History log of /linux-6.15/include/linux/proc_fs.h (Results 1 – 25 of 139)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.15, v6.15-rc7, v6.15-rc6, v6.15-rc5, v6.15-rc4, v6.15-rc3, v6.15-rc2, v6.15-rc1, v6.14, v6.14-rc7, v6.14-rc6, v6.14-rc5
# 654b33ad 01-Mar-2025 Ye Bin <[email protected]>

proc: fix UAF in proc_get_inode()

Fix race between rmmod and /proc/XXX's inode instantiation.

The bug is that pde->proc_ops don't belong to /proc, it belongs to a
module, therefore dereferencing it

proc: fix UAF in proc_get_inode()

Fix race between rmmod and /proc/XXX's inode instantiation.

The bug is that pde->proc_ops don't belong to /proc, it belongs to a
module, therefore dereferencing it after /proc entry has been registered
is a bug unless use_pde/unuse_pde() pair has been used.

use_pde/unuse_pde can be avoided (2 atomic ops!) because pde->proc_ops
never changes so information necessary for inode instantiation can be
saved _before_ proc_register() in PDE itself and used later, avoiding
pde->proc_ops->... dereference.

rmmod lookup
sys_delete_module
proc_lookup_de
pde_get(de);
proc_get_inode(dir->i_sb, de);
mod->exit()
proc_remove
remove_proc_subtree
proc_entry_rundown(de);
free_module(mod);

if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
if (de->proc_ops->proc_read_iter)
--> As module is already freed, will trigger UAF

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffbfff80a702b
PGD 817fc4067 P4D 817fc4067 PUD 817fc0067 PMD 102ef4067 PTE 0
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 2667 Comm: ls Tainted: G
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
RIP: 0010:proc_get_inode+0x302/0x6e0
RSP: 0018:ffff88811c837998 EFLAGS: 00010a06
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffffffffc0538140 RCX: 0000000000000007
RDX: 1ffffffff80a702b RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffc0538158
RBP: ffff8881299a6000 R08: 0000000067bbe1e5 R09: 1ffff11023906f20
R10: ffffffffb560ca07 R11: ffffffffb2b43a58 R12: ffff888105bb78f0
R13: ffff888100518048 R14: ffff8881299a6004 R15: 0000000000000001
FS: 00007f95b9686840(0000) GS:ffff8883af100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: fffffbfff80a702b CR3: 0000000117dd2000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
proc_lookup_de+0x11f/0x2e0
__lookup_slow+0x188/0x350
walk_component+0x2ab/0x4f0
path_lookupat+0x120/0x660
filename_lookup+0x1ce/0x560
vfs_statx+0xac/0x150
__do_sys_newstat+0x96/0x110
do_syscall_64+0x5f/0x170
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

[[email protected]: don't do 2 atomic ops on the common path]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3d25ded0-1739-447e-812b-e34da7990dcf@p183
Fixes: 778f3dd5a13c ("Fix procfs compat_ioctl regression")
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.14-rc4, v6.14-rc3, v6.14-rc2, v6.14-rc1, v6.13, v6.13-rc7, v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4, v6.13-rc3, v6.13-rc2, v6.13-rc1, v6.12, v6.12-rc7, v6.12-rc6, v6.12-rc5, v6.12-rc4, v6.12-rc3, v6.12-rc2, v6.12-rc1, v6.11, v6.11-rc7, v6.11-rc6, v6.11-rc5, v6.11-rc4, v6.11-rc3, v6.11-rc2, v6.11-rc1, v6.10, v6.10-rc7, v6.10-rc6, v6.10-rc5, v6.10-rc4, v6.10-rc3, v6.10-rc2, v6.10-rc1, v6.9, v6.9-rc7, v6.9-rc6, v6.9-rc5, v6.9-rc4, v6.9-rc3, v6.9-rc2, v6.9-rc1, v6.8, v6.8-rc7, v6.8-rc6, v6.8-rc5, v6.8-rc4, v6.8-rc3, v6.8-rc2, v6.8-rc1, v6.7, v6.7-rc8, v6.7-rc7, v6.7-rc6, v6.7-rc5, v6.7-rc4, v6.7-rc3, v6.7-rc2, v6.7-rc1, v6.6, v6.6-rc7, v6.6-rc6, v6.6-rc5, v6.6-rc4, v6.6-rc3
# e31f0a57 20-Sep-2023 Al Viro <[email protected]>

procfs: make freeing proc_fs_info rcu-delayed

makes proc_pid_ns() safe from rcu pathwalk (put_pid_ns()
is still synchronous, but that's not a problem - it does
rcu-delay everything that needs to be)

procfs: make freeing proc_fs_info rcu-delayed

makes proc_pid_ns() safe from rcu pathwalk (put_pid_ns()
is still synchronous, but that's not a problem - it does
rcu-delay everything that needs to be)

Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6-rc2, v6.6-rc1, v6.5, v6.5-rc7, v6.5-rc6, v6.5-rc5, v6.5-rc4, v6.5-rc3, v6.5-rc2, v6.5-rc1, v6.4, v6.4-rc7
# 0ee44885 13-Jun-2023 Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]>

x86: Expose thread features in /proc/$PID/status

Applications and loaders can have logic to decide whether to enable
shadow stack. They usually don't report whether shadow stack has been
enabled or

x86: Expose thread features in /proc/$PID/status

Applications and loaders can have logic to decide whether to enable
shadow stack. They usually don't report whether shadow stack has been
enabled or not, so there is no way to verify whether an application
actually is protected by shadow stack.

