|
Revision tags: v6.15, v6.15-rc7, v6.15-rc6, v6.15-rc5, v6.15-rc4, v6.15-rc3, v6.15-rc2, v6.15-rc1 |
|
| #
8fa7292f |
| 05-Apr-2025 |
Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> |
treewide: Switch/rename to timer_delete[_sync]()
timer_delete[_sync]() replaces del_timer[_sync](). Convert the whole tree over and remove the historical wrapper inlines.
Conversion was done with c
treewide: Switch/rename to timer_delete[_sync]()
timer_delete[_sync]() replaces del_timer[_sync](). Convert the whole tree over and remove the historical wrapper inlines.
Conversion was done with coccinelle plus manual fixups where necessary.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.14 |
|
| #
ffa1e7ad |
| 18-Mar-2025 |
Thomas Hellström <[email protected]> |
block: Make request_queue lockdep splats show up earlier
In recent kernels, there are lockdep splats around the struct request_queue::io_lockdep_map, similar to [1], but they typically don't show up
block: Make request_queue lockdep splats show up earlier
In recent kernels, there are lockdep splats around the struct request_queue::io_lockdep_map, similar to [1], but they typically don't show up until reclaim with writeback happens.
Having multiple kernel versions released with a known risc of kernel deadlock during reclaim writeback should IMHO be addressed and backported to -stable with the highest priority.
In order to have these lockdep splats show up earlier, preferrably during system initialization, prime the struct request_queue::io_lockdep_map as GFP_KERNEL reclaim- tainted. This will instead lead to lockdep splats looking similar to [2], but without the need for reclaim + writeback happening.
[1]: [ 189.762244] ====================================================== [ 189.762432] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 189.762441] 6.14.0-rc6-xe+ #6 Tainted: G U [ 189.762450] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 189.762459] kswapd0/119 is trying to acquire lock: [ 189.762467] ffff888110ceb710 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#26){++++}-{0:0}, at: __submit_bio+0x76/0x230 [ 189.762485] but task is already holding lock: [ 189.762494] ffffffff834c97c0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0xbe/0xb00 [ 189.762507] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 189.762519] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 189.762529] -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 189.762540] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xc5/0x100 [ 189.762548] kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x4a/0x480 [ 189.762558] alloc_inode+0xaa/0xe0 [ 189.762566] iget_locked+0x157/0x330 [ 189.762573] kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x110 [ 189.762582] kernfs_get_tree+0x1b0/0x2e0 [ 189.762590] sysfs_get_tree+0x1f/0x60 [ 189.762597] vfs_get_tree+0x2a/0xf0 [ 189.762605] path_mount+0x4cd/0xc00 [ 189.762613] __x64_sys_mount+0x119/0x150 [ 189.762621] x64_sys_call+0x14f2/0x2310 [ 189.762630] do_syscall_64+0x91/0x180 [ 189.762637] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 189.762647] -> #1 (&root->kernfs_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 189.762659] down_write+0x3e/0xf0 [ 189.762667] kernfs_remove+0x32/0x60 [ 189.762676] sysfs_remove_dir+0x4f/0x60 [ 189.762685] __kobject_del+0x33/0xa0 [ 189.762709] kobject_del+0x13/0x30 [ 189.762716] elv_unregister_queue+0x52/0x80 [ 189.762725] elevator_switch+0x68/0x360 [ 189.762733] elv_iosched_store+0x14b/0x1b0 [ 189.762756] queue_attr_store+0x181/0x1e0 [ 189.762765] sysfs_kf_write+0x49/0x80 [ 189.762773] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x17d/0x250 [ 189.762781] vfs_write+0x281/0x540 [ 189.762790] ksys_write+0x72/0xf0 [ 189.762798] __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x30 [ 189.762807] x64_sys_call+0x2a3/0x2310 [ 189.762815] do_syscall_64+0x91/0x180 [ 189.762823] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 189.762833] -> #0 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#26){++++}-{0:0}: [ 189.762845] __lock_acquire+0x1525/0x2760 [ 189.762854] lock_acquire+0xca/0x310 [ 189.762861] blk_mq_submit_bio+0x8a2/0xba0 [ 189.762870] __submit_bio+0x76/0x230 [ 189.762878] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x323/0x430 [ 189.762888] submit_bio_noacct+0x2cc/0x620 [ 189.762896] submit_bio+0x38/0x110 [ 189.762904] __swap_writepage+0xf5/0x380 [ 189.762912] swap_writepage+0x3c7/0x600 [ 189.762920] shmem_writepage+0x3da/0x4f0 [ 189.762929] pageout+0x13f/0x310 [ 189.762937] shrink_folio_list+0x61c/0xf60 [ 189.763261] evict_folios+0x378/0xcd0 [ 189.763584] try_to_shrink_lruvec+0x1b0/0x360 [ 189.763946] shrink_one+0x10e/0x200 [ 189.764266] shrink_node+0xc02/0x1490 [ 189.764586] balance_pgdat+0x563/0xb00 [ 189.764934] kswapd+0x1e8/0x430 [ 189.765249] kthread+0x10b/0x260 [ 189.765559] ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 [ 189.765889] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 189.766198] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 189.767089] Chain exists of: &q->q_usage_counter(io)#26 --> &root->kernfs_rwsem --> fs_reclaim
