History log of /linux-6.15/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c (Results 1 – 14 of 14)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.15, v6.15-rc7, v6.15-rc6, v6.15-rc5, v6.15-rc4, v6.15-rc3, v6.15-rc2, v6.15-rc1, v6.14, v6.14-rc7, v6.14-rc6, v6.14-rc5, v6.14-rc4, v6.14-rc3, v6.14-rc2, v6.14-rc1, v6.13, v6.13-rc7, v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4, v6.13-rc3, v6.13-rc2
# e70140ba 01-Dec-2024 Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Get rid of 'remove_new' relic from platform driver struct

The continual trickle of small conversion patches is grating on me, and
is really not helping. Just get rid of the 'remove_new' member
func

Get rid of 'remove_new' relic from platform driver struct

The continual trickle of small conversion patches is grating on me, and
is really not helping. Just get rid of the 'remove_new' member
function, which is just an alias for the plain 'remove', and had a
comment to that effect:

/*
* .remove_new() is a relic from a prototype conversion of .remove().
* New drivers are supposed to implement .remove(). Once all drivers are
* converted to not use .remove_new any more, it will be dropped.
*/

This was just a tree-wide 'sed' script that replaced '.remove_new' with
'.remove', with some care taken to turn a subsequent tab into two tabs
to make things line up.

I did do some minimal manual whitespace adjustment for places that used
spaces to line things up.

Then I just removed the old (sic) .remove_new member function, and this
is the end result. No more unnecessary conversion noise.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.13-rc1, v6.12, v6.12-rc7, v6.12-rc6, v6.12-rc5, v6.12-rc4, v6.12-rc3, v6.12-rc2
# 5f60d5f6 01-Oct-2024 Al Viro <[email protected]>

move asm/unaligned.h to linux/unaligned.h

asm/unaligned.h is always an include of asm-generic/unaligned.h;
might as well move that thing to linux/unaligned.h and include
that - there's nothing arch-

move asm/unaligned.h to linux/unaligned.h

asm/unaligned.h is always an include of asm-generic/unaligned.h;
might as well move that thing to linux/unaligned.h and include
that - there's nothing arch-specific in that header.

auto-generated by the following:

for i in `git grep -l -w asm/unaligned.h`; do
sed -i -e "s/asm\/unaligned.h/linux\/unaligned.h/" $i
done
for i in `git grep -l -w asm-generic/unaligned.h`; do
sed -i -e "s/asm-generic\/unaligned.h/linux\/unaligned.h/" $i
done
git mv include/asm-generic/unaligned.h include/linux/unaligned.h
git mv tools/include/asm-generic/unaligned.h tools/include/linux/unaligned.h
sed -i -e "/unaligned.h/d" include/asm-generic/Kbuild
sed -i -e "s/__ASM_GENERIC/__LINUX/" include/linux/unaligned.h tools/include/linux/unaligned.h

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.12-rc1, v6.11, v6.11-rc7, v6.11-rc6, v6.11-rc5, v6.11-rc4, v6.11-rc3, v6.11-rc2, v6.11-rc1, v6.10, v6.10-rc7, v6.10-rc6, v6.10-rc5, v6.10-rc4, v6.10-rc3, v6.10-rc2, v6.10-rc1, v6.9, v6.9-rc7, v6.9-rc6, v6.9-rc5, v6.9-rc4, v6.9-rc3, v6.9-rc2, v6.9-rc1, v6.8, v6.8-rc7, v6.8-rc6, v6.8-rc5, v6.8-rc4, v6.8-rc3, v6.8-rc2, v6.8-rc1, v6.7, v6.7-rc8, v6.7-rc7, v6.7-rc6
# d70d141b 14-Dec-2023 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

ACPI: utils: Introduce helper for _DEP list lookup

The ACPI LPSS driver and the Surface platform driver code use almost the
same code pattern for checking if one ACPI device is present in the list
r

ACPI: utils: Introduce helper for _DEP list lookup

The ACPI LPSS driver and the Surface platform driver code use almost the
same code pattern for checking if one ACPI device is present in the list
returned by _DEP for another ACPI device.

To reduce the resulting code duplication, introduce a helper for that
called acpi_device_dep() and invoke it from both places.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.7-rc5
# 6909e0f3 08-Dec-2023 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

ACPI: utils: Return bool from acpi_evaluate_reference()

There are only 4 users of acpi_evaluate_reference() and none of them
actually cares about the reason why it fails. All of them are only
inter

ACPI: utils: Return bool from acpi_evaluate_reference()

There are only 4 users of acpi_evaluate_reference() and none of them
actually cares about the reason why it fails. All of them are only
interested in whether or not it is successful, so it can return a bool
value indicating that.

Modify acpi_evaluate_reference() as per the observation above and update
its callers accordingly so as to get rid of useless code and local
variables.

The observable behavior of the kernel is not expected to change after
this modification of the code.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.7-rc4, v6.7-rc3, v6.7-rc2, v6.7-rc1, v6.6, v6.6-rc7, v6.6-rc6, v6.6-rc5, v6.6-rc4
# 2e57d10a 27-Sep-2023 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

ACPI: utils: Dynamically determine acpi_handle_list size

Address a long-standing "TBD" comment in the ACPI headers regarding the
number of handles in struct acpi_handle_list.