Add two lines in /proc/$PID/status to report enabled and locked features.

Since, this involves referring to arch specific defines in asm/prctl.h,
implement an arch breakout to emit the feature lines.

[Switched to CET, added to commit log]

Co-developed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <[email protected]>
Tested-by: John Allen <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230613001108.3040476-37-rick.p.edgecombe%40intel.com

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.4-rc6, v6.4-rc5, v6.4-rc4, v6.4-rc3
# ef104443 16-May-2023 Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

procfs: consolidate arch_report_meminfo declaration

The arch_report_meminfo() function is provided by four architectures,
with a __weak fallback in procfs itself. On architectures that don't
have a

procfs: consolidate arch_report_meminfo declaration

The arch_report_meminfo() function is provided by four architectures,
with a __weak fallback in procfs itself. On architectures that don't
have a custom version, the __weak version causes a warning because
of the missing prototype.

Remove the architecture specific prototypes and instead add one
in linux/proc_fs.h.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> # for arch/x86
Acked-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> # parisc
Reviewed-by: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.4-rc2, v6.4-rc1, v6.3, v6.3-rc7, v6.3-rc6, v6.3-rc5, v6.3-rc4, v6.3-rc3, v6.3-rc2, v6.3-rc1, v6.2, v6.2-rc8, v6.2-rc7, v6.2-rc6, v6.2-rc5, v6.2-rc4, v6.2-rc3, v6.2-rc2, v6.2-rc1, v6.1, v6.1-rc8, v6.1-rc7, v6.1-rc6, v6.1-rc5, v6.1-rc4, v6.1-rc3, v6.1-rc2, v6.1-rc1
# c3d96f69 03-Oct-2022 David Howells <[email protected]>

net, proc: Provide PROC_FS=n fallback for proc_create_net_single_write()

Provide a CONFIG_PROC_FS=n fallback for proc_create_net_single_write().

Also provide a fallback for proc_create_net_data_wri

net, proc: Provide PROC_FS=n fallback for proc_create_net_single_write()

Provide a CONFIG_PROC_FS=n fallback for proc_create_net_single_write().

Also provide a fallback for proc_create_net_data_write().

Fixes: 564def71765c ("proc: Add a way to make network proc files writable")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
cc: Marc Dionne <[email protected]>
cc: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.0, v6.0-rc7, v6.0-rc6, v6.0-rc5, v6.0-rc4, v6.0-rc3, v6.0-rc2, v6.0-rc1, v5.19, v5.19-rc8, v5.19-rc7, v5.19-rc6, v5.19-rc5, v5.19-rc4, v5.19-rc3, v5.19-rc2, v5.19-rc1, v5.18, v5.18-rc7, v5.18-rc6, v5.18-rc5, v5.18-rc4, v5.18-rc3, v5.18-rc2, v5.18-rc1, v5.17, v5.17-rc8, v5.17-rc7, v5.17-rc6, v5.17-rc5, v5.17-rc4, v5.17-rc3, v5.17-rc2, v5.17-rc1
# 359745d7 22-Jan-2022 Muchun Song <[email protected]>

proc: remove PDE_DATA() completely

Remove PDE_DATA() completely and replace it with pde_data().

[[email protected]: fix naming clash in drivers/nubus/proc.c]
[[email protected]: now

proc: remove PDE_DATA() completely

Remove PDE_DATA() completely and replace it with pde_data().

[[email protected]: fix naming clash in drivers/nubus/proc.c]
[[email protected]: now fix it properly]

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 6dfbbae1 22-Jan-2022 Muchun Song <[email protected]>

fs: proc: store PDE()->data into inode->i_private

PDE_DATA(inode) is introduced to get user private data and hide the
layout of struct proc_dir_entry. The inode->i_private is used to do the
same th

fs: proc: store PDE()->data into inode->i_private

PDE_DATA(inode) is introduced to get user private data and hide the
layout of struct proc_dir_entry. The inode->i_private is used to do the
same thing as well. Save a copy of user private data to inode->
i_private when proc inode is allocated. This means the user also can
get their private data by inode->i_private.

Introduce pde_data() to wrap inode->i_private so that we can remove
PDE_DATA() from fs/proc/generic.c and make PTE_DATE() as a wrapper of
pde_data(). It will be easier if we decide to remove PDE_DATE() in the
future.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


# ae62fbe2 20-Jan-2022 Hans de Goede <[email protected]>

proc: make the proc_create[_data]() stubs static inlines

Change the proc_create[_data]() stubs which are used when CONFIG_PROC_FS
is not set from #defines to a static inline stubs.

This should fix

proc: make the proc_create[_data]() stubs static inlines

Change the proc_create[_data]() stubs which are used when CONFIG_PROC_FS
is not set from #defines to a static inline stubs.

This should fix clang -Werror builds failing due to errors like this:

drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c:918:30: error: unused variable
'dispatch_proc_ops' [-Werror,-Wunused-const-variable]

Fixing this in include/linux/proc_fs.h should ensure that the same issue
is also fixed in any other drivers hitting the same -Werror issue.

