|
Revision tags: v6.15, v6.15-rc7, v6.15-rc6, v6.15-rc5, v6.15-rc4, v6.15-rc3, v6.15-rc2, v6.15-rc1, v6.14, v6.14-rc7, v6.14-rc6, v6.14-rc5, v6.14-rc4, v6.14-rc3, v6.14-rc2, v6.14-rc1, v6.13, v6.13-rc7, v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4, v6.13-rc3, v6.13-rc2 |
|
| #
e70140ba |
| 01-Dec-2024 |
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> |
Get rid of 'remove_new' relic from platform driver struct
The continual trickle of small conversion patches is grating on me, and is really not helping. Just get rid of the 'remove_new' member func
Get rid of 'remove_new' relic from platform driver struct
The continual trickle of small conversion patches is grating on me, and is really not helping. Just get rid of the 'remove_new' member function, which is just an alias for the plain 'remove', and had a comment to that effect:
/* * .remove_new() is a relic from a prototype conversion of .remove(). * New drivers are supposed to implement .remove(). Once all drivers are * converted to not use .remove_new any more, it will be dropped. */
This was just a tree-wide 'sed' script that replaced '.remove_new' with '.remove', with some care taken to turn a subsequent tab into two tabs to make things line up.
I did do some minimal manual whitespace adjustment for places that used spaces to line things up.
Then I just removed the old (sic) .remove_new member function, and this is the end result. No more unnecessary conversion noise.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.13-rc1, v6.12, v6.12-rc7, v6.12-rc6, v6.12-rc5, v6.12-rc4, v6.12-rc3, v6.12-rc2 |
|
| #
5f60d5f6 |
| 01-Oct-2024 |
Al Viro <[email protected]> |
move asm/unaligned.h to linux/unaligned.h
asm/unaligned.h is always an include of asm-generic/unaligned.h; might as well move that thing to linux/unaligned.h and include that - there's nothing arch-
move asm/unaligned.h to linux/unaligned.h
asm/unaligned.h is always an include of asm-generic/unaligned.h; might as well move that thing to linux/unaligned.h and include that - there's nothing arch-specific in that header.
auto-generated by the following:
for i in `git grep -l -w asm/unaligned.h`; do sed -i -e "s/asm\/unaligned.h/linux\/unaligned.h/" $i done for i in `git grep -l -w asm-generic/unaligned.h`; do sed -i -e "s/asm-generic\/unaligned.h/linux\/unaligned.h/" $i done git mv include/asm-generic/unaligned.h include/linux/unaligned.h git mv tools/include/asm-generic/unaligned.h tools/include/linux/unaligned.h sed -i -e "/unaligned.h/d" include/asm-generic/Kbuild sed -i -e "s/__ASM_GENERIC/__LINUX/" include/linux/unaligned.h tools/include/linux/unaligned.h
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.12-rc1, v6.11, v6.11-rc7, v6.11-rc6, v6.11-rc5, v6.11-rc4, v6.11-rc3, v6.11-rc2, v6.11-rc1, v6.10, v6.10-rc7, v6.10-rc6, v6.10-rc5, v6.10-rc4, v6.10-rc3, v6.10-rc2, v6.10-rc1, v6.9, v6.9-rc7, v6.9-rc6, v6.9-rc5, v6.9-rc4, v6.9-rc3, v6.9-rc2, v6.9-rc1, v6.8, v6.8-rc7, v6.8-rc6, v6.8-rc5, v6.8-rc4, v6.8-rc3, v6.8-rc2, v6.8-rc1, v6.7, v6.7-rc8, v6.7-rc7, v6.7-rc6 |
|
| #
d70d141b |
| 14-Dec-2023 |
Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> |
ACPI: utils: Introduce helper for _DEP list lookup
The ACPI LPSS driver and the Surface platform driver code use almost the same code pattern for checking if one ACPI device is present in the list r
ACPI: utils: Introduce helper for _DEP list lookup
The ACPI LPSS driver and the Surface platform driver code use almost the same code pattern for checking if one ACPI device is present in the list returned by _DEP for another ACPI device.
To reduce the resulting code duplication, introduce a helper for that called acpi_device_dep() and invoke it from both places.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.7-rc5 |
|
| #
6909e0f3 |
| 08-Dec-2023 |
Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> |
ACPI: utils: Return bool from acpi_evaluate_reference()
There are only 4 users of acpi_evaluate_reference() and none of them actually cares about the reason why it fails. All of them are only inter
ACPI: utils: Return bool from acpi_evaluate_reference()
There are only 4 users of acpi_evaluate_reference() and none of them actually cares about the reason why it fails. All of them are only interested in whether or not it is successful, so it can return a bool value indicating that.
Modify acpi_evaluate_reference() as per the observation above and update its callers accordingly so as to get rid of useless code and local variables.
The observable behavior of the kernel is not expected to change after this modification of the code.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.7-rc4, v6.7-rc3, v6.7-rc2, v6.7-rc1, v6.6, v6.6-rc7, v6.6-rc6, v6.6-rc5, v6.6-rc4 |
|
| #
2e57d10a |
| 27-Sep-2023 |
Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> |
ACPI: utils: Dynamically determine acpi_handle_list size
Address a long-standing "TBD" comment in the ACPI headers regarding the number of handles in struct acpi_handle_list.
