|
Revision tags: v6.15, v6.15-rc7, v6.15-rc6, v6.15-rc5, v6.15-rc4, v6.15-rc3, v6.15-rc2, v6.15-rc1, v6.14, v6.14-rc7, v6.14-rc6, v6.14-rc5, v6.14-rc4, v6.14-rc3, v6.14-rc2, v6.14-rc1, v6.13, v6.13-rc7, v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4, v6.13-rc3, v6.13-rc2, v6.13-rc1, v6.12, v6.12-rc7, v6.12-rc6, v6.12-rc5, v6.12-rc4, v6.12-rc3 |
|
| #
3a9320ec |
| 09-Oct-2024 |
Juri Lelli <[email protected]> |
locking/mutex: Expose __mutex_owner()
Implementing proxy execution requires that scheduler code be able to identify the current owner of a mutex. Expose __mutex_owner() for this purpose (alone!). In
locking/mutex: Expose __mutex_owner()
Implementing proxy execution requires that scheduler code be able to identify the current owner of a mutex. Expose __mutex_owner() for this purpose (alone!). Includes a null mutex check, so that users of the function can be simplified.
[Removed the EXPORT_SYMBOL] [jstultz: Reworked per Peter's suggestions] Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Metin Kaya <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <[email protected]> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <[email protected]> Tested-by: Metin Kaya <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.12-rc2, v6.12-rc1, v6.11, v6.11-rc7, v6.11-rc6, v6.11-rc5, v6.11-rc4, v6.11-rc3, v6.11-rc2, v6.11-rc1, v6.10, v6.10-rc7, v6.10-rc6, v6.10-rc5, v6.10-rc4, v6.10-rc3, v6.10-rc2, v6.10-rc1, v6.9, v6.9-rc7, v6.9-rc6, v6.9-rc5, v6.9-rc4, v6.9-rc3, v6.9-rc2, v6.9-rc1, v6.8, v6.8-rc7, v6.8-rc6, v6.8-rc5, v6.8-rc4, v6.8-rc3, v6.8-rc2, v6.8-rc1, v6.7, v6.7-rc8, v6.7-rc7, v6.7-rc6, v6.7-rc5, v6.7-rc4, v6.7-rc3, v6.7-rc2, v6.7-rc1, v6.6, v6.6-rc7, v6.6-rc6, v6.6-rc5, v6.6-rc4, v6.6-rc3, v6.6-rc2, v6.6-rc1, v6.5, v6.5-rc7, v6.5-rc6, v6.5-rc5, v6.5-rc4, v6.5-rc3, v6.5-rc2, v6.5-rc1, v6.4, v6.4-rc7, v6.4-rc6, v6.4-rc5, v6.4-rc4, v6.4-rc3, v6.4-rc2, v6.4-rc1, v6.3, v6.3-rc7, v6.3-rc6, v6.3-rc5, v6.3-rc4, v6.3-rc3, v6.3-rc2, v6.3-rc1, v6.2, v6.2-rc8, v6.2-rc7, v6.2-rc6, v6.2-rc5, v6.2-rc4, v6.2-rc3, v6.2-rc2, v6.2-rc1, v6.1, v6.1-rc8, v6.1-rc7, v6.1-rc6, v6.1-rc5, v6.1-rc4, v6.1-rc3, v6.1-rc2, v6.1-rc1, v6.0, v6.0-rc7, v6.0-rc6, v6.0-rc5, v6.0-rc4, v6.0-rc3, v6.0-rc2, v6.0-rc1, v5.19, v5.19-rc8, v5.19-rc7, v5.19-rc6, v5.19-rc5, v5.19-rc4, v5.19-rc3, v5.19-rc2, v5.19-rc1, v5.18, v5.18-rc7, v5.18-rc6, v5.18-rc5, v5.18-rc4, v5.18-rc3, v5.18-rc2, v5.18-rc1, v5.17, v5.17-rc8, v5.17-rc7, v5.17-rc6, v5.17-rc5, v5.17-rc4, v5.17-rc3, v5.17-rc2, v5.17-rc1, v5.16, v5.16-rc8, v5.16-rc7, v5.16-rc6, v5.16-rc5, v5.16-rc4, v5.16-rc3, v5.16-rc2, v5.16-rc1, v5.15, v5.15-rc7, v5.15-rc6, v5.15-rc5, v5.15-rc4, v5.15-rc3, v5.15-rc2, v5.15-rc1, v5.14, v5.14-rc7, v5.14-rc6 |
|
| #
43d2d52d |
| 15-Aug-2021 |
Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> |
locking/mutex: Move the 'struct mutex_waiter' definition from <linux/mutex.h> to the internal header
Move the mutex waiter declaration from the public <linux/mutex.h> header to the internal kernel/l
locking/mutex: Move the 'struct mutex_waiter' definition from <linux/mutex.h> to the internal header
Move the mutex waiter declaration from the public <linux/mutex.h> header to the internal kernel/locking/mutex.h header.
