|
Revision tags: v6.15, v6.15-rc7, v6.15-rc6, v6.15-rc5, v6.15-rc4, v6.15-rc3, v6.15-rc2, v6.15-rc1, v6.14, v6.14-rc7, v6.14-rc6, v6.14-rc5, v6.14-rc4, v6.14-rc3, v6.14-rc2, v6.14-rc1, v6.13, v6.13-rc7, v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4, v6.13-rc3, v6.13-rc2, v6.13-rc1, v6.12, v6.12-rc7 |
|
| #
dbefa1f3 |
| 06-Nov-2024 |
Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]> |
Rename .data.once to .data..once to fix resetting WARN*_ONCE
Commit b1fca27d384e ("kernel debug: support resetting WARN*_ONCE")
added support for clearing the state of once warnings. However,
it is
Rename .data.once to .data..once to fix resetting WARN*_ONCE
Commit b1fca27d384e ("kernel debug: support resetting WARN*_ONCE")
added support for clearing the state of once warnings. However,
it is not functional when CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION or
CONFIG_LTO_CLANG is enabled, because .data.once matches the
.data.[0-9a-zA-Z_]* pattern in the DATA_MAIN macro.
Commit cb87481ee89d ("kbuild: linker script do not match C names unless
LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION is configured") was introduced to suppress
the issue for the default CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION=n case,
providing a minimal fix for stable backporting. We were aware this did
not address the issue for CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION=y. The
plan was to apply correct fixes and then revert cb87481ee89d. [1]
Seven years have passed since then, yet the #ifdef workaround remains in
place. Meanwhile, commit b1fca27d384e introduced the .data.once section,
and commit dc5723b02e52 ("kbuild: add support for Clang LTO") extended
the #ifdef.
Using a ".." separator in the section name fixes the issue for
CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION and CONFIG_LTO_CLANG.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kbuild/CAK7LNASck6BfdLnESxXUeECYL26yUDm0cwRZuM4gmaWUkxjL5g@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: b1fca27d384e ("kernel debug: support resetting WARN*_ONCE")
Fixes: dc5723b02e52 ("kbuild: add support for Clang LTO")
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.12-rc6, v6.12-rc5, v6.12-rc4, v6.12-rc3, v6.12-rc2, v6.12-rc1, v6.11, v6.11-rc7, v6.11-rc6, v6.11-rc5, v6.11-rc4, v6.11-rc3, v6.11-rc2, v6.11-rc1, v6.10, v6.10-rc7, v6.10-rc6, v6.10-rc5, v6.10-rc4, v6.10-rc3, v6.10-rc2, v6.10-rc1, v6.9, v6.9-rc7, v6.9-rc6, v6.9-rc5, v6.9-rc4, v6.9-rc3, v6.9-rc2, v6.9-rc1, v6.8, v6.8-rc7, v6.8-rc6, v6.8-rc5, v6.8-rc4, v6.8-rc3, v6.8-rc2, v6.8-rc1, v6.7, v6.7-rc8, v6.7-rc7, v6.7-rc6, v6.7-rc5, v6.7-rc4, v6.7-rc3, v6.7-rc2, v6.7-rc1, v6.6, v6.6-rc7, v6.6-rc6, v6.6-rc5, v6.6-rc4, v6.6-rc3, v6.6-rc2, v6.6-rc1, v6.5, v6.5-rc7, v6.5-rc6, v6.5-rc5, v6.5-rc4, v6.5-rc3, v6.5-rc2, v6.5-rc1, v6.4, v6.4-rc7, v6.4-rc6, v6.4-rc5, v6.4-rc4, v6.4-rc3, v6.4-rc2, v6.4-rc1, v6.3, v6.3-rc7, v6.3-rc6, v6.3-rc5, v6.3-rc4, v6.3-rc3, v6.3-rc2, v6.3-rc1, v6.2, v6.2-rc8, v6.2-rc7, v6.2-rc6, v6.2-rc5, v6.2-rc4, v6.2-rc3, v6.2-rc2, v6.2-rc1, v6.1, v6.1-rc8, v6.1-rc7, v6.1-rc6, v6.1-rc5, v6.1-rc4, v6.1-rc3, v6.1-rc2, v6.1-rc1, v6.0, v6.0-rc7, v6.0-rc6, v6.0-rc5, v6.0-rc4, v6.0-rc3, v6.0-rc2, v6.0-rc1, v5.19, v5.19-rc8, v5.19-rc7, v5.19-rc6, v5.19-rc5, v5.19-rc4, v5.19-rc3 |
|
| #
a1a5482a |
| 17-Jun-2022 |
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> |
x86/extable: Fix ex_handler_msr() print condition
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:08:52PM +0300, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Some changes to the way invalid MSR accesses are reported by the
> kernel is cau
x86/extable: Fix ex_handler_msr() print condition
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:08:52PM +0300, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Some changes to the way invalid MSR accesses are reported by the
> kernel is causing some problems with messages printed on the
> console.