[[email protected]: fix CONFIG_PROC_FS=n]
[[email protected]: fix arch/sparc/kernel/led.c]
[[email protected]: fix build]

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Viro <[email protected]>
Cc: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Cc: David Howells <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.16, v5.16-rc8, v5.16-rc7, v5.16-rc6, v5.16-rc5, v5.16-rc4, v5.16-rc3, v5.16-rc2, v5.16-rc1, v5.15, v5.15-rc7, v5.15-rc6, v5.15-rc5, v5.15-rc4, v5.15-rc3, v5.15-rc2, v5.15-rc1, v5.14, v5.14-rc7, v5.14-rc6, v5.14-rc5, v5.14-rc4, v5.14-rc3, v5.14-rc2, v5.14-rc1, v5.13, v5.13-rc7, v5.13-rc6, v5.13-rc5, v5.13-rc4, v5.13-rc3, v5.13-rc2, v5.13-rc1
# d4455fac 07-May-2021 Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

proc: mandate ->proc_lseek in "struct proc_ops"

Now that proc_ops are separate from file_operations and other operations
it easy to check all instances to have ->proc_lseek hook and remove check
in

proc: mandate ->proc_lseek in "struct proc_ops"

Now that proc_ops are separate from file_operations and other operations
it easy to check all instances to have ->proc_lseek hook and remove check
in main code.

Note:
nonseekable_open() files naturally don't require ->proc_lseek.

Garbage collect pde_lseek() function.

[[email protected]: smoke test lseek()]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YFYX0Bzwxlc7aBa/@localhost.localdomain
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.12, v5.12-rc8, v5.12-rc7, v5.12-rc6, v5.12-rc5, v5.12-rc4, v5.12-rc3, v5.12-rc2, v5.12-rc1, v5.12-rc1-dontuse, v5.11, v5.11-rc7, v5.11-rc6, v5.11-rc5, v5.11-rc4, v5.11-rc3, v5.11-rc2, v5.11-rc1
# c6c75ded 16-Dec-2020 Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

proc: fix lookup in /proc/net subdirectories after setns(2)

Commit 1fde6f21d90f ("proc: fix /proc/net/* after setns(2)") only forced
revalidation of regular files under /proc/net/

However, /proc/ne

proc: fix lookup in /proc/net subdirectories after setns(2)

Commit 1fde6f21d90f ("proc: fix /proc/net/* after setns(2)") only forced
revalidation of regular files under /proc/net/

However, /proc/net/ is unusual in the sense of /proc/net/foo handlers
take netns pointer from parent directory which is old netns.

Steps to reproduce:

(void)open("/proc/net/sctp/snmp", O_RDONLY);
unshare(CLONE_NEWNET);

int fd = open("/proc/net/sctp/snmp", O_RDONLY);
read(fd, &c, 1);

Read will read wrong data from original netns.

Patch forces lookup on every directory under /proc/net .

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: 1da4d377f943 ("proc: revalidate misc dentries")
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Reported-by: "Rantala, Tommi T. (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <[email protected]>
Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.10, v5.10-rc7, v5.10-rc6, v5.10-rc5, v5.10-rc4, v5.10-rc3, v5.10-rc2, v5.10-rc1, v5.9, v5.9-rc8, v5.9-rc7, v5.9-rc6, v5.9-rc5, v5.9-rc4
# fd5a13f4 03-Sep-2020 Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

proc: add a read_iter method to proc proc_ops

This will allow proc files to implement iter read semantics.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]

proc: add a read_iter method to proc proc_ops

This will allow proc files to implement iter read semantics.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.9-rc3, v5.9-rc2, v5.9-rc1, v5.8, v5.8-rc7
# f9c79272 23-Jul-2020 Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

bpf: Refactor to provide aux info to bpf_iter_init_seq_priv_t

This patch refactored target bpf_iter_init_seq_priv_t callback
function to accept additional information. This will be needed
in later p

bpf: Refactor to provide aux info to bpf_iter_init_seq_priv_t

This patch refactored target bpf_iter_init_seq_priv_t callback
function to accept additional information. This will be needed
in later patches for map element targets since a particular
map should be passed to traverse elements for that particular
map. In the future, other information may be passed to target
as well, e.g., pid, cgroup id, etc. to customize the iterator.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.8-rc6, v5.8-rc5, v5.8-rc4, v5.8-rc3, v5.8-rc2, v5.8-rc1, v5.7, v5.7-rc7
# 9d78edea 18-May-2020 Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>

proc: proc_pid_ns takes super_block as an argument

syzbot found that

touch /proc/testfile

causes NULL pointer dereference at tomoyo_get_local_path()
because inode of the dentry is NULL.

Before

proc: proc_pid_ns takes super_block as an argument

syzbot found that

touch /proc/testfile

causes NULL pointer dereference at tomoyo_get_local_path()
because inode of the dentry is NULL.

Before c59f415a7cb6, Tomoyo received pid_ns from proc's s_fs_info
directly. Since proc_pid_ns() can only work with inode, using it in
the tomoyo_get_local_path() was wrong.

To avoid creating more functions for getting proc_ns, change the
argument type of the proc_pid_ns() function. Then, Tomoyo can use
the existing super_block to get pid_ns.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reported-by: [email protected]
Fixes: c59f415a7cb6 ("Use proc_pid_ns() to get pid_namespace from the proc superblock")
Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.7-rc6, v5.7-rc5
# 303cc571 05-May-2020 Christian Brauner <[email protected]>

nsproxy: attach to namespaces via pidfds

For quite a while we have been thinking about using pidfds to attach to
namespaces. This patchset has existed for about a year already but we've
wanted to wa

nsproxy: attach to namespaces via pidfds

For quite a while we have been thinking about using pidfds to attach to
namespaces. This patchset has existed for about a year already but we've
wanted to wait to see how the general api would be received and adopted.
Now that more and more programs in userspace have started using pidfds
for process management it's time to send this one out.