The number 10, which a
ACPI: utils: Dynamically determine acpi_handle_list size
Address a long-standing "TBD" comment in the ACPI headers regarding the number of handles in struct acpi_handle_list.
The number 10, which along with the comment dates back to 2.4.23, seems like it may have been arbitrarily chosen and isn't sufficient in all cases [1].
Finally change the code to dynamically determine the size of the handles table in struct acpi_handle_list and allocate it accordingly.
Update the users of to struct acpi_handle_list to take the additional dynamic allocation into account.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/[email protected] # [1] Co-developed-by: Vicki Pfau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Vicki Pfau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.6-rc3, v6.6-rc2 |
|
| #
342d7dce |
| 17-Sep-2023 |
Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]> |
platform/surface: acpi-notify: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's poss
platform/surface: acpi-notify: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.6-rc1, v6.5, v6.5-rc7, v6.5-rc6, v6.5-rc5, v6.5-rc4, v6.5-rc3, v6.5-rc2, v6.5-rc1, v6.4, v6.4-rc7, v6.4-rc6, v6.4-rc5, v6.4-rc4, v6.4-rc3, v6.4-rc2, v6.4-rc1, v6.3, v6.3-rc7, v6.3-rc6, v6.3-rc5, v6.3-rc4, v6.3-rc3, v6.3-rc2, v6.3-rc1, v6.2, v6.2-rc8, v6.2-rc7, v6.2-rc6, v6.2-rc5, v6.2-rc4, v6.2-rc3, v6.2-rc2, v6.2-rc1 |
|
| #
b09ee1cd |
| 20-Dec-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Rename top-level request functions to avoid ambiguities
We currently have a struct ssam_request_sync and a function ssam_request_sync(). While this is valid C, there ar
platform/surface: aggregator: Rename top-level request functions to avoid ambiguities
We currently have a struct ssam_request_sync and a function ssam_request_sync(). While this is valid C, there are some downsides to it.
One of these is that current Sphinx versions (>= 3.0) cannot disambiguate between the two (see disucssion and pull request linked below). It instead emits a "WARNING: Duplicate C declaration" and links for the struct and function in the resulting documentation link to the same entry (i.e. both to either function or struct documentation) instead of their respective own entries.
While we could just ignore that and wait for a fix, there's also a point to be made that the current naming can be somewhat confusing when searching (e.g. via grep) or trying to understand the levels of abstraction at play:
We currently have struct ssam_request_sync and associated functions ssam_request_sync_[alloc|free|init|wait|...]() operating on this struct. However, function ssam_request_sync() is one abstraction level above this. Similarly, ssam_request_sync_with_buffer() is not a function operating on struct ssam_request_sync, but rather a sibling to ssam_request_sync(), both using the struct under the hood.
Therefore, rename the top level request functions:
ssam_request_sync() -> ssam_request_do_sync() ssam_request_sync_with_buffer() -> ssam_request_do_sync_with_buffer() ssam_request_sync_onstack() -> ssam_request_do_sync_onstack()
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/085e0ada65c11da9303d07e70c510dc45f21315b.1656756450.git.mchehab@kernel.org/ Link: https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/pull/8313 Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.1, v6.1-rc8, v6.1-rc7, v6.1-rc6, v6.1-rc5, v6.1-rc4, v6.1-rc3, v6.1-rc2, v6.1-rc1, v6.0 |
|
| #
a776bf77 |
| 27-Sep-2022 |
Kees Cook <[email protected]> |
platform/surface: Split memcpy() of struct ssam_event flexible array
To work around a misbehavior of the compiler's ability to see into composite flexible array structs (as detailed in the coming me
platform/surface: Split memcpy() of struct ssam_event flexible array
To work around a misbehavior of the compiler's ability to see into composite flexible array structs (as detailed in the coming memcpy() hardening series[1]), split the memcpy() of the header and the payload so no false positive run-time overflow warning will be generated.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/[email protected]
Cc: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> Cc: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Gross <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.0-rc7, v6.0-rc6, v6.0-rc5, v6.0-rc4, v6.0-rc3, v6.0-rc2, v6.0-rc1, v5.19, v5.19-rc8, v5.19-rc7, v5.19-rc6, v5.19-rc5, v5.19-rc4 |
|
| #
221756e6 |
| 24-Jun-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> |
platform/surface: Update copyright year of various drivers
Update the copyright of various Surface drivers to the current year.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> Link: https:/
platform/surface: Update copyright year of various drivers
Update the copyright of various Surface drivers to the current year.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.19-rc3, v5.19-rc2 |
|
| #
31a1e4a5 |
| 10-Jun-2022 |
Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> |
platform/surface: avoid flush_scheduled_work() usage
Use local wq in order to avoid flush_scheduled_work() usage.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Maxim
platform/surface: avoid flush_scheduled_work() usage
Use local wq in order to avoid flush_scheduled_work() usage.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> Tested-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.19-rc1, v5.18, v5.18-rc7, v5.18-rc6, v5.18-rc5, v5.18-rc4, v5.18-rc3, v5.18-rc2, v5.18-rc1, v5.17, v5.17-rc8, v5.17-rc7, v5.17-rc6, v5.17-rc5, v5.17-rc4, v5.17-rc3, v5.17-rc2 |
|
| #
6768bddb |
| 26-Jan-2022 |
Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> |
platform/surface: Replace acpi_bus_get_device()
Replace acpi_bus_get_device() that is going to be dropped with acpi_fetch_acpi_dev().
