History log of /linux-6.15/fs/proc/inode.c (Results 1 – 25 of 168)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.15, v6.15-rc7, v6.15-rc6, v6.15-rc5, v6.15-rc4, v6.15-rc3, v6.15-rc2, v6.15-rc1, v6.14, v6.14-rc7, v6.14-rc6, v6.14-rc5
# 654b33ad 01-Mar-2025 Ye Bin <[email protected]>

proc: fix UAF in proc_get_inode()

Fix race between rmmod and /proc/XXX's inode instantiation.

The bug is that pde->proc_ops don't belong to /proc, it belongs to a
module, therefore dereferencing it

proc: fix UAF in proc_get_inode()

Fix race between rmmod and /proc/XXX's inode instantiation.

The bug is that pde->proc_ops don't belong to /proc, it belongs to a
module, therefore dereferencing it after /proc entry has been registered
is a bug unless use_pde/unuse_pde() pair has been used.

use_pde/unuse_pde can be avoided (2 atomic ops!) because pde->proc_ops
never changes so information necessary for inode instantiation can be
saved _before_ proc_register() in PDE itself and used later, avoiding
pde->proc_ops->... dereference.

rmmod lookup
sys_delete_module
proc_lookup_de
pde_get(de);
proc_get_inode(dir->i_sb, de);
mod->exit()
proc_remove
remove_proc_subtree
proc_entry_rundown(de);
free_module(mod);

if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
if (de->proc_ops->proc_read_iter)
--> As module is already freed, will trigger UAF

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffbfff80a702b
PGD 817fc4067 P4D 817fc4067 PUD 817fc0067 PMD 102ef4067 PTE 0
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 2667 Comm: ls Tainted: G
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
RIP: 0010:proc_get_inode+0x302/0x6e0
RSP: 0018:ffff88811c837998 EFLAGS: 00010a06
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffffffffc0538140 RCX: 0000000000000007
RDX: 1ffffffff80a702b RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffc0538158
RBP: ffff8881299a6000 R08: 0000000067bbe1e5 R09: 1ffff11023906f20
R10: ffffffffb560ca07 R11: ffffffffb2b43a58 R12: ffff888105bb78f0
R13: ffff888100518048 R14: ffff8881299a6004 R15: 0000000000000001
FS: 00007f95b9686840(0000) GS:ffff8883af100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: fffffbfff80a702b CR3: 0000000117dd2000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
proc_lookup_de+0x11f/0x2e0
__lookup_slow+0x188/0x350
walk_component+0x2ab/0x4f0
path_lookupat+0x120/0x660
filename_lookup+0x1ce/0x560
vfs_statx+0xac/0x150
__do_sys_newstat+0x96/0x110
do_syscall_64+0x5f/0x170
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

[[email protected]: don't do 2 atomic ops on the common path]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3d25ded0-1739-447e-812b-e34da7990dcf@p183
Fixes: 778f3dd5a13c ("Fix procfs compat_ioctl regression")
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.14-rc4, v6.14-rc3, v6.14-rc2, v6.14-rc1, v6.13, v6.13-rc7, v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4, v6.13-rc3, v6.13-rc2, v6.13-rc1, v6.12, v6.12-rc7, v6.12-rc6, v6.12-rc5, v6.12-rc4, v6.12-rc3, v6.12-rc2, v6.12-rc1, v6.11, v6.11-rc7
# 13309764 08-Sep-2024 Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

proc: use __auto_type more

Switch away from quite chatty declarations using typeof_member().

In theory this is faster to compile too because there is no macro
expansion and there is less type check

proc: use __auto_type more

Switch away from quite chatty declarations using typeof_member().

In theory this is faster to compile too because there is no macro
expansion and there is less type checking.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/81bf02fd-8724-4f4d-a2bb-c59620b7d716@p183
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.11-rc6, v6.11-rc5, v6.11-rc4, v6.11-rc3, v6.11-rc2, v6.11-rc1, v6.10, v6.10-rc7, v6.10-rc6, v6.10-rc5, v6.10-rc4, v6.10-rc3, v6.10-rc2, v6.10-rc1, v6.9, v6.9-rc7, v6.9-rc6, v6.9-rc5, v6.9-rc4, v6.9-rc3, v6.9-rc2
# 529ce23a 26-Mar-2024 Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]>

mm: switch mm->get_unmapped_area() to a flag

The mm_struct contains a function pointer *get_unmapped_area(), which is
set to either arch_get_unmapped_area() or arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown()
durin

mm: switch mm->get_unmapped_area() to a flag

The mm_struct contains a function pointer *get_unmapped_area(), which is
set to either arch_get_unmapped_area() or arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown()
during the initialization of the mm.