The number 10, which a

ACPI: utils: Dynamically determine acpi_handle_list size

Address a long-standing "TBD" comment in the ACPI headers regarding the
number of handles in struct acpi_handle_list.

The number 10, which along with the comment dates back to 2.4.23, seems
like it may have been arbitrarily chosen and isn't sufficient in all
cases [1].

Finally change the code to dynamically determine the size of the handles
table in struct acpi_handle_list and allocate it accordingly.

Update the users of to struct acpi_handle_list to take the additional
dynamic allocation into account.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/[email protected] # [1]
Co-developed-by: Vicki Pfau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vicki Pfau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6-rc3, v6.6-rc2
# 342d7dce 17-Sep-2023 Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>

platform/surface: acpi-notify: Convert to platform remove callback returning void

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's poss

platform/surface: acpi-notify: Convert to platform remove callback returning void

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6-rc1, v6.5, v6.5-rc7, v6.5-rc6, v6.5-rc5, v6.5-rc4, v6.5-rc3, v6.5-rc2, v6.5-rc1, v6.4, v6.4-rc7, v6.4-rc6, v6.4-rc5, v6.4-rc4, v6.4-rc3, v6.4-rc2, v6.4-rc1, v6.3, v6.3-rc7, v6.3-rc6, v6.3-rc5, v6.3-rc4, v6.3-rc3, v6.3-rc2, v6.3-rc1, v6.2, v6.2-rc8, v6.2-rc7, v6.2-rc6, v6.2-rc5, v6.2-rc4, v6.2-rc3, v6.2-rc2, v6.2-rc1
# b09ee1cd 20-Dec-2022 Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>

platform/surface: aggregator: Rename top-level request functions to avoid ambiguities

We currently have a struct ssam_request_sync and a function
ssam_request_sync(). While this is valid C, there ar

platform/surface: aggregator: Rename top-level request functions to avoid ambiguities

We currently have a struct ssam_request_sync and a function
ssam_request_sync(). While this is valid C, there are some downsides to
it.

One of these is that current Sphinx versions (>= 3.0) cannot
disambiguate between the two (see disucssion and pull request linked
below). It instead emits a "WARNING: Duplicate C declaration" and links
for the struct and function in the resulting documentation link to the
same entry (i.e. both to either function or struct documentation)
instead of their respective own entries.

While we could just ignore that and wait for a fix, there's also a point
to be made that the current naming can be somewhat confusing when
searching (e.g. via grep) or trying to understand the levels of
abstraction at play:

We currently have struct ssam_request_sync and associated functions
ssam_request_sync_[alloc|free|init|wait|...]() operating on this struct.
However, function ssam_request_sync() is one abstraction level above
this. Similarly, ssam_request_sync_with_buffer() is not a function
operating on struct ssam_request_sync, but rather a sibling to
ssam_request_sync(), both using the struct under the hood.

Therefore, rename the top level request functions:

ssam_request_sync() -> ssam_request_do_sync()
ssam_request_sync_with_buffer() -> ssam_request_do_sync_with_buffer()
ssam_request_sync_onstack() -> ssam_request_do_sync_onstack()

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/085e0ada65c11da9303d07e70c510dc45f21315b.1656756450.git.mchehab@kernel.org/
Link: https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/pull/8313
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1, v6.1-rc8, v6.1-rc7, v6.1-rc6, v6.1-rc5, v6.1-rc4, v6.1-rc3, v6.1-rc2, v6.1-rc1, v6.0
# a776bf77 27-Sep-2022 Kees Cook <[email protected]>

platform/surface: Split memcpy() of struct ssam_event flexible array

To work around a misbehavior of the compiler's ability to see into
composite flexible array structs (as detailed in the coming me

platform/surface: Split memcpy() of struct ssam_event flexible array

To work around a misbehavior of the compiler's ability to see into
composite flexible array structs (as detailed in the coming memcpy()
hardening series[1]), split the memcpy() of the header and the payload
so no false positive run-time overflow warning will be generated.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/[email protected]

Cc: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>
Cc: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Gross <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.0-rc7, v6.0-rc6, v6.0-rc5, v6.0-rc4, v6.0-rc3, v6.0-rc2, v6.0-rc1, v5.19, v5.19-rc8, v5.19-rc7, v5.19-rc6, v5.19-rc5, v5.19-rc4
# 221756e6 24-Jun-2022 Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>

platform/surface: Update copyright year of various drivers

Update the copyright of various Surface drivers to the current year.

Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>
Link: https:/

platform/surface: Update copyright year of various drivers

Update the copyright of various Surface drivers to the current year.

Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.19-rc3, v5.19-rc2
# 31a1e4a5 10-Jun-2022 Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]>

platform/surface: avoid flush_scheduled_work() usage

Use local wq in order to avoid flush_scheduled_work() usage.

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Maxim

platform/surface: avoid flush_scheduled_work() usage

Use local wq in order to avoid flush_scheduled_work() usage.