[ 189.767971] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 189.768555] CPU0 CPU1 [ 189.768849] ---- ---- [ 189.769136] lock(fs_reclaim); [ 189.769421] lock(&root->kernfs_rwsem); [ 189.769714] lock(fs_reclaim); [ 189.770016] rlock(&q->q_usage_counter(io)#26); [ 189.770305] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 189.771167] 1 lock held by kswapd0/119: [ 189.771453] #0: ffffffff834c97c0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0xbe/0xb00 [ 189.771770] stack backtrace: [ 189.772351] CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G U 6.14.0-rc6-xe+ #6 [ 189.772353] Tainted: [U]=USER [ 189.772354] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 2001 02/01/2023 [ 189.772354] Call Trace: [ 189.772355] <TASK> [ 189.772356] dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0 [ 189.772359] dump_stack+0x10/0x18 [ 189.772360] print_circular_bug.cold+0x17a/0x1b7 [ 189.772363] check_noncircular+0x13a/0x150 [ 189.772365] ? __pfx_stack_trace_consume_entry+0x10/0x10 [ 189.772368] __lock_acquire+0x1525/0x2760 [ 189.772368] ? ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 189.772371] lock_acquire+0xca/0x310 [ 189.772372] ? __submit_bio+0x76/0x230 [ 189.772375] ? lock_release+0xd5/0x2c0 [ 189.772376] blk_mq_submit_bio+0x8a2/0xba0 [ 189.772378] ? __submit_bio+0x76/0x230 [ 189.772380] __submit_bio+0x76/0x230 [ 189.772382] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1e/0xe0 [ 189.772384] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x323/0x430 [ 189.772386] ? submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x323/0x430 [ 189.772387] ? __might_sleep+0x58/0xa0 [ 189.772390] submit_bio_noacct+0x2cc/0x620 [ 189.772391] ? count_memcg_events+0x68/0x90 [ 189.772393] submit_bio+0x38/0x110 [ 189.772395] __swap_writepage+0xf5/0x380 [ 189.772396] swap_writepage+0x3c7/0x600 [ 189.772397] shmem_writepage+0x3da/0x4f0 [ 189.772401] pageout+0x13f/0x310 [ 189.772406] shrink_folio_list+0x61c/0xf60 [ 189.772409] ? isolate_folios+0xe80/0x16b0 [ 189.772410] ? mark_held_locks+0x46/0x90 [ 189.772412] evict_folios+0x378/0xcd0 [ 189.772414] ? evict_folios+0x34a/0xcd0 [ 189.772415] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa3/0x130 [ 189.772417] try_to_shrink_lruvec+0x1b0/0x360 [ 189.772420] shrink_one+0x10e/0x200 [ 189.772421] shrink_node+0xc02/0x1490 [ 189.772423] ? shrink_node+0xa08/0x1490 [ 189.772424] ? shrink_node+0xbd8/0x1490 [ 189.772425] ? mem_cgroup_iter+0x366/0x480 [ 189.772427] balance_pgdat+0x563/0xb00 [ 189.772428] ? balance_pgdat+0x563/0xb00 [ 189.772430] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1e/0xe0 [ 189.772431] ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xcb/0x330 [ 189.772433] ? __switch_to_asm+0x33/0x70 [ 189.772437] kswapd+0x1e8/0x430 [ 189.772438] ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10 [ 189.772440] ? __pfx_kswapd+0x10/0x10 [ 189.772441] kthread+0x10b/0x260 [ 189.772443] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 189.772444] ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 [ 189.772446] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 189.772447] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 189.772450] </TASK>
[2]: [ 8.760253] ====================================================== [ 8.760254] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 8.760255] 6.14.0-rc6-xe+ #7 Tainted: G U [ 8.760256] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 8.760257] (udev-worker)/674 is trying to acquire lock: [ 8.760259] ffff888100e39148 (&root->kernfs_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_remove+0x32/0x60 [ 8.760265] but task is already holding lock: [ 8.760266] ffff888110dc7680 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#27){++++}-{0:0}, at: blk_mq_freeze_queue_nomemsave+0x12/0x30 [ 8.760272] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 8.760272] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 8.760273] -> #2 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#27){++++}-{0:0}: [ 8.760276] blk_alloc_queue+0x30a/0x350 [ 8.760279] blk_mq_alloc_queue+0x6b/0xe0 [ 8.760281] scsi_alloc_sdev+0x276/0x3c0 [ 8.760284] scsi_probe_and_add_lun+0x22a/0x440 [ 8.760286] __scsi_scan_target+0x109/0x230 [ 8.760288] scsi_scan_channel+0x65/0xc0 [ 8.760290] scsi_scan_host_selected+0xff/0x140 [ 8.760292] do_scsi_scan_host+0xa7/0xc0 [ 8.760293] do_scan_async+0x1c/0x160 [ 8.760295] async_run_entry_fn+0x32/0x150 [ 8.760299] process_one_work+0x224/0x5f0 [ 8.760302] worker_thread+0x1d4/0x3e0 [ 8.760304] kthread+0x10b/0x260 [ 8.760306] ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 [ 8.760309] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 8.760312] -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 8.760315] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xc5/0x100 [ 8.760317] kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x4a/0x480 [ 8.760319] alloc_inode+0xaa/0xe0 [ 8.760322] iget_locked+0x157/0x330 [ 8.760323] kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x110 [ 8.760325] kernfs_get_tree+0x1b0/0x2e0 [ 8.760327] sysfs_get_tree+0x1f/0x60 [ 8.760329] vfs_get_tree+0x2a/0xf0 [ 8.760332] path_mount+0x4cd/0xc00 [ 8.760334] __x64_sys_mount+0x119/0x150 [ 8.760336] x64_sys_call+0x14f2/0x2310 [ 8.760338] do_syscall_64+0x91/0x180 [ 8.760340] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 