powerpc/atomic: Use YZ constraints for DS-form instructions

The 'ld' and 'std' instructions require a 4-byte aligned displacement
because they are DS-form instructions. But the "m" asm constraint
do

powerpc/atomic: Use YZ constraints for DS-form instructions

The 'ld' and 'std' instructions require a 4-byte aligned displacement
because they are DS-form instructions. But the "m" asm constraint
doesn't enforce that.

That can lead to build errors if the compiler chooses a non-aligned
displacement, as seen with GCC 14:

/tmp/ccuSzwiR.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccuSzwiR.s:2579: Error: operand out of domain (39 is not a multiple of 4)
make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:229: net/core/page_pool.o] Error 1

Dumping the generated assembler shows:

ld 8,39(8) # MEM[(const struct atomic64_t *)_29].counter, t

Use the YZ constraints to tell the compiler either to generate a DS-form
displacement, or use an X-form instruction, either of which prevents the
build error.

See commit 2d43cc701b96 ("powerpc/uaccess: Fix build errors seen with
GCC 13/14") for more details on the constraint letters.

Fixes: 9f0cbea0d8cc ("[POWERPC] Implement atomic{, 64}_{read, write}() without volatile")
Cc: [email protected] # v2.6.24+
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
Tested-by: Mina Almasry <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://msgid.link/[email protected]

show more ...

locking/atomic: make atomic*_{cmp,}xchg optional

Most architectures define the atomic/atomic64 xchg and cmpxchg
operations in terms of arch_xchg and arch_cmpxchg respectfully.

Add fallbacks for the

locking/atomic: make atomic*_{cmp,}xchg optional

Most architectures define the atomic/atomic64 xchg and cmpxchg
operations in terms of arch_xchg and arch_cmpxchg respectfully.

Add fallbacks for these cases and remove the trivial cases from arch
code. On some architectures the existing definitions are kept as these
are used to build other arch_atomic*() operations.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...

powerpc/64: Add support to build with prefixed instructions

Add an option to build kernel and module with prefixed instructions if
the CPU and toolchain support it.

This is not related to kernel su

powerpc/64: Add support to build with prefixed instructions

Add an option to build kernel and module with prefixed instructions if
the CPU and toolchain support it.

This is not related to kernel support for userspace execution of
prefixed instructions.

Building with prefixed instructions breaks some extended inline asm
memory addressing, for example it will provide immediates that exceed
the range of simple load/store displacement. Whether this is a
toolchain or a kernel asm problem remains to be seen. For now, these
are replaced with simpler and less efficient direct register addressing
when compiling with prefixed.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://msgid.link/[email protected]

show more ...

powerpc/atomics: Remove unused function

Remove arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg_lock function as it is no longer used
since commit 9f61521c7a28 ("powerpc/qspinlock: powerpc qspinlock
implementation")

Signed

powerpc/atomics: Remove unused function

Remove arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg_lock function as it is no longer used
since commit 9f61521c7a28 ("powerpc/qspinlock: powerpc qspinlock
implementation")

Signed-off-by: Nysal Jan K.A <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://msgid.link/[email protected]

show more ...

powerpc: Make eh value more explicit when using lwarx

Just like the first patch of this series, define a local 'eh' in order
to make the code clearer.

And IS_ENABLED() returns either 1 or 0 so no n

powerpc: Make eh value more explicit when using lwarx

Just like the first patch of this series, define a local 'eh' in order
to make the code clearer.

And IS_ENABLED() returns either 1 or 0 so no need to do
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64) ? 1 : 0.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
[mpe: Use symbolic names, use 'n' constraint per Segher]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/629befaa2d05e2922346e58a383886510d6af55a.1659430931.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

show more ...

powerpc/atomics: Remove atomic_inc()/atomic_dec() and friends

Now that atomic_add() and atomic_sub() handle immediate operands,
atomic_inc() and atomic_dec() have no added value compared to the
gene

powerpc/atomics: Remove atomic_inc()/atomic_dec() and friends

Now that atomic_add() and atomic_sub() handle immediate operands,
atomic_inc() and atomic_dec() have no added value compared to the
generic fallback which calls atomic_add(1) and atomic_sub(1).