This patch makes it possible to use pidfds to attach to the namespaces
of another process, i.e. they can be passed as the first argument to the
setns() syscall. When only a single namespace type is specified the
semantics are equivalent to passing an nsfd. That means
setns(nsfd, CLONE_NEWNET) equals setns(pidfd, CLONE_NEWNET). However,
when a pidfd is passed, multiple namespace flags can be specified in the
second setns() argument and setns() will attach the caller to all the
specified namespaces all at once or to none of them. Specifying 0 is not
valid together with a pidfd.

Here are just two obvious examples:
setns(pidfd, CLONE_NEWPID | CLONE_NEWNS | CLONE_NEWNET);
setns(pidfd, CLONE_NEWUSER);
Allowing to also attach subsets of namespaces supports various use-cases
where callers setns to a subset of namespaces to retain privilege, perform
an action and then re-attach another subset of namespaces.

If the need arises, as Eric suggested, we can extend this patchset to
assume even more context than just attaching all namespaces. His suggestion
specifically was about assuming the process' root directory when
setns(pidfd, 0) or setns(pidfd, SETNS_PIDFD) is specified. For now, just
keep it flexible in terms of supporting subsets of namespaces but let's
wait until we have users asking for even more context to be assumed. At
that point we can add an extension.

The obvious example where this is useful is a standard container
manager interacting with a running container: pushing and pulling files
or directories, injecting mounts, attaching/execing any kind of process,
managing network devices all these operations require attaching to all
or at least multiple namespaces at the same time. Given that nowadays
most containers are spawned with all namespaces enabled we're currently
looking at at least 14 syscalls, 7 to open the /proc/<pid>/ns/<ns>
nsfds, another 7 to actually perform the namespace switch. With time
namespaces we're looking at about 16 syscalls.
(We could amortize the first 7 or 8 syscalls for opening the nsfds by
stashing them in each container's monitor process but that would mean
we need to send around those file descriptors through unix sockets
everytime we want to interact with the container or keep on-disk
state. Even in scenarios where a caller wants to join a particular
namespace in a particular order callers still profit from batching
other namespaces. That mostly applies to the user namespace but
all container runtimes I found join the user namespace first no matter
if it privileges or deprivileges the container similar to how unshare
behaves.)
With pidfds this becomes a single syscall no matter how many namespaces
are supposed to be attached to.

A decently designed, large-scale container manager usually isn't the
parent of any of the containers it spawns so the containers don't die
when it crashes or needs to update or reinitialize. This means that
for the manager to interact with containers through pids is inherently
racy especially on systems where the maximum pid number is not
significicantly bumped. This is even more problematic since we often spawn
and manage thousands or ten-thousands of containers. Interacting with a
container through a pid thus can become risky quite quickly. Especially
since we allow for an administrator to enable advanced features such as
syscall interception where we're performing syscalls in lieu of the
container. In all of those cases we use pidfds if they are available and
we pass them around as stable references. Using them to setns() to the
target process' namespaces is as reliable as using nsfds. Either the
target process is already dead and we get ESRCH or we manage to attach
to its namespaces but we can't accidently attach to another process'
namespaces. So pidfds lend themselves to be used with this api.
The other main advantage is that with this change the pidfd becomes the
only relevant token for most container interactions and it's the only
token we need to create and send around.

Apart from significiantly reducing the number of syscalls from double
digit to single digit which is a decent reason post-spectre/meltdown
this also allows to switch to a set of namespaces atomically, i.e.
either attaching to all the specified namespaces succeeds or we fail. If
we fail we haven't changed a single namespace. There are currently three
namespaces that can fail (other than for ENOMEM which really is not
very interesting since we then have other problems anyway) for
non-trivial reasons, user, mount, and pid namespaces. We can fail to
attach to a pid namespace if it is not our current active pid namespace
or a descendant of it. We can fail to attach to a user namespace because
we are multi-threaded or because our current mount namespace shares
filesystem state with other tasks, or because we're trying to setns()
to the same user namespace, i.e. the target task has the same user
namespace as we do. We can fail to attach to a mount namespace because
it shares filesystem state with other tasks or because we fail to lookup
the new root for the new mount namespace. In most non-pathological
scenarios these issues can be somewhat mitigated. But there are cases where
we're half-attached to some namespace and failing to attach to another one.
I've talked about some of these problem during the hallway track (something
only the pre-COVID-19 generation will remember) of Plumbers in Los Angeles
in 2018(?). Even if all these issues could be avoided with super careful
userspace coding it would be nicer to have this done in-kernel. Pidfds seem
to lend themselves nicely for this.

The other neat thing about this is that setns() becomes an actual
counterpart to the namespace bits of unshare().

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <[email protected]>
Cc: Jann Horn <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <[email protected]>
Cc: Aleksa Sarai <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


# 138d0be3 09-May-2020 Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

net: bpf: Add netlink and ipv6_route bpf_iter targets

This patch added netlink and ipv6_route targets, using
the same seq_ops (except show() and minor changes for stop())
for /proc/net/{netlink,ipv6

net: bpf: Add netlink and ipv6_route bpf_iter targets

This patch added netlink and ipv6_route targets, using
the same seq_ops (except show() and minor changes for stop())
for /proc/net/{netlink,ipv6_route}.

The net namespace for these targets are the current net
namespace at file open stage, similar to
/proc/net/{netlink,ipv6_route} reference counting
the net namespace at seq_file open stage.

