xref: /sqlite-3.40.0/test/limit2.test (revision b80bb6ce)
1# 2016-05-20
2#
3# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
4# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
5#
6#    May you do good and not evil.
7#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
8#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
9#
10#***********************************************************************
11# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.  The
12# focus of this file is testing the LIMIT in combination with ORDER BY
13# and in particular, the optimizations in the inner loop that cause an
14# early exit of the inner loop when the LIMIT is reached and the inner
15# loop is emitting rows in ORDER BY order.
16
17
18set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
19source $testdir/tester.tcl
20set testprefix limit2
21
22do_execsql_test limit2-100 {
23  CREATE TABLE t1(a,b);
24  WITH RECURSIVE c(x) AS (VALUES(1) UNION ALL SELECT x+1 FROM c WHERE x<1000)
25    INSERT INTO t1(a,b) SELECT 1, (x*17)%1000 + 1000 FROM c;
26  INSERT INTO t1(a,b) VALUES(2,2),(3,1006),(4,4),(5,9999);
27  CREATE INDEX t1ab ON t1(a,b);
28}
29set sqlite_search_count 0
30do_execsql_test limit2-100.1 {
31  SELECT a, b, '|' FROM t1 WHERE a IN (2,4,5,3,1) ORDER BY b LIMIT 5;
32} {2 2 | 4 4 | 1 1000 | 1 1001 | 1 1002 |}
33set fast_count $sqlite_search_count
34set sqlite_search_count 0
35do_execsql_test limit2-100.2 {
36  SELECT a, b, '|' FROM t1 WHERE a IN (2,4,5,3,1) ORDER BY +b LIMIT 5;
37} {2 2 | 4 4 | 1 1000 | 1 1001 | 1 1002 |}
38do_test limit2-100.3 {
39  set slow_count $sqlite_search_count
40  expr {$fast_count < 0.02*$slow_count}
41} {1}
42
43do_execsql_test limit2-110 {
44  CREATE TABLE t2(x,y);
45  INSERT INTO t2(x,y) VALUES('a',1),('a',2),('a',3),('a',4);
46  INSERT INTO t2(x,y) VALUES('b',1),('c',2),('d',3),('e',4);
47  CREATE INDEX t2xy ON t2(x,y);
48}
49set sqlite_search_count 0
50do_execsql_test limit2-110.1 {
51  SELECT a, b, '|' FROM t2, t1 WHERE t2.x='a' AND t1.a=t2.y ORDER BY t1.b LIMIT 5;
52} {2 2 | 4 4 | 1 1000 | 1 1001 | 1 1002 |}
53set fast_count $sqlite_search_count
54set sqlite_search_count 0
55do_execsql_test limit2-110.2 {
56  SELECT a, b, '|' FROM t2, t1 WHERE t2.x='a' AND t1.a=t2.y ORDER BY +t1.b LIMIT 5;
57} {2 2 | 4 4 | 1 1000 | 1 1001 | 1 1002 |}
58set slow_count $sqlite_search_count
59do_test limit2-110.3 {
60  expr {$fast_count < 0.02*$slow_count}
61} {1}
62
63do_execsql_test limit2-120 {
64  DROP INDEX t1ab;
65  CREATE INDEX t1ab ON t1(a,b DESC);
66}
67set sqlite_search_count 0
68do_execsql_test limit2-120.1 {
69  SELECT a, b, '|' FROM t1 WHERE a IN (2,4,5,3,1) ORDER BY b DESC LIMIT 5;
70} {5 9999 | 1 1999 | 1 1998 | 1 1997 | 1 1996 |}
71set fast_count $sqlite_search_count
72set sqlite_search_count 0
73do_execsql_test limit2-120.2 {
74  SELECT a, b, '|' FROM t1 WHERE a IN (2,4,5,3,1) ORDER BY +b DESC LIMIT 5;
75} {5 9999 | 1 1999 | 1 1998 | 1 1997 | 1 1996 |}
76do_test limit2-120.3 {
77  set slow_count $sqlite_search_count
78  expr {$fast_count < 0.02*$slow_count}
79} {1}
80
81# Bug report against the new ORDER BY LIMIT optimization just prior to
82# release.  (Unreleased so there is no ticket).
83#
84# Make sure the optimization is not applied if the inner loop can only
85# provide a single row of output.
