file and the
suspend_stats variable in the core device system-wide PM code. They both
can be defined in kernel/power/main.c, next to the sysfs and debugfs code
accessing suspend_stats, which can be static.

Modify the code in question in accordance with the above observation and
replace the static inline functions manipulating suspend_stats with
regular ones defined in kernel/power/main.c.

While at it, move the enum suspend_stat_step to the end of suspend.h which
is a more suitable place for it.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>

show more ...


# b730bab0 29-Jan-2024 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

PM: sleep: stats: Use an array of step failure counters

Instead of using a set of individual struct suspend_stats fields
representing suspend step failure counters, use an array of counters
indexed

PM: sleep: stats: Use an array of step failure counters

Instead of using a set of individual struct suspend_stats fields
representing suspend step failure counters, use an array of counters
indexed by enum suspend_stat_step for this purpose, which allows
dpm_save_failed_step() to increment the appropriate counter
automatically, so that its callers don't need to do that directly.

It also allows suspend_stats_show() to carry out a loop over the
counters array to print their values.

Because the counters cannot become negative, use unsigned int for
representing them.

The only user-observable impact of this change is a different
ordering of entries in the suspend_stats debugfs file which is not
expected to matter.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.8-rc2, v6.8-rc1, v6.7, v6.7-rc8, v6.7-rc7, v6.7-rc6, v6.7-rc5, v6.7-rc4, v6.7-rc3, v6.7-rc2, v6.7-rc1, v6.6, v6.6-rc7, v6.6-rc6, v6.6-rc5, v6.6-rc4, v6.6-rc3, v6.6-rc2, v6.6-rc1, v6.5, v6.5-rc7, v6.5-rc6, v6.5-rc5, v6.5-rc4, v6.5-rc3, v6.5-rc2, v6.5-rc1, v6.4, v6.4-rc7, v6.4-rc6, v6.4-rc5, v6.4-rc4, v6.4-rc3, v6.4-rc2, v6.4-rc1, v6.3, v6.3-rc7, v6.3-rc6, v6.3-rc5, v6.3-rc4, v6.3-rc3, v6.3-rc2, v6.3-rc1, v6.2, v6.2-rc8, v6.2-rc7, v6.2-rc6, v6.2-rc5, v6.2-rc4, v6.2-rc3, v6.2-rc2, v6.2-rc1, v6.1, v6.1-rc8, v6.1-rc7, v6.1-rc6, v6.1-rc5, v6.1-rc4, v6.1-rc3, v6.1-rc2, v6.1-rc1, v6.0, v6.0-rc7, v6.0-rc6, v6.0-rc5, v6.0-rc4
# 811d59fd 29-Aug-2022 Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>

ACPI: s2idle: Add a new ->check() callback for platform_s2idle_ops

On some platforms it is found that Linux more aggressively enters s2idle
than Windows enters Modern Standby and this uncovers some

ACPI: s2idle: Add a new ->check() callback for platform_s2idle_ops

On some platforms it is found that Linux more aggressively enters s2idle
than Windows enters Modern Standby and this uncovers some synchronization
issues for the platform. To aid in debugging this class of problems in
the future, add support for an extra optional callback intended for
drivers to emit extra debugging.

Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.0-rc3
# 5950e5d5 22-Aug-2022 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

freezer: Have {,un}lock_system_sleep() save/restore flags

Rafael explained that the reason for having both PF_NOFREEZE and
PF_FREEZER_SKIP is that {,un}lock_system_sleep() is callable from
kthread c

freezer: Have {,un}lock_system_sleep() save/restore flags

Rafael explained that the reason for having both PF_NOFREEZE and
PF_FREEZER_SKIP is that {,un}lock_system_sleep() is callable from
kthread context that has previously called set_freezable().

In preparation of merging the flags, have {,un}lock_system_slee() save
and restore current->flags.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.0-rc2, v6.0-rc1, v5.19, v5.19-rc8, v5.19-rc7, v5.19-rc6, v5.19-rc5, v5.19-rc4, v5.19-rc3, v5.19-rc2, v5.19-rc1, v5.18, v5.18-rc7, v5.18-rc6, v5.18-rc5, v5.18-rc4
# 9ea4dcf4 22-Apr-2022 Dan Williams <[email protected]>

PM: CXL: Disable suspend

The CXL specification claims S3 support at a hardware level, but at a
system software level there are some missing pieces. Section 9.4 (CXL
2.0) rightly claims that "CXL mem

PM: CXL: Disable suspend

The CXL specification claims S3 support at a hardware level, but at a
system software level there are some missing pieces. Section 9.4 (CXL
2.0) rightly claims that "CXL mem adapters may need aux power to retain
memory context across S3", but there is no enumeration mechanism for the
OS to determine if a given adapter has that support. Moreover the save
state and resume image for the system may inadvertantly end up in a CXL
device that needs to be restored before the save state is recoverable.
I.e. a circular dependency that is not resolvable without a third party
save-area.

