ACPI: processor: Move arch_init_invariance_cppc() call later

arch_init_invariance_cppc() is called at the end of
acpi_cppc_processor_probe() in order to configure frequency invariance
based upon the

ACPI: processor: Move arch_init_invariance_cppc() call later

arch_init_invariance_cppc() is called at the end of
acpi_cppc_processor_probe() in order to configure frequency invariance
based upon the values from _CPC.

This however doesn't work on AMD CPPC shared memory designs that have
AMD preferred cores enabled because _CPC needs to be analyzed from all
cores to judge if preferred cores are enabled.

This issue manifests to users as a warning since commit 21fb59ab4b97
("ACPI: CPPC: Adjust debug messages in amd_set_max_freq_ratio() to warn"):
```
Could not retrieve highest performance (-19)
```

However the warning isn't the cause of this, it was actually
commit 279f838a61f9 ("x86/amd: Detect preferred cores in
amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()") which exposed the issue.

To fix this problem, change arch_init_invariance_cppc() into a new weak
symbol that is called at the end of acpi_processor_driver_init().
Each architecture that supports it can declare the symbol to override
the weak one.

Define it for x86, in arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c, and for all of the
architectures using the generic arch_topology.c code.

Fixes: 279f838a61f9 ("x86/amd: Detect preferred cores in amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()")
Reported-by: Ivan Shapovalov <[email protected]>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219431
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
[ rjw: Changelog edit ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI: processor: Simplify initial onlining to use same path for cold and hotplug

Separate code paths, combined with a flag set in acpi_processor.c to
indicate a struct acpi_processor was for a hotpl

ACPI: processor: Simplify initial onlining to use same path for cold and hotplug

Separate code paths, combined with a flag set in acpi_processor.c to
indicate a struct acpi_processor was for a hotplugged CPU ensured that
per CPU data was only set up the first time that a CPU was initialized.
This appears to be unnecessary as the paths can be combined by letting
the online logic also handle any CPUs online at the time of driver load.

Motivation for this change, beyond simplification, is that ARM64
virtual CPU HP uses the same code paths for hotplug and cold path in
acpi_processor.c so had no easy way to set the flag for hotplug only.
Removing this necessity will enable ARM64 vCPU HP to reuse the existing
code paths.

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Miguel Luis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI: cpufreq: Add highest perf change notification

Platform firmware sends notify 0x85 to inform the OS that the highest
performance of a CPU has changed.

This will be used by the AMD P-state driv

ACPI: cpufreq: Add highest perf change notification

Platform firmware sends notify 0x85 to inform the OS that the highest
performance of a CPU has changed.

This will be used by the AMD P-state driver to update the ranking of
preferred cores and set the priority of cores accordingly.

Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Perry Yuan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meng Li <[email protected]>
Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#processor-device-notification-values
[ rjw: New subject, changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI: processor: Reorder acpi_processor_driver_init()

The cpufreq policy notifier in the ACPI processor driver may as
well be registered before the driver itself, which causes
acpi_processor_cpufreq

ACPI: processor: Reorder acpi_processor_driver_init()

The cpufreq policy notifier in the ACPI processor driver may as
well be registered before the driver itself, which causes
acpi_processor_cpufreq_init to be true (unless the notifier
registration fails, which is unlikely at that point) when the
ACPI CPU thermal cooling devices are registered, so the
processor_get_max_state() result does not change while
acpi_processor_driver_init() is running.

Change the ordering in acpi_processor_driver_init() accordingly
to prevent the max_state value from remaining 0 permanently for all
ACPI CPU cooling devices due to setting acpi_processor_cpufreq_init
too late. [Note that processor_get_max_state() may still return
different values at different times after this change, depending on
the cpufreq driver registration time, but that issue needs to be
addressed separately.]

Fixes: a365105c685c("thermal: sysfs: Reuse cdev->max_state")
Reported-by: Wang, Quanxian <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI: processor: Split out thermal initialization from ACPI PSS

Commit 239708a3af44 ("ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor
driver"), moves processor thermal registration to acpi_pss_perf_ini

ACPI: processor: Split out thermal initialization from ACPI PSS

Commit 239708a3af44 ("ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor
driver"), moves processor thermal registration to acpi_pss_perf_init(),
which doesn't get executed if ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS is not enabled.

As ARM64 supports P-states using CPPC, it should be possible to also
support processor passive cooling even if PSS is not enabled. Split
out the processor thermal cooling register from ACPI PSS to support
this, and move it into a separate function in processor_thermal.c.

