| #
8285c032 |
| 13-Aug-2021 |
Tomasz Sapeta <[email protected]> |
Rename unimodules imports to expo-modules-core
|
| #
db1c4130 |
| 19-Jun-2020 |
Stanisław Chmiela <[email protected]> |
[expo-notifications] Add preliminary "support" for Web (#8853)
# Why
Even though we don't support Web in `expo-notifications`, we don't want to be a pain to the users and throw errors just becaus
[expo-notifications] Add preliminary "support" for Web (#8853)
# Why
Even though we don't support Web in `expo-notifications`, we don't want to be a pain to the users and throw errors just because of running the code on Web.
# How
Added simple object fallbacks for missing modules on web so that they are queryable by
```ts
if (!Module.methodAsync) {
throw new Unavailability…
}
```
Swapped `.ts` + `.web.ts` for `.native.ts` + `.ts` (or + `.web.ts` + `.ts` where it made sense, eg. if we would need to use `localStorage` inside the `.ts` file I renamed it to `.web.ts` and added an empty fallback in `.ts`).
# Test Plan
- [x] Ran NCL in `bare-expo` on Web, clicked buttons around, noticed the error is readable and makes sense.
- [x] Ran `expo-notifications` test-suite on both iOS and Web. It seems iOS tests are a little bit flaky, unfortunately (the errors could also happen due to erroring Expo API, HTTP error 504 when fetching push token, but I was able to make all of the tests pass just refreshing).
show more ...
|
| #
7cf8d919 |
| 27-Mar-2020 |
Stanisław Chmiela <[email protected]> |
[expo-notifications] Unify types across the API
|
| #
596463bc |
| 13-Feb-2020 |
Stanisław Chmiela <[email protected]> |
[expo-notifications] Add notification building infrastructure (#6843)
# Why
We want to have a way to build notifications based on some requests, eg. from `presentNotificationAsync({…})`, or from
[expo-notifications] Add notification building infrastructure (#6843)
# Why
We want to have a way to build notifications based on some requests, eg. from `presentNotificationAsync({…})`, or from a `data` property of a `RemoteMessage`.
# How
`NotificationBuilderFactory` provides `NotificationBuilders` capable of configuring `NotificationCompat.Builder` instances according to configuration passed in with `setRemoteMessage(RemoteMessage)`.
This is the class we will extend (and eventually refactor if it gets too complicated, eg. into the [Modifiers scheme](https://github.com/expo/expo/pull/6021/files#diff-5d8593d4edad0300f92d6b77d850602aR32)) to support more fields from the notifications object to set `Intent`s, links, number etc.
> **Note:** Builder uses `NotificationChannel.DEFAULT_CHANNEL_ID` at the moment, which results in not showing the notification. This module will be integrated with `NotificationChannelsManager` once [it lands](https://github.com/expo/expo/pull/6842).

More complete architecture diagram (receiving + handling + building)

# Test Plan
I have confirmed these classes work as expected in a more complex PR.
show more ...
|
| #
03846faa |
| 12-Feb-2020 |
Stanisław Chmiela <[email protected]> |
[expo-notifications] Handling notifications (#6796)
# Why
Next `expo-notifications` feature.
# How
- `NotificationsHandlerModule` registers at singleton for new notifications/messages
- fo
[expo-notifications] Handling notifications (#6796)
# Why
Next `expo-notifications` feature.
# How
- `NotificationsHandlerModule` registers at singleton for new notifications/messages
- for each message it _starts up_ a task which emits an event to JS
- in response to the JS event, delegate responds with the appropriate behavior (eg. `shouldShowAlert: true`)
- the behavior is pushed to native side using `NotificationsHandler.handleNotificationAsync` call
- which directs it to the appropriate task
- task handles the behavior (on iOS calls `completionHandler`, on Android it will show the notification once implemented) and finishes
- if for whatever reason delegate didn't respond in 3 seconds, `onTimeout` is called on task, which emits another event to JS (for debugging purposes) and the task finishes

# Test Plan
Tested manually by sending notifications and logging messages that the scheme works both when the delegate responds and when it does not.
show more ...
|