Since the function pointer only ever points to two functions that are
named the same across all arch's, a function pointer is not really
required. In addition future changes will want to add versions of the
functions that take additional arguments. So to save a pointers worth of
bytes in mm_struct, and prevent adding additional function pointers to
mm_struct in future changes, remove it and keep the information about
which get_unmapped_area() to use in a flag.

Add the new flag to MMF_INIT_MASK so it doesn't get clobbered on fork by
mmf_init_flags(). Most MM flags get clobbered on fork. In the
pre-existing behavior mm->get_unmapped_area() would get copied to the new
mm in dup_mm(), so not clobbering the flag preserves the existing behavior
around inheriting the topdown-ness.

Introduce a helper, mm_get_unmapped_area(), to easily convert code that
refers to the old function pointer to instead select and call either
arch_get_unmapped_area() or arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown() based on the
flag. Then drop the mm->get_unmapped_area() function pointer. Leave the
get_unmapped_area() pointer in struct file_operations alone. The main
purpose of this change is to reorganize in preparation for future changes,
but it also converts the calls of mm->get_unmapped_area() from indirect
branches into a direct ones.

The stress-ng bigheap benchmark calls realloc a lot, which calls through
get_unmapped_area() in the kernel. On x86, the change yielded a ~1%
improvement there on a retpoline config.

In testing a few x86 configs, removing the pointer unfortunately didn't
result in any actual size reductions in the compiled layout of mm_struct.
But depending on compiler or arch alignment requirements, the change could
shrink the size of mm_struct.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Cc: Deepak Gupta <[email protected]>
Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 5def1e0f 26-Mar-2024 Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]>

proc: refactor pde_get_unmapped_area as prep

Patch series "Cover a guard gap corner case", v4.

In working on x86’s shadow stack feature, I came across some limitations
around the kernel’s handling

proc: refactor pde_get_unmapped_area as prep

Patch series "Cover a guard gap corner case", v4.

In working on x86’s shadow stack feature, I came across some limitations
around the kernel’s handling of guard gaps. AFAICT these limitations
are not too important for the traditional stack usage of guard gaps, but
have bigger impact on shadow stack’s usage. And now in addition to x86,
we have two other architectures implementing shadow stack like features
that plan to use guard gaps. I wanted to see about addressing them, but I
have not worked on mmap() placement related code before, so would greatly
appreciate if people could take a look and point me in the right
direction.

The nature of the limitations of concern is as follows. In order to ensure
guard gaps between mappings, mmap() would need to consider two things:
1. That the new mapping isn’t placed in an any existing mapping’s guard
gap.
2. That the new mapping isn’t placed such that any existing mappings are
not in *its* guard gaps
Currently mmap never considers (2), and (1) is not considered in some
situations.

When not passing an address hint, or passing one without
MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE, (1) is enforced. With MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE, (1) is
not enforced. With MAP_FIXED, (1) is not considered, but this seems to be
expected since MAP_FIXED can already clobber existing mappings. For
MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE I would have guessed it should respect the guard gaps
of existing mappings, but it is probably a little ambiguous.

In this series I just tried to add enforcement of (2) for the normal (no
address hint) case and only for the newer shadow stack memory (not
stacks). The reason is that with the no-address-hint situation, landing
next to a guard gap could come up naturally and so be more influencable by
attackers such that two shadow stacks could be adjacent without a guard
gap. Where as the address-hint scenarios would require more control -
being able to call mmap() with specific arguments. As for why not just
fix the other corner cases anyway, I thought it might have some greater
possibility of affecting existing apps.


This patch (of 14):

Future changes will perform a treewide change to remove the indirect
branch that is involved in calling mm->get_unmapped_area(). After doing
this, the function will no longer be able to be handled as a function
pointer. To make the treewide change diff cleaner and easier to review,
refactor pde_get_unmapped_area() such that mm->get_unmapped_area() is
called without being stored in a local function pointer. With this in
refactoring, follow on changes will be able to simply replace the call
site with a future function that calls it directly.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Deepak Gupta <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]>
Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.9-rc1, v6.8, v6.8-rc7, v6.8-rc6
# c762b979 24-Feb-2024 Chengming Zhou <[email protected]>

proc: remove SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag usage

The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag used to be implemented in SLAB, which was
removed as of v6.8-rc1 (see [1]), so it became a dead flag since the
commit 16a1d968358a ("

proc: remove SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag usage

The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag used to be implemented in SLAB, which was
removed as of v6.8-rc1 (see [1]), so it became a dead flag since the
commit 16a1d968358a ("mm/slab: remove mm/slab.c and slab_def.h"). And
the series[1] went on to mark it obsolete explicitly to avoid confusion
for users. Here we can just remove all its users, which has no any
functional change.

Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.8-rc5, v6.8-rc4, v6.8-rc3, v6.8-rc2, v6.8-rc1, v6.7, v6.7-rc8, v6.7-rc7, v6.7-rc6, v6.7-rc5, v6.7-rc4, v6.7-rc3, v6.7-rc2, v6.7-rc1, v6.6, v6.6-rc7, v6.6-rc6, v6.6-rc5, v6.6-rc4, v6.6-rc3
# 47458802 20-Sep-2023 Al Viro <[email protected]>

procfs: move dropping pde and pid from ->evict_inode() to ->free_inode()

that keeps both around until struct inode is freed, making access
to them safe from rcu-pathwalk

Acked-by: Christian Brauner

procfs: move dropping pde and pid from ->evict_inode() to ->free_inode()

that keeps both around until struct inode is freed, making access
to them safe from rcu-pathwalk

Acked-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>

show more ...


# ead5a727 29-Sep-2023 Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

proc: save LOC by using while loop

Use while loop instead of infinite loop with "break;".

Also move some variable to the inner scope where they belong.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/82c8f8e7-8de

proc: save LOC by using while loop

Use while loop instead of infinite loop with "break;".

Also move some variable to the inner scope where they belong.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/82c8f8e7-8ded-46ca-8857-e60b991d6205@p183
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 200d9421 04-Oct-2023 Jeff Layton <[email protected]>

proc: convert to new timestamp accessors

Convert to using the new inode timestamp accessor functions.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231004185347.

proc: convert to new timestamp accessors

Convert to using the new inode timestamp accessor functions.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6-rc2, v6.6-rc1, v6.5, v6.5-rc7, v6.5-rc6, v6.5-rc5, v6.5-rc4, v6.5-rc3, v6.5-rc2, v6.5-rc1
# e9d7d3cb 05-Jul-2023 Jeff Layton <[email protected]>

procfs: convert to ctime accessor functions

In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is
used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of
inode->i_ctime.

procfs: convert to ctime accessor functions

In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is
used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of
inode->i_ctime.

Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.4, v6.4-rc7, v6.4-rc6, v6.4-rc5, v6.4-rc4
# b0072734 22-May-2023 David Howells <[email protected]>

tty, proc, kernfs, random: Use copy_splice_read()

Use copy_splice_read() for tty, procfs, kernfs and random files rather
than going through generic_file_splice_read() as they just copy the file
into

tty, proc, kernfs, random: Use copy_splice_read()

Use copy_splice_read() for tty, procfs, kernfs and random files rather
than going through generic_file_splice_read() as they just copy the file
into the output buffer and don't splice pages. This avoids the need for
them to have a ->read_folio() to satisfy filemap_splice_read().

Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
cc: Al Viro <[email protected]>
cc: John Hubbard <[email protected]>
cc: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
cc: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
cc: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.4-rc3, v6.4-rc2, v6.4-rc1, v6.3, v6.3-rc7, v6.3-rc6, v6.3-rc5, v6.3-rc4, v6.3-rc3, v6.3-rc2, v6.3-rc1, v6.2, v6.2-rc8, v6.2-rc7, v6.2-rc6, v6.2-rc5, v6.2-rc4, v6.2-rc3, v6.2-rc2, v6.2-rc1, v6.1, v6.1-rc8, v6.1-rc7, v6.1-rc6, v6.1-rc5, v6.1-rc4, v6.1-rc3, v6.1-rc2, v6.1-rc1, v6.0, v6.0-rc7, v6.0-rc6, v6.0-rc5, v6.0-rc4, v6.0-rc3, v6.0-rc2, v6.0-rc1
# 3f61631d 14-Aug-2022 Al Viro <[email protected]>

take care to handle NULL ->proc_lseek()

Easily done now, just by clearing FMODE_LSEEK in ->f_mode
during proc_reg_open() for such entries.

Fixes: 868941b14441 "fs: remove no_llseek"
Signed-off-by:

take care to handle NULL ->proc_lseek()

Easily done now, just by clearing FMODE_LSEEK in ->f_mode
during proc_reg_open() for such entries.