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wys
platform/surface: Replace acpi_bus_get_device()
Replace acpi_bus_get_device() that is going to be dropped with acpi_fetch_acpi_dev().
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5805278.lOV4Wx5bFT@kreacher Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.17-rc1, v5.16, v5.16-rc8, v5.16-rc7, v5.16-rc6, v5.16-rc5, v5.16-rc4, v5.16-rc3, v5.16-rc2, v5.16-rc1, v5.15, v5.15-rc7, v5.15-rc6, v5.15-rc5, v5.15-rc4, v5.15-rc3, v5.15-rc2, v5.15-rc1, v5.14, v5.14-rc7, v5.14-rc6, v5.14-rc5, v5.14-rc4, v5.14-rc3, v5.14-rc2, v5.14-rc1, v5.13, v5.13-rc7, v5.13-rc6, v5.13-rc5 |
|
| #
a9e10e58 |
| 03-Jun-2021 |
Daniel Scally <[email protected]> |
ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list()
The acpi_walk_dep_device_list() function is not as generic as its name implies, serving only to decrement the dependency count for each dependent devic
ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list()
The acpi_walk_dep_device_list() function is not as generic as its name implies, serving only to decrement the dependency count for each dependent device of the input.
Extend it to accept a callback which can be applied to all the dependencies in acpi_dep_list.
Replace all existing calls to the function with calls to a wrapper, passing a callback that applies the same dependency reduction.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> # for platform/surface parts Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <[email protected]> [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.13-rc4, v5.13-rc3, v5.13-rc2, v5.13-rc1, v5.12, v5.12-rc8, v5.12-rc7, v5.12-rc6, v5.12-rc5, v5.12-rc4, v5.12-rc3, v5.12-rc2, v5.12-rc1, v5.12-rc1-dontuse, v5.11, v5.11-rc7, v5.11-rc6, v5.11-rc5, v5.11-rc4 |
|
| #
d26cbdd2 |
| 11-Jan-2021 |
Colin Ian King <[email protected]> |
platform/surface: fix potential integer overflow on shift of a int
The left shift of int 32 bit integer constant 1 is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic and then passed as a 64 bit function argument.
platform/surface: fix potential integer overflow on shift of a int
The left shift of int 32 bit integer constant 1 is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic and then passed as a 64 bit function argument. In the case where func is 32 or more this can lead to an oveflow. Avoid this by shifting using the BIT_ULL macro instead.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow") Fixes: fc00bc8ac1da ("platform/surface: Add Surface ACPI Notify driver") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.11-rc3, v5.11-rc2, v5.11-rc1 |
|
| #
fc00bc8a |
| 21-Dec-2020 |
Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> |
platform/surface: Add Surface ACPI Notify driver
The Surface ACPI Notify (SAN) device provides an ACPI interface to the Surface Aggregator EC, specifically the Surface Serial Hub interface. This int
platform/surface: Add Surface ACPI Notify driver
The Surface ACPI Notify (SAN) device provides an ACPI interface to the Surface Aggregator EC, specifically the Surface Serial Hub interface. This interface allows EC requests to be made from ACPI code and can convert a subset of EC events back to ACPI notifications.
Specifically, this interface provides a GenericSerialBus operation region ACPI code can execute a request by writing the request command data and payload to this operation region and reading back the corresponding response via a write-then-read operation. Furthermore, this interface provides a _DSM method to be called when certain events from the EC have been received, essentially turning them into ACPI notifications.
The driver provided in this commit essentially takes care of translating the request data written to the operation region, executing the request, waiting for it to finish, and finally writing and translating back the response (if the request has one). Furthermore, this driver takes care of enabling the events handled via ACPI _DSM calls. Lastly, this driver also exposes an interface providing discrete GPU (dGPU) power-on notifications on the Surface Book 2, which are also received via the operation region interface (but not handled by the SAN driver directly), making them accessible to other drivers (such as a dGPU hot-plug driver that may be added later on).
On 5th and 6th generation Surface devices (Surface Pro 5/2017, Pro 6, Book 2, Laptop 1 and 2), the SAN interface provides full battery and thermal subsystem access, as well as other EC based functionality. On those models, battery and thermal sensor devices are implemented as standard ACPI devices of that type, however, forward ACPI calls to the corresponding Surface Aggregator EC request via the SAN interface and receive corresponding notifications (e.g. battery information change) from it. This interface is therefore required to provide said functionality on those devices.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
show more ...
|