Signed-off-by: Riwen Lu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Punit Agrawal <[email protected]>
[ rjw: Subject edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI: Use acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() instead of acpi_bus_get_device()

Modify the ACPI code to use acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() instead of
acpi_bus_get_device() where applicable.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysock

ACPI: Use acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() instead of acpi_bus_get_device()

Modify the ACPI code to use acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() instead of
acpi_bus_get_device() where applicable.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI: processor: Get rid of ACPICA message printing

The ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() macros are used for
message printing in the ACPICA code and they should not be used
elsewhere. Specia

ACPI: processor: Get rid of ACPICA message printing

The ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() macros are used for
message printing in the ACPICA code and they should not be used
elsewhere. Special configuration (either kernel command line or
sysfs-based) is needed to see the messages printed by them and
the format of those messages is also special and convoluted.

For this reason, replace all of the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and
ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances in the ACPI processor driver with
corresponding dev_*(), acpi_handle_*() and pr_*() calls depending
on the context in which they appear.

Also drop the ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT definition that is not going
to be necessary any more.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]>

show more ...

cpufreq: Use per-policy frequency QoS

Replace the CPU device PM QoS used for the management of min and max
frequency constraints in cpufreq (and its users) with per-policy
frequency QoS to avoid pro

cpufreq: Use per-policy frequency QoS

Replace the CPU device PM QoS used for the management of min and max
frequency constraints in cpufreq (and its users) with per-policy
frequency QoS to avoid problems with cpufreq policies covering
more then one CPU.

Namely, a cpufreq driver is registered with the subsys interface
which calls cpufreq_add_dev() for each CPU, starting from CPU0, so
currently the PM QoS notifiers are added to the first CPU in the
policy (i.e. CPU0 in the majority of cases).

In turn, when the cpufreq driver is unregistered, the subsys interface
doing that calls cpufreq_remove_dev() for each CPU, starting from CPU0,
and the PM QoS notifiers are only removed when cpufreq_remove_dev() is
called for the last CPU in the policy, say CPUx, which as a rule is
not CPU0 if the policy covers more than one CPU. Then, the PM QoS
notifiers cannot be removed, because CPUx does not have them, and
they are still there in the device PM QoS notifiers list of CPU0,
which prevents new PM QoS notifiers from being registered for CPU0
on the next attempt to register the cpufreq driver.

The same issue occurs when the first CPU in the policy goes offline
before unregistering the driver.

After this change it does not matter which CPU is the policy CPU at
the driver registration time and whether or not it is online all the
time, because the frequency QoS is per policy and not per CPU.

Fixes: 67d874c3b2c6 ("cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework")
Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
Diagnosed-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/5ad2624194baa2f53acc1f1e627eb7684c577a19.1562210705.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/T/#md2d89e95906b8c91c15f582146173dce2e86e99f
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20191017094612.6tbkwoq4harsjcqv@vireshk-i7/T/#m30d48cc23b9a80467fbaa16e30f90b3828a5a29b
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier

The cpufreq core now takes the min/max frequency constraints via QoS
requests and the CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier shall get removed late

ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier

The cpufreq core now takes the min/max frequency constraints via QoS
requests and the CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier shall get removed later on.

Switch over to using the QoS request for maximum frequency constraint
for acpi driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 157

Based on 3 normalized pattern(s):

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of th

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 157

Based on 3 normalized pattern(s):

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version this program is distributed in the
hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even
the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose see the gnu general public license for more details

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham]
[i] [kishon]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope that
it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see
the gnu general public license for more details

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version [author] [graeme] [gregory]
[gg]@[slimlogic] [co] [uk] [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham] [i]
[kishon]@[ti] [com] [based] [on] [twl6030]_[usb] [c] [author] [hema]
[hk] [hemahk]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope
that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the
implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose see the gnu general public license for more details

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

GPL-2.0-or-later

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1105 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI: processor: use dev_dbg() instead of dev_warn() when CPPC probe failed

_CPC is a optinal object for processor device so it's
fine for processor devices in DSDT without CPPC data,
but when booti

ACPI: processor: use dev_dbg() instead of dev_warn() when CPPC probe failed

_CPC is a optinal object for processor device so it's
fine for processor devices in DSDT without CPPC data,
but when booting the system with CPPC enabled in the
kernel but without its support in the firmware, I got
lots of warnings on a 64 core system:

[ 6.346016] acpi ACPI0007:00: CPPC data invalid or not present
[ 6.346028] acpi ACPI0007:01: CPPC data invalid or not present
[ 6.346039] acpi ACPI0007:02: CPPC data invalid or not present
[ 6.346050] acpi ACPI0007:03: CPPC data invalid or not present
[ 6.346063] acpi ACPI0007:04: CPPC data invalid or not present
...
[ 6.346737] acpi ACPI0007:3f: CPPC data invalid or not present

This isn't much useful and a little bit noise, so
switch the dev_warn() to dev_dbg().