Fixes: 868941b14441 "fs: remove no_llseek"
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.19, v5.19-rc8
# ed8fb78d 23-Jul-2022 Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

proc: add some (hopefully) insightful comments

* /proc/${pid}/net status
* removing PDE vs last close stuff (again!)
* random small stuff

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YtwrM6sDC0OQ53YB@localhost.

proc: add some (hopefully) insightful comments

* /proc/${pid}/net status
* removing PDE vs last close stuff (again!)
* random small stuff

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.19-rc7, v5.19-rc6, v5.19-rc5, v5.19-rc4, v5.19-rc3
# 376b0c26 15-Jun-2022 Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

proc: delete unused <linux/uaccess.h> includes

Those aren't necessary after seq files won.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <ado

proc: delete unused <linux/uaccess.h> includes

Those aren't necessary after seq files won.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.19-rc2, v5.19-rc1, v5.18, v5.18-rc7, v5.18-rc6, v5.18-rc5, v5.18-rc4, v5.18-rc3, v5.18-rc2, v5.18-rc1
# fd60b288 22-Mar-2022 Muchun Song <[email protected]>

fs: allocate inode by using alloc_inode_sb()

The inode allocation is supposed to use alloc_inode_sb(), so convert
kmem_cache_alloc() of all filesystems to alloc_inode_sb().

Link: https://lkml.kerne

fs: allocate inode by using alloc_inode_sb()

The inode allocation is supposed to use alloc_inode_sb(), so convert
kmem_cache_alloc() of all filesystems to alloc_inode_sb().

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> [ext4]
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <[email protected]>
Cc: Alex Shi <[email protected]>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <[email protected]>
Cc: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
Cc: Fam Zheng <[email protected]>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: Kari Argillander <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Qi Zheng <[email protected]>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <[email protected]>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: Wei Yang <[email protected]>
Cc: Xiongchun Duan <[email protected]>
Cc: Yang Shi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.17, v5.17-rc8, v5.17-rc7, v5.17-rc6, v5.17-rc5, v5.17-rc4, v5.17-rc3, v5.17-rc2, v5.17-rc1
# 6dfbbae1 22-Jan-2022 Muchun Song <[email protected]>

fs: proc: store PDE()->data into inode->i_private

PDE_DATA(inode) is introduced to get user private data and hide the
layout of struct proc_dir_entry. The inode->i_private is used to do the
same th

fs: proc: store PDE()->data into inode->i_private

PDE_DATA(inode) is introduced to get user private data and hide the
layout of struct proc_dir_entry. The inode->i_private is used to do the
same thing as well. Save a copy of user private data to inode->
i_private when proc inode is allocated. This means the user also can
get their private data by inode->i_private.

Introduce pde_data() to wrap inode->i_private so that we can remove
PDE_DATA() from fs/proc/generic.c and make PTE_DATE() as a wrapper of
pde_data(). It will be easier if we decide to remove PDE_DATE() in the
future.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.16, v5.16-rc8, v5.16-rc7, v5.16-rc6, v5.16-rc5, v5.16-rc4, v5.16-rc3, v5.16-rc2, v5.16-rc1, v5.15, v5.15-rc7, v5.15-rc6, v5.15-rc5, v5.15-rc4, v5.15-rc3, v5.15-rc2, v5.15-rc1, v5.14, v5.14-rc7, v5.14-rc6, v5.14-rc5, v5.14-rc4, v5.14-rc3, v5.14-rc2, v5.14-rc1, v5.13, v5.13-rc7, v5.13-rc6, v5.13-rc5, v5.13-rc4, v5.13-rc3, v5.13-rc2, v5.13-rc1
# 1dcdd7ef 07-May-2021 Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

proc: delete redundant subset=pid check

Two checks in lookup and readdir code should be enough to not have third
check in open code.

Can't open what can't be looked up?

Link: https://lkml.kernel.o

proc: delete redundant subset=pid check

Two checks in lookup and readdir code should be enough to not have third
check in open code.

Can't open what can't be looked up?

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


# d4455fac 07-May-2021 Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

proc: mandate ->proc_lseek in "struct proc_ops"

Now that proc_ops are separate from file_operations and other operations
it easy to check all instances to have ->proc_lseek hook and remove check
in

proc: mandate ->proc_lseek in "struct proc_ops"

Now that proc_ops are separate from file_operations and other operations
it easy to check all instances to have ->proc_lseek hook and remove check
in main code.

Note:
nonseekable_open() files naturally don't require ->proc_lseek.

Garbage collect pde_lseek() function.