8.760342] -> #0 (&root->kernfs_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 8.760345] __lock_acquire+0x1525/0x2760 [ 8.760347] lock_acquire+0xca/0x310 [ 8.760348] down_write+0x3e/0xf0 [ 8.760350] kernfs_remove+0x32/0x60 [ 8.760351] sysfs_remove_dir+0x4f/0x60 [ 8.760353] __kobject_del+0x33/0xa0 [ 8.760355] kobject_del+0x13/0x30 [ 8.760356] elv_unregister_queue+0x52/0x80 [ 8.760358] elevator_switch+0x68/0x360 [ 8.760360] elv_iosched_store+0x14b/0x1b0 [ 8.760362] queue_attr_store+0x181/0x1e0 [ 8.760364] sysfs_kf_write+0x49/0x80 [ 8.760366] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x17d/0x250 [ 8.760367] vfs_write+0x281/0x540 [ 8.760370] ksys_write+0x72/0xf0 [ 8.760372] __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x30 [ 8.760374] x64_sys_call+0x2a3/0x2310 [ 8.760376] do_syscall_64+0x91/0x180 [ 8.760377] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 8.760380] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 8.760380] Chain exists of: &root->kernfs_rwsem --> fs_reclaim --> &q->q_usage_counter(io)#27
[ 8.760384] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 8.760384] CPU0 CPU1 [ 8.760385] ---- ---- [ 8.760385] lock(&q->q_usage_counter(io)#27); [ 8.760387] lock(fs_reclaim); [ 8.760388] lock(&q->q_usage_counter(io)#27); [ 8.760390] lock(&root->kernfs_rwsem); [ 8.760391] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 8.760391] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/674: [ 8.760392] #0: ffff8881209ac420 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x72/0xf0 [ 8.760398] #1: ffff88810c80f488 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x136/0x250 [ 8.760402] #2: ffff888125d1d330 (kn->active#101){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x13f/0x250 [ 8.760406] #3: ffff888110dc7bb0 (&q->sysfs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: queue_attr_store+0x148/0x1e0 [ 8.760411] #4: ffff888110dc7680 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#27){++++}-{0:0}, at: blk_mq_freeze_queue_nomemsave+0x12/0x30 [ 8.760416] #5: ffff888110dc76b8 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#27){++++}-{0:0}, at: blk_mq_freeze_queue_nomemsave+0x12/0x30 [ 8.760421] stack backtrace: [ 8.760422] CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 674 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G U 6.14.0-rc6-xe+ #7 [ 8.760424] Tainted: [U]=USER [ 8.760425] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 2001 02/01/2023 [ 8.760426] Call Trace: [ 8.760427] <TASK> [ 8.760428] dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0 [ 8.760431] dump_stack+0x10/0x18 [ 8.760433] print_circular_bug.cold+0x17a/0x1b7 [ 8.760437] check_noncircular+0x13a/0x150 [ 8.760441] ? save_trace+0x54/0x360 [ 8.760445] __lock_acquire+0x1525/0x2760 [ 8.760446] ? irqentry_exit+0x3a/0xb0 [ 8.760448] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x57/0xc0 [ 8.760452] lock_acquire+0xca/0x310 [ 8.760453] ? kernfs_remove+0x32/0x60 [ 8.760457] down_write+0x3e/0xf0 [ 8.760459] ? kernfs_remove+0x32/0x60 [ 8.760460] kernfs_remove+0x32/0x60 [ 8.760462] sysfs_remove_dir+0x4f/0x60 [ 8.760464] __kobject_del+0x33/0xa0 [ 8.760466] kobject_del+0x13/0x30 [ 8.760467] elv_unregister_queue+0x52/0x80 [ 8.760470] elevator_switch+0x68/0x360 [ 8.760472] elv_iosched_store+0x14b/0x1b0 [ 8.760475] queue_attr_store+0x181/0x1e0 [ 8.760479] ? lock_acquire+0xca/0x310 [ 8.760480] ? kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x13f/0x250 [ 8.760482] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa3/0x130 [ 8.760485] sysfs_kf_write+0x49/0x80 [ 8.760487] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x17d/0x250 [ 8.760489] vfs_write+0x281/0x540 [ 8.760494] ksys_write+0x72/0xf0 [ 8.760497] __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x30 [ 8.760499] x64_sys_call+0x2a3/0x2310 [ 8.760502] do_syscall_64+0x91/0x180 [ 8.760504] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x5d/0xe0 [ 8.760506] ? handle_softirqs+0x479/0x4d0 [ 8.760508] ? hrtimer_interrupt+0x13f/0x280 [ 8.760511] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x8b/0x260 [ 8.760513] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x15/0x70 [ 8.760515] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x15/0x70 [ 8.760516] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x15/0x70 [ 8.760518] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 8.760520] RIP: 0033:0x7aa3bf2f5504 [ 8.760522] Code: c7 00 16 00 00 00 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d c5 8b 10 00 00 74 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 c3 0f 1f 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 20 48 89 [ 8.760523] RSP: 002b:00007ffc1e3697d8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 8.760526] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007aa3bf2f5504 [ 8.760527] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 00007ffc1e369ae0 RDI: 000000000000001c [ 8.760528] RBP: 00007ffc1e369800 R08: 00007aa3bf3f51c8 R09: 00007ffc1e3698b0 [ 8.760528] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [ 8.760529] R13: 00007ffc1e369ae0 R14: 0000613ccf21f2f0 R15: 00007aa3bf3f4e80 [ 8.760533] </TASK>
v2: - Update a code comment to increase readability (Ming Lei).
