History log of /freebsd-12.1/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86Disassembler.cpp (Results 1 – 4 of 4)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: release/12.2.0, release/11.4.0, release/12.1.0, release/11.3.0
# 4ba319b5 16-Feb-2019 Dimitry Andric <[email protected]>

Merge clang 7.0.1 and several follow-up changes

MFC r341825:

Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to
the upstream release_70 branch r348686 (effectively, 7.0.1 rc3).

Merge clang 7.0.1 and several follow-up changes

MFC r341825:

Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to
the upstream release_70 branch r348686 (effectively, 7.0.1 rc3). The
release will follow very soon, but no more functional changes are
expected.

Release notes for llvm, clang and lld 7.0.0 are available here:
<http://releases.llvm.org/7.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/7.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/7.0.0/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>

PR: 230240, 230355
Relnotes: yes

MFC r342123:

Update clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ version number to
7.0.1 release r349250. There were no functional changes since the 7.0.1
rc3 import.

PR: 230240, 230355
Relnotes: yes

r343429 | emaste | 2019-01-25 15:46:13 +0100 (Fri, 25 Jan 2019) | 16 lines

clang: default to DWARF 4 as of FreeBSD 13

FreeBSD previously defaulted to DWARF 2 because several tools (gdb,
ctfconvert, etc.) did not support later versions. These have either
been fixed or are deprecated.

Note that gdb 6 still exists but has been moved out of $PATH into
/usr/libexec and is intended only for use by crashinfo(8). The kernel
build sets the DWARF version explicitly via -gdwarf2, so this should
have no effect there.

PR: 234887 [exp-run]
Reviewed by: markj
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17930

MFC r343916:

Pull in r352607 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):

[X86] Add FPSW as a Def on some FP instructions that were missing it.

Pull in r353141 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):

[X86] Connect the default fpsr and dirflag clobbers in inline
assembly to the registers we have defined for them.

Summary:
We don't currently map these constraints to physical register numbers
so they don't make it to the MachineIR representation of inline
assembly.

This could have problems for proper dependency tracking in the
machine schedulers though I don't have a test case that shows that.

Reviewers: rnk

Reviewed By: rnk

Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57641

Pull in r353489 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):

[X86] Add FPCW as a register and start using it as an implicit use on
floating point instructions.

Summary:
FPCW contains the rounding mode control which we manipulate to
implement fp to integer conversion by changing the roudning mode,
storing the value to the stack, and then changing the rounding mode
back. Because we didn't model FPCW and its dependency chain, other
instructions could be scheduled into the middle of the sequence.

This patch introduces the register and adds it as an implciit def of
FLDCW and implicit use of the FP binary arithmetic instructions and
store instructions. There are more instructions that need to be
updated, but this is a good start. I believe this fixes at least the
reduced test case from PR40529.

Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, rnk, efriedma, andrew.w.kaylor

Subscribers: dim, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57735

These should fix a problem in clang 7.0 where it would sometimes emit
long double floating point instructions in a slightly wrong order,
leading to failures in our libm tests. In particular, the cbrt_test
test case 'cbrtl_powl' and the trig_test test case 'reduction'.

Also bump __FreeBSD_cc_version, to be able to detect this in our test
suite.

Reported by: lwhsu
PR: 234040
Upstream PR: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40206

MFC r344056:

Pull in r339734 from upstream llvm trunk (by Eli Friedman):

[ARM] Make PerformSHLSimplify add nodes to the DAG worklist correctly.

Intentionally excluding nodes from the DAGCombine worklist is likely
to lead to weird optimizations and infinite loops, so it's generally
a bad idea.

To avoid the infinite loops, fix DAGCombine to use the
isDesirableToCommuteWithShift target hook before performing the
transforms in question, and implement the target hook in the ARM
backend disable the transforms in question.

Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38530 . (I don't have a
reduced testcase for that bug. But we should have sufficient test
coverage for PerformSHLSimplify given that we're not playing weird
tricks with the worklist. I can try to bugpoint it if necessary,
though.)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50667

This should fix a possible hang when compiling sys/dev/nxge/if_nxge.c
(which exists now only in the stable/11 branch) for arm.

show more ...


Revision tags: release/12.0.0, release/11.2.0
# 0556cfad 20-Apr-2018 Dimitry Andric <[email protected]>

Recommit r332501, with an additional upstream fix for "Cannot lower
EFLAGS copy that lives out of a basic block!" errors on i386.

Pull in r325446 from upstream clang trunk (by me):

[X86] Add 'sah

Recommit r332501, with an additional upstream fix for "Cannot lower
EFLAGS copy that lives out of a basic block!" errors on i386.

