sparc64: Fix prototype warning for uprobe_trap

Fix the following warning:
arch/sparc/kernel/uprobes.c:237:17: warning: no previous prototype for ‘uprobe_trap’

Add a prototype to kernel/kernel.h to

sparc64: Fix prototype warning for uprobe_trap

Fix the following warning:
arch/sparc/kernel/uprobes.c:237:17: warning: no previous prototype for ‘uprobe_trap’

Add a prototype to kernel/kernel.h to silence the warning.
This is a fix already used for other trap handlers.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Cc: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]>
Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc32: Fix build with trapbase

Fix the following build errors:
irq_32.c:258:7: error: array subscript [16, 79] is outside array bounds of 'struct tt_entry[1]
irq_32.c:271:14: error: assignment to

sparc32: Fix build with trapbase

Fix the following build errors:
irq_32.c:258:7: error: array subscript [16, 79] is outside array bounds of 'struct tt_entry[1]
irq_32.c:271:14: error: assignment to 'struct tt_entry *' from incompatible pointer type 'struct tt_entry (*)[]

trapbase is a pointer to an array of tt_entry, but the code declared it
as a pointer so the compiler see a single entry and not an array.
Fix this by modifyinf the declaration to be an array, and modify all
users to take the address of the first member.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> # build-tested
Cc: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240224-sam-fix-sparc32-all-builds-v2-2-1f186603c5c4@ravnborg.org

show more ...

init: consolidate prototypes in linux/init.h

The init/main.c file contains some extern declarations for functions
defined in architecture code, and it defines some other functions that are
called fr

init: consolidate prototypes in linux/init.h

The init/main.c file contains some extern declarations for functions
defined in architecture code, and it defines some other functions that are
called from architecture code with a custom prototype. Both of those
result in warnings with 'make W=1':

init/calibrate.c:261:37: error: no previous prototype for 'calibrate_delay_is_known' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
init/main.c:790:20: error: no previous prototype for 'mem_encrypt_init' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
init/main.c:792:20: error: no previous prototype for 'poking_init' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:122:13: error: no previous prototype for 'init_IRQ' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
arch/arm64/kernel/time.c:55:13: error: no previous prototype for 'time_init' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
arch/x86/kernel/process.c:935:13: error: no previous prototype for 'arch_post_acpi_subsys_init' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
init/calibrate.c:261:37: error: no previous prototype for 'calibrate_delay_is_known' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
kernel/fork.c:991:20: error: no previous prototype for 'arch_task_cache_init' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]

Add prototypes for all of these in include/linux/init.h or another
appropriate header, and remove the duplicate declarations from
architecture specific code.

[[email protected]: declare time_init_early()]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Paris <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Moore <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc: share process creation helpers between sparc and sparc64

As promised in the previous patch, this moves the process creation
helpers into a common process.c file that is shared between sparc a

sparc: share process creation helpers between sparc and sparc64

As promised in the previous patch, this moves the process creation
helpers into a common process.c file that is shared between sparc and
sparc64. It allows us to get rid of quite a bit custom assembler and the
to remove the separe 32bit specific sparc_do_fork() call.

One thing to note, is that when clone() was called with a separate stack
for the child the assembler would align it. But copy_thread() has always
been doing that too so that line wasn't needed and can thus simply be
removed.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...

sparc64: refactor the ali DMA quirk

Do the quirk first in the dma_supported routines, as we don't need
any of the other checks for it, and remove the duplicate mask checking
that is already done by

sparc64: refactor the ali DMA quirk

Do the quirk first in the dma_supported routines, as we don't need
any of the other checks for it, and remove the duplicate mask checking
that is already done by the callers.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.

For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139

and resulted in the first patch in this series.

If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930

and resulted in the second patch in this series.

- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1

and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).

- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.

Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc64: initialize time early

In Linux it is possible to configure printk() to output timestamp next to
every line. This is very useful to determine the slow parts of the boot
process, and also to

sparc64: initialize time early

In Linux it is possible to configure printk() to output timestamp next to
every line. This is very useful to determine the slow parts of the boot
process, and also to avoid regressions, as boot time is visiable to
everyone.

Also, there are scripts that change these time stamps to intervals.

However, on larger machines these timestamps start appearing many seconds,
and even minutes into the boot process. This patch gets stick-frequency
property early from OpenBoot, and uses its value to initialize time stamps
before the first printk() messages are printed.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Steven Sistare <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc64: delete old wrap code

The old method that is using xcall and softint to get new context id is
deleted, as it is replaced by a method of using per_cpu_secondary_mm
without xcall to perform th

sparc64: delete old wrap code

The old method that is using xcall and softint to get new context id is
deleted, as it is replaced by a method of using per_cpu_secondary_mm
without xcall to perform the context wrap.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Bob Picco <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Steven Sistare <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc32: use proper prototype for trapbase

This killed an extern ... in a .c file.
No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemlo

sparc32: use proper prototype for trapbase

This killed an extern ... in a .c file.
No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc: Convert naked unsigned uses to unsigned int

Use the more normal kernel definition/declaration style.