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI/processor: Use cpu_hotplug_disable() instead of get_online_cpus()

Converting the hotplug locking, i.e. get_online_cpus(), to a percpu rwsem
unearthed a circular lock dependency which was hidden

ACPI/processor: Use cpu_hotplug_disable() instead of get_online_cpus()

Converting the hotplug locking, i.e. get_online_cpus(), to a percpu rwsem
unearthed a circular lock dependency which was hidden from lockdep due to
the lockdep annotation of get_online_cpus() which prevents lockdep from
creating full dependency chains.

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((&wfc.work));
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem);
lock((&wfc.work));
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem);

This dependency is established via acpi_processor_start() which calls into
the work queue code. And the work queue code establishes the reverse
dependency.

This is not a problem of get_online_cpus() recursion, it's a possible
deadlock undetected by lockdep so far.

The cure is to use cpu_hotplug_disable() instead of get_online_cpus() to
protect the probing from acpi_processor_start().

There is a side effect to this: cpu_hotplug_disable() makes a concurrent
cpu hotplug attempt via the sysfs interfaces fail with -EBUSY, but that
probing usually happens during the boot process where no interaction is
possible. Any later invocations are infrequent enough and concurrent
hotplug attempts are so unlikely that the danger of user space visible
regressions is very close to zero. Anyway, thats preferrable over a real
deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...

ACPI/processor: Replace racy task affinity logic

acpi_processor_get_throttling() requires to invoke the getter function on
the target CPU. This is achieved by temporarily setting the affinity of the

ACPI/processor: Replace racy task affinity logic

acpi_processor_get_throttling() requires to invoke the getter function on
the target CPU. This is achieved by temporarily setting the affinity of the
calling user space thread to the requested CPU and reset it to the original
affinity afterwards.

That's racy vs. CPU hotplug and concurrent affinity settings for that
thread resulting in code executing on the wrong CPU and overwriting the
new affinity setting.

acpi_processor_get_throttling() is invoked in two ways:

1) The CPU online callback, which is already running on the target CPU and
obviously protected against hotplug and not affected by affinity
settings.

2) The ACPI driver probe function, which is not protected against hotplug
during modprobe.

Switch it over to work_on_cpu() and protect the probe function against CPU
hotplug.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <[email protected]>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI/processor: Fix error handling in __acpi_processor_start()

When acpi_install_notify_handler() fails the cooling device stays
registered and the sysfs files created via acpi_pss_perf_init() are
l

ACPI/processor: Fix error handling in __acpi_processor_start()

When acpi_install_notify_handler() fails the cooling device stays
registered and the sysfs files created via acpi_pss_perf_init() are
leaked and the function returns success.

Undo acpi_pss_perf_init() and return a proper error code.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <[email protected]>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI/processor: Convert to hotplug state machine

Install the callbacks via the state machine.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjw

ACPI/processor: Convert to hotplug state machine

Install the callbacks via the state machine.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI / CPPC: Don't return on CPPC probe failure

It is still possible to continue even CPPC data is invalid or missing.

Suggested-by: Alexey Klimov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pa

ACPI / CPPC: Don't return on CPPC probe failure

It is still possible to continue even CPPC data is invalid or missing.

Suggested-by: Alexey Klimov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI / CPPC: Allow build with ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS config

Some newer x86 platforms have support for both _CPC and _PSS object. So
kernel config can have both ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS and ACPI_CPPC_LIB. So rem

ACPI / CPPC: Allow build with ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS config

Some newer x86 platforms have support for both _CPC and _PSS object. So
kernel config can have both ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS and ACPI_CPPC_LIB. So remove
restriction for ACPI_CPPC_LIB to build only when ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS is not
defined.
Also for legacy systems with only _PSS, we shouldn't bail out if
acpi_cppc_processor_probe() fails, if ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS is also defined.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states

ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate
method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the loca

ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states

ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate
method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local power
states for each node in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can
use _LPI object to select a local power state for each level of processor
hierarchy in the system. They used to produce a composite power state
request that is presented to the platform by the OSPM.

Since multiple processors affect the idle state for any non-leaf hierarchy
node, coordination of idle state requests between the processors is
required. ACPI supports two different coordination schemes: Platform
coordinated and OS initiated.