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.19-rc1, v5.18, v5.18-rc7, v5.18-rc6, v5.18-rc5, v5.18-rc4, v5.18-rc3, v5.18-rc2, v5.18-rc1, v5.17, v5.17-rc8, v5.17-rc7, v5.17-rc6, v5.17-rc5, v5.17-rc4, v5.17-rc3, v5.17-rc2
# 6768bddb 26-Jan-2022 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

platform/surface: Replace acpi_bus_get_device()

Replace acpi_bus_get_device() that is going to be dropped with
acpi_fetch_acpi_dev().

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wys

platform/surface: Replace acpi_bus_get_device()

Replace acpi_bus_get_device() that is going to be dropped with
acpi_fetch_acpi_dev().

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5805278.lOV4Wx5bFT@kreacher
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.17-rc1, v5.16, v5.16-rc8, v5.16-rc7, v5.16-rc6, v5.16-rc5, v5.16-rc4, v5.16-rc3, v5.16-rc2, v5.16-rc1, v5.15, v5.15-rc7, v5.15-rc6, v5.15-rc5, v5.15-rc4, v5.15-rc3, v5.15-rc2, v5.15-rc1, v5.14, v5.14-rc7, v5.14-rc6, v5.14-rc5, v5.14-rc4, v5.14-rc3, v5.14-rc2, v5.14-rc1, v5.13, v5.13-rc7, v5.13-rc6, v5.13-rc5
# a9e10e58 03-Jun-2021 Daniel Scally <[email protected]>

ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list()

The acpi_walk_dep_device_list() function is not as generic as its
name implies, serving only to decrement the dependency count for each
dependent devic

ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list()

The acpi_walk_dep_device_list() function is not as generic as its
name implies, serving only to decrement the dependency count for each
dependent device of the input.

Extend it to accept a callback which can be applied to all the
dependencies in acpi_dep_list.

Replace all existing calls to the function with calls to a wrapper,
passing a callback that applies the same dependency reduction.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> # for platform/surface parts
Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <[email protected]>
[ rjw: Changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.13-rc4, v5.13-rc3, v5.13-rc2, v5.13-rc1, v5.12, v5.12-rc8, v5.12-rc7, v5.12-rc6, v5.12-rc5, v5.12-rc4, v5.12-rc3, v5.12-rc2, v5.12-rc1, v5.12-rc1-dontuse, v5.11, v5.11-rc7, v5.11-rc6, v5.11-rc5, v5.11-rc4
# d26cbdd2 11-Jan-2021 Colin Ian King <[email protected]>

platform/surface: fix potential integer overflow on shift of a int

The left shift of int 32 bit integer constant 1 is evaluated using 32 bit
arithmetic and then passed as a 64 bit function argument.

platform/surface: fix potential integer overflow on shift of a int

The left shift of int 32 bit integer constant 1 is evaluated using 32 bit
arithmetic and then passed as a 64 bit function argument. In the case where
func is 32 or more this can lead to an oveflow. Avoid this by shifting
using the BIT_ULL macro instead.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: fc00bc8ac1da ("platform/surface: Add Surface ACPI Notify driver")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.11-rc3, v5.11-rc2, v5.11-rc1
# fc00bc8a 21-Dec-2020 Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>

platform/surface: Add Surface ACPI Notify driver

The Surface ACPI Notify (SAN) device provides an ACPI interface to the
Surface Aggregator EC, specifically the Surface Serial Hub interface.
This int

platform/surface: Add Surface ACPI Notify driver

The Surface ACPI Notify (SAN) device provides an ACPI interface to the
Surface Aggregator EC, specifically the Surface Serial Hub interface.
This interface allows EC requests to be made from ACPI code and can
convert a subset of EC events back to ACPI notifications.

Specifically, this interface provides a GenericSerialBus operation
region ACPI code can execute a request by writing the request command
data and payload to this operation region and reading back the
corresponding response via a write-then-read operation. Furthermore,
this interface provides a _DSM method to be called when certain events
from the EC have been received, essentially turning them into ACPI
notifications.

The driver provided in this commit essentially takes care of translating
the request data written to the operation region, executing the request,
waiting for it to finish, and finally writing and translating back the
response (if the request has one). Furthermore, this driver takes care
of enabling the events handled via ACPI _DSM calls. Lastly, this driver
also exposes an interface providing discrete GPU (dGPU) power-on
notifications on the Surface Book 2, which are also received via the
operation region interface (but not handled by the SAN driver directly),
making them accessible to other drivers (such as a dGPU hot-plug driver
that may be added later on).

On 5th and 6th generation Surface devices (Surface Pro 5/2017, Pro 6,
Book 2, Laptop 1 and 2), the SAN interface provides full battery and
thermal subsystem access, as well as other EC based functionality. On
those models, battery and thermal sensor devices are implemented as
standard ACPI devices of that type, however, forward ACPI calls to the
corresponding Surface Aggregator EC request via the SAN interface and
receive corresponding notifications (e.g. battery information change)
from it. This interface is therefore required to provide said
functionality on those devices.

Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>

show more ...