Arrange for the cxl_mem driver to fail S3 attempts. This still nominaly
allows for suspend, but requires unbinding all CXL memory devices before
the suspend to ensure the typical DRAM flow is taken. The cxl_mem unbind
flow is intended to also tear down all CXL memory regions associated
with a given cxl_memdev.

It is reasonable to assume that any device participating in a System RAM
range published in the EFI memory map is covered by aux power and
save-area outside the device itself. So this restriction can be
minimized in the future once pre-existing region enumeration support
arrives, and perhaps a spec update to clarify if the EFI memory map is
sufficent for determining the range of devices managed by
platform-firmware for S3 support.

Per Rafael, if the CXL configuration prevents suspend then it should
fail early before tasks are frozen, and mem_sleep should stop showing
'mem' as an option [1]. Effectively CXL augments the platform suspend
->valid() op since, for example, the ACPI ops are not aware of the CXL /
PCI dependencies. Given the split role of platform firmware vs OS
provisioned CXL memory it is up to the cxl_mem driver to determine if
the CXL configuration has elements that platform firmware may not be
prepared to restore.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAJZ5v0hGVN_=3iU8OLpHY3Ak35T5+JcBM-qs8SbojKrpd0VXsA@mail.gmail.com [1]
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165066828317.3907920.5690432272182042556.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.18-rc3, v5.18-rc2, v5.18-rc1, v5.17, v5.17-rc8, v5.17-rc7, v5.17-rc6, v5.17-rc5, v5.17-rc4, v5.17-rc3
# cb1f65c1 04-Feb-2022 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

PM: s2idle: ACPI: Fix wakeup interrupts handling

After commit e3728b50cd9b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race
related to the EC GPE") wakeup interrupts occurring immediately after
the one disca

PM: s2idle: ACPI: Fix wakeup interrupts handling

After commit e3728b50cd9b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race
related to the EC GPE") wakeup interrupts occurring immediately after
the one discarded by acpi_s2idle_wake() may be missed. Moreover, if
the SCI triggers again immediately after the rearming in
acpi_s2idle_wake(), that wakeup may be missed too.

The problem is that pm_system_irq_wakeup() only calls pm_system_wakeup()
when pm_wakeup_irq is 0, but that's not the case any more after the
interrupt causing acpi_s2idle_wake() to run until pm_wakeup_irq is
cleared by the pm_wakeup_clear() call in s2idle_loop(). However,
there may be wakeup interrupts occurring in that time frame and if
that happens, they will be missed.

To address that issue first move the clearing of pm_wakeup_irq to
the point at which it is known that the interrupt causing
acpi_s2idle_wake() to tun will be discarded, before rearming the SCI
for wakeup. Moreover, because that only reduces the size of the
time window in which the issue may manifest itself, allow
pm_system_irq_wakeup() to register two second wakeup interrupts in
a row and, when discarding the first one, replace it with the second
one. [Of course, this assumes that only one wakeup interrupt can be
discarded in one go, but currently that is the case and I am not
aware of any plans to change that.]

Fixes: e3728b50cd9b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race related to the EC GPE")
Cc: 5.4+ <[email protected]> # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.17-rc2, v5.17-rc1, v5.16, v5.16-rc8, v5.16-rc7, v5.16-rc6, v5.16-rc5, v5.16-rc4, v5.16-rc3, v5.16-rc2, v5.16-rc1, v5.15, v5.15-rc7
# 9f6abfcd 22-Oct-2021 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

PM: suspend: Use valid_state() consistently

Make valid_state() check if the ->enter callback is present in
suspend_ops (only PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE can be valid otherwise) and
make sleep_state_supported

PM: suspend: Use valid_state() consistently

Make valid_state() check if the ->enter callback is present in
suspend_ops (only PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE can be valid otherwise) and
make sleep_state_supported() call valid_state() consistently to
validate the states other than PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE.

While at it, clean up the comment in valid_state().