Since module is not supported for now, ipv6_route is
supported only if the IPV6 is built-in, i.e., not compiled
as a module. The restriction can be lifted once module
is properly supported for bpf_iter.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.7-rc4, v5.7-rc3, v5.7-rc2
# e61bb8b3 19-Apr-2020 Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>

proc: use named enums for better readability

Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]

proc: use named enums for better readability

Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 6814ef2d 19-Apr-2020 Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>

proc: add option to mount only a pids subset

This allows to hide all files and directories in the procfs that are not
related to tasks.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Revi

proc: add option to mount only a pids subset

This allows to hide all files and directories in the procfs that are not
related to tasks.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 24a71ce5 19-Apr-2020 Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>

proc: instantiate only pids that we can ptrace on 'hidepid=4' mount option

If "hidepid=4" mount option is set then do not instantiate pids that
we can not ptrace. "hidepid=4" means that procfs shoul

proc: instantiate only pids that we can ptrace on 'hidepid=4' mount option

If "hidepid=4" mount option is set then do not instantiate pids that
we can not ptrace. "hidepid=4" means that procfs should only contain
pids that the caller can ptrace.

Signed-off-by: Djalal Harouni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

show more ...


# fa10fed3 19-Apr-2020 Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>

proc: allow to mount many instances of proc in one pid namespace

This patch allows to have multiple procfs instances inside the
same pid namespace. The aim here is lightweight sandboxes, and to allo

proc: allow to mount many instances of proc in one pid namespace

This patch allows to have multiple procfs instances inside the
same pid namespace. The aim here is lightweight sandboxes, and to allow
that we have to modernize procfs internals.

1) The main aim of this work is to have on embedded systems one
supervisor for apps. Right now we have some lightweight sandbox support,
however if we create pid namespacess we have to manages all the
processes inside too, where our goal is to be able to run a bunch of
apps each one inside its own mount namespace without being able to
notice each other. We only want to use mount namespaces, and we want
procfs to behave more like a real mount point.

2) Linux Security Modules have multiple ptrace paths inside some
subsystems, however inside procfs, the implementation does not guarantee
that the ptrace() check which triggers the security_ptrace_check() hook
will always run. We have the 'hidepid' mount option that can be used to
force the ptrace_may_access() check inside has_pid_permissions() to run.
The problem is that 'hidepid' is per pid namespace and not attached to
the mount point, any remount or modification of 'hidepid' will propagate
to all other procfs mounts.

This also does not allow to support Yama LSM easily in desktop and user
sessions. Yama ptrace scope which restricts ptrace and some other
syscalls to be allowed only on inferiors, can be updated to have a
per-task context, where the context will be inherited during fork(),
clone() and preserved across execve(). If we support multiple private
procfs instances, then we may force the ptrace_may_access() on
/proc/<pids>/ to always run inside that new procfs instances. This will
allow to specifiy on user sessions if we should populate procfs with
pids that the user can ptrace or not.

By using Yama ptrace scope, some restricted users will only be able to see
inferiors inside /proc, they won't even be able to see their other
processes. Some software like Chromium, Firefox's crash handler, Wine
and others are already using Yama to restrict which processes can be
ptracable. With this change this will give the possibility to restrict
/proc/<pids>/ but more importantly this will give desktop users a
generic and usuable way to specifiy which users should see all processes
and which users can not.

Side notes:
* This covers the lack of seccomp where it is not able to parse
arguments, it is easy to install a seccomp filter on direct syscalls
that operate on pids, however /proc/<pid>/ is a Linux ABI using
filesystem syscalls. With this change LSMs should be able to analyze
open/read/write/close...

In the new patch set version I removed the 'newinstance' option
as suggested by Eric W. Biederman.

Selftest has been added to verify new behavior.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.7-rc1
# d919b33d 07-Apr-2020 Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

proc: faster open/read/close with "permanent" files

Now that "struct proc_ops" exist we can start putting there stuff which
could not fly with VFS "struct file_operations"...

Most of fs/proc/inode.

proc: faster open/read/close with "permanent" files

Now that "struct proc_ops" exist we can start putting there stuff which
could not fly with VFS "struct file_operations"...

Most of fs/proc/inode.c file is dedicated to make open/read/.../close
reliable in the event of disappearing /proc entries which usually happens
if module is getting removed. Files like /proc/cpuinfo which never
disappear simply do not need such protection.

Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such
"permanent" files.

Enable "permanent" flag for

/proc/cpuinfo
/proc/kmsg
/proc/modules
/proc/slabinfo
/proc/stat
/proc/sysvipc/*
/proc/swaps

More will come once I figure out foolproof way to prevent out module
authors from marking their stuff "permanent" for performance reasons
when it is not.

This should help with scalability: benchmark is "read /proc/cpuinfo R times
by N threads scattered over the system".