There is no reason to expose it outside of the core code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
show more ...
|
| #
a321fb90 |
| 17-Aug-2021 |
Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> |
locking/mutex: Consolidate core headers, remove kernel/locking/mutex-debug.h
Having two header files which contain just the non-debug and debug variants is mostly waste of disc space and has no real
locking/mutex: Consolidate core headers, remove kernel/locking/mutex-debug.h
Having two header files which contain just the non-debug and debug variants is mostly waste of disc space and has no real value. Stick the debug variants into the common mutex.h file as counterpart to the stubs for the non-debug case.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.14-rc5, v5.14-rc4, v5.14-rc3, v5.14-rc2, v5.14-rc1, v5.13, v5.13-rc7, v5.13-rc6, v5.13-rc5, v5.13-rc4, v5.13-rc3 |
|
| #
3a010c49 |
| 17-May-2021 |
Zqiang <[email protected]> |
locking/mutex: clear MUTEX_FLAGS if wait_list is empty due to signal
When a interruptible mutex locker is interrupted by a signal without acquiring this lock and removed from the wait queue. if the
locking/mutex: clear MUTEX_FLAGS if wait_list is empty due to signal
When a interruptible mutex locker is interrupted by a signal without acquiring this lock and removed from the wait queue. if the mutex isn't contended enough to have a waiter put into the wait queue again, the setting of the WAITER bit will force mutex locker to go into the slowpath to acquire the lock every time, so if the wait queue is empty, the WAITER bit need to be clear.
Fixes: 040a0a371005 ("mutex: Add support for wound/wait style locks") Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.13-rc2, v5.13-rc1, v5.12, v5.12-rc8, v5.12-rc7, v5.12-rc6, v5.12-rc5, v5.12-rc4, v5.12-rc3, v5.12-rc2, v5.12-rc1, v5.12-rc1-dontuse, v5.11, v5.11-rc7, v5.11-rc6, v5.11-rc5, v5.11-rc4, v5.11-rc3, v5.11-rc2, v5.11-rc1, v5.10, v5.10-rc7, v5.10-rc6, v5.10-rc5, v5.10-rc4, v5.10-rc3, v5.10-rc2, v5.10-rc1, v5.9, v5.9-rc8, v5.9-rc7, v5.9-rc6, v5.9-rc5, v5.9-rc4, v5.9-rc3, v5.9-rc2, v5.9-rc1, v5.8, v5.8-rc7, v5.8-rc6, v5.8-rc5, v5.8-rc4, v5.8-rc3, v5.8-rc2, v5.8-rc1, v5.7, v5.7-rc7, v5.7-rc6, v5.7-rc5, v5.7-rc4, v5.7-rc3, v5.7-rc2, v5.7-rc1, v5.6, v5.6-rc7, v5.6-rc6, v5.6-rc5, v5.6-rc4, v5.6-rc3, v5.6-rc2, v5.6-rc1, v5.5, v5.5-rc7, v5.5-rc6, v5.5-rc5, v5.5-rc4, v5.5-rc3, v5.5-rc2, v5.5-rc1, v5.4, v5.4-rc8, v5.4-rc7, v5.4-rc6, v5.4-rc5, v5.4-rc4, v5.4-rc3, v5.4-rc2, v5.4-rc1, v5.3, v5.3-rc8, v5.3-rc7, v5.3-rc6, v5.3-rc5, v5.3-rc4 |
|
| #
e57d1430 |
| 08-Aug-2019 |
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> |
mutex: Fix up mutex_waiter usage
The patch moving bits into mutex.c was a little too much; by also moving struct mutex_waiter a few less common CONFIGs would no longer build.