No expected functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 23f62d7a 22-Oct-2021 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

PM: sleep: Pause cpuidle later and resume it earlier during system transitions

Commit 8651f97bd951 ("PM / cpuidle: System resume hang fix with
cpuidle") that introduced cpuidle pausing during system

PM: sleep: Pause cpuidle later and resume it earlier during system transitions

Commit 8651f97bd951 ("PM / cpuidle: System resume hang fix with
cpuidle") that introduced cpuidle pausing during system suspend
did that to work around a platform firmware issue causing systems
to hang during resume if CPUs were allowed to enter idle states
in the system suspend and resume code paths.

However, pausing cpuidle before the last phase of suspending
devices is the source of an otherwise arbitrary difference between
the suspend-to-idle path and other system suspend variants, so it is
cleaner to do that later, before taking secondary CPUs offline (it
is still safer to take secondary CPUs offline with cpuidle paused,
though).

Modify the code accordingly, but in order to avoid code duplication,
introduce new wrapper functions, pm_sleep_disable_secondary_cpus()
and pm_sleep_enable_secondary_cpus(), to combine cpuidle_pause()
and cpuidle_resume(), respectively, with the handling of secondary
CPUs during system-wide transitions to sleep states.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 8d89835b 22-Oct-2021 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

PM: suspend: Do not pause cpuidle in the suspend-to-idle path

It is pointless to pause cpuidle in the suspend-to-idle path,
because it is going to be resumed in the same path later and
pausing it do

PM: suspend: Do not pause cpuidle in the suspend-to-idle path

It is pointless to pause cpuidle in the suspend-to-idle path,
because it is going to be resumed in the same path later and
pausing it does not serve any particular purpose in that case.

Rework the code to avoid doing that.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>

show more ...


# c1bfc598 19-Oct-2021 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

Revert "PM: sleep: Do not assume that "mem" is always present"

Revert commit bfcc1e67ff1e ("PM: sleep: Do not assume that "mem" is
always present"), because it breaks compatibility with user space
u

Revert "PM: sleep: Do not assume that "mem" is always present"

Revert commit bfcc1e67ff1e ("PM: sleep: Do not assume that "mem" is
always present"), because it breaks compatibility with user space
utilities assuming that "mem" will always be present in
/sys/power/state.

Fixes: bfcc1e67ff1e ("PM: sleep: Do not assume that "mem" is always present")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15-rc6, v5.15-rc5, v5.15-rc4, v5.15-rc3, v5.15-rc2
# bfcc1e67 15-Sep-2021 Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>

PM: sleep: Do not assume that "mem" is always present

An implementation of suspend_ops is allowed to reject the PM_SUSPEND_MEM
suspend type from its ->valid() callback, we should not assume that it

PM: sleep: Do not assume that "mem" is always present

An implementation of suspend_ops is allowed to reject the PM_SUSPEND_MEM
suspend type from its ->valid() callback, we should not assume that it
is always present as this is not a correct reflection of what a firmware
interface may support.

Fixes: 406e79385f32 ("PM / sleep: System sleep state selection interface rework")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15-rc1, v5.14, v5.14-rc7, v5.14-rc6, v5.14-rc5
# d2c8cce6 03-Aug-2021 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>

PM: sleep: s2idle: Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug functions

The functions get_online_cpus() and put_online_cpus() have been
deprecated during the CPU hotplug rework. They map directly to
cpus_read_l

PM: sleep: s2idle: Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug functions

The functions get_online_cpus() and put_online_cpus() have been
deprecated during the CPU hotplug rework. They map directly to
cpus_read_lock() and cpus_read_unlock().

Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug functions with the official version.
The behavior remains unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.14-rc4, v5.14-rc3, v5.14-rc2, v5.14-rc1, v5.13, v5.13-rc7, v5.13-rc6, v5.13-rc5, v5.13-rc4, v5.13-rc3, v5.13-rc2, v5.13-rc1, v5.12, v5.12-rc8, v5.12-rc7, v5.12-rc6, v5.12-rc5, v5.12-rc4, v5.12-rc3, v5.12-rc2, v5.12-rc1, v5.12-rc1-dontuse, v5.11, v5.11-rc7, v5.11-rc6, v5.11-rc5, v5.11-rc4, v5.11-rc3, v5.11-rc2, v5.11-rc1, v5.10, v5.10-rc7, v5.10-rc6, v5.10-rc5, v5.10-rc4
# ab150c3f 13-Nov-2020 Alex Shi <[email protected]>

