| a9f52913 | 10-Jul-2024 |
Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> |
sparc64: Fix prototype warning for prom_get_mmu_ihandle
arch/sparc/prom/misc_64.c:165:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘prom_get_mmu_ihandle’
The function prom_get_mmu_ihandle has no users out
sparc64: Fix prototype warning for prom_get_mmu_ihandle
arch/sparc/prom/misc_64.c:165:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘prom_get_mmu_ihandle’
The function prom_get_mmu_ihandle has no users outside of misc_64.c so
declare it static.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| bdcf81b6 | 10-Oct-2014 |
David S. Miller <[email protected]> |
sparc64: Fix lockdep warnings on reboot on Ultra-5
Inconsistently, the raw_* IRQ routines do not interact with and update
the irqflags tracing and lockdep state, whereas the raw_* spinlock
interface
sparc64: Fix lockdep warnings on reboot on Ultra-5
Inconsistently, the raw_* IRQ routines do not interact with and update
the irqflags tracing and lockdep state, whereas the raw_* spinlock
interfaces do.
This causes problems in p1275_cmd_direct() because we disable hardirqs
by hand using raw_local_irq_restore() and then do a raw_spin_lock()
which triggers a lockdep trace because the CPU's hw IRQ state doesn't
match IRQ tracing's internal software copy of that state.
The CPU's irqs are disabled, yet current->hardirqs_enabled is true.
====================
reboot: Restarting system
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3536 check_flags+0x7c/0x240()
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled)
Modules linked in: openpromfs
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd-shutdow Tainted: G W 3.17.0-dirty #145
Call Trace:
[000000000045919c] warn_slowpath_common+0x5c/0xa0
[0000000000459210] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40
[000000000048f41c] check_flags+0x7c/0x240
[0000000000493280] lock_acquire+0x20/0x1c0
[0000000000832b70] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x60
[000000000068f2fc] p1275_cmd_direct+0x1c/0x60
[000000000068ed28] prom_reboot+0x28/0x40
[000000000043610c] machine_restart+0x4c/0x80
[000000000047d2d4] kernel_restart+0x54/0x80
[000000000047d618] SyS_reboot+0x138/0x200
[00000000004060b4] linux_sparc_syscall32+0x34/0x60
---[ end trace 5c439fe81c05a100 ]---
possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.
irq event stamp: 2010267
hardirqs last enabled at (2010267): [<000000000049a358>] vprintk_emit+0x4b8/0x580
hardirqs last disabled at (2010266): [<0000000000499f08>] vprintk_emit+0x68/0x580
softirqs last enabled at (2010046): [<000000000045d278>] __do_softirq+0x378/0x4a0
softirqs last disabled at (2010039): [<000000000042bf08>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x28/0x40
Resetting ...
====================
Use local_* variables of the hw IRQ interfaces so that IRQ tracing sees
all of our changes.
Reported-by: Meelis Roos <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Meelis Roos <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| 242ece22 | 30-May-2013 |
Chen Gang <[email protected]> |
arch: sparc: prom: looping issue, need additional length check in the outside looping
When "cp >= barg_buf + BARG_LEN-2", it breaks internel looping 'while',
but outside loop 'for' still has effect,
arch: sparc: prom: looping issue, need additional length check in the outside looping
When "cp >= barg_buf + BARG_LEN-2", it breaks internel looping 'while',
but outside loop 'for' still has effect, so "*cp++ = ' '" will continue
repeating which may cause memory overflow.
So need additional length check for it in the outside looping.
Also beautify the related code which found by "./scripts/checkpatch.pl"
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| 5f66dd35 | 03-Jan-2011 |
Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]> |
sparc: fix sparse warnings in arch/sparc/prom for 32 bit build
Fix following sparse warnings:
arch/sparc/prom/bootstr_32.c:32:35: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
arch/sparc/prom/memory.
sparc: fix sparse warnings in arch/sparc/prom for 32 bit build
Fix following sparse warnings:
arch/sparc/prom/bootstr_32.c:32:35: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
arch/sparc/prom/memory.c:61:13: warning: symbol 'prom_meminit' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/misc_32.c:74:1: error: symbol 'prom_halt' redeclared with different type (originally declared at arch/sparc/include/asm/oplib_32.h:67) - different modifiers
arch/sparc/prom/ranges.c:16:26: warning: symbol 'promlib_obio_ranges' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/ranges.c:17:5: warning: symbol 'num_obio_ranges' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/ranges.c:39:1: warning: symbol 'prom_adjust_ranges' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/ranges.c:69:13: warning: symbol 'prom_ranges_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/tree_32.c:286:22: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
arch/sparc/prom/tree_32.c:286:38: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
None of the warnings indicated any serious issues.
We are now sparse clean for 32 bit build in arch/sparc/prom.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
show more ...
|