Fixes: 5f35d5a66b3e ("
mutex: Fix up mutex_waiter usage
The patch moving bits into mutex.c was a little too much; by also moving struct mutex_waiter a few less common CONFIGs would no longer build.
Fixes: 5f35d5a66b3e ("locking/mutex: Make __mutex_owner static to mutex.c") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.3-rc3 |
|
| #
5f35d5a6 |
| 31-Jul-2019 |
Mukesh Ojha <[email protected]> |
locking/mutex: Make __mutex_owner static to mutex.c
__mutex_owner() should only be used by the mutex api's. So, to put this restiction let's move the __mutex_owner() function definition from linux/m
locking/mutex: Make __mutex_owner static to mutex.c
__mutex_owner() should only be used by the mutex api's. So, to put this restiction let's move the __mutex_owner() function definition from linux/mutex.h to mutex.c file.
There exist functions that uses __mutex_owner() like mutex_is_locked() and mutex_trylock_recursive(), So to keep legacy thing intact move them as well and export them.
Move mutex_waiter structure also to keep it private to the file.
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.3-rc2, v5.3-rc1, v5.2, v5.2-rc7, v5.2-rc6, v5.2-rc5, v5.2-rc4, v5.2-rc3, v5.2-rc2, v5.2-rc1, v5.1, v5.1-rc7, v5.1-rc6, v5.1-rc5, v5.1-rc4, v5.1-rc3, v5.1-rc2, v5.1-rc1, v5.0, v5.0-rc8, v5.0-rc7, v5.0-rc6, v5.0-rc5, v5.0-rc4, v5.0-rc3, v5.0-rc2, v5.0-rc1, v4.20, v4.20-rc7, v4.20-rc6, v4.20-rc5, v4.20-rc4, v4.20-rc3, v4.20-rc2, v4.20-rc1, v4.19, v4.19-rc8, v4.19-rc7, v4.19-rc6, v4.19-rc5, v4.19-rc4, v4.19-rc3, v4.19-rc2, v4.19-rc1, v4.18, v4.18-rc8, v4.18-rc7, v4.18-rc6, v4.18-rc5, v4.18-rc4, v4.18-rc3, v4.18-rc2, v4.18-rc1, v4.17, v4.17-rc7, v4.17-rc6, v4.17-rc5, v4.17-rc4, v4.17-rc3, v4.17-rc2, v4.17-rc1, v4.16, v4.16-rc7, v4.16-rc6, v4.16-rc5, v4.16-rc4, v4.16-rc3, v4.16-rc2, v4.16-rc1, v4.15, v4.15-rc9, v4.15-rc8, v4.15-rc7, v4.15-rc6, v4.15-rc5, v4.15-rc4, v4.15-rc3, v4.15-rc2, v4.15-rc1, v4.14, v4.14-rc8 |
|
| #
b2441318 |
| 01-Nov-2017 |
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> |
License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine
License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v4.14-rc7, v4.14-rc6, v4.14-rc5, v4.14-rc4, v4.14-rc3, v4.14-rc2, v4.14-rc1, v4.13, v4.13-rc7, v4.13-rc6, v4.13-rc5, v4.13-rc4, v4.13-rc3, v4.13-rc2, v4.13-rc1, v4.12, v4.12-rc7, v4.12-rc6, v4.12-rc5, v4.12-rc4, v4.12-rc3, v4.12-rc2, v4.12-rc1, v4.11, v4.11-rc8, v4.11-rc7, v4.11-rc6, v4.11-rc5, v4.11-rc4, v4.11-rc3, v4.11-rc2, v4.11-rc1, v4.10, v4.10-rc8, v4.10-rc7, v4.10-rc6, v4.10-rc5 |
|
| #
b9c16a0e |
| 17-Jan-2017 |
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> |
locking/mutex: Fix lockdep_assert_held() fail
In commit:
659cf9f5824a ("locking/ww_mutex: Optimize ww-mutexes by waking at most one waiter for backoff when acquiring the lock")
I replaced a comm
locking/mutex: Fix lockdep_assert_held() fail
In commit:
659cf9f5824a ("locking/ww_mutex: Optimize ww-mutexes by waking at most one waiter for backoff when acquiring the lock")
I replaced a comment with a lockdep_assert_held(). However it turns out we hide that lock from lockdep for hysterical raisins, which results in the assertion always firing.
