| #
c35b07d1 |
| 18-Oct-2018 |
Bjoern A. Zeeb <[email protected]> |
While preparing to move init(8) to its own package as indicated in r339413, a current pkgbase update problem came up. For users testing pkgbase at the moment there is no (automatic) way to pick up n
While preparing to move init(8) to its own package as indicated in r339413, a current pkgbase update problem came up. For users testing pkgbase at the moment there is no (automatic) way to pick up new base packages (yet). As a result rather than also moving init(8) to its own package, back out the part of the change in r339413 that moved rc* to its own package and defer creating new packages until the infrastructure is in place to handle these cases. Both init and rc* are considered too problematic to be lost by early adaptors at this stage.
Discussed with: brd Reviewed by: brd Approved by: re (gjb)
show more ...
|
| #
0696600c |
| 17-Oct-2018 |
Bjoern A. Zeeb <[email protected]> |
Move the rc framework out of sbin/init into libexec/rc.
The reasons for this are forward looking to pkgbase: * /sbin/init is a special binary; try not to replace it with every package update bec
Move the rc framework out of sbin/init into libexec/rc.
The reasons for this are forward looking to pkgbase: * /sbin/init is a special binary; try not to replace it with every package update because an rc script was touched. (a follow-up commit will make init its own package) * having rc in its own place will allow more easy replacement of the rc framework with alternatives, such as openrc.
Discussed with: brd (during BSDCam), kmoore Requested by: cem, bz PR: 231522 Approved by: re (gjb)
show more ...
|