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.14-rc7, v6.14-rc6 |
|
| #
1bf70d08 |
| 04-Mar-2025 |
Nilay Shroff <[email protected]> |
block: introduce a dedicated lock for protecting queue elevator updates
A queue's elevator can be updated either when modifying nr_hw_queues or through the sysfs scheduler attribute. Currently, elev
block: introduce a dedicated lock for protecting queue elevator updates
A queue's elevator can be updated either when modifying nr_hw_queues or through the sysfs scheduler attribute. Currently, elevator switching/ updating is protected using q->sysfs_lock, but this has led to lockdep splats[1] due to inconsistent lock ordering between q->sysfs_lock and the freeze-lock in multiple block layer call sites.
As the scope of q->sysfs_lock is not well-defined, its (mis)use has resulted in numerous lockdep warnings. To address this, introduce a new q->elevator_lock, dedicated specifically for protecting elevator switches/updates. And we'd now use this new q->elevator_lock instead of q->sysfs_lock for protecting elevator switches/updates.
While at it, make elv_iosched_load_module() a static function, as it is only called from elv_iosched_store(). Also, remove redundant parameters from elv_iosched_load_module() function signature.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.14-rc5, v6.14-rc4, v6.14-rc3, v6.14-rc2, v6.14-rc1 |
|
| #
fe662860 |
| 28-Jan-2025 |
Nilay Shroff <[email protected]> |
block: get rid of request queue ->sysfs_dir_lock
The request queue uses ->sysfs_dir_lock for protecting the addition/ deletion of kobject entries under sysfs while we register/unregister blk-mq. How
block: get rid of request queue ->sysfs_dir_lock
The request queue uses ->sysfs_dir_lock for protecting the addition/ deletion of kobject entries under sysfs while we register/unregister blk-mq. However kobject addition/deletion is already protected with kernfs/sysfs internal synchronization primitives. So use of q->sysfs_ dir_lock seems redundant.
Moreover, q->sysfs_dir_lock is also used at few other callsites along with q->sysfs_lock for protecting the addition/deletion of kojects. One such example is when we register with sysfs a set of independent access ranges for a disk. Here as well we could get rid off q->sysfs_ dir_lock and only use q->sysfs_lock.
The only variable which q->sysfs_dir_lock appears to protect is q-> mq_sysfs_init_done which is set/unset while registering/unregistering blk-mq with sysfs. But use of q->mq_sysfs_init_done could be easily replaced using queue registered bit QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED.
So with this patch we remove q->sysfs_dir_lock from each callsite and replace q->mq_sysfs_init_done using QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.13, v6.13-rc7 |
|
| #
d432c817 |
| 10-Jan-2025 |
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> |
block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues
When __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues changes the number of tag sets, it might have to disable poll queues. Currently it does so by adj
block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues
When __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues changes the number of tag sets, it might have to disable poll queues. Currently it does so by adjusting the BLK_FEAT_POLL, which is a bit against the intent of features that describe hardware / driver capabilities, but more importantly causes nasty lock order problems with the broadly held freeze when updating the number of hardware queues and the limits lock. Fix this by leaving BLK_FEAT_POLL alone, and instead check for the number of poll queues in the bio submission and poll handlers. While this adds extra work to the fast path, the variables are in cache lines used by these operations anyway, so it should be cheap enough.
Fixes: 8023e144f9d6 ("block: move the poll flag to queue_limits") Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
958148a6 |
| 10-Jan-2025 |
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> |
block: check BLK_FEAT_POLL under q_usage_count
Otherwise feature reconfiguration can race with I/O submission.
Also drop the bio_clear_polled in the error path, as the flag does not matter for inst
block: check BLK_FEAT_POLL under q_usage_count
Otherwise feature reconfiguration can race with I/O submission.
Also drop the bio_clear_polled in the error path, as the flag does not matter for instant error completions, it is a left over from when we allowed polled I/O to proceed unpolled in this case.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4, v6.13-rc3, v6.13-rc2, v6.13-rc1, v6.12 |
|
| #
a3396b99 |
| 13-Nov-2024 |
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> |
block: add a rq_list type
Replace the semi-open coded request list helpers with a proper rq_list type that mirrors the bio_list and has head and tail pointers. Besides better type safety this actua
block: add a rq_list type
Replace the semi-open coded request list helpers with a proper rq_list type that mirrors the bio_list and has head and tail pointers. Besides better type safety this actually allows to insert at the tail of the list, which will be useful soon.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.12-rc7 |
|
| #
559218d4 |
| 08-Nov-2024 |
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> |
block: pre-calculate max_zone_append_sectors
max_zone_append_sectors differs from all other queue limits in that the final value used is not stored in the queue_limits but needs to be obtained using
block: pre-calculate max_zone_append_sectors
max_zone_append_sectors differs from all other queue limits in that the final value used is not stored in the queue_limits but needs to be obtained using queue_limits_max_zone_append_sectors helper. This not only adds (tiny) extra overhead to the I/O path, but also can be easily forgotten in file system code.