Pull in r325446 from upstream clang trunk (by me):

[X86] Add 'sahf' CPU feature to frontend

Summary:
Make clang accept `-msahf` (and `-mno-sahf`) flags to activate the
`+sahf` feature for the backend, for bug 36028 (Incorrect use of
pushf/popf enables/disables interrupts on amd64 kernels). This was
originally submitted in bug 36037 by Jonathan Looney
<[email protected]>.

As described there, GCC also uses `-msahf` for this feature, and the
backend already recognizes the `+sahf` feature. All that is needed is
to teach clang to pass this on to the backend.

The mapping of feature support onto CPUs may not be complete; rather,
it was chosen to match LLVM's idea of which CPUs support this feature
(see lib/Target/X86/X86.td).

I also updated the affected test case (CodeGen/attr-target-x86.c) to
match the emitted output.

Reviewers: craig.topper, coby, efriedma, rsmith

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43394

Pull in r328944 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Expose more of the condition conversion routines in the public
API for X86's instruction information. I've now got a second patch
under review that needs these same APIs. This bit is nicely
orthogonal and obvious, so landing it. NFC.

Pull in r329414 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):

[X86] Merge itineraries for CLC, CMC, and STC.

These are very simple flag setting instructions that appear to only
be a single uop. They're unlikely to need this separation.

Pull in r329657 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Introduce a pass to begin more systematically fixing PR36028
and similar issues.

The key idea is to lower COPY nodes populating EFLAGS by scanning the
uses of EFLAGS and introducing dedicated code to preserve the
necessary state in a GPR. In the vast majority of cases, these uses
are cmovCC and jCC instructions. For such cases, we can very easily
save and restore the necessary information by simply inserting a
setCC into a GPR where the original flags are live, and then testing
that GPR directly to feed the cmov or conditional branch.

However, things are a bit more tricky if arithmetic is using the
flags. This patch handles the vast majority of cases that seem to
come up in practice: adc, adcx, adox, rcl, and rcr; all without
taking advantage of partially preserved EFLAGS as LLVM doesn't
currently model that at all.

There are a large number of operations that techinaclly observe
EFLAGS currently but shouldn't in this case -- they typically are
using DF. Currently, they will not be handled by this approach.
However, I have never seen this issue come up in practice. It is
already pretty rare to have these patterns come up in practical code
with LLVM. I had to resort to writing MIR tests to cover most of the
logic in this pass already. I suspect even with its current amount
of coverage of arithmetic users of EFLAGS it will be a significant
improvement over the current use of pushf/popf. It will also produce
substantially faster code in most of the common patterns.

This patch also removes all of the old lowering for EFLAGS copies,
and the hack that forced us to use a frame pointer when EFLAGS copies
were found anywhere in a function so that the dynamic stack
adjustment wasn't a problem. None of this is needed as we now lower
all of these copies directly in MI and without require stack
adjustments.

Lots of thanks to Reid who came up with several aspects of this
approach, and Craig who helped me work out a couple of things
tripping me up while working on this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45146

Pull in r329673 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Model the direction flag (DF) separately from the rest of
EFLAGS.

This cleans up a number of operations that only claimed te use EFLAGS
due to using DF. But no instructions which we think of us setting
EFLAGS actually modify DF (other than things like popf) and so this
needlessly creates uses of EFLAGS that aren't really there.

In fact, DF is so restrictive it is pretty easy to model. Only STD,
CLD, and the whole-flags writes (WRFLAGS and POPF) need to model
this.

I've also somewhat cleaned up some of the flag management instruction
definitions to be in the correct .td file.

Adding this extra register also uncovered a failure to use the
correct datatype to hold X86 registers, and I've corrected that as
necessary here.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45154

Pull in r330264 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Fix PR37100 by teaching the EFLAGS copy lowering to rewrite
uses across basic blocks in the limited cases where it is very
straight forward to do so.

This will also be useful for other places where we do some limited
EFLAGS propagation across CFG edges and need to handle copy rewrites
afterward. I think this is rapidly approaching the maximum we can and
should be doing here. Everything else begins to require either heroic
analysis to prove how to do PHI insertion manually, or somehow
managing arbitrary PHI-ing of EFLAGS with general PHI insertion.
Neither of these seem at all promising so if those cases come up,
we'll almost certainly need to rewrite the parts of LLVM that produce
those patterns.

We do now require dominator trees in order to reliably diagnose
patterns that would require PHI nodes. This is a bit unfortunate but
it seems better than the completely mysterious crash we would get
otherwise.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45673

Together, these should ensure clang does not use pushf/popf sequences to
save and restore flags, avoiding problems with unrelated flags (such as
the interrupt flag) being restored unexpectedly.