PM / suspend: fix kernel-doc markup

Add parameter explanation to fix kernel-doc marks:

kernel/power/suspend.c:233: warning: Function parameter or member
'state' not described in 'suspend_valid_only

PM / suspend: fix kernel-doc markup

Add parameter explanation to fix kernel-doc marks:

kernel/power/suspend.c:233: warning: Function parameter or member
'state' not described in 'suspend_valid_only_mem'
kernel/power/suspend.c:344: warning: Function parameter or member
'state' not described in 'suspend_prepare'

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <[email protected]>
[ rjw: Change the proposed parameter descriptions. ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.10-rc3, v5.10-rc2, v5.10-rc1, v5.9, v5.9-rc8, v5.9-rc7, v5.9-rc6, v5.9-rc5, v5.9-rc4, v5.9-rc3, v5.9-rc2
# 70d93298 18-Aug-2020 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern

The current notifiers have the following error handling pattern all
over the place:

int err, nr;

err = __foo_notifier_call_chain(&chain, val_up, v, -1

notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern

The current notifiers have the following error handling pattern all
over the place:

int err, nr;

err = __foo_notifier_call_chain(&chain, val_up, v, -1, &nr);
if (err & NOTIFIER_STOP_MASK)
__foo_notifier_call_chain(&chain, val_down, v, nr-1, NULL)

And aside from the endless repetition thereof, it is broken. Consider
blocking notifiers; both calls take and drop the rwsem, this means
that the notifier list can change in between the two calls, making @nr
meaningless.

Fix this by replacing all the __foo_notifier_call_chain() functions
with foo_notifier_call_chain_robust() that embeds the above pattern,
but ensures it is inside a single lock region.

Note: I switched atomic_notifier_call_chain_robust() to use
the spinlock, since RCU cannot provide the guarantee
required for the recovery.

Note: software_resume() error handling was broken afaict.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.9-rc1, v5.8, v5.8-rc7, v5.8-rc6, v5.8-rc5, v5.8-rc4, v5.8-rc3, v5.8-rc2, v5.8-rc1, v5.7, v5.7-rc7, v5.7-rc6, v5.7-rc5, v5.7-rc4, v5.7-rc3, v5.7-rc2, v5.7-rc1, v5.6, v5.6-rc7, v5.6-rc6, v5.6-rc5, v5.6-rc4, v5.6-rc3, v5.6-rc2
# e3728b50 11-Feb-2020 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race related to the EC GPE

It is theoretically possible for the ACPI EC GPE to be set after the
s2idle_ops->wake() called from s2idle_loop() has returned and before

ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race related to the EC GPE

It is theoretically possible for the ACPI EC GPE to be set after the
s2idle_ops->wake() called from s2idle_loop() has returned and before
the subsequent pm_wakeup_pending() check is carried out. If that
happens, the resulting wakeup event will cause the system to resume
even though it may be a spurious one.

To avoid that race, first make the ->wake() callback in struct
platform_s2idle_ops return a bool value indicating whether or not
to let the system resume and rearrange s2idle_loop() to use that
value instad of the direct pm_wakeup_pending() call if ->wake() is
present.

Next, rework acpi_s2idle_wake() to process EC events and check
pm_wakeup_pending() before re-arming the SCI for system wakeup
to prevent it from triggering prematurely and add comments to
that function to explain the rationale for the new code flow.

Fixes: 56b991849009 ("PM: sleep: Simplify suspend-to-idle control flow")
Cc: 5.4+ <[email protected]> # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.6-rc1, v5.5, v5.5-rc7
# c052bf82 16-Jan-2020 Jonas Meurer <[email protected]>

PM: suspend: Add sysfs attribute to control the "sync on suspend" behavior

The sysfs attribute `/sys/power/sync_on_suspend` controls, whether or not
filesystems are synced by the kernel before syste

PM: suspend: Add sysfs attribute to control the "sync on suspend" behavior

The sysfs attribute `/sys/power/sync_on_suspend` controls, whether or not
filesystems are synced by the kernel before system suspend.

Congruously, the behaviour of build-time switch CONFIG_SUSPEND_SKIP_SYNC
is slightly changed: It now defines the run-tim default for the new sysfs
attribute `/sys/power/sync_on_suspend`.

The run-time attribute is added because the existing corresponding
build-time Kconfig flag for (`CONFIG_SUSPEND_SKIP_SYNC`) is not flexible
enough. E.g. Linux distributions that provide pre-compiled kernels
usually want to stick with the default (sync filesystems before suspend)
but under special conditions this needs to be changed.