N R t, s (before) t, s (after)
-----------------------------------------------------
64 4096 1.582458 1.530502 -3.2%
256 4096 6.371926 6.125168 -3.9%
1024 4096 25.64888 24.47528 -4.6%

Benchmark source:

#include <chrono>
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>
#include <vector>

#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>

const int NR_CPUS = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
int N;
const char *filename;
int R;

int xxx = 0;

int glue(int n)
{
cpu_set_t m;
CPU_ZERO(&m);
CPU_SET(n, &m);
return sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &m);
}

void f(int n)
{
glue(n % NR_CPUS);

while (*(volatile int *)&xxx == 0) {
}

for (int i = 0; i < R; i++) {
int fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY);
char buf[4096];
ssize_t rv = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
asm volatile ("" :: "g" (rv));
close(fd);
}
}

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
if (argc < 4) {
std::cerr << "usage: " << argv[0] << ' ' << "N /proc/filename R
";
return 1;
}

N = atoi(argv[1]);
filename = argv[2];
R = atoi(argv[3]);

for (int i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
if (glue(i) == 0)
break;
}

std::vector<std::thread> T;
T.reserve(N);
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
T.emplace_back(f, i);
}

auto t0 = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
{
*(volatile int *)&xxx = 1;
for (auto& t: T) {
t.join();
}
}
auto t1 = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
std::chrono::duration<double> dt = t1 - t0;
std::cout << dt.count() << '
';

return 0;
}

P.S.:
Explicit randomization marker is added because adding non-function pointer
will silently disable structure layout randomization.

[[email protected]: coding style fixes]
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200222201539.GA22576@avx2
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.6, v5.6-rc7, v5.6-rc6, v5.6-rc5, v5.6-rc4, v5.6-rc3
# 7bc3e6e5 20-Feb-2020 Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

proc: Use a list of inodes to flush from proc

Rework the flushing of proc to use a list of directory inodes that
need to be flushed.

The list is kept on struct pid not on struct task_struct, as the

proc: Use a list of inodes to flush from proc

Rework the flushing of proc to use a list of directory inodes that
need to be flushed.

The list is kept on struct pid not on struct task_struct, as there is
a fixed connection between proc inodes and pids but at least for the
case of de_thread the pid of a task_struct changes.

This removes the dependency on proc_mnt which allows for different
mounts of proc having different mount options even in the same pid
namespace and this allows for the removal of proc_mnt which will
trivially the first mount of proc to honor it's mount options.

This flushing remains an optimization. The functions
pid_delete_dentry and pid_revalidate ensure that ordinary dcache
management will not attempt to use dentries past the point their
respective task has died. When unused the shrinker will
eventually be able to remove these dentries.

There is a case in de_thread where proc_flush_pid can be
called early for a given pid. Which winds up being
safe (if suboptimal) as this is just an optiimization.

Only pid directories are put on the list as the other
per pid files are children of those directories and
d_invalidate on the directory will get them as well.

So that the pid can be used during flushing it's reference count is
taken in release_task and dropped in proc_flush_pid. Further the call
of proc_flush_pid is moved after the tasklist_lock is released in
release_task so that it is certain that the pid has already been
unhashed when flushing it taking place. This removes a small race
where a dentry could recreated.

As struct pid is supposed to be small and I need a per pid lock
I reuse the only lock that currently exists in struct pid the
the wait_pidfd.lock.

The net result is that this adds all of this functionality
with just a little extra list management overhead and
a single extra pointer in struct pid.

v2: Initialize pid->inodes. I somehow failed to get that
initialization into the initial version of the patch. A boot
failure was reported by "kernel test robot <[email protected]>", and
failure to initialize that pid->inodes matches all of the reported
symptoms.

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.6-rc2, v5.6-rc1
# d56c0d45 04-Feb-2020 Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

proc: decouple proc from VFS with "struct proc_ops"

Currently core /proc code uses "struct file_operations" for custom hooks,
however, VFS doesn't directly call them. Every time VFS expands
file_op

proc: decouple proc from VFS with "struct proc_ops"

Currently core /proc code uses "struct file_operations" for custom hooks,
however, VFS doesn't directly call them. Every time VFS expands
file_operations hook set, /proc code bloats for no reason.

Introduce "struct proc_ops" which contains only those hooks which /proc
allows to call into (open, release, read, write, ioctl, mmap, poll). It
doesn't contain module pointer as well.

Save ~184 bytes per usage:

add/remove: 26/26 grow/shrink: 1/4 up/down: 1922/-6674 (-4752)
Function old new delta
sysvipc_proc_ops - 72 +72
...
config_gz_proc_ops - 72 +72
proc_get_inode 289 339 +50
proc_reg_get_unmapped_area 110 107 -3
close_pdeo 227 224 -3
proc_reg_open 289 284 -5
proc_create_data 60 53 -7
rt_cpu_seq_fops 256 - -256
...
default_affinity_proc_fops 256 - -256
Total: Before=5430095, After=5425343, chg -0.09%

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191225172228.GA13378@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.5, v5.5-rc7, v5.5-rc6, v5.5-rc5, v5.5-rc4, v5.5-rc3, v5.5-rc2, v5.5-rc1
# 9573e8f7 05-Dec-2019 Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>

include/linux/proc_fs.h: fix confusing macro arg name

state_size and ops are in the wrong position.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miaohe

include/linux/proc_fs.h: fix confusing macro arg name

state_size and ops are in the wrong position.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Aleksa Sarai <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.4, v5.4-rc8, v5.4-rc7, v5.4-rc6, v5.4-rc5, v5.4-rc4, v5.4-rc3, v5.4-rc2, v5.4-rc1, v5.3, v5.3-rc8, v5.3-rc7, v5.3-rc6, v5.3-rc5, v5.3-rc4, v5.3-rc3, v5.3-rc2, v5.3-rc1, v5.2, v5.2-rc7, v5.2-rc6, v5.2-rc5, v5.2-rc4
# 68bc30bb 06-Jun-2019 Aubrey Li <[email protected]>

proc: Add /proc/<pid>/arch_status

Exposing architecture specific per process information is useful for
various reasons. An example is the AVX512 usage on x86 which is important
for task placement fo

proc: Add /proc/<pid>/arch_status

Exposing architecture specific per process information is useful for
various reasons. An example is the AVX512 usage on x86 which is important
for task placement for power/performance optimizations.