Add a new max_hw_zone_append_sectors value to queue_limits which is set by the driver, and calculate max_zone_append_sectors from that and the other inputs in blk_validate_zoned_limits, similar to how max_sectors is calculated to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.12-rc6 |
|
| #
6a786998 |
| 31-Oct-2024 |
Ming Lei <[email protected]> |
block: always verify unfreeze lock on the owner task
commit f1be1788a32e ("block: model freeze & enter queue as lock for supporting lockdep") tries to apply lockdep for verifying freeze & unfreeze.
block: always verify unfreeze lock on the owner task
commit f1be1788a32e ("block: model freeze & enter queue as lock for supporting lockdep") tries to apply lockdep for verifying freeze & unfreeze. However, the verification is only done the outmost freeze and unfreeze. This way is actually not correct because q->mq_freeze_depth still may drop to zero on other task instead of the freeze owner task.
Fix this issue by always verifying the last unfreeze lock on the owner task context, and make sure both the outmost freeze & unfreeze are verified in the current task.
Fixes: f1be1788a32e ("block: model freeze & enter queue as lock for supporting lockdep") Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
ab9bc81c |
| 07-Nov-2024 |
Jens Axboe <[email protected]> |
Revert "block: pre-calculate max_zone_append_sectors"
This causes issue on, at least, nvme-mpath where my boot fails with:
WARNING: CPU: 354 PID: 2729 at block/blk-settings.c:75 blk_validate_limits
Revert "block: pre-calculate max_zone_append_sectors"
This causes issue on, at least, nvme-mpath where my boot fails with:
WARNING: CPU: 354 PID: 2729 at block/blk-settings.c:75 blk_validate_limits+0x356/0x380 Modules linked in: tg3(+) nvme usbcore scsi_mod ptp i2c_piix4 libphy nvme_core crc32c_intel scsi_common usb_common pps_core i2c_smbus CPU: 354 UID: 0 PID: 2729 Comm: kworker/u2061:1 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6+ #181 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R7625/06444F, BIOS 1.8.3 04/02/2024 Workqueue: async async_run_entry_fn RIP: 0010:blk_validate_limits+0x356/0x380 Code: f6 47 01 04 75 28 83 bf 94 00 00 00 00 75 39 83 bf 98 00 00 00 00 75 34 83 7f 68 00 75 32 31 c0 83 7f 5c 00 0f 84 9b fd ff ff <0f> 0b eb 13 0f 0b eb 0f 48 c7 c0 74 12 58 92 48 89 c7 e8 13 76 46 RSP: 0018:ffffa8a1dfb93b30 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9232829c8388 RCX: 0000000000000088 RDX: 0000000000000080 RSI: 0000000000000200 RDI: ffffa8a1dfb93c38 RBP: 000000000000000c R08: 00000000ffffffff R09: 000000000000ffff R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9232829b9000 R13: ffff9232829b9010 R14: ffffa8a1dfb93c38 R15: ffffa8a1dfb93c38 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff923867c80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055c1b92480a8 CR3: 0000002484ff0002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0xca/0x1a0 ? blk_validate_limits+0x356/0x380 ? report_bug+0x11a/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x5e/0x90 ? exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x40 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? blk_validate_limits+0x356/0x380 blk_alloc_queue+0x7a/0x250 __blk_alloc_disk+0x39/0x80 nvme_mpath_alloc_disk+0x13d/0x1b0 [nvme_core] nvme_scan_ns+0xcc7/0x1010 [nvme_core] async_run_entry_fn+0x27/0x120 process_scheduled_works+0x1a0/0x360 worker_thread+0x2bc/0x350 ? pr_cont_work+0x1b0/0x1b0 kthread+0x111/0x120 ? kthread_unuse_mm+0x90/0x90 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x40 ? kthread_unuse_mm+0x90/0x90 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
presumably due to max_zone_append_sectors not being cleared to zero, resulting in blk_validate_zoned_limits() complaining and failing.
This reverts commit 2a8f6153e1c2db06a537a5c9d61102eb591776f1.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
2a8f6153 |
| 04-Nov-2024 |
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> |
block: pre-calculate max_zone_append_sectors
max_zone_append_sectors differs from all other queue limits in that the final value used is not stored in the queue_limits but needs to be obtained using
block: pre-calculate max_zone_append_sectors
max_zone_append_sectors differs from all other queue limits in that the final value used is not stored in the queue_limits but needs to be obtained using queue_limits_max_zone_append_sectors helper. This not only adds (tiny) extra overhead to the I/O path, but also can be easily forgotten in file system code.