Also remove atomic_inc_not_zero() which fallsback to
atomic_add_unless() which itself fallsback to
atomic_fetch_add_unless() which now handles immediate operands.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0bc64a2f18726055093dbb2e479cefc60a409cfd.1632236981.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

show more ...

powerpc/atomics: Use immediate operand when possible

Today we get the following code generation for atomic operations:

c001bb2c: 39 20 00 01 li r9,1
c001bb30: 7d 40 18 28 lwarx r10,0,r3

powerpc/atomics: Use immediate operand when possible

Today we get the following code generation for atomic operations:

c001bb2c: 39 20 00 01 li r9,1
c001bb30: 7d 40 18 28 lwarx r10,0,r3
c001bb34: 7d 09 50 50 subf r8,r9,r10
c001bb38: 7d 00 19 2d stwcx. r8,0,r3

c001c7a8: 39 40 00 01 li r10,1
c001c7ac: 7d 00 18 28 lwarx r8,0,r3
c001c7b0: 7c ea 42 14 add r7,r10,r8
c001c7b4: 7c e0 19 2d stwcx. r7,0,r3

By allowing GCC to choose between immediate or regular operation,
we get:

c001bb2c: 7d 20 18 28 lwarx r9,0,r3
c001bb30: 39 49 ff ff addi r10,r9,-1
c001bb34: 7d 40 19 2d stwcx. r10,0,r3
--
c001c7a4: 7d 40 18 28 lwarx r10,0,r3
c001c7a8: 39 0a 00 01 addi r8,r10,1
c001c7ac: 7d 00 19 2d stwcx. r8,0,r3

For "and", the dot form has to be used because "andi" doesn't exist.

For logical operations we use unsigned 16 bits immediate.
For arithmetic operations we use signed 16 bits immediate.

On pmac32_defconfig, it reduces the text by approx another 8 kbytes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2ec558d44db8045752fe9dbd29c9ba84bab6030b.1632236981.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

show more ...

powerpc/asm: Remove UPD_CONSTR after GCC 4.9 removal

UPD_CONSTR was previously a preprocessor define for an old GCC 4.9
inline asm bug with m<> constraints.

Fixes: 6563139d90ad ("powerpc: remove GC

powerpc/asm: Remove UPD_CONSTR after GCC 4.9 removal

UPD_CONSTR was previously a preprocessor define for an old GCC 4.9
inline asm bug with m<> constraints.

Fixes: 6563139d90ad ("powerpc: remove GCC version check for UPD_CONSTR")
Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...

powerpc: Use lwarx/ldarx directly instead of PPC_LWARX/LDARX macros

Force the eh flag at 0 on PPC32.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <m

powerpc: Use lwarx/ldarx directly instead of PPC_LWARX/LDARX macros

Force the eh flag at 0 on PPC32.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1fc81f07cabebb875b963e295408cc3dd38c8d85.1614674882.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

show more ...

locking/atomic: powerpc: move to ARCH_ATOMIC

We'd like all architectures to convert to ARCH_ATOMIC, as once all
architectures are converted it will be possible to make significant
cleanups to the at

locking/atomic: powerpc: move to ARCH_ATOMIC

We'd like all architectures to convert to ARCH_ATOMIC, as once all
architectures are converted it will be possible to make significant
cleanups to the atomics headers, and this will make it much easier to
generically enable atomic functionality (e.g. debug logic in the
instrumented wrappers).

As a step towards that, this patch migrates powerpc to ARCH_ATOMIC. The
arch code provides arch_{atomic,atomic64,xchg,cmpxchg}*(), and common
code wraps these with optional instrumentation to provide the regular
functions.

While atomic_try_cmpxchg_lock() is not part of the common atomic API, it
is given an `arch_` prefix for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...

powerpc: Fix update form addressing in inline assembly

In several places, inline assembly uses the "%Un" modifier
to enable the use of instruction with update form addressing,
but the associated "<>

powerpc: Fix update form addressing in inline assembly

In several places, inline assembly uses the "%Un" modifier
to enable the use of instruction with update form addressing,
but the associated "<>" constraint is missing.

As mentioned in previous patch, this fails with gcc 4.9, so
"<>" can't be used directly.