Adding this information to the existing /prcc/pid/status file would be the
obvious choise, but it has been agreed on that a explicit arch_status file
is better in separating the generic and architecture specific information.

[ tglx: Massage changelog ]

Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Tim Chen <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Cc: Linux API <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.2-rc3, v5.2-rc2, v5.2-rc1, v5.1, v5.1-rc7, v5.1-rc6, v5.1-rc5, v5.1-rc4, v5.1-rc3, v5.1-rc2, v5.1-rc1, v5.0, v5.0-rc8, v5.0-rc7, v5.0-rc6, v5.0-rc5, v5.0-rc4, v5.0-rc3, v5.0-rc2, v5.0-rc1, v4.20, v4.20-rc7, v4.20-rc6, v4.20-rc5, v4.20-rc4
# 3eb39f47 18-Nov-2018 Christian Brauner <[email protected]>

signal: add pidfd_send_signal() syscall

The kill() syscall operates on process identifiers (pid). After a process
has exited its pid can be reused by another process. If a caller sends a
signal to a

signal: add pidfd_send_signal() syscall

The kill() syscall operates on process identifiers (pid). After a process
has exited its pid can be reused by another process. If a caller sends a
signal to a reused pid it will end up signaling the wrong process. This
issue has often surfaced and there has been a push to address this problem [1].

This patch uses file descriptors (fd) from proc/<pid> as stable handles on
struct pid. Even if a pid is recycled the handle will not change. The fd
can be used to send signals to the process it refers to.
Thus, the new syscall pidfd_send_signal() is introduced to solve this
problem. Instead of pids it operates on process fds (pidfd).

/* prototype and argument /*
long pidfd_send_signal(int pidfd, int sig, siginfo_t *info, unsigned int flags);

/* syscall number 424 */
The syscall number was chosen to be 424 to align with Arnd's rework in his
y2038 to minimize merge conflicts (cf. [25]).

In addition to the pidfd and signal argument it takes an additional
siginfo_t and flags argument. If the siginfo_t argument is NULL then
pidfd_send_signal() is equivalent to kill(<positive-pid>, <signal>). If it
is not NULL pidfd_send_signal() is equivalent to rt_sigqueueinfo().
The flags argument is added to allow for future extensions of this syscall.
It currently needs to be passed as 0. Failing to do so will cause EINVAL.

/* pidfd_send_signal() replaces multiple pid-based syscalls */
The pidfd_send_signal() syscall currently takes on the job of
rt_sigqueueinfo(2) and parts of the functionality of kill(2), Namely, when a
positive pid is passed to kill(2). It will however be possible to also
replace tgkill(2) and rt_tgsigqueueinfo(2) if this syscall is extended.

/* sending signals to threads (tid) and process groups (pgid) */
Specifically, the pidfd_send_signal() syscall does currently not operate on
process groups or threads. This is left for future extensions.
In order to extend the syscall to allow sending signal to threads and
process groups appropriately named flags (e.g. PIDFD_TYPE_PGID, and
PIDFD_TYPE_TID) should be added. This implies that the flags argument will
determine what is signaled and not the file descriptor itself. Put in other
words, grouping in this api is a property of the flags argument not a
property of the file descriptor (cf. [13]). Clarification for this has been
requested by Eric (cf. [19]).
When appropriate extensions through the flags argument are added then
pidfd_send_signal() can additionally replace the part of kill(2) which
operates on process groups as well as the tgkill(2) and
rt_tgsigqueueinfo(2) syscalls.
How such an extension could be implemented has been very roughly sketched
in [14], [15], and [16]. However, this should not be taken as a commitment
to a particular implementation. There might be better ways to do it.
Right now this is intentionally left out to keep this patchset as simple as
possible (cf. [4]).

/* naming */
The syscall had various names throughout iterations of this patchset:
- procfd_signal()
- procfd_send_signal()
- taskfd_send_signal()
In the last round of reviews it was pointed out that given that if the
flags argument decides the scope of the signal instead of different types
of fds it might make sense to either settle for "procfd_" or "pidfd_" as
prefix. The community was willing to accept either (cf. [17] and [18]).
Given that one developer expressed strong preference for the "pidfd_"
prefix (cf. [13]) and with other developers less opinionated about the name
we should settle for "pidfd_" to avoid further bikeshedding.

The "_send_signal" suffix was chosen to reflect the fact that the syscall
takes on the job of multiple syscalls. It is therefore intentional that the
name is not reminiscent of neither kill(2) nor rt_sigqueueinfo(2). Not the
fomer because it might imply that pidfd_send_signal() is a replacement for
kill(2), and not the latter because it is a hassle to remember the correct
spelling - especially for non-native speakers - and because it is not
descriptive enough of what the syscall actually does. The name
"pidfd_send_signal" makes it very clear that its job is to send signals.

/* zombies */
Zombies can be signaled just as any other process. No special error will be
reported since a zombie state is an unreliable state (cf. [3]). However,
this can be added as an extension through the @flags argument if the need
ever arises.

/* cross-namespace signals */
The patch currently enforces that the signaler and signalee either are in
the same pid namespace or that the signaler's pid namespace is an ancestor
of the signalee's pid namespace. This is done for the sake of simplicity
and because it is unclear to what values certain members of struct
siginfo_t would need to be set to (cf. [5], [6]).