Add a new max_hw_zone_append_sectors value to queue_limits which is set by the driver, and calculate max_zone_append_sectors from that and the other inputs in blk_validate_zoned_limits, similar to how max_sectors is calculated to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.12-rc5 |
|
| #
f1be1788 |
| 25-Oct-2024 |
Ming Lei <[email protected]> |
block: model freeze & enter queue as lock for supporting lockdep
Recently we got several deadlock report[1][2][3] caused by blk_mq_freeze_queue and blk_enter_queue().
Turns out the two are just lik
block: model freeze & enter queue as lock for supporting lockdep
Recently we got several deadlock report[1][2][3] caused by blk_mq_freeze_queue and blk_enter_queue().
Turns out the two are just like acquiring read/write lock, so model them as read/write lock for supporting lockdep:
1) model q->q_usage_counter as two locks(io and queue lock)
- queue lock covers sync with blk_enter_queue()
- io lock covers sync with bio_enter_queue()
2) make the lockdep class/key as per-queue:
- different subsystem has very different lock use pattern, shared lock class causes false positive easily
- freeze_queue degrades to no lock in case that disk state becomes DEAD because bio_enter_queue() won't be blocked any more
- freeze_queue degrades to no lock in case that request queue becomes dying because blk_enter_queue() won't be blocked any more
3) model blk_mq_freeze_queue() as acquire_exclusive & try_lock - it is exclusive lock, so dependency with blk_enter_queue() is covered
- it is trylock because blk_mq_freeze_queue() are allowed to run concurrently
4) model blk_enter_queue() & bio_enter_queue() as acquire_read() - nested blk_enter_queue() are allowed
- dependency with blk_mq_freeze_queue() is covered
- blk_queue_exit() is often called from other contexts(such as irq), and it can't be annotated as lock_release(), so simply do it in blk_enter_queue(), this way still covered cases as many as possible
With lockdep support, such kind of reports may be reported asap and needn't wait until the real deadlock is triggered.
For example, lockdep report can be triggered in the report[3] with this patch applied.
[1] occasional block layer hang when setting 'echo noop > /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler' https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219166
[2] del_gendisk() vs blk_queue_enter() race condition https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/[email protected]/
[3] queue_freeze & queue_enter deadlock in scsi https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/ZxG38G9BuFdBpBHZ@fedora/T/#u
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.12-rc4, v6.12-rc3, v6.12-rc2, v6.12-rc1, v6.11, v6.11-rc7, v6.11-rc6, v6.11-rc5, v6.11-rc4, v6.11-rc3 |
|
| #
ea6787c6 |
| 05-Aug-2024 |
John Garry <[email protected]> |
scsi: block: Don't check REQ_ATOMIC for reads
We check in submit_bio_noacct() if flag REQ_ATOMIC is set for both read and write operations, and then validate the atomic operation if set. Flag REQ_AT
scsi: block: Don't check REQ_ATOMIC for reads
We check in submit_bio_noacct() if flag REQ_ATOMIC is set for both read and write operations, and then validate the atomic operation if set. Flag REQ_ATOMIC can only be set for writes, so don't bother checking for reads.
Fixes: 9da3d1e912f3 ("block: Add core atomic write support") Signed-off-by: John Garry <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.11-rc2, v6.11-rc1 |
|
| #
73e59d3e |
| 18-Jul-2024 |
hexue <[email protected]> |
block: avoid polling configuration errors
This patch adds a poll queue check, aiming to help users use polled IO accurately.
If users do polled IO but the device doesn't have poll queues, they will
block: avoid polling configuration errors
This patch adds a poll queue check, aiming to help users use polled IO accurately.
If users do polled IO but the device doesn't have poll queues, they will get suboptimal performance data and waste CPU resources. Add a poll queue check batching this. If users don't have the device properly configured, or if it simply doesn't support polled IO, it will error the IO with -EOPNOTSUPP. This is similar to what we used to do for sync polled IO, which is no longer supported.
Signed-off-by: hexue <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.10, v6.10-rc7 |
|
| #
f2a7bea2 |
| 04-Jul-2024 |
Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> |
block: Remove REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL emulation
Now that device mapper can handle resetting all zones of a mapped zoned device using REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL, all zoned block device drivers support this
block: Remove REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL emulation
Now that device mapper can handle resetting all zones of a mapped zoned device using REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL, all zoned block device drivers support this operation. With this, the request queue feature BLK_FEAT_ZONE_RESETALL is not necessary and the emulation code in blk-zone.c can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.10-rc6 |
|
| #
63db4a1f |
| 27-Jun-2024 |
John Garry <[email protected]> |
block: Delete blk_queue_flag_test_and_set()
Since commit 70200574cc22 ("block: remove QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD"), blk_queue_flag_test_and_set() has not been used, so delete it.
Signed-off-by: John Garry
block: Delete blk_queue_flag_test_and_set()
Since commit 70200574cc22 ("block: remove QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD"), blk_queue_flag_test_and_set() has not been used, so delete it.