86#
87do_execsql_test limit2-200 {
88  CREATE TABLE t200(a, b);
89  WITH RECURSIVE c(x) AS (VALUES(1) UNION ALL SELECT x+1 FROM c WHERE x<1000)
90    INSERT INTO t200(a,b) SELECT x, x FROM c;
91  CREATE TABLE t201(x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, y);
92  INSERT INTO t201(x,y) VALUES(2,12345);
93
94  SELECT *, '|' FROM t200, t201 WHERE x=b ORDER BY y LIMIT 3;
95} {2 2 2 12345 |}
96do_execsql_test limit2-210 {
97  SELECT *, '|' FROM t200 LEFT JOIN t201 ON x=b ORDER BY y LIMIT 3;
98} {1 1 {} {} | 3 3 {} {} | 4 4 {} {} |}
99
100# Bug in the ORDER BY LIMIT optimization reported on 2016-09-06.
101# Ticket https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/559733b09e96
102#
103do_execsql_test limit2-300 {
104  CREATE TABLE t300(a,b,c);
105  CREATE INDEX t300x ON t300(a,b,c);
106  INSERT INTO t300 VALUES(0,1,99),(0,1,0),(0,0,0);
107  SELECT *,'.' FROM t300 WHERE a=0 AND (c=0 OR c=99) ORDER BY c DESC;
108} {0 1 99 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 .}
109do_execsql_test limit2-310 {
110  SELECT *,'.' FROM t300 WHERE a=0 AND (c=0 OR c=99) ORDER BY c DESC LIMIT 1;
111} {0 1 99 .}
112
113# Make sure the SELECT loop is ordered correctly for the direction of
114# the ORDER BY
115#
116do_execsql_test limit2-400 {
117  CREATE TABLE t400(a,b);
118  CREATE INDEX t400_ab ON t400(a,b);
119  INSERT INTO t400(a,b) VALUES(1,90),(1,40),(2,80),(2,30),(3,70),(3,20);
120  SELECT *,'x' FROM t400 WHERE a IN (1,2,3) ORDER BY b DESC LIMIT 3;
121  SELECT *,'y' FROM t400 WHERE a IN (1,2,3) ORDER BY +b DESC LIMIT 3;
122} {1 90 x 2 80 x 3 70 x 1 90 y 2 80 y 3 70 y}
123
124
125do_execsql_test 500 {
126  CREATE TABLE t500(i INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, j);
127  INSERT INTO t500 VALUES(1, 1);
128  INSERT INTO t500 VALUES(2, 2);
129  INSERT INTO t500 VALUES(3, 3);
130  INSERT INTO t500 VALUES(4, 0);
131  INSERT INTO t500 VALUES(5, 5);
132  SELECT j FROM t500 WHERE i IN (1,2,3,4,5) ORDER BY j DESC LIMIT 3;
133} {5 3 2}
134do_execsql_test 501 {
135  CREATE TABLE t501(i INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, j);
136  INSERT INTO t501 VALUES(1, 5);
137  INSERT INTO t501 VALUES(2, 4);
138  INSERT INTO t501 VALUES(3, 3);
139  INSERT INTO t501 VALUES(4, 6);
140  INSERT INTO t501 VALUES(5, 1);
141  SELECT j FROM t501 WHERE i IN (1,2,3,4,5) ORDER BY j LIMIT 3;
142} {1 3 4}
143do_execsql_test 502 {
144  CREATE TABLE t502(i INT PRIMARY KEY, j);
145  INSERT INTO t502 VALUES(1, 5);
146  INSERT INTO t502 VALUES(2, 4);
147  INSERT INTO t502 VALUES(3, 3);
148  INSERT INTO t502 VALUES(4, 6);
149  INSERT INTO t502 VALUES(5, 1);
150  SELECT j FROM t502 WHERE i IN (1,2,3,4,5) ORDER BY j LIMIT 3;
151} {1 3 4}
152
153# Ticket https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/123c9ba32130a6c9 2017-12-13
154# Incorrect result when an idnex is used for an ordered join.
155#
156# This test case is in the limit2.test module because the problem was first
157# exposed by check-in https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/559733b09e which
158# implemented the ORDER BY LIMIT optimization that limit2.test strives to
159# test.
160#
161do_execsql_test 600 {
162  DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1;
163  CREATE TABLE t1(a, b);  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,2);
164  DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t2;
165  CREATE TABLE t2(x, y);  INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1,3);
166  CREATE INDEX t1ab ON t1(a,b);
167  SELECT y FROM t1, t2 WHERE a=x AND b<=y ORDER BY b DESC;
168} {3}
169
170finish_test
171