| e190da54 | 23-Jan-2019 |
Enji Cooper <[email protected]> |
Fix up r343367
I should have only changed the format qualifier with the `size_t` value,
`length`, not the other [`off_t`] value, `dest_file_size`.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r343362, r343365, r34
Fix up r343367
I should have only changed the format qualifier with the `size_t` value,
`length`, not the other [`off_t`] value, `dest_file_size`.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r343362, r343365, r343367
Approved by: emaste (mentor; implicit)
Reported by: gcc 8.x
show more ...
|
| 8dd6af34 | 23-Jan-2019 |
Enji Cooper <[email protected]> |
Unbreak the build on architectures where size_t isn't synonymous with uintmax_t
I should have used `%zu` instead of `%ju` with `size_t` types.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r343362, r343365
Approved
Unbreak the build on architectures where size_t isn't synonymous with uintmax_t
I should have used `%zu` instead of `%ju` with `size_t` types.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r343362, r343365
Approved by: emaste (mentor; implicit)
Reviewed by: asomers
Pointyhat to: ngie
Submitted by: asomers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18935
show more ...
|
| de00e09d | 23-Jan-2019 |
Enji Cooper <[email protected]> |
Unbreak the gcc build with sendfile_test after r343362
gcc 8.x is more pedantic than clang 7.x with format strings and the tests
passed `void*` variables while supplying `%s` (which is technically
i
Unbreak the gcc build with sendfile_test after r343362
gcc 8.x is more pedantic than clang 7.x with format strings and the tests
passed `void*` variables while supplying `%s` (which is technically
incorrect).
Make the affected `void*` variables use `char*` storage instead to address
this issue, as the compiler will upcast the values to `char*`.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r343362
Approved by: emaste (mentor; implicit)
Reviewed by: asomers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18934
show more ...
|