Requested by: jtl
PR: 225330
MFC after: 1 week

show more ...


# 6ec30ab8 14-Apr-2018 Dimitry Andric <[email protected]>

Revert r332501 for now, as it can cause build failures on i386.
Reported upstream as <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37133>.

Reported by: emaste, ci.freebsd.org
PR: 225330


# 0ae629bd 14-Apr-2018 Dimitry Andric <[email protected]>

Pull in r325446 from upstream clang trunk (by me):

[X86] Add 'sahf' CPU feature to frontend

Summary:
Make clang accept `-msahf` (and `-mno-sahf`) flags to activate the
`+sahf` feature for t

Pull in r325446 from upstream clang trunk (by me):

[X86] Add 'sahf' CPU feature to frontend

Summary:
Make clang accept `-msahf` (and `-mno-sahf`) flags to activate the
`+sahf` feature for the backend, for bug 36028 (Incorrect use of
pushf/popf enables/disables interrupts on amd64 kernels). This was
originally submitted in bug 36037 by Jonathan Looney
<[email protected]>.

As described there, GCC also uses `-msahf` for this feature, and the
backend already recognizes the `+sahf` feature. All that is needed is
to teach clang to pass this on to the backend.

The mapping of feature support onto CPUs may not be complete; rather,
it was chosen to match LLVM's idea of which CPUs support this feature
(see lib/Target/X86/X86.td).

I also updated the affected test case (CodeGen/attr-target-x86.c) to
match the emitted output.

Reviewers: craig.topper, coby, efriedma, rsmith

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43394

Pull in r328944 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Expose more of the condition conversion routines in the public
API for X86's instruction information. I've now got a second patch
under review that needs these same APIs. This bit is nicely
orthogonal and obvious, so landing it. NFC.

Pull in r329414 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):

[X86] Merge itineraries for CLC, CMC, and STC.

These are very simple flag setting instructions that appear to only
be a single uop. They're unlikely to need this separation.

Pull in r329657 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Introduce a pass to begin more systematically fixing PR36028
and similar issues.

The key idea is to lower COPY nodes populating EFLAGS by scanning the
uses of EFLAGS and introducing dedicated code to preserve the
necessary state in a GPR. In the vast majority of cases, these uses
are cmovCC and jCC instructions. For such cases, we can very easily
save and restore the necessary information by simply inserting a
setCC into a GPR where the original flags are live, and then testing
that GPR directly to feed the cmov or conditional branch.

However, things are a bit more tricky if arithmetic is using the
flags. This patch handles the vast majority of cases that seem to
come up in practice: adc, adcx, adox, rcl, and rcr; all without
taking advantage of partially preserved EFLAGS as LLVM doesn't
currently model that at all.

There are a large number of operations that techinaclly observe
EFLAGS currently but shouldn't in this case -- they typically are
using DF. Currently, they will not be handled by this approach.
However, I have never seen this issue come up in practice. It is
already pretty rare to have these patterns come up in practical code
with LLVM. I had to resort to writing MIR tests to cover most of the
logic in this pass already. I suspect even with its current amount
of coverage of arithmetic users of EFLAGS it will be a significant
improvement over the current use of pushf/popf. It will also produce
substantially faster code in most of the common patterns.

This patch also removes all of the old lowering for EFLAGS copies,
and the hack that forced us to use a frame pointer when EFLAGS copies
were found anywhere in a function so that the dynamic stack
adjustment wasn't a problem. None of this is needed as we now lower
all of these copies directly in MI and without require stack
adjustments.

Lots of thanks to Reid who came up with several aspects of this
approach, and Craig who helped me work out a couple of things
tripping me up while working on this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45146

Pull in r329673 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):

[x86] Model the direction flag (DF) separately from the rest of
EFLAGS.

This cleans up a number of operations that only claimed te use EFLAGS
due to using DF. But no instructions which we think of us setting
EFLAGS actually modify DF (other than things like popf) and so this
needlessly creates uses of EFLAGS that aren't really there.

In fact, DF is so restrictive it is pretty easy to model. Only STD,
CLD, and the whole-flags writes (WRFLAGS and POPF) need to model
this.

I've also somewhat cleaned up some of the flag management instruction
definitions to be in the correct .td file.

Adding this extra register also uncovered a failure to use the
correct datatype to hold X86 registers, and I've corrected that as
necessary here.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45154

Together, these should ensure clang does not use pushf/popf sequences to
save and restore flags, avoiding problems with unrelated flags (such as
the interrupt flag) being restored unexpectedly.

Requested by: jtl
PR: 225330
MFC after: 1 week

show more ...