| 31691914 | 28-Oct-2024 |
Stanislav Kinsburskii <[email protected]> |
kunit: Introduce autorun option
The new option controls tests run on boot or module load. With the new
debugfs "run" dentry allowing to run tests on demand, an ability to disable
automatic tests run
kunit: Introduce autorun option
The new option controls tests run on boot or module load. With the new
debugfs "run" dentry allowing to run tests on demand, an ability to disable
automatic tests run becomes a useful option in case of intrusive tests.
The option is set to true by default to preserve the existent behavior. It
can be overridden by either the corresponding module option or by the
corresponding config build option.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/173015245931.4747.16419517391658830640.stgit@skinsburskii-cloud-desktop.internal.cloudapp.net
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskii <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Gow <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| 5ac79730 | 18-Jul-2024 |
Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> |
platform: Add test managed platform_device/driver APIs
Introduce KUnit resource wrappers around platform_driver_register(),
platform_device_alloc(), and platform_device_add() so that test authors
ca
platform: Add test managed platform_device/driver APIs
Introduce KUnit resource wrappers around platform_driver_register(),
platform_device_alloc(), and platform_device_add() so that test authors
can register platform drivers/devices from their tests and have the
drivers/devices automatically be unregistered when the test is done.
This makes test setup code simpler when a platform driver or platform
device is needed. Add a few test cases at the same time to make sure the
APIs work as intended.
Cc: Brendan Higgins <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <[email protected]>
Cc: Rae Moar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
show more ...
|
| ebf51e46 | 11-Jul-2024 |
Eric Chan <[email protected]> |
kunit: Introduce KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMNEQ macros
Introduces KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMNEQ macros
to provide assert-type equivalents for memory comparison.
While KUNIT_
kunit: Introduce KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMNEQ macros
Introduces KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMNEQ macros
to provide assert-type equivalents for memory comparison.
While KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ are available for
expectations, the addition of these new macros ensures that assertions
can also be used for memory comparisons, enhancing the consistency and
completeness of the kunit framework.
Signed-off-by: Eric Chan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| 7d4087b0 | 11-Jul-2024 |
Eric Chan <[email protected]> |
kunit: Rename KUNIT_ASSERT_FAILURE to KUNIT_FAIL_AND_ABORT for readability
Both KUNIT_FAIL and KUNIT_ASSERT_FAILURE defined to KUNIT_FAIL_ASSERTION
with different tpye of kunit_assert_type. The curr
kunit: Rename KUNIT_ASSERT_FAILURE to KUNIT_FAIL_AND_ABORT for readability
Both KUNIT_FAIL and KUNIT_ASSERT_FAILURE defined to KUNIT_FAIL_ASSERTION
with different tpye of kunit_assert_type. The current naming of
KUNIT_ASSERT_FAILURE and KUNIT_FAIL_ASSERTION is confusing due to their
similarities. To improve readability and symmetry, renames
KUNIT_ASSERT_FAILURE to KUNIT_FAIL_AND_ABORT. Makes the naming
consistent, with KUNIT_FAIL and KUNIT_FAIL_AND_ABORT being symmetrical.
Additionally, an explanation for KUNIT_FAIL_AND_ABORT has been added to
clarify its usage.
Signed-off-by: Eric Chan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| 51104c19 | 12-Jun-2024 |
Kees Cook <[email protected]> |
kunit: test: Add vm_mmap() allocation resource manager
For tests that need to allocate using vm_mmap() (e.g. usercopy and
execve), provide the interface to have the allocation tracked by KUnit
itsel
kunit: test: Add vm_mmap() allocation resource manager
For tests that need to allocate using vm_mmap() (e.g. usercopy and
execve), provide the interface to have the allocation tracked by KUnit
itself. This requires bringing up a placeholder userspace mm.
This combines my earlier attempt at this with Mark Rutland's version[1].
Normally alloc_mm() and arch_pick_mmap_layout() aren't exported for
modules, so export these only for KUnit testing.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ [1]
Co-developed-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| 7ece381a | 20-Dec-2023 |
Richard Fitzgerald <[email protected]> |
kunit: Protect string comparisons against NULL
Add NULL checks to KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION() so that it will fail
cleanly if either pointer is NULL, instead of causing a NULL pointer
dereference i
kunit: Protect string comparisons against NULL
Add NULL checks to KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION() so that it will fail
cleanly if either pointer is NULL, instead of causing a NULL pointer
dereference in the strcmp().
A test failure could be that a string is unexpectedly NULL. This could
be trapped by KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL() but that would terminate the test
at that point. It's preferable that the KUNIT_EXPECT_STR*() macros can
handle NULL pointers as a failure.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| fcbac39b | 21-Dec-2023 |
Richard Fitzgerald <[email protected]> |
kunit: Allow passing function pointer to kunit_activate_static_stub()
Swap the arguments to typecheck_fn() in kunit_activate_static_stub()
so that real_fn_addr can be either the function itself or a
kunit: Allow passing function pointer to kunit_activate_static_stub()
Swap the arguments to typecheck_fn() in kunit_activate_static_stub()
so that real_fn_addr can be either the function itself or a pointer
to that function.
This is useful to simplify redirecting static functions in a module.
Having to pass the actual function meant that it must be exported
from the module. Either making the 'static' and EXPORT_SYMBOL*()
conditional (which makes the code messy), or change it to always
exported (which increases the export namespace and prevents the
compiler inlining a trivial stub function in non-test builds).
With the original definition of kunit_activate_static_stub() the
address of real_fn_addr was passed to typecheck_fn() as the type to
be passed. This meant that if real_fn_addr was a pointer-to-function
it would resolve to a ** instead of a *, giving an error like this:
error: initialization of ‘int (**)(int)’ from incompatible pointer
type ‘int (*)(int)’ [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
kunit_activate_static_stub(test, add_one_fn_ptr, subtract_one);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/typecheck.h:21:25: note: in definition of macro
‘typecheck_fn’
21 | ({ typeof(type) __tmp = function; \
Swapping the arguments to typecheck_fn makes it take the type of a
pointer to the replacement function. Either a function or a pointer
to function can be assigned to that. For example:
static int some_function(int x)
{
/* whatever */
}
int (* some_function_ptr)(int) = some_function;
static int replacement(int x)
{
/* whatever */
}
Then:
kunit_activate_static_stub(test, some_function, replacement);
yields:
typecheck_fn(typeof(&replacement), some_function);
and:
kunit_activate_static_stub(test, some_function_ptr, replacement);
yields:
typecheck_fn(typeof(&replacement), some_function_ptr);
The two typecheck_fn() then resolve to:
int (*__tmp)(int) = some_function;
and
int (*__tmp)(int) = some_function_ptr;
Both of these are valid. In the first case the compiler inserts
an implicit '&' to take the address of the supplied function, and
in the second case the RHS is already a pointer to the same type.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| b3231d35 | 20-Dec-2023 |
Benjamin Berg <[email protected]> |
kunit: add a convenience allocation wrapper for SKBs
Add a simple convenience helper to allocate and zero fill an SKB for the
use by a kunit test. Also provide a way to free it again in case that
ma
kunit: add a convenience allocation wrapper for SKBs
Add a simple convenience helper to allocate and zero fill an SKB for the
use by a kunit test. Also provide a way to free it again in case that
may be desirable.
This simply mirrors the kunit_kmalloc API.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <[email protected]>
Link: https://msgid.link/[email protected]
[adjust file description as discussed]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
show more ...
|