Use UPD_CONSTR macro everywhere %Un modifier is used.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/62eab5ca595485c192de1765bdac099f633a21d0.1603358942.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

show more ...

locking/atomic: Move ATOMIC_INIT into linux/types.h

This patch moves ATOMIC_INIT from asm/atomic.h into linux/types.h.
This allows users of atomic_t to use ATOMIC_INIT without having to
include atom

locking/atomic: Move ATOMIC_INIT into linux/types.h

This patch moves ATOMIC_INIT from asm/atomic.h into linux/types.h.
This allows users of atomic_t to use ATOMIC_INIT without having to
include atomic.h as that way may lead to header loops.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...

powerpc/qspinlock: Optimised atomic_try_cmpxchg_lock() that adds the lock hint

This brings the behaviour of the uncontended fast path back to roughly
equivalent to simple spinlocks -- a single atomi

powerpc/qspinlock: Optimised atomic_try_cmpxchg_lock() that adds the lock hint

This brings the behaviour of the uncontended fast path back to roughly
equivalent to simple spinlocks -- a single atomic op with lock hint.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...

powerpc: Remove IBM405 Erratum #77

This erratum is dedicated to IBM 405GP and STB03xxx
which are now gone.

Remove this erratum.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Signed-off

powerpc: Remove IBM405 Erratum #77

This erratum is dedicated to IBM 405GP and STB03xxx
which are now gone.

Remove this erratum.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/44dbc08e9034681eb28324cbabc086e97044c36c.1590079969.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

show more ...

locking/atomic, powerpc: Use s64 for atomic64

As a step towards making the atomic64 API use consistent types treewide,
let's have the powerpc atomic64 implementation use s64 as the underlying
type f

locking/atomic, powerpc: Use s64 for atomic64

As a step towards making the atomic64 API use consistent types treewide,
let's have the powerpc atomic64 implementation use s64 as the underlying
type for atomic64_t, rather than long, matching the generated headers.

As atomic64_read() depends on the generic defintion of atomic64_t, this
still returns long on 64-bit. This will be converted in a subsequent
patch.

Otherwise, there should be no functional change as a result of this
patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

show more ...

powerpc/405: move PPC405_ERR77 in asm-405.h

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>

locking/atomics: Rework ordering barriers

Currently architectures can override __atomic_op_*() to define the barriers
used before/after a relaxed atomic when used to build acquire/release/fence
vari

locking/atomics: Rework ordering barriers

Currently architectures can override __atomic_op_*() to define the barriers
used before/after a relaxed atomic when used to build acquire/release/fence
variants.

This has the unfortunate property of requiring the architecture to define the
full wrapper for the atomics, rather than just the barriers they care about,
and gets in the way of generating atomics which can be easily read.

Instead, this patch has architectures define an optional set of barriers:

* __atomic_acquire_fence()
* __atomic_release_fence()
* __atomic_pre_full_fence()
* __atomic_post_full_fence()

... which <linux/atomic.h> uses to build the wrappers.

It would be nice if we could undef these, along with the __atomic_op_*()
wrappers, but that would break the cmpxchg() wrappers, which are written
in preprocessor. Undefs would have been nice, but alas.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Parri <[email protected]>
Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

show more ...

atomics/treewide: Make conditional inc/dec ops optional

The conditional inc/dec ops differ for atomic_t and atomic64_t:

- atomic_inc_unless_positive() is optional for atomic_t, and doesn't exist fo

atomics/treewide: Make conditional inc/dec ops optional

The conditional inc/dec ops differ for atomic_t and atomic64_t:

- atomic_inc_unless_positive() is optional for atomic_t, and doesn't exist for atomic64_t.
- atomic_dec_unless_negative() is optional for atomic_t, and doesn't exist for atomic64_t.
- atomic_dec_if_positive is optional for atomic_t, and is mandatory for atomic64_t.

Let's make these consistently optional for both. At the same time, let's
clean up the existing fallbacks to use atomic_try_cmpxchg().

The instrumented atomics are updated accordingly.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

show more ...

atomics/treewide: Make unconditional inc/dec ops optional

Many of the inc/dec ops are mandatory, but for most architectures inc/dec are
simply trivial wrappers around their corresponding add/sub ops

atomics/treewide: Make unconditional inc/dec ops optional

Many of the inc/dec ops are mandatory, but for most architectures inc/dec are
simply trivial wrappers around their corresponding add/sub ops.

Let's make all the inc/dec ops optional, so that we can get rid of these
boilerplate wrappers.