Remove the old debug code as lockdep will easily spot the abuse it was meant to catch, which will make the lock visible to lockdep and make the assertion work as intended.
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Nicolai Haehnle <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Fixes: 659cf9f5824a ("locking/ww_mutex: Optimize ww-mutexes by waking at most one waiter for backoff when acquiring the lock") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170117150609.GB32474@worktop Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v4.10-rc4, v4.10-rc3, v4.10-rc2, v4.10-rc1, v4.9, v4.9-rc8, v4.9-rc7, v4.9-rc6, v4.9-rc5, v4.9-rc4, v4.9-rc3, v4.9-rc2, v4.9-rc1, v4.8, v4.8-rc8, v4.8-rc7, v4.8-rc6, v4.8-rc5, v4.8-rc4 |
|
| #
3ca0ff57 |
| 23-Aug-2016 |
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> |
locking/mutex: Rework mutex::owner
The current mutex implementation has an atomic lock word and a non-atomic owner field.
This disparity leads to a number of issues with the current mutex code as i
locking/mutex: Rework mutex::owner
The current mutex implementation has an atomic lock word and a non-atomic owner field.
This disparity leads to a number of issues with the current mutex code as it means that we can have a locked mutex without an explicit owner (because the owner field has not been set, or already cleared).
This leads to a number of weird corner cases, esp. between the optimistic spinning and debug code. Where the optimistic spinning code needs the owner field updated inside the lock region, the debug code is more relaxed because the whole lock is serialized by the wait_lock.
Also, the spinning code itself has a few corner cases where we need to deal with a held lock without an owner field.
Furthermore, it becomes even more of a problem when trying to fix starvation cases in the current code. We end up stacking special case on special case.
To solve this rework the basic mutex implementation to be a single atomic word that contains the owner and uses the low bits for extra state.
This matches how PI futexes and rt_mutex already work. By having the owner an integral part of the lock state a lot of the problems dissapear and we get a better option to deal with starvation cases, direct owner handoff.
Changing the basic mutex does however invalidate all the arch specific mutex code; this patch leaves that unused in-place, a later patch will remove that.
Tested-by: Jason Low <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v4.8-rc3, v4.8-rc2, v4.8-rc1, v4.7, v4.7-rc7, v4.7-rc6, v4.7-rc5 |
|
| #
6720a305 |
| 23-Jun-2016 |
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> |
locking: avoid passing around 'thread_info' in mutex debugging code
None of the code actually wants a thread_info, it all wants a task_struct, and it's just converting back and forth between the two
locking: avoid passing around 'thread_info' in mutex debugging code
None of the code actually wants a thread_info, it all wants a task_struct, and it's just converting back and forth between the two ("ti->task" to get the task_struct from the thread_info, and "task_thread_info(task)" to go the other way).