Signed-off-by: John Garry <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.10-rc5 |
|
| #
9da3d1e9 |
| 20-Jun-2024 |
John Garry <[email protected]> |
block: Add core atomic write support
Add atomic write support, as follows: - add helper functions to get request_queue atomic write limits - report request_queue atomic write support limits to sysfs
block: Add core atomic write support
Add atomic write support, as follows: - add helper functions to get request_queue atomic write limits - report request_queue atomic write support limits to sysfs and update Doc - support to safely merge atomic writes - deal with splitting atomic writes - misc helper functions - add a per-request atomic write flag
New request_queue limits are added, as follows: - atomic_write_hw_max is set by the block driver and is the maximum length of an atomic write which the device may support. It is not necessarily a power-of-2. - atomic_write_max_sectors is derived from atomic_write_hw_max_sectors and max_hw_sectors. It is always a power-of-2. Atomic writes may be merged, and atomic_write_max_sectors would be the limit on a merged atomic write request size. This value is not capped at max_sectors, as the value in max_sectors can be controlled from userspace, and it would only cause trouble if userspace could limit atomic_write_unit_max_bytes and the other atomic write limits. - atomic_write_hw_unit_{min,max} are set by the block driver and are the min/max length of an atomic write unit which the device may support. They both must be a power-of-2. Typically atomic_write_hw_unit_max will hold the same value as atomic_write_hw_max. - atomic_write_unit_{min,max} are derived from atomic_write_hw_unit_{min,max}, max_hw_sectors, and block core limits. Both min and max values must be a power-of-2. - atomic_write_hw_boundary is set by the block driver. If non-zero, it indicates an LBA space boundary at which an atomic write straddles no longer is atomically executed by the disk. The value must be a power-of-2. Note that it would be acceptable to enforce a rule that atomic_write_hw_boundary_sectors is a multiple of atomic_write_hw_unit_max, but the resultant code would be more complicated.
All atomic writes limits are by default set 0 to indicate no atomic write support. Even though it is assumed by Linux that a logical block can always be atomically written, we ignore this as it is not of particular interest. Stacked devices are just not supported either for now.
An atomic write must always be submitted to the block driver as part of a single request. As such, only a single BIO must be submitted to the block layer for an atomic write. When a single atomic write BIO is submitted, it cannot be split. As such, atomic_write_unit_{max, min}_bytes are limited by the maximum guaranteed BIO size which will not be required to be split. This max size is calculated by request_queue max segments and the number of bvecs a BIO can fit, BIO_MAX_VECS. Currently we rely on userspace issuing a write with iovcnt=1 for pwritev2() - as such, we can rely on each segment containing PAGE_SIZE of data, apart from the first+last, which each can fit logical block size of data. The first+last will be LBS length/aligned as we rely on direct IO alignment rules also.
New sysfs files are added to report the following atomic write limits: - atomic_write_unit_max_bytes - same as atomic_write_unit_max_sectors in bytes - atomic_write_unit_min_bytes - same as atomic_write_unit_min_sectors in bytes - atomic_write_boundary_bytes - same as atomic_write_hw_boundary_sectors in bytes - atomic_write_max_bytes - same as atomic_write_max_sectors in bytes
Atomic writes may only be merged with other atomic writes and only under the following conditions: - total resultant request length <= atomic_write_max_bytes - the merged write does not straddle a boundary
Helper function bdev_can_atomic_write() is added to indicate whether atomic writes may be issued to a bdev. If a bdev is a partition, the partition start must be aligned with both atomic_write_unit_min_sectors and atomic_write_hw_boundary_sectors.
FSes will rely on the block layer to validate that an atomic write BIO submitted will be of valid size, so add blk_validate_atomic_write_op_size() for this purpose. Userspace expects an atomic write which is of invalid size to be rejected with -EINVAL, so add BLK_STS_INVAL for this. Also use BLK_STS_INVAL for when a BIO needs to be split, as this should mean an invalid size BIO.
Flag REQ_ATOMIC is used for indicating an atomic write.
Co-developed-by: Himanshu Madhani <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Madhani <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: John Garry <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
8023e144 |
| 17-Jun-2024 |
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> |
block: move the poll flag to queue_limits
Move the poll flag into the queue_limits feature field so that it can be set atomically with the queue frozen.
Stacking drivers are simplified in that they
block: move the poll flag to queue_limits
Move the poll flag into the queue_limits feature field so that it can be set atomically with the queue frozen.
Stacking drivers are simplified in that they now can simply set the flag, and blk_stack_limits will clear it when the features is not supported by any of the underlying devices.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
1122c0c1 |
| 17-Jun-2024 |
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> |
block: move cache control settings out of queue->flags
Move the cache control settings into the queue_limits so that the flags can be set atomically with the device queue frozen.
Add new features a
block: move cache control settings out of queue->flags
Move the cache control settings into the queue_limits so that the flags can be set atomically with the device queue frozen.
Add new features and flags field for the driver set flags, and internal (usually sysfs-controlled) flags in the block layer. Note that we'll eventually remove enough field from queue_limits to bring it back to the previous size.
The disable flag is inverted compared to the previous meaning, which means it now survives a rescan, similar to the max_sectors and max_discard_sectors user limits.