[[email protected]: smoke test lseek()]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YFYX0Bzwxlc7aBa/@localhost.localdomain
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.12, v5.12-rc8, v5.12-rc7, v5.12-rc6, v5.12-rc5, v5.12-rc4, v5.12-rc3, v5.12-rc2, v5.12-rc1, v5.12-rc1-dontuse, v5.11, v5.11-rc7, v5.11-rc6, v5.11-rc5, v5.11-rc4, v5.11-rc3, v5.11-rc2, v5.11-rc1, v5.10, v5.10-rc7, v5.10-rc6, v5.10-rc5, v5.10-rc4, v5.10-rc3
# fe33850f 04-Nov-2020 Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

proc: wire up generic_file_splice_read for iter ops

Wire up generic_file_splice_read for the iter based proxy ops, so
that splice reads from them work.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

proc: wire up generic_file_splice_read for iter ops

Wire up generic_file_splice_read for the iter based proxy ops, so
that splice reads from them work.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.10-rc2, v5.10-rc1, v5.9, v5.9-rc8, v5.9-rc7, v5.9-rc6, v5.9-rc5, v5.9-rc4
# fd5a13f4 03-Sep-2020 Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

proc: add a read_iter method to proc proc_ops

This will allow proc files to implement iter read semantics.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]

proc: add a read_iter method to proc proc_ops

This will allow proc files to implement iter read semantics.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 906146f4 03-Sep-2020 Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

proc: cleanup the compat vs no compat file ops

Instead of providing a special no-compat version provide a special
compat version for operations with ->compat_ioctl.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig

proc: cleanup the compat vs no compat file ops

Instead of providing a special no-compat version provide a special
compat version for operations with ->compat_ioctl.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>

show more ...


# f6ef7b7b 03-Sep-2020 Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

proc: remove a level of indentation in proc_get_inode

Just return early on inode allocation failure.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>


Revision tags: v5.9-rc3, v5.9-rc2, v5.9-rc1, v5.8, v5.8-rc7, v5.8-rc6, v5.8-rc5, v5.8-rc4, v5.8-rc3, v5.8-rc2, v5.8-rc1
# ef1548ad 12-Jun-2020 Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

proc: Use new_inode not new_inode_pseudo

Recently syzbot reported that unmounting proc when there is an ongoing
inotify watch on the root directory of proc could result in a use
after free when the

proc: Use new_inode not new_inode_pseudo

Recently syzbot reported that unmounting proc when there is an ongoing
inotify watch on the root directory of proc could result in a use
after free when the watch is removed after the unmount of proc
when the watcher exits.

Commit 69879c01a0c3 ("proc: Remove the now unnecessary internal mount
of proc") made it easier to unmount proc and allowed syzbot to see the
problem, but looking at the code it has been around for a long time.

Looking at the code the fsnotify watch should have been removed by
fsnotify_sb_delete in generic_shutdown_super. Unfortunately the inode
was allocated with new_inode_pseudo instead of new_inode so the inode
was not on the sb->s_inodes list. Which prevented
fsnotify_unmount_inodes from finding the inode and removing the watch
as well as made it so the "VFS: Busy inodes after unmount" warning
could not find the inodes to warn about them.

Make all of the inodes in proc visible to generic_shutdown_super,
and fsnotify_sb_delete by using new_inode instead of new_inode_pseudo.
The only functional difference is that new_inode places the inodes
on the sb->s_inodes list.

I wrote a small test program and I can verify that without changes it
can trigger this issue, and by replacing new_inode_pseudo with
new_inode the issues goes away.

Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reported-by: [email protected]
Fixes: 0097875bd415 ("proc: Implement /proc/thread-self to point at the directory of the current thread")
Fixes: 021ada7dff22 ("procfs: switch /proc/self away from proc_dir_entry")
Fixes: 51f0885e5415 ("vfs,proc: guarantee unique inodes in /proc")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.7, v5.7-rc7, v5.7-rc6, v5.7-rc5, v5.7-rc4, v5.7-rc3, v5.7-rc2
# e61bb8b3 19-Apr-2020 Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>

proc: use named enums for better readability

Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]

proc: use named enums for better readability

Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 1c6c4d11 19-Apr-2020 Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>

proc: use human-readable values for hidepid

The hidepid parameter values are becoming more and more and it becomes
difficult to remember what each new magic number means.

Backward compatibility is

proc: use human-readable values for hidepid

The hidepid parameter values are becoming more and more and it becomes
difficult to remember what each new magic number means.

Backward compatibility is preserved since it is possible to specify
numerical value for the hidepid parameter. This does not break the
fsconfig since it is not possible to specify a numerical value through
it. All numeric values are converted to a string. The type
FSCONFIG_SET_BINARY cannot be used to indicate a numerical value.

Selftest has been added to verify this behavior.

Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 6814ef2d 19-Apr-2020 Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>

proc: add option to mount only a pids subset

This allows to hide all files and directories in the procfs that are not
related to tasks.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Revi

proc: add option to mount only a pids subset

This allows to hide all files and directories in the procfs that are not
related to tasks.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

show more ...


1234567