Done via:

$ git ls-files arch/sparc | \
xargs ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --fix-inplace

sparc: Convert naked unsigned uses to unsigned int

Use the more normal kernel definition/declaration style.

Done via:

$ git ls-files arch/sparc | \
xargs ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --fix-inplace --types=unspecified_int

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc64: fix sparse warning in kgdb_64.c

Fix following warnings:
kgdb_64.c:114:18: warning: symbol 'smp_kgdb_capture_client' was not declared. Should it be static?
kgdb_64.c:161:17: warning: symbol

sparc64: fix sparse warning in kgdb_64.c

Fix following warnings:
kgdb_64.c:114:18: warning: symbol 'smp_kgdb_capture_client' was not declared. Should it be static?
kgdb_64.c:161:17: warning: symbol 'kgdb_trap' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add proper prototypes

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc64: fix sparse warnings in compat_audit.c

Fix following warnings:
compat_audit.c:4:10: warning: symbol 'sparc32_dir_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
compat_audit.c:9:10: warning: s

sparc64: fix sparse warnings in compat_audit.c

Fix following warnings:
compat_audit.c:4:10: warning: symbol 'sparc32_dir_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
compat_audit.c:9:10: warning: symbol 'sparc32_chattr_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
compat_audit.c:14:10: warning: symbol 'sparc32_write_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
compat_audit.c:19:10: warning: symbol 'sparc32_read_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
compat_audit.c:24:10: warning: symbol 'sparc32_signal_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
compat_audit.c:29:5: warning: symbol 'sparc32_classify_syscall' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add declarations to kernel.h

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc64: fix sparse "Should it be static?" warnings in signal32.c

Fix following warnings:
signal32.c:140:6: warning: symbol 'do_sigreturn32' was not declared. Should it be static?
signal32.c:230:17:

sparc64: fix sparse "Should it be static?" warnings in signal32.c

Fix following warnings:
signal32.c:140:6: warning: symbol 'do_sigreturn32' was not declared. Should it be static?
signal32.c:230:17: warning: symbol 'do_rt_sigreturn32' was not declared. Should it be static?
signal32.c:729:6: warning: symbol 'do_signal32' was not declared. Should it be static?
signal32.c:773:16: warning: symbol 'do_sys32_sigstack' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add proper prototypes and drop local prototype

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc64: fix sparse warning in pci.c

Fix following warning:
pci.c:886:5: warning: symbol 'pci64_dma_supported' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add proper prototype in kernel.h and delete loc

sparc64: fix sparse warning in pci.c

Fix following warning:
pci.c:886:5: warning: symbol 'pci64_dma_supported' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add proper prototype in kernel.h and delete local prototype in iommu.c

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc64: fix sparse warnings in smp_64.c

Fix following warnings:
smp_64.c:88:6: warning: symbol 'smp_callin' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:133:6: warning: symbol 'cpu_panic' was no

sparc64: fix sparse warnings in smp_64.c

Fix following warnings:
smp_64.c:88:6: warning: symbol 'smp_callin' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:133:6: warning: symbol 'cpu_panic' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:187:6: warning: symbol 'smp_synchronize_tick_client' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:821:18: warning: symbol 'smp_call_function_client' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:827:18: warning: symbol 'smp_call_function_single_client' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:964:18: warning: symbol 'smp_new_mmu_context_version_client' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:1149:6: warning: symbol 'smp_capture' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:1171:6: warning: symbol 'smp_release' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:1190:18: warning: symbol 'smp_penguin_jailcell' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:1410:18: warning: symbol 'smp_receive_signal_client' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add prototypes in kernel.h or asm/smp_64.h as appropriate.
Delete duplicate function kimage_addr_to_ra(), and
adapt parameter to const void * to match the broader use.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc64: fix sparse warnings in sys_sparc_64.c + unaligned_64.c

Fix following warnings:
kernel/sys_sparc_64.c:643:17: warning: symbol 'sys_kern_features' was not declared. Should it be static?
kerne

sparc64: fix sparse warnings in sys_sparc_64.c + unaligned_64.c

Fix following warnings:
kernel/sys_sparc_64.c:643:17: warning: symbol 'sys_kern_features' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/unaligned_64.c:297:17: warning: symbol 'kernel_unaligned_trap' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/unaligned_64.c:387:5: warning: symbol 'handle_popc' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/unaligned_64.c:428:5: warning: symbol 'handle_ldf_stq' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/unaligned_64.c:553:6: warning: symbol 'handle_ld_nf' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/unaligned_64.c:579:6: warning: symbol 'handle_lddfmna' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/unaligned_64.c:643:6: warning: symbol 'handle_stdfmna' was not declared. Should it be static?

Functions that are only used in kernel/ - add prototypes in kernel.h
Functions used outside kernel/ - add prototype in asm/setup.h
Removed local prototypes

One of the local prototypes had wrong signature (return void - not int).