The FLUSH and FUA flags are now inherited by blk_stack_limits, which simplified the code in dm a lot, but also causes a slight behavior change in that dm-switch and dm-unstripe now advertise a write cache despite setting num_flush_bios to 0. The I/O path will handle this gracefully, but as far as I can tell the lack of num_flush_bios and thus flush support is a pre-existing data integrity bug in those targets that really needs fixing, after which a non-zero num_flush_bios should be required in dm for targets that map to underlying devices.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.10-rc4, v6.10-rc3, v6.10-rc2, v6.10-rc1 |
|
| #
9a42891c |
| 21-May-2024 |
Yu Kuai <[email protected]> |
block: fix lost bio for plug enabled bio based device
With the following two conditions, bio will be lost:
1) blk plug is not enabled, for example, __blkdev_direct_IO_simple() and __blkdev_direct_I
block: fix lost bio for plug enabled bio based device
With the following two conditions, bio will be lost:
1) blk plug is not enabled, for example, __blkdev_direct_IO_simple() and __blkdev_direct_IO_async(); 2) bio plug is enabled, for example write IO for raid1/raid10 while bitmap is enabled;
Root cause is that blk_finish_plug() will add the bio to curent->bio_list, while such bio will not be handled:
__submit_bio_noacct current->bio_list = bio_list_on_stack; blk_start_plug
do { dm_submit_bio md_handle_request raid10_write_request -> generate new bio for underlying disks raid1_add_bio_to_plug -> bio is added to plug } while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&bio_list_on_stack[0]))) -> previous bio are all handled
blk_finish_plug raid10_unplug raid1_submit_write submit_bio_noacct if (current->bio_list) bio_list_add(¤t->bio_list[0], bio) -> add new bio
current->bio_list = NULL -> new bio is lost
Fix the problem by moving the plug into the while loop, so that current->bio_list will still be handled after blk_finish_plug().
By the way, enable plug for raid1/raid10 in this case will also prevent delay IO handling into daemon thread, which should also improve IO performance.
Fixes: 060406c61c7c ("block: add plug while submitting IO") Reported-by: Changhui Zhong <[email protected]> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAGVVp+Xsmzy2G9YuEatfMT6qv1M--YdOCQ0g7z7OVmcTbBxQAg@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <[email protected]> Tested-by: Changhui Zhong <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.9 |
|
| #
99dc4223 |
| 09-May-2024 |
Yu Kuai <[email protected]> |
block: support to account io_ticks precisely
Currently, io_ticks is accounted based on sampling, specifically update_io_ticks() will always account io_ticks by 1 jiffies from bdev_start_io_acct()/bl
block: support to account io_ticks precisely
Currently, io_ticks is accounted based on sampling, specifically update_io_ticks() will always account io_ticks by 1 jiffies from bdev_start_io_acct()/blk_account_io_start(), and the result can be inaccurate, for example(HZ is 250):
Test script: fio -filename=/dev/sda -bs=4k -rw=write -direct=1 -name=test -thinktime=4ms
Test result: util is about 90%, while the disk is really idle.
This behaviour is introduced by commit 5b18b5a73760 ("block: delete part_round_stats and switch to less precise counting"), however, there was a key point that is missed that this patch also improve performance a lot:
Before the commit: part_round_stats: if (part->stamp != now) stats |= 1;
part_in_flight() -> there can be lots of task here in 1 jiffies. part_round_stats_single() __part_stat_add() part->stamp = now;
After the commit: update_io_ticks: stamp = part->bd_stamp; if (time_after(now, stamp)) if (try_cmpxchg()) __part_stat_add() -> only one task can reach here in 1 jiffies.
Hence in order to account io_ticks precisely, we only need to know if there are IO inflight at most once in one jiffies. Noted that for rq-based device, iterating tags should not be used here because 'tags->lock' is grabbed in blk_mq_find_and_get_req(), hence part_stat_lock_inc/dec() and part_in_flight() is used to trace inflight. The additional overhead is quite little:
- per cpu add/dec for each IO for rq-based device; - per cpu sum for each jiffies;
And it's verified by null-blk that there are no performance degration under heavy IO pressure.
Fixes: 5b18b5a73760 ("block: delete part_round_stats and switch to less precise counting") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
060406c6 |
| 09-May-2024 |
Yu Kuai <[email protected]> |
block: add plug while submitting IO
So that if caller didn't use plug, for example, __blkdev_direct_IO_simple() and __blkdev_direct_IO_async(), block layer can still benefit from caching nsec time i
block: add plug while submitting IO
So that if caller didn't use plug, for example, __blkdev_direct_IO_simple() and __blkdev_direct_IO_async(), block layer can still benefit from caching nsec time in the plug.
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.9-rc7, v6.9-rc6 |
|
| #
811ba89a |
| 28-Apr-2024 |
Al Viro <[email protected]> |
bdev: move ->bd_make_it_fail to ->__bd_flags
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
|
|
Revision tags: v6.9-rc5, v6.9-rc4 |
|
| #
49a43dae |
| 12-Apr-2024 |
Al Viro <[email protected]> |
bdev: move ->bd_ro_warned to ->__bd_flags
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
|
| #
ac2b6f9d |
| 12-Apr-2024 |
Al Viro <[email protected]> |
bdev: move ->bd_has_subit_bio to ->__bd_flags
In bdev_alloc() we have all flags initialized to false, so assignment to ->bh_has_submit_bio n there is a no-op unless we have partno != 0 and flag alre
bdev: move ->bd_has_subit_bio to ->__bd_flags
In bdev_alloc() we have all flags initialized to false, so assignment to ->bh_has_submit_bio n there is a no-op unless we have partno != 0 and flag already set on entire device.
In device_add_disk() we have just allocated the block_device in question and it had been a full-device one, so the flag is guaranteed to be still clear when we get to assignment.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
show more ...
|