The instrumented atomics are updated accordingly.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

show more ...

atomics/treewide: Make test ops optional

Some of the atomics return the result of a test applied after the atomic
operation, and almost all architectures implement these as trivial
wrappers around t

atomics/treewide: Make test ops optional

Some of the atomics return the result of a test applied after the atomic
operation, and almost all architectures implement these as trivial
wrappers around the underlying atomic. Specifically:

* <atomic>_inc_and_test(v) is (<atomic>_inc_return(v) == 0)
* <atomic>_dec_and_test(v) is (<atomic>_dec_return(v) == 0)
* <atomic>_sub_and_test(i, v) is (<atomic>_sub_return(i, v) == 0)
* <atomic>_add_negative(i, v) is (<atomic>_add_return(i, v) < 0)

Rather than have these definitions duplicated in all architectures, with
minor inconsistencies in formatting and documentation, let's make these
operations optional, with default fallbacks as above. Implementations
must now provide a preprocessor symbol.

The instrumented atomics are updated accordingly.

Both x86 and m68k have custom implementations, which are left as-is,
given preprocessor symbols to avoid being overridden.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

show more ...

atomics/powerpc: Define atomic64_fetch_add_unless()

As a step towards unifying the atomic/atomic64/atomic_long APIs, this
patch converts the arch/powerpc implementation of atomic64_add_unless()
into

atomics/powerpc: Define atomic64_fetch_add_unless()

As a step towards unifying the atomic/atomic64/atomic_long APIs, this
patch converts the arch/powerpc implementation of atomic64_add_unless()
into an implementation of atomic64_fetch_add_unless().

A wrapper in <linux/atomic.h> will build atomic_add_unless() atop of
this, provided it is given a preprocessor definition.

No functional change is intended as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

show more ...

atomics/treewide: Make atomic_fetch_add_unless() optional

Several architectures these have a near-identical implementation based
on atomic_read() and atomic_cmpxchg() which we can instead define in

atomics/treewide: Make atomic_fetch_add_unless() optional

Several architectures these have a near-identical implementation based
on atomic_read() and atomic_cmpxchg() which we can instead define in
<linux/atomic.h>, so let's do so, using something close to the existing
x86 implementation with try_cmpxchg().

Where an architecture provides its own atomic_fetch_add_unless(), it
must define a preprocessor symbol for it. The instrumented atomics are
updated accordingly.

Note that arch/arc's existing atomic_fetch_add_unless() had redundant
barriers, as these are already present in its atomic_cmpxchg()
implementation.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

show more ...

atomics/treewide: Make atomic64_inc_not_zero() optional

We define a trivial fallback for atomic_inc_not_zero(), but don't do
the same for atomic64_inc_not_zero(), leading most architectures to
defin

atomics/treewide: Make atomic64_inc_not_zero() optional

We define a trivial fallback for atomic_inc_not_zero(), but don't do
the same for atomic64_inc_not_zero(), leading most architectures to
define the same boilerplate.

Let's add a fallback in <linux/atomic.h>, and remove the redundant
implementations. Note that atomic64_add_unless() is always defined in
<linux/atomic.h>, and promotes its arguments to the requisite types, so
we need not do this explicitly.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

show more ...

atomics/treewide: Rename __atomic_add_unless() => atomic_fetch_add_unless()

While __atomic_add_unless() was originally intended as a building-block
for atomic_add_unless(), it's now used in a number

atomics/treewide: Rename __atomic_add_unless() => atomic_fetch_add_unless()

While __atomic_add_unless() was originally intended as a building-block
for atomic_add_unless(), it's now used in a number of places around the
kernel. It's the only common atomic operation named __atomic*(), rather
than atomic_*(), and for consistency it would be better named
atomic_fetch_add_unless().

This lack of consistency is slightly confusing, and gets in the way of
scripting atomics. Given that, let's clean things up and promote it to
an official part of the atomics API, in the form of
atomic_fetch_add_unless().

This patch converts definitions and invocations over to the new name,
including the instrumented version, using the following script:

----
git grep -w __atomic_add_unless | while read line; do
sed -i '{s/\<__atomic_add_unless\>/atomic_fetch_add_unless/}' "${line%%:*}";
done
git grep -w __arch_atomic_add_unless | while read line; do
sed -i '{s/\<__arch_atomic_add_unless\>/arch_atomic_fetch_add_unless/}' "${line%%:*}";
done
----

Note that we do not have atomic{64,_long}_fetch_add_unless(), which will
be introduced by later patches.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

show more ...

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.

For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139

and resulted in the first patch in this series.

If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930

and resulted in the second patch in this series.

- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1

and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).

- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.

Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

show more ...