History log of /freebsd-14.2/libexec/rc/Makefile (Results 1 – 11 of 11)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: release/13.4.0-p5, release/13.5.0-p1, release/14.2.0-p3, release/13.5.0, release/14.2.0-p2, release/14.1.0-p8, release/13.4.0-p4, release/14.1.0-p7, release/14.2.0-p1, release/13.4.0-p3, release/14.2.0, release/13.4.0, release/14.1.0, release/13.3.0, release/14.0.0
# d0b2dbfa 16-Aug-2023 Warner Losh <[email protected]>

Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line sh pattern

Remove /^\s*#[#!]?\s*\$FreeBSD\$.*$\n/


Revision tags: release/13.2.0, release/12.4.0
# 0b1adc42 09-Nov-2022 Baptiste Daroussin <[email protected]>

rc.sendmail: remove unused script

20 years ago the use of rc.sendmail script was dropped in favor
of /etc/rc.d/sendmail, it is time to retire the script entirely
now.

MFC after: 1 week


# e7437ae9 07-Jul-2022 Mateusz Piotrowski <[email protected]>

rc: Start testing the rc(8) framework (beginning with *_oomprotect)

This change adds 2 tests to make sure that the *_oomprotect variable
sets the protection against OOM killer properly within rc(8)

rc: Start testing the rc(8) framework (beginning with *_oomprotect)

This change adds 2 tests to make sure that the *_oomprotect variable
sets the protection against OOM killer properly within rc(8) scripts.

This is also adding the first tests for the rc(8) framework. More tests
will be added as we go.

PR: 256148
Approved by: des
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D35745

show more ...


Revision tags: release/13.1.0, release/12.3.0, release/13.0.0, release/12.2.0, release/11.4.0
# fdf46c24 25-Mar-2020 Baptiste Daroussin <[email protected]>

Revert r359294 per manu's request

It breaks etcupdate

Reported by: cy


# 77f0f1df 25-Mar-2020 Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]>

pkgbase: Stop threating rc files as config files

rc scripts arent configuration files so use FILES instead of CONFS.
While here put rc scripts into related package (sendmail in the FreeBSD-sendmail

pkgbase: Stop threating rc files as config files

rc scripts arent configuration files so use FILES instead of CONFS.
While here put rc scripts into related package (sendmail in the FreeBSD-sendmail
package, wpa_supplicant in the FreeBSD-wpa etc ...)

Reviewed by: bapt, emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24177

show more ...


Revision tags: release/12.1.0
# 8c15be73 05-Sep-2019 Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]>

pkgbase: Move rc scripts and related files to their own packages

It doesn't need to be in runtime and might help people who want to
experiment with other rc system or don't use one (like in small
em

pkgbase: Move rc scripts and related files to their own packages

It doesn't need to be in runtime and might help people who want to
experiment with other rc system or don't use one (like in small
embedded mfsroot).

Reviewed by: bapt, gjb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21499

show more ...


Revision tags: release/11.3.0
# 42438321 22-May-2019 Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]>

pkgbase: Move rc.sendmail to libexec/rc

Reviewed by: bapt


# f4022639 22-May-2019 Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]>

pkgbase: Move rc.bsdextended to libexec/rc

Reviewed by: bapt


# f0f0053a 22-May-2019 Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]>

pkgbase: Move rc.firewall to libexec/rc

Put it with all the other rc files

Reviewed by: bapt


Revision tags: release/12.0.0
# c35b07d1 18-Oct-2018 Bjoern A. Zeeb <[email protected]>

While preparing to move init(8) to its own package as indicated
in r339413, a current pkgbase update problem came up. For users
testing pkgbase at the moment there is no (automatic) way to pick
up n

While preparing to move init(8) to its own package as indicated
in r339413, a current pkgbase update problem came up. For users
testing pkgbase at the moment there is no (automatic) way to pick
up new base packages (yet).
As a result rather than also moving init(8) to its own package,
back out the part of the change in r339413 that moved rc* to its
own package and defer creating new packages until the
infrastructure is in place to handle these cases.
Both init and rc* are considered too problematic to be lost by
early adaptors at this stage.

Discussed with: brd
Reviewed by: brd
Approved by: re (gjb)

show more ...


# 0696600c 17-Oct-2018 Bjoern A. Zeeb <[email protected]>

Move the rc framework out of sbin/init into libexec/rc.

The reasons for this are forward looking to pkgbase:
* /sbin/init is a special binary; try not to replace it with
every package update bec

Move the rc framework out of sbin/init into libexec/rc.

The reasons for this are forward looking to pkgbase:
* /sbin/init is a special binary; try not to replace it with
every package update because an rc script was touched.
(a follow-up commit will make init its own package)
* having rc in its own place will allow more easy replacement
of the rc framework with alternatives, such as openrc.

Discussed with: brd (during BSDCam), kmoore
Requested by: cem, bz
PR: 231522
Approved by: re (gjb)

show more ...