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc: drop use of extern for prototypes in arch/sparc/*

Drop the remaining uses of extern for prototypes in .h files
in the sparc specific part of the kernel tree.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam

sparc: drop use of extern for prototypes in arch/sparc/*

Drop the remaining uses of extern for prototypes in .h files
in the sparc specific part of the kernel tree.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc32: drop tadpole specific code

tadpole.c assigned cpu_pwr_save based on the current configuration.
The rest of the tadpole.c file was only used if cpu_pwr_save was
dereferenced.
But this variab

sparc32: drop tadpole specific code

tadpole.c assigned cpu_pwr_save based on the current configuration.
The rest of the tadpole.c file was only used if cpu_pwr_save was
dereferenced.
But this variable was never dereferenced - and I went back to a 2.6.12
kernel to check (from June 2005) - and not even then was it used.

Drop this code as it has not been in use for ~10 years.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in time_32.c

Fix following warnings:
time_32.c:63:1: warning: symbol 'rtc_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
time_32.c:357:13: warning: symbol 'time_init' was

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in time_32.c

Fix following warnings:
time_32.c:63:1: warning: symbol 'rtc_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
time_32.c:357:13: warning: symbol 'time_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
time_32.c:148:16: warning: dereference of noderef expression

Add extern definition of rtc_lock in mc146818rtc.h.
time_init() is called from init/main.c - add prototype to kernel.h.
Use proper u32 __iomem * for master_l10_counter.
Fix all users.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in pcic.c

Fix following warnings:
pcic.c:164:14: warning: symbol 'pcic_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
pcic.c:165:14: warning: symbol 'pcic_speculative' was

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in pcic.c

Fix following warnings:
pcic.c:164:14: warning: symbol 'pcic_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
pcic.c:165:14: warning: symbol 'pcic_speculative' was not declared. Should it be static?
pcic.c:166:14: warning: symbol 'pcic_trapped' was not declared. Should it be static?
pcic.c:332:66: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
pcic.c:344:66: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
pcic.c:539:38: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
pcic.c:677:1: warning: symbol 'pcic_pin_to_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
pcic.c:783:6: warning: symbol 'pcic_nmi' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add extern for pcic_regs.
Define a few variables static.
Replace 0 with NULL.
Delete unused funtion pcic_pin_to_irq().
Include kernel.h so we could drop declaration of
t_nmi and add prototype for pcic_nmi.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc32: fix build breakage

Add forward declaration to kernel.h to fix build breakage
in some configurations

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@dav

sparc32: fix build breakage

Add forward declaration to kernel.h to fix build breakage
in some configurations

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in leon_smp.c

Fix following warnings:
leon_smp.c:133:6: warning: symbol 'leon_smp_setbroadcast' was not declared. Should it be static?
leon_smp.c:151:14: warning: symbol

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in leon_smp.c

Fix following warnings:
leon_smp.c:133:6: warning: symbol 'leon_smp_setbroadcast' was not declared. Should it be static?
leon_smp.c:151:14: warning: symbol 'leon_smp_getbroadcast' was not declared. Should it be static?
leon_smp.c:269:6: warning: symbol 'leon_irq_rotate' was not declared. Should it be static?
leon_smp.c:355:6: warning: symbol 'leonsmp_ipi_interrupt' was not declared. Should it be static?
leon_smp.c:457:6: warning: symbol 'leon_cross_call_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add static.
Remove unused functions.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Hellstrom <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in sun4d_smp.c

Fix following warnings:
sun4d_smp.c:113:13: warning: symbol 'smp4d_boot_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4d_smp.c:121:5: warning: symbol 's

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in sun4d_smp.c

Fix following warnings:
sun4d_smp.c:113:13: warning: symbol 'smp4d_boot_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4d_smp.c:121:5: warning: symbol 'smp4d_boot_one_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4d_smp.c:162:13: warning: symbol 'smp4d_smp_done' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4d_smp.c:353:6: warning: symbol 'smp4d_cross_call_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4d_smp.c:363:6: warning: symbol 'smp4d_percpu_timer_interrupt' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add proper declarations

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in sun4m_smp.c

Fix following warnings:
sun4m_smp.c:72:13: warning: symbol 'smp4m_boot_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4m_smp.c:78:5: warning: symbol 'smp

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in sun4m_smp.c

Fix following warnings:
sun4m_smp.c:72:13: warning: symbol 'smp4m_boot_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4m_smp.c:78:5: warning: symbol 'smp4m_boot_one_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4m_smp.c:120:13: warning: symbol 'smp4m_smp_done' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4m_smp.c:230:6: warning: symbol 'smp4m_cross_call_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4m_smp.c:240:6: warning: symbol 'smp4m_percpu_timer_interrupt' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add proper declarations.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in unaligned_32.c

Fix following warnings:
unaligned_32.c:146:15: warning: symbol 'safe_compute_effective_address' was not declared. Should it be static?
unaligned_32.c:2

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in unaligned_32.c

Fix following warnings:
unaligned_32.c:146:15: warning: symbol 'safe_compute_effective_address' was not declared. Should it be static?
unaligned_32.c:235:17: warning: symbol 'kernel_unaligned_trap' was not declared. Should it be static?
unaligned_32.c:319:17: warning: symbol 'user_unaligned_trap' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add proper declarations in kernel.h + setup.h

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

show more ...