No semantic change.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v4.7-rc4, v4.7-rc3, v4.7-rc2, v4.7-rc1 |
|
| #
6e281474 |
| 20-May-2016 |
Jason Low <[email protected]> |
locking/mutex: Set and clear owner using WRITE_ONCE()
The mutex owner can get read and written to locklessly. Use WRITE_ONCE when setting and clearing the owner field in order to avoid optimizations
locking/mutex: Set and clear owner using WRITE_ONCE()
The mutex owner can get read and written to locklessly. Use WRITE_ONCE when setting and clearing the owner field in order to avoid optimizations such as store tearing. This avoids situations where the owner field gets written to with multiple stores and another thread could concurrently read and use a partially written owner value.
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Acked-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Scott J Norton <[email protected]> Cc: Terry Rudd <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463782776.2479.9.camel@j-VirtualBox Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v4.6, v4.6-rc7, v4.6-rc6, v4.6-rc5, v4.6-rc4, v4.6-rc3, v4.6-rc2, v4.6-rc1, v4.5, v4.5-rc7, v4.5-rc6, v4.5-rc5, v4.5-rc4, v4.5-rc3, v4.5-rc2, v4.5-rc1, v4.4, v4.4-rc8, v4.4-rc7, v4.4-rc6, v4.4-rc5, v4.4-rc4, v4.4-rc3, v4.4-rc2, v4.4-rc1, v4.3, v4.3-rc7, v4.3-rc6, v4.3-rc5, v4.3-rc4, v4.3-rc3, v4.3-rc2, v4.3-rc1, v4.2, v4.2-rc8, v4.2-rc7, v4.2-rc6, v4.2-rc5, v4.2-rc4, v4.2-rc3, v4.2-rc2, v4.2-rc1, v4.1, v4.1-rc8, v4.1-rc7, v4.1-rc6, v4.1-rc5, v4.1-rc4, v4.1-rc3, v4.1-rc2, v4.1-rc1, v4.0, v4.0-rc7, v4.0-rc6, v4.0-rc5, v4.0-rc4, v4.0-rc3, v4.0-rc2, v4.0-rc1, v3.19, v3.19-rc7, v3.19-rc6, v3.19-rc5, v3.19-rc4, v3.19-rc3, v3.19-rc2, v3.19-rc1, v3.18, v3.18-rc7, v3.18-rc6, v3.18-rc5, v3.18-rc4, v3.18-rc3, v3.18-rc2, v3.18-rc1, v3.17, v3.17-rc7, v3.17-rc6, v3.17-rc5, v3.17-rc4, v3.17-rc3, v3.17-rc2, v3.17-rc1, v3.16 |
|
| #
7608a43d |
| 30-Jul-2014 |
Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> |
locking/mutexes: Use MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER when appropriate
4badad35 ("locking/mutex: Disable optimistic spinning on some architectures") added a ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW flag to disable the mutex opt
locking/mutexes: Use MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER when appropriate
4badad35 ("locking/mutex: Disable optimistic spinning on some architectures") added a ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW flag to disable the mutex optimistic feature on specific archs.
Because CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER only depended on DEBUG and SMP, it was ok to have the ->owner field conditional a bit flexible. However by adding a new variable to the matter, we can waste space with the unused field, ie: CONFIG_SMP && (!CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER && !CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEX).
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jason Low <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Low <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Cc: Tim Chen <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v3.16-rc7, v3.16-rc6, v3.16-rc5, v3.16-rc4, v3.16-rc3, v3.16-rc2, v3.16-rc1, v3.15, v3.15-rc8, v3.15-rc7, v3.15-rc6, v3.15-rc5, v3.15-rc4, v3.15-rc3, v3.15-rc2, v3.15-rc1, v3.14, v3.14-rc8, v3.14-rc7, v3.14-rc6, v3.14-rc5, v3.14-rc4, v3.14-rc3, v3.14-rc2, v3.14-rc1, v3.13, v3.13-rc8, v3.13-rc7, v3.13-rc6, v3.13-rc5, v3.13-rc4, v3.13-rc3, v3.13-rc2, v3.13-rc1, v3.12 |
|
| #
01768b42 |
| 31-Oct-2013 |
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> |
locking: Move the mutex code to kernel/locking/
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-1ditvncg30dgbpvrz
locking: Move the mutex code to kernel/locking/
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
show more ...
|