|
Revision tags: v6.15, v6.15-rc7, v6.15-rc6, v6.15-rc5, v6.15-rc4, v6.15-rc3, v6.15-rc2, v6.15-rc1, v6.14, v6.14-rc7, v6.14-rc6, v6.14-rc5, v6.14-rc4, v6.14-rc3, v6.14-rc2, v6.14-rc1, v6.13, v6.13-rc7, v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4, v6.13-rc3, v6.13-rc2, v6.13-rc1, v6.12, v6.12-rc7, v6.12-rc6, v6.12-rc5, v6.12-rc4, v6.12-rc3, v6.12-rc2, v6.12-rc1, v6.11, v6.11-rc7, v6.11-rc6, v6.11-rc5, v6.11-rc4, v6.11-rc3, v6.11-rc2, v6.11-rc1, v6.10, v6.10-rc7, v6.10-rc6, v6.10-rc5, v6.10-rc4, v6.10-rc3, v6.10-rc2, v6.10-rc1, v6.9, v6.9-rc7, v6.9-rc6, v6.9-rc5, v6.9-rc4, v6.9-rc3, v6.9-rc2, v6.9-rc1, v6.8, v6.8-rc7, v6.8-rc6, v6.8-rc5, v6.8-rc4, v6.8-rc3, v6.8-rc2, v6.8-rc1, v6.7, v6.7-rc8, v6.7-rc7, v6.7-rc6, v6.7-rc5, v6.7-rc4, v6.7-rc3, v6.7-rc2 |
|
| #
671c08ec |
| 13-Nov-2023 |
Andrew Davis <[email protected]> |
ARM: mach-nspire: Rework support and directory structure
Having a platform need a mach-* directory should be seen as a negative,
it means the platform needs special non-standard handling. ARM64 supp
ARM: mach-nspire: Rework support and directory structure
Having a platform need a mach-* directory should be seen as a negative,
it means the platform needs special non-standard handling. ARM64 support
does not allow mach-* directories at all. While we may not get to that
given all the non-standard architectures we support, we should still try
to get as close as we can and reduce the number of mach directories.
The mach-nspire/ directory and files, provides just one "feature":
having the kernel print the machine name if the DTB does not also contain
a "model" string (which they always do). To reduce the number of mach-*
directories let's do without that feature and remove this directory.
NOTE: The default l2c_aux_mask is now ~0 but these devices never have
this type of cache controller so this is safe.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
ae73dadb |
| 13-Nov-2023 |
Andrew Davis <[email protected]> |
ARM: mach-sunplus: Rework support and directory structure
Having a platform need a mach-* directory should be seen as a negative,
it means the platform needs special non-standard handling. ARM64 sup
ARM: mach-sunplus: Rework support and directory structure
Having a platform need a mach-* directory should be seen as a negative,
it means the platform needs special non-standard handling. ARM64 support
does not allow mach-* directories at all. While we may not get to that
given all the non-standard architectures we support, we should still try
to get as close as we can and reduce the number of mach directories.
The mach-sunplus/ directory and files, provides just one "feature":
having the kernel print the machine name if the DTB does not also contain
a "model" string (which they always do). To reduce the number of mach-*
directories let's do without that feature and remove this directory.
NOTE: The default l2c_aux_mask is now ~0 but these devices never have
this type of cache controller so this is safe.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
00e58c36 |
| 13-Nov-2023 |
Andrew Davis <[email protected]> |
ARM: mach-airoha: Rework support and directory structure
Having a platform need a mach-* directory should be seen as a negative,
it means the platform needs special non-standard handling. ARM64 supp
ARM: mach-airoha: Rework support and directory structure
Having a platform need a mach-* directory should be seen as a negative,
it means the platform needs special non-standard handling. ARM64 support
does not allow mach-* directories at all. While we may not get to that
given all the non-standard architectures we support, we should still try
to get as close as we can and reduce the number of mach directories.
The mach-airoha/ directory, and files within, provide just one "feature":
having the kernel print the machine name if the DTB does not also contain
a "model" string (which they always do). To reduce the number of mach-*
directories let's do without that feature and remove this directory.
It also seems there was a copy/paste error and the "MEDIATEK_DT"
name was re-used in the DT_MACHINE_START macro. This may have caused
conflicts if this was built in a multi-arch configuration.
NOTE: The default l2c_aux_mask is now ~0 but these devices never have
this type of cache controller so this is safe.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
dcfbe025 |
| 13-Nov-2023 |
Andrew Davis <[email protected]> |
ARM: mach-moxart: Move MOXA ART support into Kconfig.platforms
This removes the need for a dedicated Kconfig and empty mach directory.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnd B
ARM: mach-moxart: Move MOXA ART support into Kconfig.platforms
This removes the need for a dedicated Kconfig and empty mach directory.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
93911741 |
| 13-Nov-2023 |
Andrew Davis <[email protected]> |
ARM: mach-uniphier: Move Socionext UniPhier support into Kconfig.platforms
This removes the need for a dedicated Kconfig and empty mach directory.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-
ARM: mach-uniphier: Move Socionext UniPhier support into Kconfig.platforms
This removes the need for a dedicated Kconfig and empty mach directory.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
8b7776fe |
| 13-Nov-2023 |
Andrew Davis <[email protected]> |
ARM: mach-rda: Move RDA Micro support into Kconfig.platforms
This removes the need for a dedicated Kconfig and empty mach directory.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Ber
ARM: mach-rda: Move RDA Micro support into Kconfig.platforms
This removes the need for a dedicated Kconfig and empty mach directory.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
b6ed4800 |
| 13-Nov-2023 |
Andrew Davis <[email protected]> |
ARM: mach-asm9260: Move ASM9260 support into Kconfig.platforms
This removes the need for a dedicated Kconfig and mach directory.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel
ARM: mach-asm9260: Move ASM9260 support into Kconfig.platforms
This removes the need for a dedicated Kconfig and mach directory.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
| #
20e3ab9e |
| 13-Nov-2023 |
Andrew Davis <[email protected]> |
ARM: Kconfig: move platform selection into its own Kconfig file
Mostly just for better organization for now. This matches what is done on
some other platforms including ARM64. This also lets us star
ARM: Kconfig: move platform selection into its own Kconfig file
Mostly just for better organization for now. This matches what is done on
some other platforms including ARM64. This also lets us start to reduce
the number of mach- directories that only exist to store the platform
selection.
Start with "Platform selection" and ARCH_VIRT.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
show more ...
|