One example for such a special condition is user-space handling of
suspending block devices (e.g. using `cryptsetup luksSuspend` or `dmsetup
suspend`) before system suspend. The Kernel trying to sync filesystems
after the underlying block device already got suspended obviously leads
to dead-locks. Be aware that you have to take care of the filesystem sync
yourself before suspending the system in those scenarios.

Signed-off-by: Jonas Meurer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.5-rc6, v5.5-rc5, v5.5-rc4, v5.5-rc3, v5.5-rc2, v5.5-rc1, v5.4, v5.4-rc8, v5.4-rc7, v5.4-rc6, v5.4-rc5, v5.4-rc4, v5.4-rc3, v5.4-rc2, v5.4-rc1, v5.3, v5.3-rc8, v5.3-rc7, v5.3-rc6, v5.3-rc5, v5.3-rc4
# 11f26633 10-Aug-2019 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

PM: suspend: Fix platform_suspend_prepare_noirq()

After commit ac9eafbe930a ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Execute LPS0 _DSM
functions with suspended devices"), a NULL pointer may be dereferenced
if suspend-to

PM: suspend: Fix platform_suspend_prepare_noirq()

After commit ac9eafbe930a ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Execute LPS0 _DSM
functions with suspended devices"), a NULL pointer may be dereferenced
if suspend-to-idle is attempted on a platform without "traditional"
suspend support due to invalid fall-through in
platform_suspend_prepare_noirq().

Fix that and while at it add missing braces in platform_resume_noirq().

Fixes: ac9eafbe930a ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Execute LPS0 _DSM functions with suspended devices")
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.3-rc3
# ac9eafbe 01-Aug-2019 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

ACPI: PM: s2idle: Execute LPS0 _DSM functions with suspended devices

According to Section 3.5 of the "Intel Low Power S0 Idle" document [1],
Function 5 of the LPS0 _DSM is expected to be invoked whe

ACPI: PM: s2idle: Execute LPS0 _DSM functions with suspended devices

According to Section 3.5 of the "Intel Low Power S0 Idle" document [1],
Function 5 of the LPS0 _DSM is expected to be invoked when the system
configuration matches the criteria for entering the target low-power
state of the platform. In particular, this means that all devices
should be suspended and in low-power states already when that function
is invoked.

This is not the case currently, however, because Function 5 of the
LPS0 _DSM is invoked by it before the "noirq" phase of device suspend,
which means that some devices may not have been put into low-power
states yet at that point. That is a consequence of the previous
design of the suspend-to-idle flow that allowed the "noirq" phase of
device suspend and the "noirq" phase of device resume to be carried
out for multiple times while "suspended" (if any spurious wakeup
events were detected) and the point of the LPS0 _DSM Function 5
invocation was chosen so as to call it (and LPS0 _DSM Function 6
analogously) once per suspend-resume cycle (regardless of how many
times the "noirq" phases of device suspend and resume were carried
out while "suspended").

Now that the suspend-to-idle flow has been redesigned to carry out
the "noirq" phases of device suspend and resume once in each cycle,
the code can be reordered to follow the specification that it is
based on more closely.

For this purpose, add ->prepare_late and ->restore_early platform
callbacks for suspend-to-idle, to be executed, respectively, after
the "noirq" phase of suspending devices and before the "noirq"
phase of resuming them and make ACPI use them for the invocation
of LPS0 _DSM functions as appropriate.

While at it, move the LPS0 entry requirements check to be made
before invoking Functions 3 and 5 of the LPS0 _DSM (also once
per cycle) as follows from the specification [1].

Link: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Intel_ACPI_Low_Power_S0_Idle.pdf # [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Kai-Heng Feng <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.3-rc2, v5.3-rc1
# 8eb0fd3b 15-Jul-2019 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

PM: sleep: Integrate suspend-to-idle with generig suspend flow

After previous changes the suspend-to-idle code flow can be
integrated more tightly with the generic system suspend code flow
by making

PM: sleep: Integrate suspend-to-idle with generig suspend flow

After previous changes the suspend-to-idle code flow can be
integrated more tightly with the generic system suspend code flow
by making suspend_enter() call s2idle_loop() later and removing
the direct invocations of dpm_noirq_begin(),
dpm_noirq_suspend_devices(), dpm_noirq_end(), and
dpm_noirq_resume_devices() from the latter, so do that.

This change is not expected to alter functionality.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

show more ...


12345