/* compat syscalls */
It became clear that we would like to avoid adding compat syscalls
(cf. [7]). The compat syscall handling is now done in kernel/signal.c
itself by adding __copy_siginfo_from_user_generic() which lets us avoid
compat syscalls (cf. [8]). It should be noted that the addition of
__copy_siginfo_from_user_any() is caused by a bug in the original
implementation of rt_sigqueueinfo(2) (cf. 12).
With upcoming rework for syscall handling things might improve
significantly (cf. [11]) and __copy_siginfo_from_user_any() will not gain
any additional callers.

/* testing */
This patch was tested on x64 and x86.

/* userspace usage */
An asciinema recording for the basic functionality can be found under [9].
With this patch a process can be killed via:

#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>

static inline int do_pidfd_send_signal(int pidfd, int sig, siginfo_t *info,
unsigned int flags)
{
#ifdef __NR_pidfd_send_signal
return syscall(__NR_pidfd_send_signal, pidfd, sig, info, flags);
#else
return -ENOSYS;
#endif
}

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int fd, ret, saved_errno, sig;

if (argc < 3)
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);

fd = open(argv[1], O_DIRECTORY | O_CLOEXEC);
if (fd < 0) {
printf("%s - Failed to open \"%s\"\n", strerror(errno), argv[1]);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}

sig = atoi(argv[2]);

printf("Sending signal %d to process %s\n", sig, argv[1]);
ret = do_pidfd_send_signal(fd, sig, NULL, 0);

saved_errno = errno;
close(fd);
errno = saved_errno;

if (ret < 0) {
printf("%s - Failed to send signal %d to process %s\n",
strerror(errno), sig, argv[1]);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}

exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}

/* Q&A
* Given that it seems the same questions get asked again by people who are
* late to the party it makes sense to add a Q&A section to the commit
* message so it's hopefully easier to avoid duplicate threads.
*
* For the sake of progress please consider these arguments settled unless
* there is a new point that desperately needs to be addressed. Please make
* sure to check the links to the threads in this commit message whether
* this has not already been covered.
*/
Q-01: (Florian Weimer [20], Andrew Morton [21])
What happens when the target process has exited?
A-01: Sending the signal will fail with ESRCH (cf. [22]).

Q-02: (Andrew Morton [21])
Is the task_struct pinned by the fd?
A-02: No. A reference to struct pid is kept. struct pid - as far as I
understand - was created exactly for the reason to not require to
pin struct task_struct (cf. [22]).

Q-03: (Andrew Morton [21])
Does the entire procfs directory remain visible? Just one entry
within it?
A-03: The same thing that happens right now when you hold a file descriptor
to /proc/<pid> open (cf. [22]).

Q-04: (Andrew Morton [21])
Does the pid remain reserved?
A-04: No. This patchset guarantees a stable handle not that pids are not
recycled (cf. [22]).

Q-05: (Andrew Morton [21])
Do attempts to signal that fd return errors?
A-05: See {Q,A}-01.

Q-06: (Andrew Morton [22])
Is there a cleaner way of obtaining the fd? Another syscall perhaps.
A-06: Userspace can already trivially retrieve file descriptors from procfs
so this is something that we will need to support anyway. Hence,
there's no immediate need to add another syscalls just to make
pidfd_send_signal() not dependent on the presence of procfs. However,
adding a syscalls to get such file descriptors is planned for a
future patchset (cf. [22]).

Q-07: (Andrew Morton [21] and others)
This fd-for-a-process sounds like a handy thing and people may well
think up other uses for it in the future, probably unrelated to
signals. Are the code and the interface designed to permit such
future applications?
A-07: Yes (cf. [22]).

Q-08: (Andrew Morton [21] and others)
Now I think about it, why a new syscall? This thing is looking
rather like an ioctl?
A-08: This has been extensively discussed. It was agreed that a syscall is
preferred for a variety or reasons. Here are just a few taken from
prior threads. Syscalls are safer than ioctl()s especially when
signaling to fds. Processes are a core kernel concept so a syscall
seems more appropriate. The layout of the syscall with its four
arguments would require the addition of a custom struct for the
ioctl() thereby causing at least the same amount or even more
complexity for userspace than a simple syscall. The new syscall will
replace multiple other pid-based syscalls (see description above).
The file-descriptors-for-processes concept introduced with this
syscall will be extended with other syscalls in the future. See also
[22], [23] and various other threads already linked in here.

Q-09: (Florian Weimer [24])
What happens if you use the new interface with an O_PATH descriptor?
A-09:
pidfds opened as O_PATH fds cannot be used to send signals to a
process (cf. [2]). Signaling processes through pidfds is the
equivalent of writing to a file. Thus, this is not an operation that
operates "purely at the file descriptor level" as required by the
open(2) manpage. See also [4].

/* References */
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[4]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[5]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[6]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[7]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[8]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[9]: https://asciinema.org/a/IQjuCHew6bnq1cr78yuMv16cy
[11]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[12]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[13]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[14]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[15]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[16]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[17]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGXu5jL8PciZAXvOvCeCU3wKUEB_dU-O3q0tDw4uB_ojMvDEew@mail.gmail.com/
[18]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[19]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[20]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[21]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[22]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[23]: https://lwn.net/Articles/773459/
[24]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[25]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a0ej9NcJM8wXNPbcGUyOUZYX+VLoDFdbenW3s3114oQZw@mail.gmail.com/

Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
Cc: Jann Horn <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Cc: Florian Weimer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tycho Andersen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Aleksa Sarai <[email protected]>

show more ...


123456