|
Revision tags: release/13.4.0-p5, release/13.5.0-p1, release/14.2.0-p3, release/13.5.0, release/14.2.0-p2, release/14.1.0-p8, release/13.4.0-p4, release/14.1.0-p7, release/14.2.0-p1, release/13.4.0-p3, release/14.2.0, release/13.4.0, release/14.1.0, release/13.3.0, release/14.0.0 |
|
| #
d0b2dbfa |
| 16-Aug-2023 |
Warner Losh <[email protected]> |
Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line sh pattern
Remove /^\s*#[#!]?\s*\$FreeBSD\$.*$\n/
|
|
Revision tags: release/13.2.0, release/12.4.0 |
|
| #
0b1adc42 |
| 09-Nov-2022 |
Baptiste Daroussin <[email protected]> |
rc.sendmail: remove unused script
20 years ago the use of rc.sendmail script was dropped in favor of /etc/rc.d/sendmail, it is time to retire the script entirely now.
MFC after: 1 week
|
| #
e7437ae9 |
| 07-Jul-2022 |
Mateusz Piotrowski <[email protected]> |
rc: Start testing the rc(8) framework (beginning with *_oomprotect)
This change adds 2 tests to make sure that the *_oomprotect variable sets the protection against OOM killer properly within rc(8)
rc: Start testing the rc(8) framework (beginning with *_oomprotect)
This change adds 2 tests to make sure that the *_oomprotect variable sets the protection against OOM killer properly within rc(8) scripts.
This is also adding the first tests for the rc(8) framework. More tests will be added as we go.
PR: 256148 Approved by: des MFC after: 2 weeks Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D35745
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: release/13.1.0, release/12.3.0, release/13.0.0, release/12.2.0, release/11.4.0 |
|
| #
fdf46c24 |
| 25-Mar-2020 |
Baptiste Daroussin <[email protected]> |
Revert r359294 per manu's request
It breaks etcupdate
Reported by: cy
|
| #
77f0f1df |
| 25-Mar-2020 |
Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> |
pkgbase: Stop threating rc files as config files
rc scripts arent configuration files so use FILES instead of CONFS. While here put rc scripts into related package (sendmail in the FreeBSD-sendmail
pkgbase: Stop threating rc files as config files
rc scripts arent configuration files so use FILES instead of CONFS. While here put rc scripts into related package (sendmail in the FreeBSD-sendmail package, wpa_supplicant in the FreeBSD-wpa etc ...)
Reviewed by: bapt, emaste Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24177
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: release/12.1.0 |
|
| #
8c15be73 |
| 05-Sep-2019 |
Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> |
pkgbase: Move rc scripts and related files to their own packages
It doesn't need to be in runtime and might help people who want to experiment with other rc system or don't use one (like in small em
pkgbase: Move rc scripts and related files to their own packages
It doesn't need to be in runtime and might help people who want to experiment with other rc system or don't use one (like in small embedded mfsroot).
Reviewed by: bapt, gjb Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21499
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: release/11.3.0 |
|
| #
42438321 |
| 22-May-2019 |
Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> |
pkgbase: Move rc.sendmail to libexec/rc
Reviewed by: bapt
|
| #
f4022639 |
| 22-May-2019 |
Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> |
pkgbase: Move rc.bsdextended to libexec/rc
Reviewed by: bapt
|
| #
f0f0053a |
| 22-May-2019 |
Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> |
pkgbase: Move rc.firewall to libexec/rc
Put it with all the other rc files
Reviewed by: bapt
|
|
Revision tags: release/12.0.0 |
|
| #
c35b07d1 |
| 18-Oct-2018 |
Bjoern A. Zeeb <[email protected]> |
While preparing to move init(8) to its own package as indicated in r339413, a current pkgbase update problem came up. For users testing pkgbase at the moment there is no (automatic) way to pick up n
While preparing to move init(8) to its own package as indicated in r339413, a current pkgbase update problem came up. For users testing pkgbase at the moment there is no (automatic) way to pick up new base packages (yet). As a result rather than also moving init(8) to its own package, back out the part of the change in r339413 that moved rc* to its own package and defer creating new packages until the infrastructure is in place to handle these cases. Both init and rc* are considered too problematic to be lost by early adaptors at this stage.
Discussed with: brd Reviewed by: brd Approved by: re (gjb)
show more ...
|
| #
0696600c |
| 17-Oct-2018 |
Bjoern A. Zeeb <[email protected]> |
Move the rc framework out of sbin/init into libexec/rc.
The reasons for this are forward looking to pkgbase: * /sbin/init is a special binary; try not to replace it with every package update bec
Move the rc framework out of sbin/init into libexec/rc.
The reasons for this are forward looking to pkgbase: * /sbin/init is a special binary; try not to replace it with every package update because an rc script was touched. (a follow-up commit will make init its own package) * having rc in its own place will allow more easy replacement of the rc framework with alternatives, such as openrc.
Discussed with: brd (during BSDCam), kmoore Requested by: cem, bz PR: 231522 Approved by: re (gjb)
show more ...
|