>
> We have seen several cases of ex_handler_msr() printing invalid MSR
> accesses once but the callstack multiple times causing confusion on
> the console.
> The problem here is that another earlier commit (5.13):
>
> a358f40600b3 ("once: implement DO_ONCE_LITE for non-fast-path "do once" functionality")
>
> Modifies all the pr_*_once() calls to always return true claiming
> that no caller is ever checking the return value of the functions.
>
> This is why we are seeing the callstack printed without the
> associated printk() msg.
Extract the ONCE_IF(cond) part into __ONCE_LTE_IF() and use that to
implement DO_ONCE_LITE_IF() and fix the extable code.
Fixes: a358f40600b3 ("once: implement DO_ONCE_LITE for non-fast-path "do once" functionality")
Reported-by: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.19-rc2, v5.19-rc1, v5.18, v5.18-rc7, v5.18-rc6, v5.18-rc5, v5.18-rc4, v5.18-rc3, v5.18-rc2, v5.18-rc1, v5.17, v5.17-rc8, v5.17-rc7, v5.17-rc6, v5.17-rc5, v5.17-rc4, v5.17-rc3, v5.17-rc2, v5.17-rc1, v5.16, v5.16-rc8, v5.16-rc7, v5.16-rc6, v5.16-rc5, v5.16-rc4, v5.16-rc3, v5.16-rc2, v5.16-rc1, v5.15, v5.15-rc7, v5.15-rc6, v5.15-rc5, v5.15-rc4, v5.15-rc3, v5.15-rc2, v5.15-rc1, v5.14, v5.14-rc7, v5.14-rc6, v5.14-rc5, v5.14-rc4, v5.14-rc3, v5.14-rc2, v5.14-rc1 |
|
| #
a358f406 |
| 28-Jun-2021 |
Tanner Love <[email protected]> |
once: implement DO_ONCE_LITE for non-fast-path "do once" functionality
Certain uses of "do once" functionality reside outside of fast path,
and so do not require jump label patching via static keys,
once: implement DO_ONCE_LITE for non-fast-path "do once" functionality
Certain uses of "do once" functionality reside outside of fast path,
and so do not require jump label patching via static keys, making
existing DO_ONCE undesirable in such cases.
Replace uses of __section(".data.once") with DO_ONCE_LITE(_IF)?
This patch changes the return values of xfs_printk_once, printk_once,
and printk_deferred_once. Before, they returned whether the print was
performed, but now, they always return true. This is okay because the
return values of the following macros are entirely ignored throughout
the kernel:
- xfs_printk_once
- xfs_warn_once
- xfs_notice_once
- xfs_info_once
- printk_once
- pr_emerg_once
- pr_alert_once
- pr_crit_once
- pr_err_once
- pr_warn_once
- pr_notice_once
- pr_info_once
- pr_devel_once
- pr_debug_once
- printk_deferred_once
- orc_warn
Changes
v3:
- Expand commit message to explain why changing return values of
xfs_printk_once, printk_once, printk_deferred_once is benign
v2:
- Fix i386 build warnings
Signed-off-by: Tanner Love <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mahesh Bandewar <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
show more ...
|