This patch adds initial support for Platform coordination scheme of LPI.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI/processor: Avoid STARTING/DYING actions in a more logical way

As part of the hotplug cleanup, the CPU_STARTING/DYING actions are going
away soon. This driver needlessly uses those two macro, a

ACPI/processor: Avoid STARTING/DYING actions in a more logical way

As part of the hotplug cleanup, the CPU_STARTING/DYING actions are going
away soon. This driver needlessly uses those two macro, and so this patch
replaces that code with something more sensible.

Commit:

8da8373447d6a57a5a9f55233d35beb15d92d0d2 ("ACPI / processor: Fix STARTING/DYING action in acpi_cpu_soft_notify()")

added checks for those two actions, because the notification callback can
sleep, causing a hung CPU. This patch instead checks for the ONLINE/DEAD
actions, which are the ones that are handled by the driver in the first
place.

Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI / sleep: move acpi_processor_sleep to sleep.c

acpi_processor_sleep is neither related nor used by CPUIdle framework.
It's used in system suspend/resume path as a syscore operation. It makes
mor

ACPI / sleep: move acpi_processor_sleep to sleep.c

acpi_processor_sleep is neither related nor used by CPUIdle framework.
It's used in system suspend/resume path as a syscore operation. It makes
more sense to move it to acpi/sleep.c where all the S-state transition
(a.k.a. Linux system suspend/hiberate) related code are present.

Also make it depend on CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM_POWER_STATES_SUPPORT so that
it's not compiled on architecture like ARM64 where S-states are not
yet defined in ACPI.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI / processor: Fix thermal cooling device regression

The processor cooling device is no longer present for passive thermal
control.

Commit 239708a3af44 ("ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Proce

ACPI / processor: Fix thermal cooling device regression

The processor cooling device is no longer present for passive thermal
control.

Commit 239708a3af44 ("ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver")
moved the processing to a new function acpi_pss_perf_init(), but
missed "return 0" after successful creation. This causes the error
handling functions to be called, which will delete the previously
created processor cooling device.

Fixes: 239708a3af44 (ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver)
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]>
Cc: 4.3+ <[email protected]> # 4.3+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...

CPPC: Probe for CPPC tables for each ACPI Processor object

For each detected ACPI Processor object (ACPI0007), search its
device handle for CPPC specific tables (i.e. _CPC) and extract
CPU specific

CPPC: Probe for CPPC tables for each ACPI Processor object

For each detected ACPI Processor object (ACPI0007), search its
device handle for CPPC specific tables (i.e. _CPC) and extract
CPU specific performance capabilities.

Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Al Stone <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver

The ACPI processor driver is currently tied too closely
to the ACPI P-states (PSS) and other related constructs
for controlling CPU performance.

ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver

The ACPI processor driver is currently tied too closely
to the ACPI P-states (PSS) and other related constructs
for controlling CPU performance.

The newer ACPI specification (v5.1 onwards) introduces
alternative methods to PSS. These new mechanisms are
described within each ACPI Processor object and so they
need to be scanned whenever a new Processor object is detected.
This patch introduces a new Kconfig symbol to allow for
finer configurability among the two options for controlling
performance states. There is no change in functionality and
the option is auto-selected by the architectures which support it.

A future commit will introduce support for CPPC: A newer method of
controlling CPU performance. The OS is not expected to support
CPPC and PSS at the same time, so the Kconfig option lets us make
the two mutually exclusive at compile time.

Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <[email protected]>
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI / processor: remove leftover __refdata annotations

The processor_handler structure does not reference any __init / __exit
code or data. Therefore the __refdata annotation is not needed. It used

ACPI / processor: remove leftover __refdata annotations

The processor_handler structure does not reference any __init / __exit
code or data. Therefore the __refdata annotation is not needed. It used
to be prior to commit fe7bf106ebc2 ("acpi: delete __cpuinit usage from
all acpi files") due to the __cpuinit annotation of acpi_processor_add().
But with that commit in place that requirement has gone.

The same is true for the acpi_cpu_notifier notifier block.
acpi_cpu_soft_notify() used to be marked __cpuinit but lost its
annotation in the above mentioned commit as well. Therefore the __refdata
annotation isn't needed there either.

Just drop the unneded __refdata annotations to be able to catch future
section mismatches.

Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...

ACPI: Remove FSF mailing addresses

There is no need to carry potentially outdated Free Software Foundation
mailing address in file headers since the COPYING file includes it.

Signed-off-by: Jarkko

ACPI: Remove FSF mailing addresses

There is no need to carry potentially outdated Free Software Foundation
mailing address in file headers since the COPYING file includes it.

Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

show more ...